Fintech

Mastercard’s scramble to back the right fintechs

"We don't know what consumers will ultimately choose," North American President Linda Kirkpatrick said.

Mastercard’s scramble to back the right fintechs

Fintechs are upending the way consumers and businesses pay for goods and services.

Image: Mastercard

Linda Kirkpatrick started out as an intern at Mastercard in 1997, at the height of the dot-com boom. More than two decades later, the lessons she learned back then resonate in her current role as Mastercard's North America president.

"Digital commerce was in its infancy, but everybody really didn't understand the magnitude of it at the time," she told Protocol. "They knew it was going to be really big and so everybody was trying to come up with their own unique idea for how they would capitalize on online commerce."

Today, Kirkpatrick, who assumed her new job in January, is helping Mastercard grapple with another technological upheaval. Fintechs are upending the way consumers and businesses pay for goods and services, and the impact seems even greater than during the dot-com era. Part of her job is to engage with these smaller, newer, nimbler players — and quickly figure out which technologies and startups to bet on.

"For a company like Mastercard, we want to partner with as many companies as we can, because we don't know what consumers will ultimately choose as their preferred form of payment," she said. "We don't know which players will ultimately be the clear winners, but we know that if we partner and collaborate across a variety of segments and a variety of technologies and a variety of solutions and use cases, we will end up with some winners."

Linda Kirkpatrick, MasterCard's president for U.S. operations.Image: MasterCard

Mastercard has been making some big bets recently. There's the pending deal unveiled two years ago to buy the Denmark-based payments platform Nets for about $3.5 billion. In November, the company completed its $825 million acquisition of financial data analytics company Finicity. Two weeks ago, Mastercard said it will open up its network to select cryptocurrencies, despite the fact they're not yet that widely used in commerce.

"Frankly, that has yet to be proven, that there's consumer demand to make payments in cryptocurrencies," Craig Vosburg, who previously held Kirkpatrick's position before he was promoted to Mastercard's chief product officer, told Protocol.

"But if you assume for the time being, given the level of interest in cryptocurrencies, that there may be demand by consumers to make a payment in a crypto, that's very much aligned with our strategy of enabling choice in how consumers and businesses make and receive payments," he said. "If there's demand on either side of the transaction for a consumer to pay that way and for a business to be paid, then that's something that we'll want to facilitate."

Mastercard's recent moves mirror those of archrival Visa. Last month, Visa announced a partnership with neobank First Boulevard that would enable customers to buy and sell Bitcoin through Visa partner Anchorage. Both companies have been investing more in blockchain and digital currency technologies.

And they even recently engaged in a tit-for-tat of sorts on the M&A front. Mastercard announced its merger with Finicity just a few months after Visa unveiled its own (now abandoned) acquisition of Plaid in January 2020.

Mark Batsiyan, a partner at Inspired Capital, said that "was clearly [a] defensive" move by Mastercard, a company that's been part of a longtime duopoly. Mastercard and Visa have, for decades, been able "to dictate lots of the terms of how payments are transacted in the United States," he told Protocol.

Kirkpatrick downplayed speculation that Mastercard was simply following its rival's lead: "You can assume that Mastercard has been looking at any and all partners in this space. If it's a company that's put itself out there for evaluation, we've looked at it. We have our finger on the pulse for what's important and we evaluate. Finicity was just one of those opportunities."

Pressed to act

Founded in 1966, Mastercard serves more than 20,000 financial institutions worldwide with 2.8 billion cards in use worldwide. Last year, the company's network recorded $6.3 trillion in transactions. On the other hand, Visa, which was founded in 1958, serves more than 15,000 financial institutions with more than 3.5 billion cards in the market worldwide. Last year, it processed $11.3 trillion in transactions.

Experts say both companies face new threats with the rise of fintech, particularly the emergence of payment technologies developed by startups such as Plaid and Stripe. "They were caught flat-footed by the explosion of fintech," Bill Pearce, assistant dean and chief marketing officer for the Haas School of Business at University of California, Berkeley, told Protocol. "These guys have been rocked."

He said these companies were particularly rattled by one technology: "Blockchain really scared them. Blockchain potentially becomes a real threat to them. So they've been aggressive to improve their innovation performance."

Logan Allin, managing general partner and founder of Fin Venture Capital, echoed this view, saying "unless they diversify their revenue streams and their partnerships, their businesses are going to continue to get disrupted."

"The innovation that's happening, whether it's in blockchain payments or alternative payment rails, what they're seeing emerging is they're going to get cut out as the middleman," he said.

Which is why they're scrambling to find ways to become more competitive, said Tonya Evans, a professor at Penn State Dickinson Law and CEO of Advantage Evans, an adult education services company. "In the interest of making sure that these companies remain competitive, they have to do something," she told Protocol. "It's not because they want to, it's because they've been pressed to do so."

M&A is clearly a key component of their strategies. And Mastercard recently outperformed its rival on this front. While Mastercard's Finicity deal went through without a hitch, Visa's bid to buy Plaid failed after the Justice Department opposed the deal, which it called anti-competitive. Visa and Plaid denied the charge, but decided to end the merger talks to avoid a protracted legal battle. The DOJ cited a comment by Visa CEO Al Kelly who described the planned merger as an "insurance policy" aimed at neutralizing a "threat to our important U.S. debit business."

Kirkpatrick declined to comment on Visa's failed merger, but said, "We were super pleased that we were given the green light to move forward, and not surprised. To be honest, because our acquisition was premised on giving consumers choice and giving them access."

Allin praised Mastercard for doing "the exact opposite" of how Visa positioned the Plaid deal; they painted the deal as "additive" and "nowhere near competitive."

'We compete vigorously'

Still, the collapse of the Visa-Plaid deal underscored the serious antitrust issues Visa and Mastercard face as they look for other potential M&A fintech targets. That's why beyond gobbling up fintechs, Mastercard, like Visa, is also looking to forge alliances with the startups that are disrupting their space.

"We look at them as partners," Kirkpatrick said. "We operate a payments ecosystem that sits in the center of multiple stakeholders, and we're almost at that nucleus. We're the convener and sort of an intermediary between lots of different players."

These players include the big banks with their "tremendous consumer reach and tremendous connectivity to their customers on one side," she said. "On another front, you've got fintechs. They're not banks necessarily, but they might have a great idea around how to access information and data from consumers that the banks can use to speed up decision-making. I view fintechs and financial institutions as peacefully coexisting."

One company Mastercard has aligned with is Payveris, a digital payment and money movement platform. Payveris is the company's partner in its Bill Pay Exchange platform.

CEO Ron Bergamesca said he was initially worried about working with a dominant corporate giant. "I thought Mastercard was going to be a pain in the butt to work with, and that they were going to slow us down," he told Protocol.

But the company, he said, is "surprisingly nimble." He said Mastercard has managed to take "a big behemoth that's been around for a while" and "act like an entrepreneurial company," he said. "Whoever is at the top over there is doing something good."

Mastercard Chief Product Officer Craig Vosburg.Image: Mastercard

Those at the top include Kirkpatrick and Vosburg, who are both drawing lessons from past tech upheavals to guide the company forward.

Vosburg, who joined Mastercard in 2006, also lived through the dot-com era when he worked as a management consultant. Fintech, he said, is "a continuation of that trend," which has created a "very innovative space where consumers are kind of voting with their business, and in some cases voting with their data" to embrace new technologies for managing their finances.

And the current wave of innovations reminds Kirkpatrick of the dot-com era, when Mastercard had to navigate a market where established and new players found themselves jockeying for position in a fast-changing market.

"The time that we're in right now is sort of a similar situation," she said. "We compete vigorously for share and for growth in the space. There are some things that ultimately when we work together increase the pie for all of us. There are other things where we're squarely looking to increase our piece of the pie. And we do that often and frequently and aggressively."

"Many companies are looking to get into payments because they see that it's a sexy space and they see that it's growing," she said. "You can have a model of competition or you can have a model of coopetition with those players. And we've chosen the latter."

Climate

A pro-China disinformation campaign is targeting rare earth miners

It’s uncommon for cyber criminals to target private industry. But a new operation has cast doubt on miners looking to gain a foothold in the West in an apparent attempt to protect China’s upper hand in a market that has become increasingly vital.

It is very uncommon for coordinated disinformation operations to target private industry, rather than governments or civil society, a cybersecurity expert says.

Photo: Goh Seng Chong/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Just when we thought the renewable energy supply chains couldn’t get more fraught, a sophisticated disinformation campaign has taken to social media to further complicate things.

Known as Dragonbridge, the campaign has existed for at least three years, but in the last few months it has shifted its focus to target several mining companies “with negative messaging in response to potential or planned rare earths production activities.” It was initially uncovered by cybersecurity firm Mandiant and peddles narratives in the Chinese interest via its network of thousands of fake social media accounts.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).

Some of the most astounding tech-enabled advances of the next decade, from cutting-edge medical research to urban traffic control and factory floor optimization, will be enabled by a device often smaller than a thumbnail: the memory chip.

While vast amounts of data are created, stored and processed every moment — by some estimates, 2.5 quintillion bytes daily — the insights in that code are unlocked by the memory chips that hold it and transfer it. “Memory will propel the next 10 years into the most transformative years in human history,” said Sanjay Mehrotra, president and CEO of Micron Technology.

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Fintech

Ripple’s CEO threatens to leave the US if it loses SEC case

CEO Brad Garlinghouse said a few countries have reached out to Ripple about relocating.

"There's no doubt that if the SEC doesn't win their case against us that that is good for crypto in the United States,” Brad Garlinghouse told Protocol.

Photo: Stephen McCarthy/Sportsfile for Collision via Getty Images

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said the crypto company will move to another country if it loses in its legal battle with the SEC.

Garlinghouse said he’s confident that Ripple will prevail against the federal regulator, which accused the company of failing to register roughly $1.4 billion in XRP tokens as securities.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Policy

The Supreme Court’s EPA ruling is bad news for tech regulation, too

The justices just gave themselves a lot of discretion to smack down agency rules.

The ruling could also endanger work on competition issues by the FTC and net neutrality by the FCC.

Photo: Geoff Livingston/Getty Images

The Supreme Court’s decision last week gutting the Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions didn’t just signal the conservative justices’ dislike of the Clean Air Act at a moment of climate crisis. It also served as a warning for anyone that would like to see more regulation of Big Tech.

At the heart of Chief Justice John Roberts’ decision in West Virginia v. EPA was a codification of the “major questions doctrine,” which, he wrote, requires “clear congressional authorization” when agencies want to regulate on areas of great “economic and political significance.”

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Enterprise

Microsoft and Google are still using emotion AI, but with limits

Microsoft said accessibility goals overrode problems with emotion recognition and Google offers off-the-shelf emotion recognition technology amid growing concern over the controversial AI.

Emotion recognition is a well-established field of computer vision research; however, AI-based technologies used in an attempt to assess people’s emotional states have moved beyond the research phase.

Photo: Microsoft

Microsoft said last month it would no longer provide general use of an AI-based cloud software feature used to infer people’s emotions. However, despite its own admission that emotion recognition technology creates “risks,” it turns out the company will retain its emotion recognition capability in an app used by people with vision loss.

In fact, amid growing concerns over development and use of controversial emotion recognition in everyday software, both Microsoft and Google continue to incorporate the AI-based features in their products.

“The Seeing AI person channel enables you to recognize people and to get a description of them, including an estimate of their age and also their emotion,” said Saqib Shaikh, a software engineering manager and project lead for Seeing AI at Microsoft who helped build the app, in a tutorial about the product in a 2017 Microsoft video.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories
Bulletins