Neo's new startup accelerator is thinking small so it can go big

Neo Accelerator will take just 20 teams for each class.

Baby chicks in an incubator.

On Tuesday, veteran angel investor Ali Partovi unveiled the Neo Accelerator, which will take just 20 teams at a time.

Photo: Wikimedia Commons

The last thing the world needs is another startup accelerator, right? There’s Y Combinator and Techstars and … and … 500 Startups and … there must be others.

Ali Partovi, a veteran angel investor who became a full-time VC in 2018 with his firm Neo, thinks there’s still room for more. On Tuesday, he unveiled the Neo Accelerator, which will take just 20 teams at a time.

The notion of startup finishing schools probably peaked in 2014, if you take the milestone of coverage in The New Yorker as a trend’s apex.

  • Y Combinator cohorts used to be tiny and incredibly selective. From 2005 to 2009, it admitted between 7 and 25 startup teams in twice-a-year “batches.”
  • More recently, YC has become obsessed with the question of scaling, practicing what it preaches to the ventures it incubates. Its most recent batch had 377 companies. Remote collaboration, forced on Y Combinator by the pandemic, has made growing batches easier. “All of these accelerators have become a 100% Zoom experience,” Partovi said.
  • Y Combinator has become a brand, and its imprimatur still matters. It made its name from the companies it backed in early batches, like Airbnb and Dropbox, but it’s still picking companies that matter, like Coinbase and OpenSea.
  • But Y Combinator seems to be very much the exception. It’s had hosts of imitators and most have failed. Techstars has taken a different approach, seeding small accelerators around the country and across the world. Its latest, outside Knoxville, just opened. 500 Startups likewise has 11 global locations.

Neo is thinking small in the hopes of scoring big. The economics of venture capital are brutal: A very few superstars make up for the many failures. The point of an accelerator should be to increase the odds.

  • Partovi, who has a good reputation as a startup picker — as an angel investor, he also backed Airbnb and Dropbox, as well as Facebook and Uber — is bringing back something of a velvet rope, aiming to recruit top technical graduates and alumni of successful startups.
  • But selectivity doesn’t mean exclusivity. Diversity is incredibly important to Partovi, who’s Iranian-American. He picked “Neo” after the “Matrix” character: “a software engineer overcoming imposter syndrome with the help of a Black man and a woman.” His firm rethought the technical interview to make it more inclusive, and 49% of its capital has gone to firms led by women or underrepresented minority CEOs.
  • The accelerator program includes a month of in-person collaboration at a resort outside Bend, Oregon, and a reunion week in San Diego.
  • Where YC has set a template for most accelerators by ending in a Demo Day where startups pitch investors, Neo is holding a career fair instead. Partovi argues that hiring, not access to capital, is the real constraint for startups, and he’s trying to solve for that.

He’s also rethinking the financial mechanics of startup accelerators. Most accelerators provide funding and make their money, like VC funds, from selling their stakes in successful graduates.

  • Y Combinator has changed its terms over time. The latest deal gives startups $125,000 in exchange for 7% of the company. Then they get another $375,000 in the form of a note convertible to equity. The terms are complex but they allow Y Combinator to maintain a meaningful ownership stake in the company over time.
  • Neo’s terms are more generous to founders, Partovi said. It offers $125,000 for 2.5% of the company and a $500,000 note that also converts to equity — but for no more than 2.5% of the company.
  • Why does that matter? Besides the more generous pricing, which implies the startups are more valuable, taking a smaller stake leaves more room for future investors. Getting the math right in what startups and VCs call the “cap table” — who owns how much — can be crucial to a startup’s long-term success. Screw up the cap table, and you may find yourself dining alone.

We won’t know for years if Partovi’s reboot of the accelerator model is a success. But it shows that there’s always room to tinker in the startup world. Founders constantly promise VCs that they’ll upend this or that industry. Why should the investing world be immune to change?


Musk’s texts reveal what tech’s most powerful people really want

From Jack Dorsey to Joe Rogan, Musk’s texts are chock-full of überpowerful people, bending a knee to Twitter’s once and (still maybe?) future king.

“Maybe Oprah would be interested in joining the Twitter board if my bid succeeds,” one text reads.

Photo illustration: Patrick Pleul/picture alliance via Getty Images; Protocol

Elon Musk’s text inbox is a rarefied space. It’s a place where tech’s wealthiest casually commit to spending billions of dollars with little more than a thumbs-up emoji and trade tips on how to rewrite the rules for how hundreds of millions of people around the world communicate.

Now, Musk’s ongoing legal battle with Twitter is giving the rest of us a fleeting glimpse into that world. The collection of Musk’s private texts that was made public this week is chock-full of tech power brokers. While the messages are meant to reveal something about Musk’s motivations — and they do — they also say a lot about how things get done and deals get made among some of the most powerful people in the world.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

Circle’s CEO: This is not the time to ‘go crazy’

Jeremy Allaire is leading the stablecoin powerhouse in a time of heightened regulation.

“It’s a complex environment. So every CEO and every board has to be a little bit cautious, because there’s a lot of uncertainty,” Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire told Protocol at Converge22.

Photo: Circle

Sitting solo on a San Francisco stage, Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire asked tennis superstar Serena Williams what it’s like to face “unrelenting skepticism.”

“What do you do when someone says you can’t do this?” Allaire asked the athlete turned VC, who was beaming into Circle’s Converge22 convention by video.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.


Is Salesforce still a growth company? Investors are skeptical

Salesforce is betting that customer data platform Genie and new Slack features can push the company to $50 billion in revenue by 2026. But investors are skeptical about the company’s ability to deliver.

Photo: Marlena Sloss/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Salesforce has long been enterprise tech’s golden child. The company said everything customers wanted to hear and did everything investors wanted to see: It produced robust, consistent growth from groundbreaking products combined with an aggressive M&A strategy and a cherished culture, all operating under the helm of a bombastic, but respected, CEO and team of well-coiffed executives.

Dreamforce is the embodiment of that success. Every year, alongside frustrating San Francisco residents, the over-the-top celebration serves as a battle cry to the enterprise software industry, reminding everyone that Marc Benioff’s mighty fiefdom is poised to expand even deeper into your corporate IT stack.

Keep Reading Show less
Joe Williams

Joe Williams is a writer-at-large at Protocol. He previously covered enterprise software for Protocol, Bloomberg and Business Insider. Joe can be reached at To share information confidentially, he can also be contacted on a non-work device via Signal (+1-309-265-6120) or


The US and EU are splitting on tech policy. That’s putting the web at risk.

A conversation with Cédric O, the former French minister of state for digital.

“With the difficulty of the U.S. in finding political agreement or political basis to legislate more, we are facing a risk of decoupling in the long term between the EU and the U.S.”

Photo: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Cédric O, France’s former minister of state for digital, has been an advocate of Europe’s approach to tech and at the forefront of the continent’s relations with U.S. giants. Protocol caught up with O last week at a conference in New York focusing on social media’s negative effects on society and the possibilities of blockchain-based protocols for alternative networks.

O said watching the U.S. lag in tech policy — even as some states pass their own measures and federal bills gain momentum — has made him worry about the EU and U.S. decoupling. While not as drastic as a disentangling of economic fortunes between the West and China, such a divergence, as O describes it, could still make it functionally impossible for companies to serve users on both sides of the Atlantic with the same product.

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Latest Stories