Fintech

Banks need to start cashing in on the subscription economy

Customers hate bank fees. But they love subscriptions. Neobanks have figured this out, but traditional banks have been slow to follow.

Old bank and neobank

Banks' efforts to reduce their fees aren’t making a significant dent in improving customer dissatisfaction.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Click banner image for more Subscription Week 2022 coverage

For consumers, casually checking their bank account and seeing a monthly maintenance fee or overdraft charge is a frustrating experience, and fees are a major factor in banks’ low satisfaction ratings.

The challenge for banks is that their efforts to reduce their fees aren’t making a significant dent in improving customer dissatisfaction, according to a recent J.D. Power study. And banks are caught in a financial bind: A study by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau showed that overdraft and insufficient-fund penalties made up two-thirds of reported fee revenue. A wobbly earnings season for big banks has made cutting a key revenue source even trickier.

There’s a solution neobanks have found, which is part marketing and part product design: Recast fees as subscriptions, and market premium memberships as time- and worry-saving features with a predictable cost instead of surprise charges that disrupt customers’ financial plans.

One of the ways that neobanks have flipped the script on traditional banks is by luring in customers with subscriptions that offer perks on top of ways to avoid fees. It may be a matter of semantics — What’s the difference between a subscription payment and a monthly fee? — but it works for modern consumers.

Neobanks like Chime, Nubank and Revolut all offer subscription or membership plans in exchange for some of their services and reward programs. Because the subscriptions are optional, these firms still market their services as fee-free.

Paul McAdam, a senior director at J.D. Power, told Protocol that younger consumers are more attracted to the neobanks’ approach.

“There are really two drivers, and both of them are rooted in, from the customer's perception, the issue of unfairness,” McAdam said. “Unfairness around fees, monthly fees, punitive fees.” Besides better interest rates on deposits, neobank customers see their products as putting them in a position of more control over what they’re paying and when.

According to the J.D. Power study, 78% of survey respondents who paid a fee said they knew they would be charged it.

It does raise the question of why banks haven’t just rebranded fees as subscriptions. Instead of hitting customers with unknown and unexpected maintenance or overdraft fees, banks could use their broad relationships with customers to offer subscriptions that do more than just maintain accounts, potentially generating goodwill and occasionally delighting them with avoided fees and bonus perks.

McAdam theorizes that the banking industry just hasn’t been pushed to do it yet, calling the emerging neobank competition “a classic case of an industry being pushed to move by a new pricing model.”

There have been glimmers of this in the past: Citi once charged $125 a year for Women & Co., a membership-based personal financial planning service. Citi and Chase today have packages like Priority Checking and Sapphire Premium Checking with a monthly fee that’s waived for higher account balances. But those are targeted at higher0net-worth individuals, not the younger consumers flocking to neobank subscriptions.

Traditional banks are already undergoing a digital transformation. Bank of America reported that 53% of its consumer sales came from digital channels in the first quarter of this year. The question is whether it will start evolving its products alongside its distribution. Neobanks aren’t waiting to capitalize on the subscription economy.

Policy

How 'Zuck Bucks' saved the 2020 election — and fueled the Big Lie

The true story of how Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan’s $419 million donation became the 2020 election’s most enduring conspiracy theory.

Mark Zuckerberg is smack in the center of one of the 2020 election’s multitudinous conspiracies.

Illustration: Mike McQuade; Photos: Getty Images

If Mark Zuckerberg could have imagined the worst possible outcome of his decision to insert himself into the 2020 election, it might have looked something like the scene that unfolded inside Mar-a-Lago on a steamy evening in early April.

There in a gilded ballroom-turned-theater, MAGA world icons including Kellyanne Conway, Corey Lewandowski, Hope Hicks and former president Donald Trump himself were gathered for the premiere of “Rigged: The Zuckerberg Funded Plot to Defeat Donald Trump.”

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Sponsored Content

Why the digital transformation of industries is creating a more sustainable future

Qualcomm’s chief sustainability officer Angela Baker on how companies can view going “digital” as a way not only toward growth, as laid out in a recent report, but also toward establishing and meeting environmental, social and governance goals.

Three letters dominate business practice at present: ESG, or environmental, social and governance goals. The number of mentions of the environment in financial earnings has doubled in the last five years, according to GlobalData: 600,000 companies mentioned the term in their annual or quarterly results last year.

But meeting those ESG goals can be a challenge — one that businesses can’t and shouldn’t take lightly. Ahead of an exclusive fireside chat at Davos, Angela Baker, chief sustainability officer at Qualcomm, sat down with Protocol to speak about how best to achieve those targets and how Qualcomm thinks about its own sustainability strategy, net zero commitment, other ESG targets and more.

Keep Reading Show less
Chris Stokel-Walker

Chris Stokel-Walker is a freelance technology and culture journalist and author of "YouTubers: How YouTube Shook Up TV and Created a New Generation of Stars." His work has been published in The New York Times, The Guardian and Wired.

Fintech

From frenzy to fear: Trading apps grapple with anxious investors

After riding the stock-trading wave last year, trading apps like Robinhood have disenchanted customers and jittery investors.

Retail stock trading is still an attractive business, as shown by the news that crypto exchange FTX is dipping its toes in the market by letting some U.S. customers trade stocks.

Photo: Lam Yik/Bloomberg via Getty Images

For a brief moment, last year’s GameStop craze made buying and selling stocks cool, even exciting, for a new generation of young investors. Now, that frenzy has turned to fear.

Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev pointed to “a challenging macro environment” marked by rising prices and interest rates and a slumping market in a call with analysts explaining his company’s lackluster results. The downturn, he said, was something “most of our customers have never experienced in their lifetimes.”

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Enterprise

Broadcom is reportedly in talks to acquire VMware

It hasn't been long since it left the ownership of Dell Technologies.

Photo: Yichuan Cao/NurPhoto via Getty Images

Broadcom is said to be in discussions with VMware to buy the cloud computing company for as much as $50 billion.

Keep Reading Show less
Jamie Condliffe

Jamie Condliffe ( @jme_c) is the executive editor at Protocol, based in London. Prior to joining Protocol in 2019, he worked on the business desk at The New York Times, where he edited the DealBook newsletter and wrote Bits, the weekly tech newsletter. He has previously worked at MIT Technology Review, Gizmodo, and New Scientist, and has held lectureships at the University of Oxford and Imperial College London. He also holds a doctorate in engineering from the University of Oxford.

Podcasts

Should startups be scared?

Stock market turmoil is making VCs skittish. Could now be the best time to start a company?

Dark times could be ahead for startups.

Photo by Startaê Team on Unsplash

This week, we break down why Elon Musk is tweeting about the S&P 500's ESG rankings — and why he might be right to be mad. Then we discuss how tech companies are failing to prevent mass shootings, and why the new Texas social media law might make it more difficult for platforms to be proactive.

Then Protocol's Biz Carson, author of the weekly VC newsletter Pipeline, joins us to explain the state of venture capital amidst plunging stocks and declining revenues. Should founders start panicking? The answer might surprise you.

Keep Reading Show less
Caitlin McGarry

Caitlin McGarry is the news editor at Protocol.

Latest Stories
Bulletins