They want to fight for their right to NFT

Does owning a shoe or screenplay give you the right to turn it into an NFT? Lawsuits are testing the boundaries of intellectual property rules for digital assets.

A gavel made of tokens.

Trademark law is relatively settled, but NFTs are testing some of its principles.

Illustration: iStock / Getty Images Plus; Protocol

A wave of NFT lawsuits is cresting as celebrities, corporations and startups scramble after the intellectual property rights that may or may not ride along with the trendy tokens people are trading.

NFTs don’t themselves convey any intellectual property rights, unless a contract specifically provides those rights and vests them in ownership of the token. But that hasn’t stopped many NFT buyers from trying to convince themselves and others that owning a shoe, screenplay or some other form of intellectual property gives them the right to mint digital assets off of it.

When any new technology is released, there is always conflict until a standard set of understandings sets in, said Peter Willsey, an intellectual property attorney who has worked on NFT cases at Brown Rudnick. Willsey expects to see NFT lawsuits filed for a couple of years until the law is more settled and people find legal ways to get what they want.

“With any of these changes in technology over the last 30 years, eventually litigation is going to teach people what the rules are,” Willsey said. “College students got sued for using [Napster]. After a while people realized, ‘You know what, I'll just pay Spotify the monthly fee, and legally get whatever music I want’” instead of relying on unlicensed file-sharing.

Trademark law is relatively settled, but NFTs are testing some of its principles. A notable lawsuit involves Yuga Labs, creator of the popular Bored Ape Yacht Club NFTs, which has sued Ryder Ripps, who minted NFTs that essentially copy Bored Apes. Ripps has said that he was “trolling” consumers. Yuga accused Ripps of trademark infringement in Los Angeles federal court, saying his project devalued Bored Apes and caused confusion in the market. Yuga even blamed Ripps for causing a decline in Bored Ape prices.

Ripps’ attempt to claim parody or satire as a defense will be balanced against his clear ability to make money from the work, according to legal experts. “You can parody and that might be okay,” Willsey said. “But if you're doing it mainly for commercial purposes, which it looks like he's doing — he’s come up with these explanations that ‘I'm making social commentary,’ but he also claims that he's made over $3 million doing this.”

In another trademark case, Nike sued shoe reseller StockX in February for creating NFTs derived from Nike shoes. StockX says the “Vault” NFTs represent ownership of a product it stores for customers, saving them the trouble of finding space in a closet, and can redeem the NFT at any time to have the actual shoes shipped to them. Nike argued that it’s trademark infringement, pointing out that buyers can sell the NFT without ever taking possession of the shoes.

Contracts from the pre-NFT era often aren’t much help in clearing up issues that arise. In another recent case, Miramax sued Quentin Tarantino in November for creating NFTs of his screenplay of “Pulp Fiction.” The studio argued that the filmmaker didn’t have rights to do so. Tarantino’s lawyers responded that the NFTs are a derivative of the screenplay, to which he retained publishing rights. The original agreements between the parties were before NFTs existed, so the case will depend on how language conferring “other” rights is interpreted, Willsey said.

In at least one case, the parties came to an agreement. Jay-Z’s Roc-A-Fella Records sued co-owner Damon Dash, claiming he was attempting to sell part of the copyright to Jay-Z’s “Reasonable Doubt” album as an NFT. Dash said that he was not trying to sell an NFT of the album but rather his interest in the record label. Last month, the parties settled, agreeing that Dash could sell his one-third stake in the record company, but could not sell any part of the album, which was a corporate asset.

“It's another example of people thinking, ‘Oh there's this new technology, here’s what I can do with it’ — without thinking, ‘Am I violating somebody's intellectual property rights?’” Willsey said.

The notion of tokenizing the music industry’s royalty streams has some merit. Justin Blau, known as 3LAU when performing as a DJ, has started a company called Royal that’s aiming to do just that. But Royal is setting up agreements with NFTs in mind from the beginning, not trying to graft them onto old contracts.

While these cases wind their way through the courts, there will likely be debates about whether the underlying copyright or trademark laws need to change to account for NFTs. Willsey doesn’t think they do, but some in the industry disagree. “It's up to the courts to interpret those statutes and apply them to new types of work like NFTs,” Willsey said.

But change may be coming. In June two senators asked the U.S. Patent and Trademark and Copyright Offices a series of questions about whether NFTs required changes in laws and regulations, and those agencies recently agreed to undertake a study.

How GM plans to make its ambitious EV goals reality

The automaker's chief sustainability officer is optimistic that GM is well-positioned to rapidly scale up the EV side of its business.

"I think everything that’s been put in place to support the transition will be a real positive for the industry and for the country."

Photo: Eva Marie Uzcategui/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Automakers are on the cusp of an entirely new era.

The transition to electric vehicles is quickly becoming more than just theoretical: More models are coming onto the scene every day. This week, the Inflation Reduction Act was signed into law, enshrining a new structure for EV tax credits and offering a boost to domestic critical mineral mining. The transition isn’t coming a moment too soon, given that the transportation sector makes up the largest share of greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (

As management teams at financial institutions look for best practices to make part of their regular toolkit, they are reaching most for the ones that increase the speed and reduce the risk of large-scale change.

That forward-thinking approach can lead financial institutions to leverage AI technology, which can help give decision-makers trusted tools to solve integral challenges vital to the health of the business. One of the leading providers of AI and machine-learning software, DataRobot continues to attract clients in financial services who want to de-risk their AI investments and rapidly scale AI to almost every part of their operations, resulting in improved productivity and higher customer satisfaction.

Keep Reading Show less
David Silverberg
David Silverberg is a Toronto-based freelance journalist, editor and writing coach. He writes for The Washington Post, BBC News, Business Insider, The Toronto Star, New Scientist, Fodor's, and several alumni magazines. He also writes for brands such as 23andme, Shopify and Bold Commerce. He has served as editor of B2B News Network, Canada's only B2B news magazine, and Digital Journal, a leading pioneer in citizen journalism. Find more about him at

How Embracer Group bought ‘Lord of the Rings’ rights for a bargain

The Swedish holding company, known best for its gaming acquisitions, bought the rights to “The Lord of the Rings.” But the deal is much more complicated than it seems.

Who really owns LOTR's rights?

Photo: New Line/WireImage

A new stakeholder has entered the complex licensing web of “The Lord of the Rings,” and the landmark deal has further complicated the already messy media empire surrounding author J.R.R. Tolkien’s fantasy epic.

The buyer, the acquisition-hungry Swedish gaming conglomerate known as Embracer Group, has purchased Middle-earth Enterprises, and with it the associated film, video game, board game, merchandise, theater production and theme park rights to the core LOTR book trilogy and “The Hobbit'' from its previous owner, The Saul Zaentz Company. Formerly Tolkien Enterprises, Zaentz’s holding group has held onto the rights since purchasing them from United Artists in 1976. (Tolkien initially sold them to UA in 1969, four years before his death.)

Keep Reading Show less
Nick Statt

Nick Statt is Protocol's video game reporter. Prior to joining Protocol, he was news editor at The Verge covering the gaming industry, mobile apps and antitrust out of San Francisco, in addition to managing coverage of Silicon Valley tech giants and startups. He now resides in Rochester, New York, home of the garbage plate and, completely coincidentally, the World Video Game Hall of Fame. He can be reached at


Upstart has a new plan to sell Wall Street on its loans

The AI-powered lender will hold some loans on its balance sheet as it seeks partners for long-term capital.

Despite the current struggles, Upstart views the marketplace model as the best way to write to keep its loan business growing.

Photo: Upstart

After a revenue drop its CEO called “unacceptable,” the leadership at fintech lender Upstart is making a bet on the strength of its ability to underwrite loans with AI.

The San Mateo company is planning to leave some loans on its balance sheet that investors do not want to buy, as concerns about the economy shift Wall Street away from backing riskier consumer debt. Rather than pull back on its lending in response, the company said it will hold some loans as it seeks longer-term capital partners.

Keep Reading Show less
Ryan Deffenbaugh
Ryan Deffenbaugh is a reporter at Protocol focused on fintech. Before joining Protocol, he reported on New York's technology industry for Crain's New York Business. He is based in New York and can be reached at

Does your boss sound a little funny? It might be an audio deepfake

Voice deepfake attacks against enterprises, often aimed at tricking corporate employees into transferring money to the attackers, are on the rise. And at least in some cases, they’re succeeding.

Audio deepfakes are a new spin on the impersonation tactics that have long been used in social engineering and phishing attacks, but most people aren’t trained to disbelieve their ears.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

As a cyberattack investigator, Nick Giacopuzzi’s work now includes responding to growing attacks against businesses that involve deepfaked voices — and has ultimately left him convinced that in today's world, "we need to question everything."

In particular, Giacopuzzi has investigated multiple incidents where an attacker deployed fabricated audio, created with the help of AI, that purported to be an executive or a manager at a company. You can guess how it went: The fake boss asked an employee to urgently transfer funds. And in some cases, it’s worked, he said.

Keep Reading Show less
Kyle Alspach

Kyle Alspach ( @KyleAlspach) is a senior reporter at Protocol, focused on cybersecurity. He has covered the tech industry since 2010 for outlets including VentureBeat, CRN and the Boston Globe. He lives in Portland, Oregon, and can be reached at

Latest Stories