NFT lending is becoming a big business, even as prices crash

You can take out a $250,000 loan against your Bored Ape. Is that a good thing? The big institutions getting involved are betting it is.

Golden Ape

Golden Ape Token ID #2089 is locked up for a loan on Arcade, an NFT lending service.

Image: Arcade

NFTs are no longer just cute JPEGs to use for a Twitter avatar — they’re big business. The latest proof: NFT lending, which lets people lend out their NFTs as collateral to borrow crypto, is booming.

Even as prices have taken a tumble along with the broader crypto market, NFTs are growing in use for everything from fantasy sports to social clubs. That has made NFT lending profitable and popular. It’s also an example of the way that crypto can turn almost anything into a complex financial instrument. That’s adding more and more risk along the way, with major implications for the future of Web3.

NFTs are often thought of as one-off artworks. But non-fungible tokens are still tokens, which means they can be traded on blockchains and used in smart contracts. That’s how crypto turns them into financial assets that can be loaned out and borrowed against.

The NFT trade

Larger financial institutions are getting involved, which is tying the NFT trade to the broader financial system. Prime crypto brokerage Genesis Trading and crypto exchange Nexo are two of the institutions that are lending against NFTs on Arcade, one such service.

These structures also bring increasing risk. The steep drop in NFT prices, with some top-tier NFTs dropping 50% in the past month alone, shows how fast things can change in this market. And the more NFTs are collateralized, traded and held by larger institutions, the more risk they bring to the wider market, some investors say.

Why do NFT holders want to borrow against them? Many individuals or funds are sitting on large gains in value of NFTs. They often don’t want to sell their NFTs because they believe in the long-term value or don’t want to pay taxes on the gains.

Some borrowers want to maximize how many new NFTs they can buy, while others want the cash to opportunistically buy new investments, said Stephen Young, CEO of NFTfi. Others want to generate returns through play-to-earn games or yield farming. One person even took out a loan on a Doodles NFT to buy a truck to donate to Ukraine, NFTfi reported on Twitter recently.

Another strategy is hedging. In case an NFT drops in price below the amount borrowed, a borrower can default on the loan and walk away with more value in cash, Young said: “You can almost think of it as a put option in that scenario.”

Still, this form of lending is extremely risky, some investors say. “This is the peak of overcollateralizing and overleveraging,” said Adam Jackson, the CEO of Freelance Lab and an angel investor.

While this is more risky than NFT trading already is, these loans are self-contained and lenders can’t go after a borrowers’ other assets, Young said. That’s because the loans are all on the blockchain — those are the only assets lenders can access. But there’s still a lot of risk involved.

“Obviously, if you go super-leveraged on all of your assets, there's still ways for people to get into trouble, right?” he said. His company tells people in presentations: “[B]e careful — your leverage allows you to increase your upside, but it also allows you to increase your downside. So you need to make sure that you know what you're doing and make sure that you limit the risk to assets you're willing to put at risk.”

Borrowing on the blockchain

NFT lending is typically done on-chain via smart contracts. Both NFTfi and Arcade offer fixed-period, fixed-rate loans. Both do not have access to the NFTs or capital involved, and their systems will not liquidate an NFT holder’s loan if the NFT’s price drops. That differs from some offerings such as decentralized protocol JPEG’d, which will liquidate an NFT if the loan-to-value ratio hits 33% or higher.

On NFTfi and Arcade, lenders compete on terms such as loan-to-value ratio or interest rate. Depending on the type of asset, the loan-to-value ratio may be higher or lower, and the interest rate may also vary.

NFTfi, one of the larger services, had its public beta launch in June 2020. It did $300,000 in loans in its first year, $14 million in 2021 and $150 million so far in 2022, with $37 million in loans outstanding. Its loans range from 30 to 180 days in duration. The loans are paid back all at once, like a traditional bullet loan. Typical loan-to-value ratio is about 50%, and NFTfi charges lenders 5% of the interest earned only on loans that don’t default. The largest loan NFTfi has done was an $8.3 million loan for 104 CryptoPunks at a 30% loan-to-value ratio and 10% APR.

NFTfi NFTfi allows NFT owners to borrow against their assets.Image: NFTFi

The sharp crypto downturn this month has had a sizable effect on this market. That has “absolutely” caused more NFT holders to be liquidated recently, said Frank Chien, an NFT collector.

Meanwhile, the downturn has caused these loans’ interest rates to jump: Last month, the average APR was 50%. After falling, it’s now up to 60%. “So that's the lenders telling you that they're taking on more risk by doing loans, so that tells you that they think the markets are still gonna be choppy going forward, and there's risk in that,” Young said.

NFTfi’s average loan size was around $20,000 prior to May, but now has dropped to about $16,800. However, the total number of loans has increased recently.

Defaults are also up. But Young said this isn't necessarily because the borrower couldn’t repay the loan. “The main driver of defaults is when the market conditions completely change. And it just doesn't actually make financial sense to repay the assets because it's cheaper to just default it and then go buy another asset from the same project for cheaper,” he said.

Arcade, which launched in late January, focuses on higher-end NFTs like Bored Apes and CryptoPunks. The rates typically range from 10% APR to 40% APR, with an average of 18%, said Gabe Frank, its CEO. Arcade takes a 0.5% origination fee from the borrower.

Right now it focuses on 90-day loans with capital paid back in a lump sum. So far, it has not had any defaults. NFT holders have the option to extend the term. Arcade plans to add one-year installment loans that can be paid in 12 monthly installments.

Those with higher liquidity and demand, such as CryptoPunks, can get higher loan-to-value ratios of 60% to 70% from lenders, while on lower ones it can be 20% to 50%, Frank said.

Arcade provides valuations and appraisals on assets and uses machine learning to help appraise NFTs.

While this type of loan is clearly risky, most of the NFT holders borrowing on Arcade are crypto experts. “Most are sophisticated players in DeFi,” said Frank, who himself has taken a loan on Arcade against a Bored Ape that he owns. He plans to keep the loan recycling over time.

Securitization takes coordination

Meanwhile, these assets are becoming more complex, securitized and potentially more risky. Goblin Sax is building pooled liquidity on top of NFTfi through instant loan products, Young noted. Meanwhile, MetaStreet buys the NFTfi loans as promissory notes and packages them up in tranches to be sold, similar to the way mortgages are packaged in collateralized debt obligations.

There are also derivative products being built on top of MetaStreet that are similar to interest rate swaps, Young said. He also believes NFTfi itself can build products on top of those derivatives.

Meanwhile, there’s been consolidation among lenders. These more sophisticated lenders have set up APIs, AI and bots to automate their lending strategies. “Typically for an Ape or a CryptoPunk, you'll get five or six offers within two or three minutes on listing that asset,” Young said.

This complex financialization of NFTs is making what started as a set of online art projects into a more tradable asset. Proponents compare it to the mortgage market. Critics who remember the 2007-2008 crisis might make the same analogy.


Musk’s texts reveal what tech’s most powerful people really want

From Jack Dorsey to Joe Rogan, Musk’s texts are chock-full of überpowerful people, bending a knee to Twitter’s once and (still maybe?) future king.

“Maybe Oprah would be interested in joining the Twitter board if my bid succeeds,” one text reads.

Photo illustration: Patrick Pleul/picture alliance via Getty Images; Protocol

Elon Musk’s text inbox is a rarefied space. It’s a place where tech’s wealthiest casually commit to spending billions of dollars with little more than a thumbs-up emoji and trade tips on how to rewrite the rules for how hundreds of millions of people around the world communicate.

Now, Musk’s ongoing legal battle with Twitter is giving the rest of us a fleeting glimpse into that world. The collection of Musk’s private texts that was made public this week is chock-full of tech power brokers. While the messages are meant to reveal something about Musk’s motivations — and they do — they also say a lot about how things get done and deals get made among some of the most powerful people in the world.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

Circle’s CEO: This is not the time to ‘go crazy’

Jeremy Allaire is leading the stablecoin powerhouse in a time of heightened regulation.

“It’s a complex environment. So every CEO and every board has to be a little bit cautious, because there’s a lot of uncertainty,” Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire told Protocol at Converge22.

Photo: Circle

Sitting solo on a San Francisco stage, Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire asked tennis superstar Serena Williams what it’s like to face “unrelenting skepticism.”

“What do you do when someone says you can’t do this?” Allaire asked the athlete turned VC, who was beaming into Circle’s Converge22 convention by video.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.


Is Salesforce still a growth company? Investors are skeptical

Salesforce is betting that customer data platform Genie and new Slack features can push the company to $50 billion in revenue by 2026. But investors are skeptical about the company’s ability to deliver.

Photo: Marlena Sloss/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Salesforce has long been enterprise tech’s golden child. The company said everything customers wanted to hear and did everything investors wanted to see: It produced robust, consistent growth from groundbreaking products combined with an aggressive M&A strategy and a cherished culture, all operating under the helm of a bombastic, but respected, CEO and team of well-coiffed executives.

Dreamforce is the embodiment of that success. Every year, alongside frustrating San Francisco residents, the over-the-top celebration serves as a battle cry to the enterprise software industry, reminding everyone that Marc Benioff’s mighty fiefdom is poised to expand even deeper into your corporate IT stack.

Keep Reading Show less
Joe Williams

Joe Williams is a writer-at-large at Protocol. He previously covered enterprise software for Protocol, Bloomberg and Business Insider. Joe can be reached at To share information confidentially, he can also be contacted on a non-work device via Signal (+1-309-265-6120) or


The US and EU are splitting on tech policy. That’s putting the web at risk.

A conversation with Cédric O, the former French minister of state for digital.

“With the difficulty of the U.S. in finding political agreement or political basis to legislate more, we are facing a risk of decoupling in the long term between the EU and the U.S.”

Photo: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Cédric O, France’s former minister of state for digital, has been an advocate of Europe’s approach to tech and at the forefront of the continent’s relations with U.S. giants. Protocol caught up with O last week at a conference in New York focusing on social media’s negative effects on society and the possibilities of blockchain-based protocols for alternative networks.

O said watching the U.S. lag in tech policy — even as some states pass their own measures and federal bills gain momentum — has made him worry about the EU and U.S. decoupling. While not as drastic as a disentangling of economic fortunes between the West and China, such a divergence, as O describes it, could still make it functionally impossible for companies to serve users on both sides of the Atlantic with the same product.

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Latest Stories