Think you know how NFT taxes work? Try getting a write-off.

Tax season is here, but NFT tax guidance isn’t. That means major headaches for anyone who bought, sold or donated an NFT.

An NFT coin changing hands.

NFT taxes remain blurry to many, including accountants.

Illustration: Fairywong/DigitalVision Vectors/Getty Images; Protocol

2021 was the year NFTs became mainstream. And that means as Tax Day on April 18 looms, all those new NFT buyers may find themselves dealing with thorny questions they’ve never faced before: How exactly does one file taxes on NFT sales? Or what if I donated an NFT and want to take a write-off? (Don’t take a shot every time NFT appears in this story; you won’t survive. Or maybe that’s the only way you’ll make it to April 18. We don’t judge.)

The IRS first offered guidance on virtual currency transactions in 2014. That’s offered some basis for interpreting the rules around NFTs, but there are many unanswered questions. As a result, NFT taxes remain blurry to many, including accountants.

While the Internal Revenue Service hasn’t issued specific tax guidance for NFTs, the general consensus is that NFTs are taxed as collectibles. For NFT creators, the income generated by selling one would be taxed as ordinary income, with a rate varying between 10% to 37%, in addition to a 15.3% rate for self-employment taxes.

For traders and investors, taxes on NFTs are broadly similar to buying and selling stocks — albeit at the significantly higher rate for collectibles. Since the NFT craze only really started in August, most new traders will only have short-term gains if they made a profit, which are taxed as ordinary income. Early adopters could qualify for long-term gains on NFTs they held for more than a year, which would be taxed at a 28% rate for collectibles. High-income individuals might also pay a 3.8% net investment income tax. Losses on NFTs could offset other capital gains — but not if they’re held for personal use. What does that mean for NFTs? It’s hard to say without official IRS guidance, but you might have a problem if you just bought that Bored Ape to show it off on your Twitter profile.

Tax guidance seems to get even more complicated for those who want to give an NFT to charity and take a write-off. Donating an NFT without knowing exactly what the organization you donated to is going to do with it in the next few years may very well backfire.

When NFTs are donated to a 501(c)(3) charity, they’re usually eligible for tax deductions. Charles Kolstad, a partner at international law firm Withers, said that issues arise when the recipient of the NFT donation isn’t clear on how they’re going to use it due to a “related use” provision in IRC 170(e) of the tax code.

“Typically, when someone gives a piece of real art to a hospital, we make sure the hospital has that piece of art in the hallway or in waiting rooms so that it’s using it in its overall business,” Kolstad told Protocol.

He added that in addition to the requirement to demonstrate a related business use, if the recipient of an NFT sells it within three years of the gift, then the donor will have to report some of the resulting profit as income and therefore pay income tax. That may be part of why selling or auctioning off NFTs, with the cash proceeds donated to charity, seems to be more popular than donating NFTs directly.

Austin Woodward, CEO of crypto tax accounting firm TaxBit, told Protocol that while he thinks traditional tax guidance for collectibles provides a fair amount of direction for how to treat the taxation of NFTs, there are plenty of nuances specific to NFTs that haven’t been addressed, such as minting fees, gas fees and royalties.

The IRS has yet to issue official guidance on whether or how transaction fees in digital assets factor into the cost basis of an asset. Much of the burden in the tax filing process still falls on the taxpayer, giving rise to third-party services such as TaxBit and CoinTracker.

But Woodward is optimistic that the IRS will issue guidance down the line.

“They don’t want to kill digital assets, they don’t want to kill crypto. This is an asset class that they just want people to be tax-compliant,” Woodward said. “I do think we’re going to see more and more guidance around the corner.”


Election markets are far from a sure bet

Kalshi has big-name backing for its plan to offer futures contracts tied to election results. Will that win over a long-skeptical regulator?

Whether Kalshi’s election contracts could be considered gaming or whether they serve a true risk-hedging purpose is one of the top questions the CFTC is weighing in its review.

Photo illustration: Getty Images; Protocol

Crypto isn’t the only emerging issue on the CFTC’s plate. The futures regulator is also weighing a fintech sector that has similarly tricky political implications: election bets.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has set Oct. 28 as a date by which it hopes to decide whether the New York-based startup Kalshi can offer a form of wagering up to $25,000 on which party will control the House of Representatives and Senate after the midterms. PredictIt, another online market for election trading, has also sued the regulator over its decision to cancel a no-action letter.

Keep Reading Show less
Ryan Deffenbaugh
Ryan Deffenbaugh is a reporter at Protocol focused on fintech. Before joining Protocol, he reported on New York's technology industry for Crain's New York Business. He is based in New York and can be reached at
Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

The Uber verdict shows why mandatory disclosure isn't such a bad idea

The conviction of Uber's former chief security officer, Joe Sullivan, seems likely to change some minds in the debate over proposed cyber incident reporting regulations.

Executives and boards will now be "a whole lot less likely to cover things up," said one information security veteran.

Photo: Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images

If nothing else, the guilty verdict delivered Wednesday in a case involving Uber's former security head will have this effect on how breaches are handled in the future: Executives and boards, according to information security veteran Michael Hamilton, will be "a whole lot less likely to cover things up."

Following the conviction of former Uber chief security officer Joe Sullivan, "we likely will get better voluntary reporting" of cyber incidents, said Hamilton, formerly the chief information security officer of the City of Seattle, and currently the founder and CISO at cybersecurity vendor Critical Insight.

Keep Reading Show less
Kyle Alspach

Kyle Alspach ( @KyleAlspach) is a senior reporter at Protocol, focused on cybersecurity. He has covered the tech industry since 2010 for outlets including VentureBeat, CRN and the Boston Globe. He lives in Portland, Oregon, and can be reached at


Delta and MIT are running flight tests to fix contrails

The research team and airline are running flight tests to determine if it’s possible to avoid the climate-warming effects of contrails.

Delta and MIT just announced a partnership to test how to mitigate persistent contrails.

Photo: Gabriela Natiello/Unsplash

Contrails could be responsible for up to 2% of all global warming, and yet how they’re formed and how to mitigate them is barely understood by major airlines.

That may be changing.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma

Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol covering climate. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at


Inside Amazon’s free video strategy

Amazon has been doubling down on original content for Freevee, its ad-supported video service, which has seen a lot of growth thanks to a deep integration with other Amazon properties.

Freevee’s investment into original programming like 'Bosch: Legacy' has increased by 70%.

Photo: Tyler Golden/Amazon Freevee

Amazon’s streaming efforts have long been all about Prime Video. So the company caught pundits by surprise when, in early 2019, it launched a stand-alone ad-supported streaming service called IMDb Freedive, with Techcrunch calling the move “a bit odd.”

Nearly four years and two rebrandings later, Amazon’s ad-supported video efforts appear to be flourishing. Viewership of the service grew by 138% from 2020 to 2021, according to Amazon. The company declined to share any updated performance data on the service, which is now called Freevee, but a spokesperson told Protocol the performance of originals in particular “exceeded expectations,” leading Amazon to increase investments into original content by 70% year-over-year.

Keep Reading Show less
Janko Roettgers

Janko Roettgers (@jank0) is a senior reporter at Protocol, reporting on the shifting power dynamics between tech, media, and entertainment, including the impact of new technologies. Previously, Janko was Variety's first-ever technology writer in San Francisco, where he covered big tech and emerging technologies. He has reported for Gigaom, Frankfurter Rundschau, Berliner Zeitung, and ORF, among others. He has written three books on consumer cord-cutting and online music and co-edited an anthology on internet subcultures. He lives with his family in Oakland.

Latest Stories