Protocol | Fintech

A crypto trading firm has gotten FINRA approval. It hopes the SEC is next.

While crypto is in the spotlight, Prometheum hopes to trade blockchain securities — with regulatory approval in hand.

SEC headquarters in Washington

Prometheum co-CEO Aaron Kaplan is hoping to get SEC approval for his trading system.

Photo: Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images

Startup Prometheum said Wednesday it had received approval from FINRA to operate an alternate trading system, or ATS, for trading digital assets including blockchain-based securities.

Prometheum now needs to get approval from the SEC and then can begin trading, co-CEO Aaron Kaplan says. The approval for subsidiary Prometheum Ember ATS Inc., or PEATS, includes trading by accredited and non-accredited investors.

Trading on the Prometheum system would differ from current crypto exchanges in that the assets on the platform will all be regulated as securities and the system itself would be regulated — if the SEC approves.

And then there's the regulatory scheme it will operate under. Exchanges such as Coinbase in the U.S. sometimes fall under state money transmitter licenses, though some states like Alaska and California have taken the position that such licenses don't apply to crypto businesses, leaving them in a regulatory gap. SEC Chairman Gary Gensler has raised concerns about the lack of regulatory oversight of crypto exchanges.

An ATS is an SEC-regulated trading system, sometimes known as a dark pool. An ATS matches buyers and sellers of securities but is typically regulated as a broker-dealer, not an exchange.

PEATS will offer trading for both retail investors and professionals and provide automated know-your-customer and anti-money laundering checks, the company says. Anchorage Digital Bank, a chartered bank, is providing custody and settlement for the ATS.

Prometheum is one of several companies that have been building new systems to enable trading of digital assets.

Competitor tZERO also has an ATS for trading digital securities, which it says did the first trade of a blockchain-based security in 2016 and says it did $39 million in digital securities transactions in the third quarter of 2020., the online retailer which took a detour into blockchain businesses recently, is in the process of spinning tZERO off.

Prometheum sees itself as taking a different route than many crypto exchanges by focusing on getting regulatory approval first. Kaplan believes that many cryptocurrencies could be deemed securities by the SEC and thus end up needing to be traded on regulated exchanges.

"[I]f something's a security and deemed to be a security, then the only place that could trade it would have to be for registered securities — and places that are operating under the money transmitter laws aren't necessarily authorized to do so," Kaplan said.

Kaplan says he believes Prometheum is in a good regulatory position, citing Gensler's comments on crypto exchanges needing regulation.

The SEC has not made a wholesale indication of which digital assets are or aren't securities — though it has said that bitcoin and ether aren't. The SEC has filed a lawsuit against Ripple alleging that the token it backs, XRP, is a security.

Prometheum has been seeking this ATS approval for several years. It required an initial application to FINRA, followed by a back-and-forth with the industry self-regulatory body, an interview, a demonstration and follow-up, Kaplan said.

To help on the regulatory front, Prometheum recently hired Rosemarie Fanelli as chief regulatory officer. She previously worked for 13 years at FINRA and also worked for the NYSE.

While this sort of official sign-off is hard to get, there have been recent regulatory actions that have signaled more clarity for what Prometheum is doing, Kaplan says.

In September, a no-action letter from the SEC to FINRA indicated that broker-dealers could operate alternative trading systems for digital assets, provided they maintain $250,000 in net capital, don't settle trades and ensure that the assets are registered with regulators and that transactions comply with securities laws.

Issuers of crypto tokens can register the digital assets as securities with the SEC, but not many have done so, which could limit the offerings on Prometheum's ATS in the near term.

Prometheum, once it gets SEC approval, aims to be live "in the coming months," Kaplan said.

Protocol | Enterprise

Startups are pouncing as SaaS giants struggle in the intelligence race

Companies like Salesforce and Workday spent the last two decades building walled gardens around their systems. Now, it's a mad dash to make those ecosystems more open.

Companies want to predict the future, and "systems of intelligence" might be their best bet.

Image: Yuichiro Chino / Getty Images

Take a look at any software vendor's marketing materials and you're sure to see some variation of the word "intelligence" splattered everywhere.

It's part of a tectonic shift happening within enterprise technology. Companies spent the last several years moving their systems to the internet and, along the way, rapidly adopting new applications.

Keep Reading Show less
Joe Williams

Joe Williams is a senior reporter at Protocol covering enterprise software, including industry giants like Salesforce, Microsoft, IBM and Oracle. He previously covered emerging technology for Business Insider. Joe can be reached at To share information confidentially, he can also be contacted on a non-work device via Signal (+1-309-265-6120) or

Keep Reading Show less
A technology company reimagining global capital markets and economies.
Protocol | Workplace

The hottest new perk in tech: A week off for burnout recovery

In an industry where long hours are a "badge of honor," a week of rest may be the best way to retain talent.

Tech companies are giving their employees a week to rest and recover from burnout.

Photo: Kinga Cichewicz/Unsplash

In early May, the founder of Lessonly, a company that makes training software, sent out a companywide email issuing a mandate to all employees. But it wasn't the sort of mandate employees around the world have been receiving related to vaccines and masks. This mandate required that every worker take an entire week off in July.

The announcement took Lessonly's staff by surprise. "We had employees reach out and share that they were emotional, just thankful that they had the opportunity to do this," said Megan Jarvis, who leads the company's talent team and worked on planning the week off.

Keep Reading Show less
Aisha Counts
Aisha J. Counts is a reporting fellow at Protocol, based out of Los Angeles. Previously, she worked for Ernst & Young, where she researched and wrote about the future of work, the gig economy and startups. She is a graduate of the University of Southern California, where she studied business and philosophy.

Chip costs are rising. How will that affect gadget prices?

The global chip shortage is causing component costs to go up, so hardware makers are finding new ways to keep their prices low.

Chips are getting more expensive, but most consumer electronics companies have so far resisted price increases.

Photo: Chris Hondros/Getty Images

How do you get people to pay more for your products while avoiding sticker shock? That's a question consumer electronics companies are grappling with as worldwide chip shortages and component cost increases are squeezing their bottom lines.

One way to do it: Make more expensive and higher-margin products seem like a good deal to customers.

Keep Reading Show less
Janko Roettgers

Janko Roettgers (@jank0) is a senior reporter at Protocol, reporting on the shifting power dynamics between tech, media, and entertainment, including the impact of new technologies. Previously, Janko was Variety's first-ever technology writer in San Francisco, where he covered big tech and emerging technologies. He has reported for Gigaom, Frankfurter Rundschau, Berliner Zeitung, and ORF, among others. He has written three books on consumer cord-cutting and online music and co-edited an anthology on internet subcultures. He lives with his family in Oakland.

Protocol | Policy

Laws want humans to check biased AI. Research shows they can’t.

Policymakers want people to oversee — and override — biased AI. But research suggests there's no evidence to prove humans are up to the task.

The recent trend toward requiring human oversight of automated decision-making systems runs counter to mounting research about humans' inability to effectively override AI tools.

Photo: Jackal Pan/Getty Images

There was a time, not long ago, when a certain brand of technocrat could argue with a straight face that algorithms are less biased decision-makers than human beings — and not be laughed out of the room. That time has come and gone, as the perils of AI bias have entered mainstream awareness.

Awareness of bias hasn't stopped institutions from deploying algorithms to make life-altering decisions about, say, people's prison sentences or their health care coverage. But the fear of runaway AI has led to a spate of laws and policy guidance requiring or recommending that these systems have some sort of human oversight, so machines aren't making the final call all on their own. The problem is: These laws almost never stop to ask whether human beings are actually up to the job.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Latest Stories