Ripple’s CEO won’t apologize for taking on the SEC

“The SEC declared war on Ripple. We’re defending ourselves.”

Brad Garlinghouse

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse isn’t apologizing for his company’s pugnacious stance with regulators.

Photo: Ripple

Ripple just bought back a huge chunk of its shares this week, which CEO Brad Garlinghouse touted as a sign of the crypto company’s momentum.

But he also used the opportunity to hit back at the agency that the crypto powerhouse considers its nemesis: the SEC.

“Despite these crazy headwinds with the SEC — and frankly, losing some customers because of the SEC lawsuit — we grew very quickly, and we feel like we're starting 2022 in a great position of strength,” Garlinghouse told Protocol.

The company is embroiled in a lawsuit, filed in 2020, in which the agency accused Ripple of raising $1.3 billion in unregistered digital-asset securities by issuing XRP tokens. The SEC's key claim is that XRP is not a currency, but a security, and therefore subject to strict securities laws. Ripple has argued that XRP is a virtual currency, not an investment contract.

In an interview with Protocol, Garlinghouse discussed why the share buyback makes sense, the growing worries about another crypto winter and why the SEC and crypto critics are wrong to portray the industry as the “Wild West.”

This interview has been edited for brevity and clarity.

Why buy back shares?

A lot has changed in the crypto world in the last two years since we did this [funding round]. Overall asset values have grown from about $200 billion to about 8x that today. Ripple’s business has materially grown. So despite these crazy headwinds with the SEC — and frankly, losing some customers because of the SEC lawsuit — we grew very quickly, and we feel like we're starting 2022 in a great position of strength.

We have over a billion dollars of cash on the balance sheet today. We're super excited about where things are going. We had this opportunity to repurchase shares at a $15 billion valuation. We obviously thought that it was a good use of capital for all shareholders.

You’re still in a battle with the SEC. How do you see the regulatory challenges unfolding this year?

If you step back at 100,000 feet, the regulatory climate globally has actually trended extremely positively over the last five years. You see that the trend line for most major markets recognizes that digital assets can and will play a role in the future financial system and that that's to the benefit of consumers, the benefit of businesses, the benefit of even governments.

If you look at it at a very high level, countries like the United Kingdom, Switzerland, Japan, Singapore have all provided very constructive frameworks. Yes, there's regulatory oversight, but they're actually encouraging that innovation. Your question, I think, is more about what's going on here in the United States. I think it's certainly disappointing and frustrating as a U.S. company to find ourselves where we are.

The SEC continues, in my judgment, to drag its feet. It just feels like there's a certain hypocrisy since the SEC is continuing to note that justice delayed is justice denied. But they're seeking delays all the time. What Ripple seeks is clarity, and a level playing field. The United States government and the regulators of the United States government should not be picking winners and picking losers.

There’s the view you have become much more combative, especially on Twitter.

The SEC declared war on Ripple. Are we being combative? I don't know. We're trying to defend ourselves. If you read their initial lawsuit, there's all kinds of allegations there that aren't actually grounded in fact. They've certainly contorted the facts into telling a story which doesn't represent reality.

I don't know if we're being combative. I think we're trying to get the truth. We're trying to get this resolved as expediently as we can. The SEC is dragging its feet. We got sued. You’d think that if they sued us, they'd have all the ducks in a row. And they're the ones dragging their feet. Of course I'm going to be combative.

There will likely be speculation that this move of buying back your shares is a step toward an IPO. Can you comment on that?

That is an astute observation. The United States does have the most liquid, the most vibrant, the largest capital market in the world. My hope and expectation is we'll get this case with the SEC behind us in 2022. Then we will evaluate where to go from there. I think ultimately the future for Ripple is that we will be a public company. But I don't think that's a question we're spending a lot of time on today, given where we are with the SEC lawsuit.

The crypto market has been falling, together with the broader market. Do you think we are entering another crypto winter?

I've been at Ripple for seven years. There have always been interesting cycles. We've certainly dealt with this before.

I view this as part of the journey not dissimilar to what we've already experienced. I'm incredibly optimistic about what the future holds for Ripple and for digital assets broadly, particularly in a market where global economies are printing more and more fiat currencies that devalue the currency that everyone is holding.

What is your biggest worry on the regulatory front?

I'd say I'm optimistic. Again, if you step back over the last five, six years, most major economies have leaned into crypto in a way that is supporting innovation that is good for businesses, good for consumers.

Now, the wheels of justice and the wheels of government change are slow. I think it's going to take time. But as is the case with a lot of new technologies, people try to paint it, as the chair of the SEC said, by saying the “Wild West.” No, it’s not. Here in the United States, the crypto industry is actually quite regulated, not by the SEC, but by the CFTC. So it's kind of like painting a picture of crisis and drama by saying the “Wild West,” but the facts don't bear that out.

There’s the view that most crypto companies want the SEC not to be involved or to have its role minimized in any kind of new regulatory framework. Is that your view?

When you see a regulator going above and beyond and really stretching the mandate that has been given to them by law, it’s overreach. It’s like a power grab.


Election markets are far from a sure bet

Kalshi has big-name backing for its plan to offer futures contracts tied to election results. Will that win over a long-skeptical regulator?

Whether Kalshi’s election contracts could be considered gaming or whether they serve a true risk-hedging purpose is one of the top questions the CFTC is weighing in its review.

Photo illustration: Getty Images; Protocol

Crypto isn’t the only emerging issue on the CFTC’s plate. The futures regulator is also weighing a fintech sector that has similarly tricky political implications: election bets.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has until Oct. 28 to decide whether the New York-based startup Kalshi can offer a form of wagering up to $25,000 on which party will control the House of Representatives and Senate after the midterms. PredictIt, another online market for election trading, has also sued the regulator over its decision to cancel a no-action letter.

Keep Reading Show less
Ryan Deffenbaugh
Ryan Deffenbaugh is a reporter at Protocol focused on fintech. Before joining Protocol, he reported on New York's technology industry for Crain's New York Business. He is based in New York and can be reached at
Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

The Uber verdict shows why mandatory disclosure isn't such a bad idea

The conviction of Uber's former chief security officer, Joe Sullivan, seems likely to change some minds in the debate over proposed cyber incident reporting regulations.

Executives and boards will now be "a whole lot less likely to cover things up," said one information security veteran.

Photo: Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images

If nothing else, the guilty verdict delivered Wednesday in a case involving Uber's former security head will have this effect on how breaches are handled in the future: Executives and boards, according to information security veteran Michael Hamilton, will be "a whole lot less likely to cover things up."

Following the conviction of former Uber chief security officer Joe Sullivan, "we likely will get better voluntary reporting" of cyber incidents, said Hamilton, formerly the chief information security officer of the City of Seattle, and currently the founder and CISO at cybersecurity vendor Critical Insight.

Keep Reading Show less
Kyle Alspach

Kyle Alspach ( @KyleAlspach) is a senior reporter at Protocol, focused on cybersecurity. He has covered the tech industry since 2010 for outlets including VentureBeat, CRN and the Boston Globe. He lives in Portland, Oregon, and can be reached at


Delta and MIT are running flight tests to fix contrails

The research team and airline are running flight tests to determine if it’s possible to avoid the climate-warming effects of contrails.

Delta and MIT just announced a partnership to test how to mitigate persistent contrails.

Photo: Gabriela Natiello/Unsplash

Contrails could be responsible for up to 2% of all global warming, and yet how they’re formed and how to mitigate them is barely understood by major airlines.

That may be changing.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma

Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol covering climate. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at


Inside Amazon’s free video strategy

Amazon has been doubling down on original content for Freevee, its ad-supported video service, which has seen a lot of growth thanks to a deep integration with other Amazon properties.

Freevee’s investment into original programming like 'Bosch: Legacy' has increased by 70%.

Photo: Tyler Golden/Amazon Freevee

Amazon’s streaming efforts have long been all about Prime Video. So the company caught pundits by surprise when, in early 2019, it launched a stand-alone ad-supported streaming service called IMDb Freedive, with Techcrunch calling the move “a bit odd.”

Nearly four years and two rebrandings later, Amazon’s ad-supported video efforts appear to be flourishing. Viewership of the service grew by 138% from 2020 to 2021, according to Amazon. The company declined to share any updated performance data on the service, which is now called Freevee, but a spokesperson told Protocol the performance of originals in particular “exceeded expectations,” leading Amazon to increase investments into original content by 70% year-over-year.

Keep Reading Show less
Janko Roettgers

Janko Roettgers (@jank0) is a senior reporter at Protocol, reporting on the shifting power dynamics between tech, media, and entertainment, including the impact of new technologies. Previously, Janko was Variety's first-ever technology writer in San Francisco, where he covered big tech and emerging technologies. He has reported for Gigaom, Frankfurter Rundschau, Berliner Zeitung, and ORF, among others. He has written three books on consumer cord-cutting and online music and co-edited an anthology on internet subcultures. He lives with his family in Oakland.

Latest Stories