Protocol | Fintech

Robinhood: Commission-free trades are good for crypto, too

The online broker uses a practice similar to payment for order flow for its commission-free crypto trades. It's hoping the industry will follow it.

Phone screen with Dogecoin stock chart

Free crypto trading has a price.

Photo: Clay Banks/Unsplash

Robinhood's commission-free approach to stock trading has fueled its explosive growth, and as it prepares to go public, it's betting that free crypto orders could add to its momentum as the digital currencies grow in mainstream awareness.

But its approach could highlight gaps in crypto regulation, and given Robinhood's already-high profile among regulators and legislators, bring unwanted attention to some shadowy corners of the industry.

With the hypergrowth of crypto in recent months, Robinhood doubled down on this practice in a blog post Thursday, touting its fee-free crypto trades and outlining how it funnels crypto orders to "various trading venues" to obtain "competitive prices." It compared its free crypto trades to competitors such as Coinbase, Gemini and Venmo, which each charge about $2.30 to $2.99 per trade, saying that the fees cut into investors' gains.

The parallels to Robinhood's approach to stocks and option trading were clear. In order to offer free stock trades, the brokerage routes its orders to big market makers who pay Robinhood for sending customer orders to them, essentially splitting the trading profits those firms make.

This practice, known as payment for order flow, is controversial in the industry because some critics believe it is a conflict of interest, leads to market concentration and doesn't provide the best prices. Robinhood and others who use it say payment for order flow provides better prices and enables commission-free trading, which saves small retail investors money.

Robinhood says that it doesn't consider negotiated payments when choosing where to route orders, but the company paid a $65 million fine in December to settle charges it had misled customers about its revenue sources and failed to deliver best execution on trades.

Similar to how it handles stock trades, Robinhood says it does not consider payments from crypto trading venues: "We receive uniform volume-based rebates from trading venues, but never consider rebates when deciding where to route your order."

Coinbase declined to comment but CFO Alesia Haas told CNN in April that Coinbase does not get paid for its order flow. "Today we believe our fees represent the product that we're selling," she said. "Those are transparent fees that we share with our customers. There's no other embedded or hidden fees. We're not monetizing through any back end mechanisms."

Unlike with stock trades, U.S. crypto brokers do not have to disclose where they are routing their trades. (Robinhood declined to comment on where it routes its crypto trades, though Bloomberg reported in 2019 that Robinhood was using Jump Trading to execute crypto orders.)

That's because crypto trading firms are not regulated like stockbrokers and equities markets — they are mainly regulated by states via money transmitter licenses.

Robinhood Crypto is also regulated by the New York State Department of Financial Services as a virtual currency business, but that state's regulations mainly consider which coins a regulated business can list, not payments or rebates for trading.

New SEC chair Gary Gensler has said he wants to evaluate how crypto exchanges are regulated.

With wild swings in prices often juiced by popular figures like Elon Musk weighing in on social media, crypto is becoming more popular for retail investors and institutions. It's also playing a bigger role for Robinhood in recent months. In the first quarter of 2021, 9.5 million customers traded crypto on Robinhood, up from 1.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2020.

As Robinhood prepares to go public, the increase in crypto trading could provide a boost to its revenue, which in turn could mean a bigger bounce when its shares begin trading.

While it isn't a crypto specialist in the way Coinbase is, Robinhood clearly wants to build on its branding as an advocate for the small retail investor. And crypto, borne out of an ethos of decentralization and superseding big financial institutions, fits nicely with that narrative.

"Crypto was born out of a mission to return power to the people. To stay true to that mission, we believe that crypto trading should be accessible to all," Robinhood wrote in its blog post.

But Robinhood's lack of clarity in funneling orders to unnamed partners for undisclosed payments could backfire among crypto believers. Many who have championed the digital currencies say they prize the transparency that cryptocurrencies bring with their public blockchain ledgers.

Robinhood doesn't currently offer crypto customers a wallet to hold their cryptocurrencies, though CEO Vlad Tenev said in March it hoped to build one "as fast as possible."

Update: This story has been updated to include a Coinbase executive's comments on its fee structure.

Protocol | China

Beijing meets an unstoppable force: Chinese parents and their children

Live-in tutors disguised as nannies, weekday online tutoring classes and adult gaming accounts for rent. Here's how citizens are finding ways to skirt Beijing's diktats.

Citizens in China are experienced at cooking up countermeasures when Beijing or governments come down with rigid policies.

Photo: Liu Ying/Xinhua via Getty Images

During the summer break, Beijing handed down a parade of new regulations designed to intervene in youth education and entertainment, including a strike against private tutoring, a campaign to "cleanse" the internet and a strict limit on online game playing time for children. But so far, these seemingly iron-clad rules have met their match, with students and their parents quickly finding workarounds.

Grassroots citizens in China are experienced at cooking up countermeasures when Beijing or governments come down with rigid policies. Authorities then have to play defense, amending holes in their initial rules.

Keep Reading Show less
Shen Lu

Shen Lu is a reporter with Protocol | China. Her writing has appeared in Foreign Policy, The New York Times and POLITICO, among other publications. She can be reached at shenlu@protocol.com.


Keep Reading Show less
Nasdaq
A technology company reimagining global capital markets and economies.
Protocol | Policy

Google and Microsoft are at it again, now over government software

The on-again, off-again battle between the two companies flared up again when Google commissioned a study on how much the U.S. government relies on Microsoft software.

Google and Microsoft are in a long-running feud that has once again flared up in recent months.

Photo: Jens Tandler/EyeEm/Getty Images

According to a new report commissioned by Google, Microsoft has an overwhelming "share in the U.S. government office productivity software market," potentially leading to security risks for local, state and federal governments.

The five-page document, released Tuesday by a trade group that counts Google as a member, represents the latest escalation between the two companies in a long-running feud that has once again flared up in recent months.

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

People

Facebook wants to kill the family iPad

Facebook has built the first portable smart display, and is introducing a new household mode that makes it easier to separate work from play.

Facebook's new Portal Go device will go on sale for $199 in October.

Photo: Facebook

Facebook is coming for the coffee table tablet: The company on Tuesday introduced a new portable version of its smart display called Portal Go, which promises to be a better communal device for video calls, media consumption and many of the other things families use iPads for.

Facebook also announced a revamped version of its Portal Pro device Tuesday, and introduced a new household mode to Portals that will make it easier to share these devices with everyone in a home without having to compromise on working-from-home habits. Taken together, these announcements show that there may be an opening for consumer electronics companies to meet this late-pandemic moment with new device categories.

Keep Reading Show less
Janko Roettgers

Janko Roettgers (@jank0) is a senior reporter at Protocol, reporting on the shifting power dynamics between tech, media, and entertainment, including the impact of new technologies. Previously, Janko was Variety's first-ever technology writer in San Francisco, where he covered big tech and emerging technologies. He has reported for Gigaom, Frankfurter Rundschau, Berliner Zeitung, and ORF, among others. He has written three books on consumer cord-cutting and online music and co-edited an anthology on internet subcultures. He lives with his family in Oakland.

Protocol | Policy

The techlash is threatening human rights around the world

Some 48 countries introduced laws to regulate tech last year. But researchers say many of those laws are just attempts at censorship and surveillance.

In its latest report, Freedom House President Michael Abramowitz said, "We really see free expression and privacy as under unprecedented strain."

Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Governments around the world are seizing on widespread frustrations with Big Tech as justification for a spate of increasingly restrictive laws governing online speech, a new report finds, a trend that researchers say puts both free expression and the fate of tech companies' overseas employees at risk.

Over the last year alone, some 48 countries worldwide introduced — and in some cases, passed — laws to regulate tech companies, according to the latest report by Freedom House, a nonprofit that publishes an annual survey on internet freedoms in 70 countries. While those laws have often been passed in the name of promoting competition, protecting people's data and moderating offensive content, the report's authors say that, in many cases, these laws are merely thinly veiled attempts to force companies into censorship and surveillance.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Latest Stories