Fintech

The hunt for Russian crypto is on

The blockchain never forgets, and crypto isn’t as anonymous as you think.

Russian crypto coin running from magnifying glass

There’s no such thing as complete anonymity on a blockchain.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Finding yachts is pretty easy. At least two belonging to sanctioned allies of Vladimir Putin were confiscated last week, and the locations of others are known to authorities.

The hunt for Russian crypto is trickier. But it turns out to be harder to hide than Russian oligarchs might think.

The push to penalize Russia for invading Ukraine is the first major sanctions campaign aimed at “financially destabilizing a head of state” by targeting digital assets, said Michael Fasanello, chief compliance officer of LVL, a banking and crypto trading company.

But it’s not the first sanctions program to take crypto into account. The Trump administration banned U.S. transactions based on the petro, the digital currency issued by the Venezuelan government under President Nicolás Maduro.

That campaign, Fasanello said, was “miniscule compared to the attack on digital assets focused on Putin and his oligarchy.”

The start of the invasion was reportedly followed by a spike in crypto trades involving the Russian ruble, which some took as a sign that oligarchs might be trying to use digital currencies to evade sanctions.

The U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control tightened its rules this month to make clear that sanctions against Russia included digital assets. Last week, Senate Democrats led by Elizabeth Warren raised concerns with the Treasury Department that Russian oligarchs could be using crypto for “nefarious purposes.” And on Monday, FinCEN specifically warned that sanctioned individuals and entities in Russia and Belarus might be using “convertible virtual currencies” to evade restrictions.

Crypto crime is real, and large: It hit $14 billion last year, according to Chainalysis, up from $7.8 billion in 2020. It also has the unique aspect of happening in plain sight. Unlike fiat money laundered through a series of opaque shell-company transactions, every crypto transfer is recorded permanently on the blockchain. It’s just a question of whether authorities can link those transactions to a real identity.

Oligarchs can hide their crypto. Moving it is another matter.

There’s no such thing as complete anonymity on a blockchain. A crypto account or wallet, which is typically identified as a series of numbers and letters, is visible to a network. Even though no names or any other info is visible, pretty much all transactions can be tracked.

“Ultimately, crypto is very easy to track, whether it’s decentralized or centralized,” said Steven Waterhouse, CEO of Orchid Labs.

To monitor accounts and transactions, all you need is a wallet address. “With that, you can see how much is in the crypto accounts,” Marco Bellin, founder and CEO of Datacappy, told Protocol. “There is a trail that can be followed. Every transaction that an identified account has with another account is noted and can be traced.”

Tigran Gambaryan, vice president of Global Intelligence and Investigations at Binance, said crypto is “a terrible thing to use to evade sanctions” because “everybody looks at these transactions,” which makes it extremely difficult when you’re trying to move large amounts of money.

FinCEN noted in its Monday alert that “large-scale sanctions evasion using convertible virtual currency by a government such as the Russian Federation is not necessarily practicable.”

But Fasanello observed that “crypto permits pseudo-anonymity,” which, when combined with tools for obfuscating transactions, “can present a very difficult situation for investigators — even using best-in-class blockchain analytics.”

It is possible to protect a crypto wallet from scrutiny by taking it offline. That typically means using a hardware wallet — also referred to as a cold wallet — that is not constantly connected to a blockchain network.

But that means an oligarch wouldn’t be able to do anything with the crypto. “If you have some crypto and you want to store it in a cold wallet, then it would come down to when you want it to move and how you want to process it at that point,” Waterhouse said.

And that won’t be easy, especially if they’re moving huge amounts.

“If they're sending to an unhosted wallet, we're not always going to know who controls that on the back end,” Nirvana Patel, chief compliance officer of Prime Trust, a digital assets infrastructure software company, told Protocol.

But once they try to move funds, the wallet will become visible to the network. And those connections can be traced — a “six degrees of Kevin Bacon kind of thing,” Patel said. “You're going to know that someone is connected to something down the chain at some point.”

The tools to hide crypto aren’t perfect

Money launderers use blockchain-based tools known as tumblers or mixers to obfuscate transactions. The idea is to pool coins to be transferred, breaking the origin and destination chain and enabling crypto users to cover their tracks.

But these tools are typically slow and “expensive to use,” Gambaryan of Binance said. “And they're not very efficient if you're trying to move around billions or hundreds of millions of dollars because they're not built to process those kinds of transactions … They're built to actually transfer small amounts. And if you actually try to move large amounts, it's actually very easy to break through tumblers.”

Waterhouse agreed, saying, “for the scale of what we're talking about … these tools are not really sufficient.”

Some crypto exchanges have blocked withdrawals to mixing services.

The blockchain never forgets

Crypto technology continues to evolve. And transactions made stealthily now could come back to haunt sanctions evaders years later.

“The scary thing about this stuff for bad actors is it's not like you get away with it and then someone forgets about it,” Waterhouse said. “The tools are getting better. And then a few years later, someone's like, ‘Oh, actually, I figured out who did that and I can go back and trace it.’”

But the flip side is also true, argued Fasanello. With the resources they have, oligarchs can gain access to “the finest of hackers to discover new ways to game the system.”

“The oligarchs have been perfecting the skill of hiding assets and obfuscating the course of funds for a very long time,” he said. “Marry this skill set with cutting-edge tech, and you have one heck of a fight on your hands as a counter-[financial crime] professional.”

But even the slightest slip-up can unravel years of secrecy. A $500 Walmart gift card helped lead investigators to the couple accused of laundering $4.5 billion stolen in the Bitfinex hack. Ultimately, crypto is safest when it’s hidden. And oligarchs have a tendency to display their wealth — like those yachts being seized around the world.

Policy

How 'Zuck Bucks' saved the 2020 election — and fueled the Big Lie

The true story of how Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan’s $419 million donation became the 2020 election’s most enduring conspiracy theory.

Mark Zuckerberg is smack in the center of one of the 2020 election’s multitudinous conspiracies.

Illustration: Mike McQuade; Photos: Getty Images

If Mark Zuckerberg could have imagined the worst possible outcome of his decision to insert himself into the 2020 election, it might have looked something like the scene that unfolded inside Mar-a-Lago on a steamy evening in early April.

There in a gilded ballroom-turned-theater, MAGA world icons including Kellyanne Conway, Corey Lewandowski, Hope Hicks and former president Donald Trump himself were gathered for the premiere of “Rigged: The Zuckerberg Funded Plot to Defeat Donald Trump.”

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Sponsored Content

Why the digital transformation of industries is creating a more sustainable future

Qualcomm’s chief sustainability officer Angela Baker on how companies can view going “digital” as a way not only toward growth, as laid out in a recent report, but also toward establishing and meeting environmental, social and governance goals.

Three letters dominate business practice at present: ESG, or environmental, social and governance goals. The number of mentions of the environment in financial earnings has doubled in the last five years, according to GlobalData: 600,000 companies mentioned the term in their annual or quarterly results last year.

But meeting those ESG goals can be a challenge — one that businesses can’t and shouldn’t take lightly. Ahead of an exclusive fireside chat at Davos, Angela Baker, chief sustainability officer at Qualcomm, sat down with Protocol to speak about how best to achieve those targets and how Qualcomm thinks about its own sustainability strategy, net zero commitment, other ESG targets and more.

Keep Reading Show less
Chris Stokel-Walker

Chris Stokel-Walker is a freelance technology and culture journalist and author of "YouTubers: How YouTube Shook Up TV and Created a New Generation of Stars." His work has been published in The New York Times, The Guardian and Wired.

Fintech

From frenzy to fear: Trading apps grapple with anxious investors

After riding the stock-trading wave last year, trading apps like Robinhood have disenchanted customers and jittery investors.

Retail stock trading is still an attractive business, as shown by the news that crypto exchange FTX is dipping its toes in the market by letting some U.S. customers trade stocks.

Photo: Lam Yik/Bloomberg via Getty Images

For a brief moment, last year’s GameStop craze made buying and selling stocks cool, even exciting, for a new generation of young investors. Now, that frenzy has turned to fear.

Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev pointed to “a challenging macro environment” marked by rising prices and interest rates and a slumping market in a call with analysts explaining his company’s lackluster results. The downturn, he said, was something “most of our customers have never experienced in their lifetimes.”

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Enterprise

Broadcom is reportedly in talks to acquire VMware

It hasn't been long since it left the ownership of Dell Technologies.

Photo: Yichuan Cao/NurPhoto via Getty Images

Broadcom is said to be in discussions with VMware to buy the cloud computing company for as much as $50 billion.

Keep Reading Show less
Jamie Condliffe

Jamie Condliffe ( @jme_c) is the executive editor at Protocol, based in London. Prior to joining Protocol in 2019, he worked on the business desk at The New York Times, where he edited the DealBook newsletter and wrote Bits, the weekly tech newsletter. He has previously worked at MIT Technology Review, Gizmodo, and New Scientist, and has held lectureships at the University of Oxford and Imperial College London. He also holds a doctorate in engineering from the University of Oxford.

Podcasts

Should startups be scared?

Stock market turmoil is making VCs skittish. Could now be the best time to start a company?

Dark times could be ahead for startups.

Photo by Startaê Team on Unsplash

This week, we break down why Elon Musk is tweeting about the S&P 500's ESG rankings — and why he might be right to be mad. Then we discuss how tech companies are failing to prevent mass shootings, and why the new Texas social media law might make it more difficult for platforms to be proactive.

Then Protocol's Biz Carson, author of the weekly VC newsletter Pipeline, joins us to explain the state of venture capital amidst plunging stocks and declining revenues. Should founders start panicking? The answer might surprise you.

Keep Reading Show less
Caitlin McGarry

Caitlin McGarry is the news editor at Protocol.

Latest Stories
Bulletins