Yes, you can short a startup

With synthetic derivatives, hedge funds can bet against a startup’s price and VCs can de-risk an aging portfolio.

Man stepping on bitcoin with down stock arrow behind him

Th long-sought idea of shorting startups may be coming to fruition.

Illustration: iStock/Getty Images Plus; Protocol

Startup valuations have shot sky-high in recent years. Now they’re taking a breather — but there hasn’t been a way to bet on startups getting less valuable the way you can with publicly traded companies.

That’s because shorting a company typically requires borrowing the stock, selling it, then buying it back at a lower price. That’s almost impossible to do, as private companies can often block sales.

In the current down market for tech, the long-sought idea of shorting startups — a safe-seeming bet, since most startups fail — may be coming to fruition. Companies are offering synthetic derivatives and options so investors can take the equivalent of a short position.

This isn’t about monetizing Silicon Valley schadenfreude, though. Solid financial reasons for wanting to short a startup range from public-market hedge funds hunting for alpha in private markets to VCs looking to hedge their own investments.

Synthetic derivatives trade in concert with an underlying asset’s value, even though they are not directly tied to that asset. Synthetics first grew popular in other parts of the investing world; though they got a black eye in the 2007-2009 financial crisis, they’ve made something of a comeback in recent years.

As Silicon Valley minted unicorn after unicorn, synthetics that let investors take long positions in startups without actually investing were sought-after alternatives for those shut out of hot deals. But providers of startup synthetics say the interest has strongly tilted to the short side recently.

Selling interest increased to 80% of open order interest at Caplight, while the buy side has dropped to 20%, according to Javier Avalos, CEO of the private-market derivatives marketplace. It was previously fairly even or a 60/40 split, he said. “We basically saw the demand side of the Caplight marketplace go away for the past few months,” he said.

Caplight co-founders Javier Avalos and Justin Moore Javier Avalos and Justin Moore co-founded Caplight, a private-market derivatives marketplace.Photo: Caplight

Family offices, private equity, sovereign wealth and hedge funds previously took the long side of these bets, but many have dropped out recently, said Natalie Hwang, founder at Apeira Capital, which has a long and short investing strategy in private companies.

The short interest, meanwhile, is still there, typically from hedge funds or public-market investors. Hwang calls it an opportunity to “capture negative value,” either to defend a portfolio or take advantage of volatility.

The trade is risky — and involves complex investing strategies, and collateral is required. But this trade is being done largely by sophisticated institutional investors, Avalos said.

The startup-synthetics sector has gone through several iterations. Two previous attempts at this were shut down by the SEC. In 2015, Sand Hill Exchange settled with the SEC for offering illegal derivatives to retail investors. And in 2016, Equidate, now Forge Global, settled SEC charges and agreed to shut down a service offering unregistered swaps on pre-IPO startups to provide liquidity for private company employees.

Avalos said Caplight, which has a broker-dealer license, is different because it offers options, which are regulated differently than swaps, and because the options are offered only as private placements between institutional investors, typically with at least $100 million of assets.

Natalie Hwang Apeira Capital founder Natalie Hwang.Photo: Apeira Capital

Companies whose names are involved in the trades are not affected because their shares are not touched and the information rights and governance rights are not affected, Avalos said.

Most of the investors now seeking to short startup stock are investors or shareholders who already have a sizable position in a company and don’t want to sell it, Avalos said. They see these derivatives as a hedge.

Venture firms are among the groups doing this, taking some money off the table without having to actually sell a portion of their stake. This could be a growing strategy, especially for firms sitting on a large, aging stake in a company.

Meanwhile, the companies generating most of the short interest are well-known private companies worth $10 billion or more that have a relatively strong amount of liquidity, often where investors are sitting on large gains, Avalos said. On the buy side, investors are often looking for earlier-stage companies worth $1 billion or more, he said.

While the buy side has collapsed, some investors are starting to come back and place orders on certain targeted names that they’re interested in, Avalos said.

He doesn’t expect the broader startup market to really take off until the prospects of IPOs return. In the meantime, options provide trading strategies that will bring in new investors who aren’t necessarily betting on the company’s long-term prospects.

“The really cool part about introducing optionality like call and put options into this market is it gives you the opportunity to now invest without just needing the IPO window to be opened,” he said. “Because for really sophisticated institutional investors who are comfortable using options you can find really attractive option pricing, even if you're not necessarily making a bet on the fundamentals of those businesses.”

That could make the startup market more like the traditional public markets — with all the speculative good and bad that goes with it.


Binance’s co-founder could remake its crypto deal-making

Yi He is overseeing a $7.5 billion portfolio, with more investments to come, making her one of the most powerful investors in the industry.

Binance co-founder Yi He will oversee $7.5 billion in assets.

Photo: Binance

Binance co-founder Yi He isn’t as well known as the crypto giant’s colorful and controversial CEO, Changpeng “CZ” Zhao.

That could soon change. The 35-year-old executive is taking on a new, higher-profile role at the world’s largest crypto exchange as head of Binance Labs, the company’s venture capital arm. With $7.5 billion in assets to oversee, that instantly makes her one of the most powerful VC investors in crypto.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Sponsored Content

How cybercrime is going small time

Blockbuster hacks are no longer the norm – causing problems for companies trying to track down small-scale crime

Cybercrime is often thought of on a relatively large scale. Massive breaches lead to painful financial losses, bankrupting companies and causing untold embarrassment, splashed across the front pages of news websites worldwide. That’s unsurprising: cyber events typically cost businesses around $200,000, according to cybersecurity firm the Cyentia Institute. One in 10 of those victims suffer losses of more than $20 million, with some reaching $100 million or more.

That’s big money – but there’s plenty of loot out there for cybercriminals willing to aim lower. In 2021, the Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) received 847,376 complaints – reports by cybercrime victims – totaling losses of $6.9 billion. Averaged out, each victim lost $8,143.

Keep Reading Show less
Chris Stokel-Walker

Chris Stokel-Walker is a freelance technology and culture journalist and author of "YouTubers: How YouTube Shook Up TV and Created a New Generation of Stars." His work has been published in The New York Times, The Guardian and Wired.


Trump ordered social media visa screening. Biden's defending it.

The Knight First Amendment Institute just lost a battle to force the Biden administration to provide a report on the collection of social media handles from millions of visa applicants every year.

Visa applicants have to give up any of their social media handles from the past five years.

Photo: belterz/Getty Images

Would you feel comfortable if a U.S. immigration official reviewed all that you post on Facebook, Reddit, Snapchat, Twitter or even YouTube? Would it change what you decide to post or whom you talk to online? Perhaps you’ve said something critical of the U.S. government. Perhaps you’ve jokingly threatened to whack someone.

If you’ve applied for a U.S. visa, there’s a chance your online missives have been subjected to this kind of scrutiny, all in the name of keeping America safe. But three years after the Trump administration ordered enhanced vetting of visa applications, the Biden White House has not only continued the program, but is defending it — despite refusing to say if it’s had any impact.

Keep Reading Show less
Anna Kramer

Anna Kramer is a reporter at Protocol (Twitter: @ anna_c_kramer, email:, where she writes about labor and workplace issues. Prior to joining the team, she covered tech and small business for the San Francisco Chronicle and privacy for Bloomberg Law. She is a recent graduate of Brown University, where she studied International Relations and Arabic and wrote her senior thesis about surveillance tools and technological development in the Middle East.


The US plans to block sales of older chipmaking tech to China

The Biden administration will attempt to roll back China’s chipmaking abilities by blocking tools that make a widely used type of transistor other chipmakers have employed for years.

By using a specific, fundamental building block of chip design as the basis for the overall policy, the White House hopes to both tighten existing controls and avoid the pitfalls around trying to block a generation of manufacturing technology.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

The Biden administration has for several months been working to tighten its grip on U.S. exports of technology that China needs to make advanced chips, with the goals of both hurting China’s current manufacturing ability and also blocking its future access to next-generation capabilities.

According to two people familiar with the administration’s plans, President Joe Biden’s approach is based around choking off access to the tools, software and support mechanisms necessary to manufacture a specific type of technology that is one of the fundamental building blocks of modern microchips: the transistor.

Keep Reading Show less
Max A. Cherney

Max A. Cherney is a senior reporter at Protocol covering the semiconductor industry. He has worked for Barron's magazine as a Technology Reporter, and its sister site MarketWatch. He is based in San Francisco.


Netflix Games had its best month yet. Here's what's next.

A closer look at the company’s nascent gaming initiative suggests big plans that could involve cloud gaming and more.

Netflix’s acquisitions in the gaming space, and clues found in a number of job listings, suggest it has big plans.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Netflix’s foray into gaming is dead on arrival — at least according to the latest headlines about the company’s first few mobile games.

“Less than 1 percent of Netflix’s subscribers are playing its games,” declared Engadget recently. The article was referencing data from app analytics company Apptopia, which estimated that on any given day, only around 1.7 million people were playing Netflix’s mobile games on average.

Keep Reading Show less
Janko Roettgers

Janko Roettgers (@jank0) is a senior reporter at Protocol, reporting on the shifting power dynamics between tech, media, and entertainment, including the impact of new technologies. Previously, Janko was Variety's first-ever technology writer in San Francisco, where he covered big tech and emerging technologies. He has reported for Gigaom, Frankfurter Rundschau, Berliner Zeitung, and ORF, among others. He has written three books on consumer cord-cutting and online music and co-edited an anthology on internet subcultures. He lives with his family in Oakland.

Latest Stories