Fintech

Bad bets on 'safe' tokens are fueling the crypto crash

Staked ether is the latest token to cause a liquidity crisis in the crypto market.

A piggy bank with money going in and out

The stETH token was supposed to be equal in value to ether. But that peg started to erode.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Three Arrows Capital, one of the biggest crypto hedge funds, is facing questions about its solvency amid a broader market meltdown.

The latest challenge involves staked ether, or stETH, a token on the Lido Finance network. The episode is the latest example of complex crypto derivatives once considered relatively safe — bets that have turned out quite differently in a broad crypto downturn. A dive into the mechanics of staked ether reveals how things can go wrong so quickly in crypto markets.

What’s at stake

Staking is a common concept in DeFi — essentially pledging a token and tying it up with smart contracts so it can’t be spent or sold, usually in exchange for earning an interest-like yield. It’s become a big part of Ethereum’s upcoming move to proof of stake, known as the Merge. Part of that involves letting investors stake ether to earn rewards on the new Beacon Chain.

Staking on the new chain locks up an investor’s ether until the Merge is complete. It also requires 32 ETH, or nearly $40,000 at recent prices, to participate. Lido created stETH to let smaller investors get in on staking rewards without the 32 ETH minimum, which in theory creates a more liquid market — it also lets them reinvest that stETH, which is otherwise locked up in so-called “liquid staking.”

Some DeFi investors have taken this risk to another level by engaging in a recursive trade by depositing ETH, getting stETH, then depositing stETH as collateral on a lending protocol such as Aave in order to borrow more ETH, and then go back to Lido to get more stETH.

This stETH token has become popular in DeFi, with the protocol grabbing 32% of all the ether staked on the Beacon Chain. And like UST, the stablecoin of the Terra network, it was until recently considered a relatively common and less risky trade in the risky world of crypto investing. In stETH’s case, this was due to the popularity of ether as the second-largest token and the widely expected finality of Ethereum’s Merge coming this year.

Investors just had to believe that the Merge would happen soon, and that in the meantime they could trade back out to ETH if they needed to. But the Merge now looks like it may happen later than expected because of technical challenges, another development that may have spooked investors in addition to the general market downturn.

Like UST, stETH also presented a liquidity problem once investors started to run for the exits, because unlike some other forms of crypto staking, the underlying ether tokens can’t be unlocked. And like UST, much of its liquidity was on Curve, a decentralized exchange focusing on liquidity between stablecoins and other similar coins with little slippage in trading.

The stETH token was supposed to be equal in value to ether. But that peg started to erode during the Terra collapse and was lately down about 6%. With investors looking for liquidity, selling pressure on stETH has increased.

That has also placed pressure on the Curve liquidity pool where stETH is traded. Typically such a pool would show a 50/50 split for stable assets, in this case a balance between stETH and ETH. Instead, more than 80% of the ETH/stETH pool is now stETH, indicating that investors are unloading stETH.

Enough arrows in the quiver?

Three Arrows Capital, which has invested in Avalanche, BlockFi and Polkadot and had $10 billion in assets in March per crypto analytics firm Nansen, was liquidated by top lending firms for at least $400 million, according to The Block, throwing its solvency into question.

One of the firm’s holdings was staked ether. Three Arrows withdrew more than 80,000 stETH from decentralized lending service Aave. It then traded 38,900 of stETH for ether, at more than a 5% discount to the cost of ether, according to Nansen.

Three Arrows co-founder Zhu Su tweeted a cryptic message Tuesday about trying to resolve problems. “We are in the process of communicating with relevant parties and fully committed to working this out,” he wrote.

The firm, also known as 3AC, has faced several challenges in recent weeks, including the Terra crisis. 3AC bought UST in an effort to prop up the network, which ultimately collapsed. The firm did not respond to a request for comment.

Celsius has also faced a liquidity crunch. The lending company announced on Sunday night that it had stopped all withdrawals, swaps and transfers. It is now reportedly seeking financial support and a possible restructuring.

The staked ether issue is Celsius’ latest challenge. Celsius had offered staking of various tokens for its customers, paying 6-8% on ether. It’s not clear what portion of its customers’ ether was in stETH, but Celsius itself had at least 409,000 stETH, worth roughly $463 million, in its wallets. With the imbalance in the Curve stETH pool noted above, unwinding that position could be difficult.

Alameda Research, the crypto trading firm founded by FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried, also reportedly recently sold 50,615 stETH, according to Coindesk.
Climate

Sealed finds a market in home decarbonization

Sealed offers homeowners the chance to save money and help protect the planet.

Sealed is convincing homeowners to look at their HVAC systems and insulation in order to save energy and money.

Photo: Gabe Souza/Portland Portland Press Herald via Getty Images

Shiny silver panels hug the walls of Andy Frank’s attic; they vaguely remind me of a child’s robot Halloween costume. A sticky-looking foam lines both the gaps in the attic’s floorboards and the roof, plugging up holes where squirrels could have once taken shelter.

The space is positively sweat-inducing, even for the mere minute I have my head poking above the trapdoor.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).

Now that most organizations are returning to the office, there are varying extremes – some leaders demand that employees return to the office, with some employees revolting and some rejoicing to be together again. On the other hand, some companies have closed physical offices and made remote work permanent; creating a sigh of relief for some employees and creating frustration for others.

Most of us are somewhere in between, trying our best to take a measured approach at building the right hybrid strategy tailored to company culture. Some seemingly have begun to crack the code, while the majority are grappling with the when, how, why, and who of this new hybrid work reality.

Keep Reading Show less
Nathan Coutinho

Nathan Coutinho leads Logitech's global conferencing business strategy and analyst relations. A Swiss company focused on innovation and quality, Logitech designs products and experiences that have an everyday place in people's lives.Coutinho leads strategy and execution of Logitech's video conferencing solutions, from personal solutions to highly-scalable conference rooms.Coutinho has more than 25 years of experience in the IT industry with various roles in executive leadership, consulting, engineering, marketing and technical sales.

Workplace

Experts say tech companies need to prepare for the next SCOTUS decision

HR experts said companies need to be proactive about protections for contraception, privacy and LGBTQ+ rights.

Experts say tech leaders need to start thinking about future Supreme Court rulings.

Photo: Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

Tech companies are still trying to prepare for a post-Roe world. But it might already be time to think about what the Supreme Court is planning next.

When the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade Friday, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in a concurring opinion that the court should also reconsider rulings protecting contraception and same-sex relationships, citing Griswold, Lawrence and Obergefell. If those decisions were ever overruled, it would have massive implications for everyone, but especially for employees living in states where same-sex marriage is at risk of becoming illegal without a federal shield.

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at llawrence@protocol.com.

Policy

What’s next for tech in a post-Roe world

From employee support to privacy concerns, tech companies play a critical role in what’s to come for abortion access in the U.S.

States banning abortion means that tech will play a critical role in what’s to come for abortion access in the U.S.

Photo: Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images

The end of Roe v. Wade has sent the world of tech scrambling. Many companies are now trying to quickly figure out how to protect workers in states where abortion will be banned, while also facing potential privacy and legal ramifications.


Here’s a look at tech companies’ roles and responses to the ruling. We will update this page as news and events change.

Keep Reading Show less
Alex Eichenstein

Alex Eichenstein (@alexeichenstein) is Protocol's social media editor. Previously, she managed social media and audience engagement efforts at the Center for Public Integrity. She earned an B.A. in English, women and gender studies and political science from the University of Delaware. She lives in Washington, D.C.

Fintech

You’re thinking about Apple Pay Later all wrong

Apple’s “buy now, pay later” product has a distinctly different distribution strategy that means it doesn’t directly threaten Affirm, Klarna and Afterpay.

Apple Pay Later emerges as a distinctly different product than what Klarna and Affirm offer.

Image: Apple; Protocol

Apple’s entry into the “buy now, pay later” market was one of its worst-kept secrets: Analysts had been predicting the company’s rollout of a pay-later service as early as 2020. The most common read on the move was predictable: Apple was here to smash the competition. The company has a track record of jumping into new sectors late and still managing to come out on top — the iPod came out when there were tons of MP3 players on the market.

But some analysts have a starkly different view. When you look at it under the hood, Apple Pay Later emerges as a distinctly different product than what Klarna and Affirm offer, they say — and one that isn’t much of a market predator.

Keep Reading Show less
Veronica Irwin

Veronica Irwin (@vronirwin) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol covering fintech. Previously she was at the San Francisco Examiner, covering tech from a hyper-local angle. Before that, her byline was featured in SF Weekly, The Nation, Techworker, Ms. Magazine and The Frisc.

Latest Stories
Bulletins