Protocol | Fintech

Consumers can buy stocks everywhere. Is that a good thing?

Amid a bull market, many financial apps have added stock-trading features in hopes of drawing in new investors.

Square's Cash App is among many banking and payments apps that have added investing features.​

Square's Cash App is among many banking and payments apps that have added investing features.

Photo: Tech Daily/Unsplash

Retail investing is taking off in the U.S., with daily trading volume in January double what it was a year ago and much of the increase attributable to individual investors.

It's more than just the Robinhood effect: A number of companies are making it easy to tack on investing alongside other financial services, and a broader range of apps now feature stock trading as a result.

The spread of stock trading in apps originally designed for borrowing, saving or paying has big implications. It could lure more people back into the stock market: The percentage of households owning stocks dropped after the dot-com bust and the 2008 financial crisis, and has only recently started to recover. That, in turn, has meant that the stock market's gains in recent years have only benefited some families.

But just adding a "buy stocks" button to an app won't reverse years of worsening income inequality by itself. Easy access to the markets could hurt some novice traders if apps lure them into risky, rapid-fire trading.

For startups looking to challenge the finance establishment, one-stop shopping is another way to attract customers and keep them once they're there with more options to save or invest.

Square's Cash App lets people get paid back by a friend for beers, and then turn around and plow it into shares of BUD. People who use Revolut or MoneyLion for banking can move money from savings into investing. Stash even offers a Stock-Back Card that pays customers for shopping with fractional shares of the retailers they frequent. Several apps promise free stock, often in familiar brand names, for making your first trade.

Online brokers have often marketed themselves to people who are already trading. Apps where trading is an add-on are more often trying to attract customers who are new to the markets.

"There's a big paradigm shift from a brokerage mentality to an embedded finance mentality," said Bob Cortright, CEO of DriveWealth, which has 90 partners with close to 10 million accounts, including Revolut, MoneyLion and Square.

Time for investing

There are arguments for getting consumers started with investing sooner. Starting to invest while people are young can compound into much larger savings in the future. Especially if consumers invest for the long term — and avoid cycling in and out of stocks in search of short-term profits — these relatively small investments can turn into much larger retirement savings over time.

Younger Americans targeted by many of these apps generally invest less, said Brian Graham, a partner at Klaros Group. That's in part because they have less money to save: Wages stagnated after the 2007-2008 financial crisis and student loan debt has skyrocketed.

"We see this whole divide and accessibility problem," said Yoshi Yokokawa, CEO of Alpaca, which provides trading services for financial apps.

It's not clear how many users of these apps are new to investing. More than 2.5 million customers have bought stocks using the Cash App in the 10 months since launch, Square said in its third-quarter 2020 earnings report. Many of those users originally came to the app for peer-to-peer payments. Square now includes dollar-cost averaging options to address market volatility.

With features such as gamification, hyper-targeted customer segmentation and low or no trading fees, embedded investing in financial apps should draw more first-time investors, but there is a danger if apps focus on short-term trading, not longer-term investing, Klaros' Graham said.

"It'll expose people to financial services in a more integrated way. It has enormous potential to do good. It also has enormous potential to do bad," he said.

"A very small portion of American society actually invests in assets. Our customer base has historically been left out," said Dee Choubey, CEO of MoneyLion, whose customers mostly make between $50,000 and $100,000 a year. "Our mission is to create financial access."

Moving money

Smashing banking and brokerage services together isn't a new idea. Following passage of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act in 1999, brokers and banks literally merged. Citigroup emerged from the $70 billion combination of Travelers, Salomon Smith Barney and Citibank, while E-Trade bought Telebanc for $1.8 billion. At the same time, the dot-com boom lured retail investors into the market to trade online.

What's different now is that you don't need billion-dollar deals to put banking and brokerage services together. All you need is an API that can route trades from an app to the market. Companies such as DriveWealth, Alpaca and Parkside offer backend trading services for a variety of customers.

Now, there's renewed retail interest in investing with a bull market that roared back after the pandemic crash last year, and low interest rates often don't provide meaningful savings. All-in-one financial apps make moving cash and buying stocks as easy as ordering an Uber — not something that requires expertise or even downloading a separate app.

Some companies offer education for new investors. MoneyLion asks for a customer's financial goals and provides a caution flag if they seek to invest in something that is outside of their risk profile. Square has a digital "My First Stock" slideshow complete with sharks and crocodiles to illustrate risk. Robinhood bought MarketSnacks, a financial media company, in 2019, and now calls it Robinhood Snacks.

Some, following Robinhood's lead, offer commission-free trading, while others like MoneyLion offer managed baskets of stocks for a fee. "It's philosophically different than stock trading apps out there," MoneyLion's Choubey said. "Our customers start out with $1,000 to $10,000 of investable assets. To start off you really should probably not be buying a fraction of a single stock of GameStop. You really should start in a managed way with your goals."

Others use card rewards to get consumers interested in stocks. Stash customers have earned about 25 million stock rewards via the Stock-Back Card, the company says. And 35% of customers who received a stock through the card later invested their own cash in that company. Stash spokeswoman Vera Hanson calls the program a "gateway for customers to explore and discover new investments."

But the common theme is that placing stock-purchasing next to other financial products such as banking or lending is a way to drive increasing interest in investing.

"That consumer behavior is tied to the investment behavior," Cortright said. "It's a way to get young people thinking about investing for the long haul. Sometimes they're not using their own money. It's a reward back for behavior. If every time there's a transaction you generate a lot of financial literacy, powerful things can come out of that over time."

Protocol | Fintech

How European fintech startup N26 is preparing for U.S. regulations

"There's a lot more scrutiny being placed on fintech. We are definitely mindful of it."

In an interview with Protocol, Stephanie Balint, N26's U.S. general manager, discussed the company's approach to regulations in the U.S.

Photo: N26

N26's monster $900 million funding round announced Monday underlined the German startup's momentum in the digital banking market.

Stephanie Balint, N26's U.S. general manager, said the funding will be used for expansion and also to improve "our core offering to make this the most reliable bank that our customers can trust," she told Protocol.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Signal at (510)731-8429.

The way we work has fundamentally changed. COVID-19 upended business dealings and office work processes, putting into hyperdrive a move towards digital collaboration platforms that allow teams to streamline processes and communicate from anywhere. According to the International Data Corporation, the revenue for worldwide collaboration applications increased 32.9 percent from 2019 to 2020, reaching $22.6 billion; it's expected to become a $50.7 billion industry by 2025.

"While consumers and early adopter businesses had widely embraced collaborative applications prior to the pandemic, the market saw five years' worth of new users in the first six months of 2020," said Wayne Kurtzman, research director of social and collaboration at IDC. "This has cemented collaboration, at least to some extent, for every business, large and small."

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Silver

Kate Silver is an award-winning reporter and editor with 15-plus years of journalism experience. Based in Chicago, she specializes in feature and business reporting. Kate's reporting has appeared in the Washington Post, The Chicago Tribune, The Atlantic's CityLab, Atlas Obscura, The Telegraph and many other outlets.

Apple’s new MacBooks are the future — and the past

After years of reinventing the wheel, Apple's back to just building really good ones.

Apple brought back the ports.

Photo: Apple

The 2015 Pro was, by most accounts, one of the best laptops Apple ever made. It was fast and functional, and it had a great screen, a MagSafe charger, plenty of ports, a great keyboard and solid battery life. If you walked around practically any office in Silicon Valley, you'd see Pros everywhere.

Many of those users have been holding on to their increasingly old and dusty 2015 Pros, too, because right about when that computer came out was when Apple seemed to lose its way in the laptop market. It released the 12-inch MacBook, an incredibly thin and light computer that made a bunch of changes — a new keyboard and trackpad design chief among them — that eventually made their way around the rest of the MacBook lineup. Then came the Touch Bar, Apple's attempt to build an entirely new user interface into a laptop.

Keep Reading Show less
David Pierce

David Pierce ( @pierce) is Protocol's editorial director. Prior to joining Protocol, he was a columnist at The Wall Street Journal, a senior writer with Wired, and deputy editor at The Verge. He owns all the phones.

Protocol spoke to founders and tech execs who've embraced async and have tips on how to get started.

Image: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Imagine a company where there are no meetings — just time for deep, focused work punctuated by short conversations on Slack and project updates on Trello.

Now imagine a company where the no-meeting ethos is so ingrained that it's possible to work there for 10 years without ever speaking face-to-face with a single coworker, and for your boss to not even recognize the sound of your voice.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma
Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol, where she writes about management, leadership and workplace issues in tech. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at mma@protocol.com.
Protocol | Workplace

#AppleToo activist says Apple fired her for deleting apps from her devices

Janneke Parrish says she was dismissed after deleting Robinhood, Pokemon Go and Google Drive from her work devices during an investigation inside the company.

The Apple Too movement is trying to organize Apple workers into a collective movement.
Photo: Bloomberg via Getty

Unlike most other companies, Apple asks that its employees use their work phones like personal ones — and for five years, Apple program manager Janneke Parrish did as she was told. But last week, when Apple asked Parrish for her devices in an internal investigation, she was afraid Apple would see her personal and private information. She disobeyed orders and deleted apps like Robinhood, Pokemon Go and Google Drive. Then Apple fired her.

Keep Reading Show less
Anna Kramer

Anna Kramer is a reporter at Protocol (Twitter: @ anna_c_kramer, email: akramer@protocol.com), where she writes about labor and workplace issues. Prior to joining the team, she covered tech and small business for the San Francisco Chronicle and privacy for Bloomberg Law. She is a recent graduate of Brown University, where she studied International Relations and Arabic and wrote her senior thesis about surveillance tools and technological development in the Middle East.

Latest Stories