The Merge is Ethereum’s insurance against government control

The cost of running the network will drop by a factor of 10, which will have big impacts on Ethereum and the rest of the industry.

Ethereum symbol

The Merge, if it goes off smoothly, could do much to bolster Ethereum’s position as the home to a host of cryptocurrencies and the largest smart contract network.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Ethereum is expecting to make its biggest change ever this month, transforming how transactions are processed and secured on the blockchain. But the Merge, as the switch from proof of work to proof of stake is known, is more than just technical. It’s expected to bring major changes to the security and economics of the network, and ultimately its structure of control.

The most visible and popular aspect of the upgrade is reducing Ethereum’s environmental impact, with the Merge cutting energy consumption by about 99%. But proof of stake, advocates believe, will also make the network more resistant to a hostile takeover or government interference.

It’s far from the only change coming to Ethereum, which is facing increasing competition from other blockchains. Major improvements to increase transaction speed and lower costs are arriving later. But the Merge, if it goes off smoothly, could do much to bolster Ethereum’s position as the home to a host of cryptocurrencies including its native ether and the largest smart contract network.

One major change will be increased security, which should bring more confidence in Ethereum, developers say. The move to proof of stake for verifying transactions will make it much harder for anyone to make a 51% attack, which is a way hostile parties try to take over a network and steal tokens by cornering its processing power, according to Ben Edgington, ConsenSys product lead for Teku and a core developer involved in the Merge.

In Ethereum’s new proof of stake model, if anyone tries such an attack, the network can automatically detect it and slash their stake of tokens. “Under proof of stake, basically, there's no way to succeed — once you revert the chain, it will slash your stake and you lose all of your ether,” Edgington said. That kind of defense is hard to do in proof of work, he said.

Control of the network won’t change with the Merge. Decisions about network rules are still determined by all the nodes in the network, through means such as Ethereum Improvement Proposals for voting. And core developers who have a large influence in the development have regular public meetings to discuss potential changes.

A lot at stake

However, the process of running the network and processing transactions is changing dramatically, as are the people involved. Instead of miners, the new network will have stakers as validators for transactions. Proof of work mining requires hardware and large amounts of power and is therefore a scale game, and the largest miners typically win, pushing small or individual miners out.

Proof of stake, however, doesn’t require hardware, just holdings of ether. While there’s a minimum contribution of 32 ether, worth about $50,000 at present, to become a validator, individuals can contribute ether to a pool to join up. That should open up the network to a much wider range of people to operate it, Edgington said. The goal is to make Ethereum more “censorship”-resistant — meaning less subject to the actions of particular governments.

“If you've got a lot of operators in a single jurisdiction, then you become vulnerable to regulatory capture,” Edgington said. “And so by having the network so that no one jurisdiction is dominant or can single-handedly take down the network, then everything is much more robust.”

Proof of stake’s transaction model makes the network more distributed compared to proof of work’s miners, who typically consolidate and centralize in fewer places, he said.

“If 80% of nodes are in the U.S., and OFAC says, ‘You can't do this,’ that means they have to conform to those rules,” Edgington said. “And that forces those rules on to the rest of the world. And so we avoid that by making sure that we have very broad geopolitical dispersion of the nodes.”

Money matters

The other large change in Ethereum is the economics of the network. Beyond price action as traders bet on the pros and cons of the Merge, the move to proof of stake is expected to have a deflationary effect on ether, or ETH. Last year, Ethereum passed EIP-1559, a measure which burns, or destroys, some of the ETH paid to process every transaction. That has had some deflationary effect as it reduces the supply of tokens. But the Merge will do more.

Under the current proof of work system, miners are paid 2 ETH per block (about $4,000) partly to cover the cost of hardware and electricity. Those 2 ETH are newly created and hence inflationary. But under the new proof of stake system, the cost to pay validators goes down by a factor of 10 for each block, because the cost for validators to participate is minimal.

In addition to less inflation, there is expected to be less selling pressure on ether. Miners typically need to sell some of their ether to pay for hardware and electricity. But validators don’t have electricity or hardware costs and could end up just staking their rewards.

As a result of both factors, many see deflation coming for ether. “We expect the economic dynamics to be more favorable under the proof of stake,” Edgington said.

These economic changes could also have an impact on many other trading pairs that use ether across the crypto industry.

Chain of tools

The Merge could also have an effect on Ethereum’s competition with other upstart blockchains, many of which already use proof of stake. These top-level blockchains are known as Layer 1 chains, while blockchains built on top of them are known as Layer 2. Both categories could be affected.

“This removes one of the biggest differentiators between Ethereum and many of the newer chains — that most of them are already on proof of stake systems,” said Steven Goldfeder, CEO at Offchain Labs, which works on Arbitrum, an Ethereum-based Layer 2 network, noting that Ethereum’s strength is its long-tested technology and its robust community.

The Merge shouldn’t hurt newer Layer 1 blockchains much in the short term, said Urvashi Barooah, a crypto investor at Redpoint Ventures. “Many of these alt Layer 1s have vibrant communities and DApp ecosystems which won't move away overnight,” she said.

However, if Ethereum rolls out further improvements to speed and cost next year, it could increase Ethereum’s sway over other networks, Barooah said.

The Merge will also have an impact on the Layer 2 blockchains that run on top of Ethereum. The consensus mechanism for Ethereum Layer 2 blockchains will stay the same, meaning no big disruptions. But if the Merge goes well, it will bring more confidence to developers and others that want to use Ethereum or Layer 2s on top of it. “Many will have renewed confidence in Ethereum not only being the winner today, but being the winning smart contract platform for quite a long time,” Goldfeder said.

The Merge will also set the stage for coming changes that will increase transaction speed and lower costs. One upcoming proposal, EIP-4844, would significantly lower costs, particularly for roll-ups, a technique for settling transactions off-chain and later consolidating them.

“I personally think once the Merge is complete, there'll be a lot more focus turned towards data sharding and the proposals to significantly reduce the cost for blocks,” Goldfeder said.

About 70% of the cost of an Arbitrum transaction comes from data expenses. Upcoming changes could lower those costs by “an order of magnitude,” he said.

There’s a consensus that Ethereum’s future will depend on Layer 2s to handle transactions, so lower costs on Layer 2s ultimately benefit Ethereum.

First, though, Ethereum has to finish the Merge. Software clients will need to be updated Tuesday, setting a clock for the changeover. Any hitches in the transition could spook developers and Ethereum holders, but the core group working on the Merge seems confident they can pull it off. And though the Merge is a big milestone, it’s only one of many changes to come as crypto keeps evolving.


This carbon capture startup wants to clean up the worst polluters

The founder and CEO of point-source carbon capture company Carbon Clean discusses what the startup has learned, the future of carbon capture technology, as well as the role of companies like his in battling the climate crisis.

Carbon Clean CEO Aniruddha Sharma told Protocol that fossil fuels are necessary, at least in the near term, to lift the living standards of those who don’t have access to cars and electricity.

Photo: Carbon Clean

Carbon capture and storage has taken on increasing importance as companies with stubborn emissions look for new ways to meet their net zero goals. For hard-to-abate industries like cement and steel production, it’s one of the few options that exist to help them get there.

Yet it’s proven incredibly challenging to scale the technology, which captures carbon pollution at the source. U.K.-based company Carbon Clean is leading the charge to bring down costs. This year, it raised a $150 million series C round, which the startup said is the largest-ever funding round for a point-source carbon capture company.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma

Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol covering climate. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

Why companies cut staff after raising millions

Are tech firms blowing millions in funding just weeks after getting it? Experts say it's more complicated than that.

Bolt, Trade Republic, HomeLight, and Stord all drew attention from funding announcements that happened just weeks or days before layoffs.

Photo: Pulp Photography/Getty Images

Fintech startup Bolt was one of the first tech companies to slash jobs, cutting 250 employees, or a third of its staff, in May. For some workers, the pain of layoffs was a shock not only because they were the first, but also because the cuts came just four months after Bolt had announced a $355 million series E funding round and achieved a peak valuation of $11 billion.

“Bolt employees were blind sided because the CEO was saying just weeks ago how everything is fine,” an anonymous user wrote on the message board Blind. “It has been an extremely rough day for 1/3 of Bolt employees,” another user posted. “Sadly, I was one of them who was let go after getting a pay-raise just a couple of weeks ago.”

Keep Reading Show less
Nat Rubio-Licht

Nat Rubio-Licht is a Los Angeles-based news writer at Protocol. They graduated from Syracuse University with a degree in newspaper and online journalism in May 2020. Prior to joining the team, they worked at the Los Angeles Business Journal as a technology and aerospace reporter.


The fight to define the carbon offset market's future

The world’s largest carbon offset issuer is fighting a voluntary effort to standardize the industry. And the fate of the climate could hang in the balance.

It has become increasingly clear that scaling the credit market will first require clear standards and transparency.

Kevin Frayer/Getty Images

There’s a major fight brewing over what kind of standards will govern the carbon offset market.

A group of independent experts looking to clean up the market’s checkered record and the biggest carbon credit issuer on the voluntary market is trying to influence efforts to define what counts as a quality credit. The outcome could make or break an industry increasingly central to tech companies meeting their net zero goals.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (


White House AI Bill of Rights lacks specific guidance for AI rules

The document unveiled today by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy is long on tech guidance, but short on restrictions for AI.

While the document provides extensive suggestions for how to incorporate AI rights in technical design, it does not include any recommendations for restrictions on the use of controversial forms of AI.

Photo: Ana Lanza/Unsplash

It was a year in the making, but people eagerly anticipating the White House Bill of Rights for AI will have to continue waiting for concrete recommendations for future AI policy or restrictions.

Instead, the document unveiled today by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy is legally non-binding and intended to be used as a handbook and a “guide for society” that could someday inform government AI legislation or regulations.

Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights features a list of five guidelines for protecting people in relation to AI use:

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories