Fintech

Upstart has a new plan to sell Wall Street on its loans

The AI-powered lender will hold some loans on its balance sheet as it seeks partners for long-term capital.

Upstart office

Despite the current struggles, Upstart views the marketplace model as the best way to write to keep its loan business growing.

Photo: Upstart

After a revenue drop its CEO called “unacceptable,” the leadership at fintech lender Upstart is making a bet on the strength of its ability to underwrite loans with AI.

The San Mateo company is planning to leave some loans on its balance sheet that investors do not want to buy, as concerns about the economy shift Wall Street away from backing riskier consumer debt. Rather than pull back on its lending in response, the company said it will hold some loans as it seeks longer-term capital partners.

"Historically, as soon as there is a whiff of macro risk, credit markets shut down altogether," CFO Sanjay Datta told Protocol. "Our holy grail has always been to convince markets that you can use technology to react more quickly and more precisely to macro risk, and navigate economic cycles, without shutting down."

Upstart is among a long list of fintechs working to answer the doubts of investors as consumer sentiment declines and the economy shifts from the low-interest, stimulus-boosted environment that proved fertile ground for the industry in 2021.

But the company says it is not becoming a balance-sheet lender and has no plans to pursue a banking charter, as other lenders have: It is making a temporary change in response to the market.

Quick and abrupt

Founded in 2012 by former Google executives, Upstart uses an algorithm to identify worthy borrowers overlooked by traditional creditors. As a marketplace lender, it gets most of its revenue from fees for matching financial institutions with borrowers. Personal loans are its main business, but the company has expanded into auto and small-business lending.

Business was good last year. Upstart originated nearly $12 billion in loans and its share price soared from $20 at its December 2020 IPO to $400 in October.

Those good times didn’t last. The firm’s share price has fallen nearly 80% this year, as Wall Street in general has soured on fintech stocks.

Upstart reported $228 million in second-quarter revenue, down 26% from the first three months of the year. That was in line with preliminary earnings the company published in July. But it projects further revenue declines in the third quarter, to $170 million.

Those declines are "obviously disappointing and unacceptable to us," CEO Dave Girouard said on Upstart’s Aug. 8 earnings call.

Upstart facilitated $3.3 billion in loans during the quarter, compared to $4.5 billion in the first. "Lenders and institutional credit investors reacted more quickly and abruptly than we anticipated" to economic uncertainty, Girouard said.

The company said it would like to find more long-term deals from institutions willing to back its loans, rather than rely on one-off purchases. Girouard made Upstart’s case in a blog post accompanying earnings, stating that Upstart’s lending systems have been better at identifying risks than traditional credit scores and its loans have consistently delivered returns to investors.

But finding more partners will take time, so Upstart will for now rely on about $800 million on its balance sheet to cover funding gaps between borrowers and investors.

Wall Street analysts already reacted negatively when Upstart revealed it was holding some loans on its balance sheet at the start of the year — prompting the company to reverse course and sell off the loans. Holding loans introduces risks that investors in Upstart’s marketplace lending model did not previously have to worry about, said Andrew Boone, a managing director at investment firm JMP Securities.

JMP has a neutral assessment of Upstart, noting in its second-quarter report that “the company continues to have significant runway ahead as it addresses more credit products; however, we await greater stability in its core business before we become more positive.”

Upstart acknowledged to analysts that it is now going back on what it said publicly by putting some loans on its balance sheet. Datta said the firm’s thinking has evolved along with the market.

“Now we can see very clearly that this is of use, it is an asset,” Datta told Protocol. “And we would be myopic to try navigating the current macro choppiness not using an $800 million unrestricted cash pile, just because of some religious edict that we're not to touch it.”

Unchartered territory

Upstart has no plans to become a chartered bank itself, as its leaders made clear several times during the earnings call. That’s despite other marketplace lenders SoFi and LendingClub becoming chartered through acquisitions in recent years.

Charters bring higher regulatory costs, but they allow institutions to lend off of low-cost deposits. LendingClub CEO Scott Sanborn recently told analysts the firm was “leaning more towards the bank model, being conservative on credit and using our low cost deposit funding to hold more loans for investment and drive recurring revenue.”

Upstart sees a banking charter as a potential impediment to its focus on finding worthy borrowers overlooked because of their credit score.

Banks are “set up to be very robust and survive macro shocks,” Datta said. “But as a result, those entities tend to struggle with a mission of trying to provide capital to Americans who are either less affluent or, through a traditional lens, less credit-worthy.”

Despite the current struggles, it views the marketplace model as the best way to write to keep its loan business growing.

“We set up our mission to partner with banks,” Datta said, “because we want to leverage as much of the capital out there as possible.”

Along with planning changes to the funding of its loans, Upstart also recently indicated it planned to make adjustments to its AI-loan underwriting in response to the changing market. That led to the company’s request to have its no-action letter with the Consumer FInancial Protection Bureau terminated, because the agency said approving such changes would require a lengthy review.

Girouard was asked on the earnings call about working with the CFPB and how the change could affect its algorithms. He said the company uses state-of-the-art fairness testing for its lending models and expects to continue working with the regulator.

“We do continue to have open communication with CFPB and would expect to do so in the future as well,” he said. It’s one more way that Upstart is leaving itself open to change.

Policy

Steel decided World War II. Chips will decide whatever is next.

“Chip War: The Fight for the World’s Most Critical Technology” foreshadows the coming battle between nations over semiconductors.

“Chip War” outlines the nature of the coming battle over semiconductors, showing how the power to produce leading-edge chips fell into the hands of just five companies.

Image: Scribner; Protocol

“World War II was decided by steel and aluminum, and followed shortly thereafter by the Cold War, which was defined by atomic weapons,” Chris Miller, a professor at Tufts University’s Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, writes in the introduction to his latest book. So what’s next? According to Miller, the next era, including the rivalry between the U.S. and China, is all about computing power.

That tech rivalry and the story of how the chip industry got from four to 11.8 billion transistors are all part of Miller’s book, “Chip War: The Fight for the World’s Most Critical Technology,” which comes out Oct. 4. “Chip War” outlines the nature of the coming battle over semiconductors, showing how the power to produce leading-edge chips fell into the hands of just five companies: three from the U.S., one from Japan, and one from the Netherlands.

Keep Reading Show less
Hirsh Chitkara

Hirsh Chitkara ( @HirshChitkara) is a reporter at Protocol focused on the intersection of politics, technology and society. Before joining Protocol, he helped write a daily newsletter at Insider that covered all things Big Tech. He's based in New York and can be reached at hchitkara@protocol.com.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Policy

Musk’s texts reveal what tech’s most powerful people really want

From Jack Dorsey to Joe Rogan, Musk’s texts are chock-full of überpowerful people, bending a knee to Twitter’s once and (still maybe?) future king.

“Maybe Oprah would be interested in joining the Twitter board if my bid succeeds,” one text reads.

Photo illustration: Patrick Pleul/picture alliance via Getty Images; Protocol

Elon Musk’s text inbox is a rarefied space. It’s a place where tech’s wealthiest casually commit to spending billions of dollars with little more than a thumbs-up emoji and trade tips on how to rewrite the rules for how hundreds of millions of people around the world communicate.

Now, Musk’s ongoing legal battle with Twitter is giving the rest of us a fleeting glimpse into that world. The collection of Musk’s private texts that was made public this week is chock-full of tech power brokers. While the messages are meant to reveal something about Musk’s motivations — and they do — they also say a lot about how things get done and deals get made among some of the most powerful people in the world.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Fintech

Circle’s CEO: This is not the time to ‘go crazy’

Jeremy Allaire is leading the stablecoin powerhouse in a time of heightened regulation.

“It’s a complex environment. So every CEO and every board has to be a little bit cautious, because there’s a lot of uncertainty,” Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire told Protocol at Converge22.

Photo: Circle

Sitting solo on a San Francisco stage, Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire asked tennis superstar Serena Williams what it’s like to face “unrelenting skepticism.”

“What do you do when someone says you can’t do this?” Allaire asked the athlete turned VC, who was beaming into Circle’s Converge22 convention by video.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Enterprise

Is Salesforce still a growth company? Investors are skeptical

Salesforce is betting that customer data platform Genie and new Slack features can push the company to $50 billion in revenue by 2026. But investors are skeptical about the company’s ability to deliver.

Photo: Marlena Sloss/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Salesforce has long been enterprise tech’s golden child. The company said everything customers wanted to hear and did everything investors wanted to see: It produced robust, consistent growth from groundbreaking products combined with an aggressive M&A strategy and a cherished culture, all operating under the helm of a bombastic, but respected, CEO and team of well-coiffed executives.

Dreamforce is the embodiment of that success. Every year, alongside frustrating San Francisco residents, the over-the-top celebration serves as a battle cry to the enterprise software industry, reminding everyone that Marc Benioff’s mighty fiefdom is poised to expand even deeper into your corporate IT stack.

Keep Reading Show less
Joe Williams

Joe Williams is a writer-at-large at Protocol. He previously covered enterprise software for Protocol, Bloomberg and Business Insider. Joe can be reached at JoeWilliams@Protocol.com. To share information confidentially, he can also be contacted on a non-work device via Signal (+1-309-265-6120) or JPW53189@protonmail.com.

Latest Stories
Bulletins