Fintech

Western Union is about to turn 170. It still thinks it can win the fintech wave.

"We're not just a digital-only player or a retail-only player."

Western Union is about to turn 170. It still thinks it can win the fintech wave.

Western Union CFO Raj Agrawal

Western Union

Western Union is not one of the stars of the fintech revolution, but it is a trailblazer in financial technology.

A decade after it was formed in 1851, the company set up the first transcontinental telegraph cable. That made it possible to send telegrams and wire funds across the country and soon the world, creating a network of retail money transfer outlets in more than 200 countries.

Along the way, the company embedded itself in American popular culture, from singing telegrams to candy-grams to an improbable cameo in "Back to the Future II," when a Western Union man hand-delivered a 70-year-old letter to Marty McFly.

As it gets ready to mark its 170th anniversary, Western Union is one of the oldest players riding the fintech wave. But don't call it low tech or think of it as slow-moving around Chief Financial Officer Raj Agrawal. He said the company is speeding things up, whether that's expanding their digital business into more countries or testing out blockchain technology.

The Denver-based company still has more than 550,000 agent locations for money transfers in almost every country in the globe. But at a time when fintech startups are disrupting the way people move money, Western Union is focused increasingly on its digital business, wu.com, which now reaches 75 countries.

The company has taken hits from the pandemic. It posted a year-over-year dip in revenue in 2020 when global remittances took a plunge. But Western Union, which has a market cap of about $10 billion, has been viewed favorably on Wall Street: Its stock is up about 14% year-to-date.

In an interview with Protocol, Agrawal talked about Western Union's game plan in the fast-changing fintech market and why he thinks the company has key advantages over its much younger — if less profitable — rivals.

This interview has been edited for clarity and brevity.

Western Union is one of the early fintech companies, though it's probably known as a low-tech fintech company. How are you adapting to the fintech trend?

First of all, I have not actually heard the words "low-tech fintech" [laughs].

I just made it up.

My goal then is for you to never say that again [laughs].

That's the misconception of Western Union. In our original core traditional business, we're very high-tech. We move money in minutes around the world. It doesn't happen with a stagecoach. It doesn't happen because we're carrying bags of cash around the world.

We really are transferring information. That's the way we move money around the world and we actually do it better than traditional channels that have been available to move money. It's the technology that allows us to settle in 130 currencies globally. It's a really good competitive moat that we have that we've continued to build upon over the many years. We allow customers to transact with us in any way they want. They can go to a retail location, or they can go to our online site.

There has been an explosion in technologies related to payments and cross-border payments. What has been the most surprising to you?

What I see in the market, then is that there are many companies who are operating, it seems, forever at a loss. They're not sustainable business models. I'm not sure what their endgame is. We are aware of the competition that exists all around the world, but we believe that we have a better offering for consumers on a global basis.

Fintech is changing the way money moves overseas, especially in Asia and Africa. What is the future of Western Union's retail system?

We are absolutely evolving with the market needs. Everywhere in the world we can send money from a retail location. We're agnostic as to how consumers want to use us. If there's a need that you have one day to send money because you happen to be shopping at a Safeway, we want you to be able to do that. However, if the next time you want to send money you're going to use our app, no problem. We're not just a digital-only player and we're not just a retail-only player. We're omnichannel.

What fintech trends are most exciting for you?

The biggest thing for us is our almost 9 million consumers on wu.com: How do we extend the service offerings to them so we go even further beyond the remittance market? We're looking at launching a pilot later this year which is going to allow consumers to have more banking service offerings from Western Union. We're launching this pilot in a handful of markets in Europe.

So you're considering expanding into banking?

We already have a bank in Austria. We're going to be leveraging the bank and the bank license to provide more financial services to consumers. It could be a credit card. It could be a debit card. We obviously want the account relationship with the consumer.

We're going after a migrant customer who is using our services. They are comfortable with the Western Union brand. They're moving money to their loved ones already and we want to extend the relationship with them.

How do you view the rise of cryptocurrency?

There has been a lot of talk about cryptocurrency and blockchain technology. We haven't currently found a great use case for those things, but we're always evaluating new technologies. We settle in 130 currencies today with consumers all around the world. So for us, if there was a real demand for cryptocurrency from a consumer standpoint to start, we would absolutely be able to offer that. [But] it's not likely that consumers want to transact in cryptocurrency for a $200 or $300 transaction. It's just not what they're looking for. It's not even in their thoughts when they're thinking about sending money to their loved ones. That's sort of obvious.

We evaluated blockchain technology and we have done some specific testing there. We want to see if we get better foreign exchange rates. Can we save time? Is it more transparent for the consumer or for us? Can we move money around the world easier? The answer to all those thus far has been: no, no, no, no and no.

What is the fintech trend that worries you most?

The thing that we always think about is: Why can't we move faster? We have some great plans for the next three years. I would love for us to accomplish them in the next 12 months. We would love to have wu.com in 200 countries in the next 12 months. I don't want to wait three years to get there. The market as you know it is moving at a very fast pace, and we just want to keep doing everything we can to remove the internal roadblocks to being able to move fast.

Climate

A pro-China disinformation campaign is targeting rare earth miners

It’s uncommon for cyber criminals to target private industry. But a new operation has cast doubt on miners looking to gain a foothold in the West in an apparent attempt to protect China’s upper hand in a market that has become increasingly vital.

It is very uncommon for coordinated disinformation operations to target private industry, rather than governments or civil society, a cybersecurity expert says.

Photo: Goh Seng Chong/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Just when we thought the renewable energy supply chains couldn’t get more fraught, a sophisticated disinformation campaign has taken to social media to further complicate things.

Known as Dragonbridge, the campaign has existed for at least three years, but in the last few months it has shifted its focus to target several mining companies “with negative messaging in response to potential or planned rare earths production activities.” It was initially uncovered by cybersecurity firm Mandiant and peddles narratives in the Chinese interest via its network of thousands of fake social media accounts.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).

Some of the most astounding tech-enabled advances of the next decade, from cutting-edge medical research to urban traffic control and factory floor optimization, will be enabled by a device often smaller than a thumbnail: the memory chip.

While vast amounts of data are created, stored and processed every moment — by some estimates, 2.5 quintillion bytes daily — the insights in that code are unlocked by the memory chips that hold it and transfer it. “Memory will propel the next 10 years into the most transformative years in human history,” said Sanjay Mehrotra, president and CEO of Micron Technology.

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Fintech

Ripple’s CEO threatens to leave the US if it loses SEC case

CEO Brad Garlinghouse said a few countries have reached out to Ripple about relocating.

"There's no doubt that if the SEC doesn't win their case against us that that is good for crypto in the United States,” Brad Garlinghouse told Protocol.

Photo: Stephen McCarthy/Sportsfile for Collision via Getty Images

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said the crypto company will move to another country if it loses in its legal battle with the SEC.

Garlinghouse said he’s confident that Ripple will prevail against the federal regulator, which accused the company of failing to register roughly $1.4 billion in XRP tokens as securities.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Policy

The Supreme Court’s EPA ruling is bad news for tech regulation, too

The justices just gave themselves a lot of discretion to smack down agency rules.

The ruling could also endanger work on competition issues by the FTC and net neutrality by the FCC.

Photo: Geoff Livingston/Getty Images

The Supreme Court’s decision last week gutting the Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions didn’t just signal the conservative justices’ dislike of the Clean Air Act at a moment of climate crisis. It also served as a warning for anyone that would like to see more regulation of Big Tech.

At the heart of Chief Justice John Roberts’ decision in West Virginia v. EPA was a codification of the “major questions doctrine,” which, he wrote, requires “clear congressional authorization” when agencies want to regulate on areas of great “economic and political significance.”

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Enterprise

Microsoft and Google are still using emotion AI, but with limits

Microsoft said accessibility goals overrode problems with emotion recognition and Google offers off-the-shelf emotion recognition technology amid growing concern over the controversial AI.

Emotion recognition is a well established field of computer vision research; however, AI-based technologies used in an attempt to assess people’s emotional states have moved beyond the research phase.

Photo: Microsoft

Microsoft said last month it would no longer provide general use of an AI-based cloud software feature used to infer people’s emotions. However, despite its own admission that emotion recognition technology creates “risks,” it turns out the company will retain its emotion recognition capability in an app used by people with vision loss.

In fact, amid growing concerns over development and use of controversial emotion recognition in everyday software, both Microsoft and Google continue to incorporate the AI-based features in their products.

“The Seeing AI person channel enables you to recognize people and to get a description of them, including an estimate of their age and also their emotion,” said Saqib Shaikh, a software engineering manager and project lead for Seeing AI at Microsoft who helped build the app, in a tutorial about the product in a 2017 Microsoft video.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories
Bulletins