People

We counted the FTC employees who moved over to tech. Is reform needed?

"My ultimate goal was to be at a Facebook or a Google," one former commission employee said.

Sen. Josh Hawley

Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri wants to overhaul the FTC as it investigates tech's biggest companies.

Photo: Sarah Silbiger via Getty Images

The Federal Trade Commission occupies a powerful role that could alter the future of the technology industry, investigating whether the biggest companies violated antitrust laws during their meteoric rise. But is the regulator's position compromised when those same tech giants hire from the FTC's ranks?

Dozens of former commission lawyers now work for big and small companies across the tech industry, advising them on antitrust issues and other topics under the purview of the FTC, a Protocol review found. Apple, for example, counts at least three former FTC attorneys on its high-powered legal team, with more than 24 years of experience at the agency among them. Multiple former employees who left the agency to work at tech companies said they were recruited by their firms while working at the FTC, opening up the kind of potential conflicts that concern critics.

Get what matters in tech, in your inbox every morning. Sign up for Source Code.

At least 72 lawyers and other former employees who left the agency from 2015 to 2018 now work for private law firms, many of which count major tech companies as their clients, Protocol found, a step removed that some lawmakers say isn't enough to alleviate the "revolving door" concerns.

"People at the FTC who are looking to cash in are looking to cash in at a law firm, not a tech company," said one former FTC lawyer, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because his current employer is often the subject of merger and antitrust scrutiny. "One of your marketable skills is knowing how the agency works. And knowing people who work at the agency."

In interviews with Protocol, several former FTC staffers said they did not think the agency was compromised by the movement of employees to industry jobs, pointing to existing ethics policies that prevent staffers from switching sides to help companies defend matters that they once pursued as regulators.

But some lawmakers are not convinced. Last month, Sen. Josh Hawley, a Republican from Missouri, said he wanted to slow down the revolving door and "overhaul" the FTC. His proposal calls for, among other things, stricter ethics requirements, including a "cooling-off" period that would prohibit some employees from working at large companies altogether after they leave the agency.

"Officials at the FTC are supposed to enforce the law against big tech companies. … But many high-level officials begin working for big tech right after leaving the FTC," Hawley's proposal reads. "The lack of a sufficient cooling-off period raises the concern that senior FTC officials will be too timid to discharge their duties against big tech and other corporate giants because so many of them intend to ask those companies for jobs right away."

The FTC has taken significant action against tech firms in the past year, including imposing a record $5 billion penalty against Facebook for privacy violations. Last month, the commission expanded its antitrust investigation into big companies, ordering Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Microsoft and Alphabet to provide details about their acquisitions of smaller rivals over the past decade.

Hawley's proposal cites a 2019 report from the think tank Public Citizen, which found that more than 60% of top FTC officials, or 26 of 41, had "revolving door conflicts of interest involving work on behalf of the technology sector." The report covers 20 years and includes former FTC commissioners as well as the most senior staff at the agency, identifying instances where individuals worked on behalf of corporate interests both before and after joining the agency.

A spokesman for the FTC said the agency would not comment on the proposed legislation.

In an effort to put the issue in context, Protocol requested a list of all former FTC employees, including lawyers, paralegals, HR staff and interns, via a Freedom of Information Act request, then researched the names through records and interviews. We found that tech-related businesses are a popular but not dominant destination for FTC employees once they leave the agency.

Of the nearly 700 lawyers and other employees who left the FTC between 2015 and 2018, at least 40 now work for tech companies. At least 72 work for private law firms, and at least 82 hold other government jobs. The rest of the agency's former employees are either retired or are working in unrelated fields — or their current employment could not be verified.

Many of the highest-profile FTC alums who went on to work at large tech companies declined to comment for this story. They include Julie Brill, a former FTC commissioner who is now an attorney with Microsoft. When reached by phone, Brill told a Protocol reporter, "Yeah, I'm not going to comment," before hanging up. An Amazon spokesperson declined to comment on behalf of Joseph Breedlove, an economist at the company who spent more than 13 years at the FTC. So did former FTC Commissioner Joshua Wright, who as a law school professor reportedly received funding from Google for academic papers that supported the company's defense against antitrust allegations.

Some technology companies actively recruit senior staff members at the agency. One former FTC employee said her current employer tried to recruit her several times while she was at the agency because of her antitrust expertise. She asked not to be named because her company has recently been investigated by the agency.

Another former employee who left the FTC to work for a major tech company said she would not have joined the agency had she been subject to limitations on where she could work after leaving. "I wanted operational experience. My ultimate goal was to be at a Facebook or a Google. So yeah, that would have impacted my decision," said the former employee, who also spoke on the condition of anonymity. "I would never go back to the government knowing what I know now about stock compensation, the benefits and exposure to advanced technology … the government just doesn't offer that."

Get in touch with us: Share information securely with Protocol via encrypted Signal or WhatsApp message, at 415-214-4715 or through our anonymous SecureDrop.

Tech companies can attract FTC employees by offering substantial pay increases. Experienced staffers at the agency cap out at about $170,000 a year, while working as an antitrust lawyer for a tech firm or law firm representing those companies can pay two to three times that salary, or more.

Whitney Merrill, a former staff attorney at the FTC, said she joined the video game company Electronic Arts in 2017 in large part because of the pay bump. "I was based in San Francisco," she said, "and it's very difficult to live there on a government salary, especially if you have student loan debt."

Merrill said she had a positive experience at the FTC and would be open to rejoining the agency in the future. She believes her experience in the private sector would improve her work, because it showed her how companies struggle with privacy safeguards and complex systems. As for potential conflicts of interest, Merrill cited the steps the FTC already takes to prevent former regulators from representing the companies they once investigated. She said she was instructed during her onboarding at the FTC to maintain a list of cases she worked on. When she left the agency, ethics officials reminded her of her confidentiality and conflict-of-interest obligations.

"Everyone I've worked with takes it very seriously," Merill said. "They don't want to ruin their careers."

The FTC's ethics rules and guidelines include a lifetime ban on representing clients concerning matters they "personally and substantially" worked on at the FTC, as well as a two-year ban for matters over which they had an official responsibility while at the agency. Senior employees — a category determined by pay that generally includes commissioners, bureau directors and other senior executives — are subject to a one-year cooling-off period in which they're banned from representing others to the FTC "concerning any official matter."

Megan Gray, an attorney in the commission's enforcement division until 2018, said the rules can effectively limit where ex-FTC employees work. When companies settle a complaint with the agency, they often agree to decades-long stipulations in which they regularly report to the FTC on compliance. This would make it difficult to work at one of those companies in their area of expertise, because reporting to the FTC would likely violate the lifetime ban, she said.

For example, Gray worked on a case against Google during her time at the FTC, and now believes she would never be able to work on certain areas for the company. "Not that I was going to work for Google, but I was surprised I could never work for them on privacy issues for the rest of my life. No one ever told me that before I took the case on," said Gray, who now works as general counsel at the privacy-focused search engine DuckDuckGo.

One reason why more FTC employees don't go on to work at large companies is there aren't many jobs for technologists at the agency to begin with. "There's really only two ways to work for the FTC" as a technologist, said Cara Bloom, a cybersecurity researcher at Mitre who interned at the agency in 2016. Aside from the internship program that Bloom and many others who now work in Silicon Valley went through, the only tech-oriented jobs at the FTC are a handful of investigators assigned to the Office of Technology and the chief technologist role, a one-year term typically held by a high-profile academic.

It's unclear how much traction Hawley's proposal will receive in Washington this spring. If recent efforts to close revolving doors at other agencies are any indication, perhaps not much. In 2014, the Securities and Exchange Commission introduced rules requiring former senior staff who go on to represent companies regulated by the agency to refrain from contacting their former colleagues for at least a year. The move came after political pressure to extend the cooling-off period to three years.

Other federal agencies have similar cooling-off periods. What makes Hawley's proposal remarkable is that it seeks to go further, banning some FTC employees from working for private companies altogether.

Were Hawley's proposal to be implemented, "It may chill some people who want to go and spend some time in public service," said Marc Fagel, who spent more than 15 years at the SEC before joining the law firm Gibson Dunn. Fagel questioned the premise of the idea, that attorneys at the FTC won't be willing to enforce antitrust law against companies they might later work for.

"People who are willing to go into public service, like I did, do it because they appreciate the mission of that agency. If you are working in enforcement, the way you get ahead and make yourself marketable is by bringing big cases," Fagel said. "The thought that someone in enforcement isn't going to pursue investigations … you would really be kneecapping your career."

Enterprise

How I decided to leave the US and pursue a tech career in Europe

Melissa Di Donato moved to Europe to broaden her technology experience with a different market perspective. She planned to stay two years. Seventeen years later, she remains in London as CEO of Suse.

“It was a hard go for me in the beginning. I was entering inside of a company that had been very traditional in a sense.”

Photo: Suse

Click banner image for more How I decided seriesA native New Yorker, Melissa Di Donato made a life-changing decision back in 2005 when she packed up for Europe to further her career in technology. Then with IBM, she made London her new home base.

Today, Di Donato is CEO of Germany’s Suse, now a 30-year-old, open-source enterprise software company that specializes in Linux operating systems, container management, storage, and edge computing. As the company’s first female leader, she has led Suse through the coronavirus pandemic, a 2021 IPO on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange, and the acquisitions of Kubernetes management startup Rancher Labs and container security company NeuVector.

Keep Reading Show less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Enterprise

UiPath had a rocky few years. Rob Enslin wants to turn it around.

Protocol caught up with Enslin, named earlier this year as UiPath’s co-CEO, to discuss why he left Google Cloud, the untapped potential of robotic-process automation, and how he plans to lead alongside founder Daniel Dines.

Rob Enslin, UiPath's co-CEO, chats with Protocol about the company's future.

Photo: UiPath

UiPath has had a shaky history.

The company, which helps companies automate business processes, went public in 2021 at a valuation of more than $30 billion, but now the company’s market capitalization is only around $7 billion. To add insult to injury, UiPath laid off 5% of its staff in June and then lowered its full-year guidance for fiscal year 2023 just months later, tanking its stock by 15%.

Keep Reading Show less
Aisha Counts

Aisha Counts (@aishacounts) is a reporter at Protocol covering enterprise software. Formerly, she was a management consultant for EY. She's based in Los Angeles and can be reached at acounts@protocol.com.

Workplace

Figma CPO: We can do more with Adobe

Yuhki Yamashita thinks Figma might tackle video or 3D objects someday.

Figman CPO Yuhki Yamashita told Protocol about Adobe's acquisition of the company.

Photo: Figma

Figma CPO Yuhki Yamashita’s first design gig was at The Harvard Crimson, waiting for writers to file their stories so he could lay them out in Adobe InDesign. Given his interest in computer science, pursuing UX design became the clear move. He worked on Outlook at Microsoft, YouTube at Google, and user experience at Uber, where he was a very early user of Figma. In 2019, he became a VP of product at Figma; this past June, he became CPO.

“Design has been really near and dear to my heart, which is why when this opportunity came along to join Figma and rethink design, it was such an obvious opportunity,” Yamashita said.

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at llawrence@protocol.com.

Climate

Microsoft lays out its climate advocacy goals

The tech giant has staked out exactly what kind of policies it will support to decarbonize the world and clean up the grid.

Microsoft published two briefs explaining what new climate policies it will advocate for.

Photo by Jeremy Bezanger on Unsplash

The tech industry has no shortage of climate goals, but they’ll be very hard to achieve without the help of sound public policy.

Microsoft published two new briefs on Sept. 22 explaining what policies it will advocate for in the realm of reducing carbon and cleaning up the grid. With policymakers in the U.S. and around the world beginning to weigh more stringent climate policies (or in the U.S.’s case, any serious climate policies at all), the briefs will offer a measuring stick for whether Microsoft is living up to its ideals.

Keep Reading Show less
Brian Kahn

Brian ( @blkahn) is Protocol's climate editor. Previously, he was the managing editor and founding senior writer at Earther, Gizmodo's climate site, where he covered everything from the weather to Big Oil's influence on politics. He also reported for Climate Central and the Wall Street Journal. In the even more distant past, he led sleigh rides to visit a herd of 7,000 elk and boat tours on the deepest lake in the U.S.

Latest Stories
Bulletins