The game industry’s post-pandemic reality check is here

New industry reports show a gaming business that's still big and growing, but not quite like it was in 2020.

A close-up of an Xbox controller being held by a player.

Looking ahead, these reports paint a picture of more tempered growth in more predictable fashion, but growth nonetheless.

Photo: Jung Yeon-Je/AFP via Getty Images

The growth of the video game industry over the past 18 months has in many ways reflected human behavior during the pandemic.

When everyone was locked inside, we turned to gaming to connect with friends, pass the time and spend discretionary income no longer reserved for nights out and vacations. The industry boomed as a result, and this past year we've seen the effects reflected in record gaming investments and consumer spending.

But new reports out this week on the financial state of the industry point to a more complex picture emerging. While COVID-19 marks a definitive turning point for the industry, game makers are now grappling with the reality that the industry may never again see the same level of cultural diffusion and unprecedented financial growth it did in 2020, when analyst firm Newzoo says the industry grew more than 23% from the year prior.

As expected, last year's growth hasn't been replicable as consumers become reacquainted with leaving their homes, returning to the office and traveling more often. Now, the industry has to chart a path toward a post-pandemic future that recognizes what worked during the pandemic, what won't keep working in the future and what's a more realistic expectation of gaming's new normal going forward.

This reality check hasn't stopped investors, for now. The game industry has emerged as one of the hottest investment markets in the world over the past nine months, with a record $71 billion in deals across nearly 1,000 transactions according to a report released this week from investment firm Drake Star Partners.

Scores of companies that never dabbled in games before now want a piece of the fast-growing pie. New studios are opening left and right, investments are pouring in (more than $9 billion across 493 deals), gaming startups have had massive, high-profile IPOs (Roblox and Unity, to name a couple) and buzzy new markets like NFTs and blockchain-related gaming startups are popping up around the industry.

The frenzied state of investments and industry consolidation illustrates just how confident the industry is that its best years are still ahead. But in many of the areas that count most for the short term, the industry's growth is starting to lag, and it's going to take careful maneuvering for game developers to weather the slowdown after last year's high.

Spending on video games in the U.S. jumped 35% in the first six months of the year compared with 2020, according to The NPD Group, but the percentage of players who play games dropped three percentage points to 76% of Americans compared with last year. That 3% drop is evidence of just how fickle audience growth and retention can be, as people are prone to abandon hobbies they picked up during lockdown once they're able to return to old habits.

Newzoo, which tracks global game spending, reported earlier this year the industry was on track to shrink roughly 1% to $175 billion, mainly due to remote work disruptions causing delays in big releases like Sony's Horizon Forbidden West and the global chip shortage resulting in drops in console and PC gaming spending. Those issues are expected to persist well into next year.

Looking ahead, these reports paint a picture of more tempered growth in more predictable fashion, but growth nonetheless. NPD says that while the number of Americans playing games this year has dropped from last year, it's still much higher than it was in 2019 and those that are playing games still are doing so far more on average.

"Despite the decline in number of people playing video games, the industry continues to see growth in the number of hours spent gaming," NPD wrote in its report. "There was a dramatic increase in time spent playing games from 2019 to 2020, with average hours played per week jumping from 12.7 to 14.8, respectively. And the growth continues, increasing to 16.5 hours per week this year."

NPD makes an interesting observation in its report: One age group, the lapsed gamer aged 45 to 64, is helping contribute to new audience growth. "We had a number of lapsed gamers in the 45-64 age group re-enter the market last year, not only for entertainment, but to stay connected with family and friends. And these gamers have continued to play more than other age groups," said NPD analyst Mat Piscatella. "Despite an overall decline in the percentage of folks that play games in the market, the time 45–64-year-old gamers spent playing continued to increase."

Mobile is another bright spot. While much of the global decline in game revenue this year can be attributed to contractions in the PC and console market, it's mobile holding the industry afloat with an estimated 4.4% year-over-year growth, Newzoo said last month, primarily because it's the type of gaming that doesn't require players to stay in one place all the time.

The firm now says the overall gaming industry will grow at a compound annual rate of 11% per year through 2024, to a record $200 billion. And mobile's ascendance will continue, with mobile gamers making up the largest chunk of new audiences (now expected to grow to 3.3 billion people by 2024) and the biggest spenders globally.

The game industry is already among the largest and most powerful entertainment sectors in the world, and it's only going to keep growing as more people play games, buy gaming hardware, try mobile gaming for the first time and spend more money more often on free-to-play games. 2020 marked a watershed moment for the industry, and it's not one easily or likely ever replicable again without another world-changing shift in behavior like the pandemic. But it's clear now more than ever the industry has only its brightest days ahead.


Gavin Newsom shows crypto some California love

“A more flexible approach is needed,” Gov. Newsom said in rejecting a bill that would require crypto companies to get a state license.

Strong bipartisan support wasn’t enough to convince Newsom that requiring crypto companies to register with the state’s Department of Financial Protection and Innovation is the smart path for California.

Photo: Jerod Harris/Getty Images for Vox Media

The Digital Financial Assets Law seemed like a legislative slam dunk in California for critics of the crypto industry.

But strong bipartisan support — it passed 71-0 in the state assembly and 31-6 in the Senate — wasn’t enough to convince Gov. Gavin Newsom that requiring crypto companies to register with the state’s Department of Financial Protection and Innovation is the smart path for California.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

Slack’s rallying cry at Dreamforce: No more meetings

It’s not all cartoon bears and therapy pigs — work conferences are a good place to talk about the future of work.

“We want people to be able to work in whatever way works for them with flexible schedules, in meetings and out of meetings,” Slack chief product officer Tamar Yehoshua told Protocol at Dreamforce 2022.

Photo: Marlena Sloss/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Dreamforce is primarily Salesforce’s show. But Slack wasn’t to be left out, especially as the primary connector between Salesforce and the mainstream working world.

The average knowledge worker spends more time using a communication tool like Slack than a CRM like Salesforce, positioning it as the best Salesforce product to concern itself with the future of work. In between meeting a therapy pig and meditating by the Dreamforce waterfall, Protocol sat down with several Slack execs and conference-goers to chat about the shifting future.

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at

LA is a growing tech hub. But not everyone may fit.

LA has a housing crisis similar to Silicon Valley’s. And single-family-zoning laws are mostly to blame.

As the number of tech companies in the region grows, so does the number of tech workers, whose high salaries put them at an advantage in both LA's renting and buying markets.

Photo: Nat Rubio-Licht/Protocol

LA’s tech scene is on the rise. The number of unicorn companies in Los Angeles is growing, and the city has become the third-largest startup ecosystem nationally behind the Bay Area and New York with more than 4,000 VC-backed startups in industries ranging from aerospace to creators. As the number of tech companies in the region grows, so does the number of tech workers. The city is quickly becoming more and more like Silicon Valley — a new startup and a dozen tech workers on every corner and companies like Google, Netflix, and Twitter setting up offices there.

But with growth comes growing pains. Los Angeles, especially the burgeoning Silicon Beach area — which includes Santa Monica, Venice, and Marina del Rey — shares something in common with its namesake Silicon Valley: a severe lack of housing.

Keep Reading Show less
Nat Rubio-Licht

Nat Rubio-Licht is a Los Angeles-based news writer at Protocol. They graduated from Syracuse University with a degree in newspaper and online journalism in May 2020. Prior to joining the team, they worked at the Los Angeles Business Journal as a technology and aerospace reporter.


SFPD can now surveil a private camera network funded by Ripple chair

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors approved a policy that the ACLU and EFF argue will further criminalize marginalized groups.

SFPD will be able to temporarily tap into private surveillance networks in certain circumstances.

Photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Ripple chairman and co-founder Chris Larsen has been funding a network of security cameras throughout San Francisco for a decade. Now, the city has given its police department the green light to monitor the feeds from those cameras — and any other private surveillance devices in the city — in real time, whether or not a crime has been committed.

This week, San Francisco’s Board of Supervisors approved a controversial plan to allow SFPD to temporarily tap into private surveillance networks during life-threatening emergencies, large events, and in the course of criminal investigations, including investigations of misdemeanors. The decision came despite fervent opposition from groups, including the ACLU of Northern California and the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which say the police department’s new authority will be misused against protesters and marginalized groups in a city that has been a bastion for both.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Latest Stories