Inside India’s booming startup ecosystem with Freshworks CEO Girish Mathrubootham

Companies around the world are focused on succeeding in India. But the local tech industry is growing fast, too.

Girish Mathrubootham headshot

Girish Mathrubootham made it big with a company in India. He wants to help others do the same.

Photo: Freshworks

Girish Mathrubootham is in pay-it-forward mode. After starting Freshworks in Chennai, India, and growing the customer communication startup into a multibillion-dollar company, Mathrubootham wants to take the lessons he learned along the way and help a new generation of Indian entrepreneurs do even more, even faster.

India is one of the fastest-growing markets for the tech industry, with hundreds of millions of people coming online and a much more open, global stance than countries like China have adopted toward tech. That's why Google, Amazon and practically every other tech giant is scrambling to establish a foothold in the country. Mathrubootham said that's a good thing, but he's focused on investing in and helping the founders already in India build companies that can rival those giants both in the country and around the world.

Mathrubootham joined the Source Code podcast to talk about his experiences as a CEO and an investor, the state of the Indian startup market (particularly for SaaS companies), what his new Together Fund is looking for in Indian companies and what it means to build "a Silicon Valley" in a city like Chennai.

You can hear our full conversation on the latest episode of the Source Code podcast, or by clicking on the player above. Below are excerpts from our conversation, edited for length and clarity.

A few years ago, India started coming up as the more open version of China. China was increasingly going to become its own place, run by its own companies, and inaccessible to Western companies. If you were a big company in Silicon Valley, the market you really should be looking into is India, because there's a billion people, everybody's coming online very fast, India was going to be the next big thing. Fast forward a few years to now, where are we in that process?

So I think there are two parallel opportunities that are happening right now. On the consumer internet side, the Facebooks and the Googles and the Amazons of the world are going to India because that's where a billion people are. And everybody's coming onto the internet. And I think that journey is on.

The global SaaS opportunity from India is something where startups can actually go global from day one.

What's more interesting and fascinating, for me personally, is the global SaaS opportunity for Indian founders. So that is actually not about the India market opportunity. It's about how entrepreneurs can actually disrupt global markets. From India, these companies are directly going global from day one, so there's no parallel in China here. Like China, where you want to grow in China and then hopefully try to get outside and never do? Forget that. Even in the U.S., companies first win in the U.S. before going to Europe, and then going to APAC, or companies that start in Europe and Australia want to win locally. The global SaaS opportunity from India is something where startups can actually go global from day one, and sell to customers anywhere in the world. And then later on also have customers in India or parallely have customers in India. That's a very new trend.

How do you explain why that has been the focus, as opposed to so many other places?

I think there are a few key macro changes that are enabling this. One, online acquisition of customers thanks to Google AdWords, and SEO/SEM, that's one of the macro trends that is enabling businesses to find customers without actually having to hire expensive enterprise salespeople.

The second macro is SMBs wanting to digitally transform themselves. Every business today wants to adopt technology, to be able to take care of their customers and take care of their back office and employees and so on. And the revolution of product-led growth and SaaS as business models, where you can buy software on your credit card with $100 a month or $50 a month, as opposed to, say, 15 years ago when you had to have $50,000 or $100,000 budget to even be able to start at the lowest price for enterprise software.

Broadly, I would say, these three macro changes — online acquisition via Google, evolution of SaaS and monthly credit card billing and SMB digital transformation — are converging. And if you look at AWS, allowing anybody from anywhere to start a company, and we see money is being available everywhere.

For decades, the story has been, you have to be on Sand Hill Road, you have to be within a drive of your investors, or you're not going anywhere. And so there's always been this geographic pull to Silicon Valley. But now you have companies like Zoho and Freshworks, and investors like you, is that less important? Have India and Sand Hill Road gotten closer together?

Definitely. The first VC who called me when I was raising money for Freshworks — it was called Freshdesk at the time in 2011 — was from Sand Hill Road. And even though they liked the story, immediately after 30 minutes, they said, "Girish, we didn't realize you are in Chennai, India. We don't invest in companies that are not close to us. We thought you were in the Bay Area." And then hung up.

I think a lot of people had that phone call over the years!

Yeah. So I think that has changed. Today, you have VCs fighting for early-stage deals. And there are deals in the U.S. where VCs from India are pitching. So I think the world has really become flat, and probably in a Zoom world it's even more relevant. Nobody's actually meeting in person. So if you look at the last 18 months, no deal has happened with in-person meetings, right? So you're just meeting people on a Zoom call and writing checks.

You've talked a bunch over the years about wanting to build "a Silicon Valley in India." I was going to ask you what that looks like, and how that might be sort of similar and different. But what you're saying makes me think having "Silicon Valleys" in lots of different places is an old, out-of-date construct. That Silicon Valley exists in India already, it exists in Brazil, and it exists in lots of places. That maybe this thing left Sand Hill Road a long time ago.

I think you have to understand what people mean by saying "the Silicon Valley of India," right? What it refers to is having a closely knit ecosystem of people who understand what a startup needs to succeed, and who are willing to come together and help each other.

In 2010 to 2011, when we first launched a product, nobody would be even willing to try our product in the ecosystem, because you don't trust a startup. Whereas you look at Silicon Valley, everybody in a batch in Y Combinator will be using the other startups' tools, right? So I think that is the culture that we need.

When we say we want to create a Silicon Valley, we want to create a culture of believing in founders where you want to help, you want to share, you want to give feedback and make connections, make introductions, help them get funded, get them advice on tax, accounting, whatever they need, and help them hire and go forward. And in that sense, I think it will be hard to create one global network. So if we can have pockets of Silicon Valley in, say, 10 places in the world, I think it's a good thing.

When we say we want to create a Silicon Valley, we want to create a culture of believing in founders.

And how is that going in India? I was reading in preparation for this that there's been heated debate over the years about which city in India should be the one that is focused on for the tech industry. What is the state of that space in India right now?

I think all those fights are all just interesting media stories.

If you look at SaaS, one of the things that we have done in Chennai is to create Chennai as the SaaSBoomi — Boomi means Earth in both Tamil and Sanskrit. So there are a lot of SaaS companies in Chennai. If you look at Bangalore and Delhi, predominantly there have been more consumer focused: You look at Flipkart and Zomato and Swiggy and Paytm. Even the earlier ones, like MakeMyTrip and Naukri. So I think most of the consumer internet companies have been in Delhi and Bangalore. SaaS has been predominantly in Chennai, but Bangalore now has SaaS companies also, and BrowserStack is from Mumbai. So I think we have other pockets, but with Zoho and Freshworks and Chargebee and Kissflow and a bunch of other companies, we see Chennai as a hotbed for SaaS.

You just named a series of pretty big companies with real, global footprints. And I would think that that means you have the anchor tenants of the tech industry at this point. And then you get the people who leave those companies to go start other companies, which is like the very early days of Silicon Valley being played out again. Is that happening? Are people leaving Freshworks, and there's, like, the Freshworks Mafia out there like there's the PayPal Mafia in Silicon Valley?

Yeah. There was somebody who reached out to me two days ago with a sample website that they are putting on Notion. It's called the Freshworks Mafia: 16 companies on their list who are ex-Freshworks who have started up. I think that is happening. And it's a good thing.

Do you feel like you've built a playbook for how to create an ecosystem like this? I think everybody wants that kind of founder-believing, interconnected ecosystem. But it's a hard thing to build from scratch, and it doesn't just come because you say you want it. The mayor of Miami is out here saying, "We want to be a tech industry!" But it turns out it's more complicated than that. Do you feel like you've built a repeatable playbook?

I don't know if it is repeatable, but I definitely think we have a playbook. Now that you say it, I'm thinking we should probably try to open-source that playbook.

It's entirely volunteer-driven. And that's what makes it successful. A lot of times others have tried it — like you said, the Miami mayor, but similar attempts have been done by state governments in India — but it's not money that makes the ecosystem happen, right? It's not infrastructure or fancy buildings. It's really, truly a set of volunteers and operators, founders who want to pay it forward and share their successes. I think that's what is needed in order to make it successful. And I think in that sense, we probably have a playbook that we can open source.

Is there a reason that SaaS has become such a hub in Chennai? Is that your doing? You just forced everybody to start SaaS companies and they took off?

We're not forcing anybody to start SaaS companies! One of the things you have to understand is, if you are starting a company in the Valley, we used to have a very enterprise-y approach to scaling. You have the Workdays, and the ServiceNows and the Salesforces of the world, where you go up-market and you hire a lot of salespeople. But this new phenomenon of product-led growth — when you think about a Zoom or a Stripe or Asana or a, Atlassian, Freshworks — you now have a go-to market machine where if you build products that customers can come online and try, and if they like it they will use a credit card and buy, that is really the opportunity for anybody anywhere in the world.

India having an English-speaking, tech-savvy talent pool makes it a very natural choice for this to flourish. You certainly can be anywhere in the world, but if your product is world-class, you can win.

And I would think being globally focused winds up being a huge advantage in that space.

Yeah. Every business everywhere around the world is digitally transforming themselves.

I think the other advantage that India has is, we have a whole industry in Business Process Outsourcing and call centers, right? So you have people who are used to working night shifts, who service U.S. customers and European customers, they have been trained on language skills, accent and even selling to U.S. clients and European clients. So that also probably is a differentiator for India, where you can hire people who can work in the time zones in the U.S. and Europe and actually close deals, which may not be possible sitting here in the U.S.

So you have all these Western companies trying to figure out India, because it's a big market full of lots of people. And then you have companies in India that are thinking more globally. Are those two destined to run into each other in some way? Is there going to be a fight over who wins India at some point, or is that all being overhyped?

I think these are two parallel things. One is India as a market, the other is India as a startup ecosystem. I don't see an overlap in these two forces.

If you look at India as a market, one of the things India has been is an open market. Unlike China, which was heavily regulated, India has really let the best player win. So whether it's ecommerce or transport or delivery, I think everybody was given a field to play. And if Amazon did well, Amazon won. Flipkart did well, Flipkart won. And both of them can exist. And they both exist, right? That's been India's stance: It wasn't heavily regulated in favor of Indian companies. So from a B2B standpoint, I think it's clearly a non-overlapping opportunity for Indian founders to go global.

You've said that for a long time, being an entrepreneur wasn't cool in India. What do you account for that change over the last several years?

You have to understand, the social mindset for Indian parents used to be: Study well, go and get a job and be safe. Job security was more of a concern than wealth creation. And the majority of the population was middle class, and they never wanted to take any risk.

And also, a lack of opportunity: India did not have VC money till very recently — especially this early-stage seed funding was unheard of. Very little funding had happened before 2007, I would say. So I also remember a story where the Ola CEO said, when he was starting a cab company, his father said, "After all this education, you're starting a taxi company?"

So I think what changed is clearly parents seeing the success, when you see companies like Flipkart, and all the others that came after. Flipkart inspired a whole set of ecommerce companies, and I would like to say Freshworks actually started the B2B startup, so when people saw companies like ChargeBee, and they got funded, and it worked out, they're now employing hundreds of people. And founders also have transformed, professionally and financially. So I think it's changed the whole outlook.


Apple's new payments tech won't kill Square

It could be used in place of the Square dongle, but it's far short of a full-fledged payments service.

The Apple system would reportedly only handle contactless payments.

Photo: Nathan Dumlao/Unsplash

Apple is preparing a product to enable merchants to accept contactless payments via iPhones without additional hardware, according to Bloomberg.

While this may seem like a move to compete with Block and its Square merchant unit in point-of-sale payments, that’s unlikely. The Apple service is using technology from its acquisition of Mobeewave in 2020 that enables contactless payments using NFC technology.

Keep Reading Show less
Tomio Geron

Tomio Geron ( @tomiogeron) is a San Francisco-based reporter covering fintech. He was previously a reporter and editor at The Wall Street Journal, covering venture capital and startups. Before that, he worked as a staff writer at Forbes, covering social media and venture capital, and also edited the Midas List of top tech investors. He has also worked at newspapers covering crime, courts, health and other topics. He can be reached at or

Sponsored Content

A CCO’s viewpoint on top enterprise priorities in 2022

The 2022 non-predictions guide to what your enterprise is working on starting this week

As Honeywell’s global chief commercial officer, I am privileged to have the vantage point of seeing the demands, challenges and dynamics that customers across the many sectors we cater to are experiencing and sharing.

This past year has brought upon all businesses and enterprises an unparalleled change and challenge. This was the case at Honeywell, for example, a company with a legacy in innovation and technology for over a century. When I joined the company just months before the pandemic hit we were already in the midst of an intense transformation under the leadership of CEO Darius Adamczyk. This transformation spanned our portfolio and business units. We were already actively working on products and solutions in advanced phases of rollouts that the world has shown a need and demand for pre-pandemic. Those included solutions in edge intelligence, remote operations, quantum computing, warehouse automation, building technologies, safety and health monitoring and of course ESG and climate tech which was based on our exceptional success over the previous decade.

Keep Reading Show less
Jeff Kimbell
Jeff Kimbell is Senior Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer at Honeywell. In this role, he has broad responsibilities to drive organic growth by enhancing global sales and marketing capabilities. Jeff has nearly three decades of leadership experience. Prior to joining Honeywell in 2019, Jeff served as a Partner in the Transformation Practice at McKinsey & Company, where he worked with companies facing operational and financial challenges and undergoing “good to great” transformations. Before that, he was an Operating Partner at Silver Lake Partners, a global leader in technology and held a similar position at Cerberus Capital LP. Jeff started his career as a Manufacturing Team Manager and Engineering Project Manager at Procter & Gamble before becoming a strategy consultant at Bain & Company and holding executive roles at Dell EMC and Transamerica Corporation. Jeff earned a B.S. in electrical engineering at Kansas State University and an M.B.A. at Dartmouth College.

Why does China's '996' overtime culture persist?

A Tencent worker’s open criticism shows why this work schedule is hard to change in Chinese tech.

Excessive overtime is one of the plights Chinese workers are grappling with across sectors.

Photo: VCG/VCG via Getty Images

Workers were skeptical when Chinese Big Tech called off its notorious and prevalent overtime policy: “996,” a 12-hour, six-day work schedule. They were right to be: A recent incident at gaming and social media giant Tencent proves that a deep-rooted overtime culture is hard to change, new policy or not.

Defiant Tencent worker Zhang Yifei, who openly challenged the company’s overtime culture, reignited wide discussion of the touchy topic this week. What triggered Zhang's criticism, according to his own account, was his team’s positive attitude toward overtime. His team, which falls under WeCom — a business communication and office collaboration tool similar to Slack — announced its in-house Breakthrough Awards. The judges’ comments to one winner highly praised them for logging “over 20 hours of intense work nonstop,” to help meet the deadline for launching a marketing page.

Keep Reading Show less
Shen Lu

Shen Lu covers China's tech industry.

Boost 2

Can Matt Mullenweg save the internet?

He's turning Automattic into a different kind of tech giant. But can he take on the trillion-dollar walled gardens and give the internet back to the people?

Matt Mullenweg, CEO of Automattic and founder of WordPress, poses for Protocol at his home in Houston, Texas.
Photo: Arturo Olmos for Protocol

In the early days of the pandemic, Matt Mullenweg didn't move to a compound in Hawaii, bug out to a bunker in New Zealand or head to Miami and start shilling for crypto. No, in the early days of the pandemic, Mullenweg bought an RV. He drove it all over the country, bouncing between Houston and San Francisco and Jackson Hole with plenty of stops in national parks. In between, he started doing some tinkering.

The tinkering is a part-time gig: Most of Mullenweg’s time is spent as CEO of Automattic, one of the web’s largest platforms. It’s best known as the company that runs, the hosted version of the blogging platform that powers about 43% of the websites on the internet. Since WordPress is open-source software, no company technically owns it, but Automattic provides tools and services and oversees most of the WordPress-powered internet. It’s also the owner of the booming ecommerce platform WooCommerce, Day One, the analytics tool and the podcast app Pocket Casts. Oh, and Tumblr. And Simplenote. And many others. That makes Mullenweg one of the most powerful CEOs in tech, and one of the most important voices in the debate over the future of the internet.

Keep Reading Show less
David Pierce

David Pierce ( @pierce) is Protocol's editorial director. Prior to joining Protocol, he was a columnist at The Wall Street Journal, a senior writer with Wired, and deputy editor at The Verge. He owns all the phones.


Spoiler alert: We’re already in the beta-metaverse

300 million people use metaverse-like platforms — Fortnite, Roblox and Minecraft — every month. That equals the total user base of the internet in 1999.

A lot of us are using platforms that can be considered metaverse prototypes.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

What does it take to build the metaverse? What building blocks do we need, how can companies ensure that the metaverse is going to be inclusive, and how do we know that we have arrived in the 'verse?

This week, we convened a panel of experts for Protocol Entertainment’s first virtual live event, including Epic Games Unreal Engine VP and GM Marc Petit, Oasis Consortium co-founder and President Tiffany Xingyu Wang and Emerge co-founder and CEO Sly Lee.

Keep Reading Show less
Janko Roettgers

Janko Roettgers (@jank0) is a senior reporter at Protocol, reporting on the shifting power dynamics between tech, media, and entertainment, including the impact of new technologies. Previously, Janko was Variety's first-ever technology writer in San Francisco, where he covered big tech and emerging technologies. He has reported for Gigaom, Frankfurter Rundschau, Berliner Zeitung, and ORF, among others. He has written three books on consumer cord-cutting and online music and co-edited an anthology on internet subcultures. He lives with his family in Oakland.


Lyin’ AI: OpenAI launches new language model despite toxic tendencies

Research company OpenAI says this year’s language model is less toxic than GPT-3. But the new default, InstructGPT, still has tendencies to make discriminatory comments and generate false information.

The new default, called InstructGPT, still has tendencies to make discriminatory comments and generate false information.

Illustration: Pixabay; Protocol

OpenAI knows its text generators have had their fair share of problems. Now the research company has shifted to a new deep-learning model it says works better to produce “fewer toxic outputs” than GPT-3, its flawed but widely-used system.

Starting Thursday, a new model called InstructGPT will be the default technology served up through OpenAI’s API, which delivers foundational AI into all sorts of chatbots, automatic writing tools and other text-based applications. Consider the new system, which has been in beta testing for the past year, to be a work in progress toward an automatic text generator that OpenAI hopes is closer to what humans actually want.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories