yesIssie LapowskyNone
×

Get access to Protocol

I’ve already subscribed

Will be used in accordance with our Privacy Policy

Politics

As 2020 election heated up, Google banned employee-led voter registration drives

In the past, groups like the Black Googler Network had organized these events, registering voters in predominantly Black neighborhoods.

As 2020 election heated up, Google banned employee-led voter registration drives

Google's new policy prohibits employees from organizing team events to register voters.

Photo: Ariel Skelley

Last fall, Google gathered leaders of its employee resource groups for a meeting to discuss its policies on political activity. While the company has always prohibited employees from engaging in partisan political activity at work, it had allowed groups like the Black Googler Network to organize nonpartisan voter registration drives.

But as the presidential primary was underway, Google told the staffers gathered at the meeting that it would be putting a stop to that. Google employees, including employee resource groups, would no longer be able to participate in or organize voter registration events, unless they did so in their personal capacity.

Vanessa Williams, a Google product marketing manager who was at the meeting and described it to Protocol, had participated in one of the Black Googler Network voter registration drives in the past. As the only representative of the group at the meeting, Williams said she felt the need to speak up. "One thing I had to flag to the group was there's a specific historical context the Black community was coming from," Williams said. "That type of [rule] is kind of a big deal."

A Google spokesperson confirmed the company made the policy change at the beginning of the year and briefed the company-funded employee resource groups on the change last fall. The spokesperson said the change was an effort to "streamline" the company's policies in response to questions from employees on the type of political activity they could or couldn't engage in. "There are long-standing laws that limit corporate support for political activity, and that encompasses a number of things, including registering to vote," the spokesperson said.

The spokesperson declined to specify any examples of laws preventing employees from participating in nonpartisan voting drives, saying that "campaign finance laws are complex and factually dependent."

Google's policy on political activism generally states that if employees want to participate in political advocacy, it has to happen on their own time, with their own resources, and in their own voice, not the company's. In the past, though, Google did allow groups of employees to participate in voter registration drives, as long as they did so in a nonpartisan way, in partnership with a 501(c)(3) organization and in a way that complied with laws, which vary state-to-state.

On one trip, Williams and other members of the Black Googler Network registered voters in a Black neighborhood in Maryland. While she was there, Williams says she helped educate a man with a felony record about a new law in the state that finally would allow him to vote, a moment that stuck with her.

"It was really great to be able to experience that," she said.

Google's decision to change the policy disappointed Williams, who left the company for a new job in January. It struck her as an attempt by Google to project political neutrality at a time when the company was, Williams says, "being pulled to the left and the right to do things or not do things."

Indeed, shortly before the meeting, Google issued new community guidelines, discouraging employees from discussing politics on internal forums. "While sharing information and ideas with colleagues helps build community, disrupting the workday to have a raging debate over politics or the latest news story does not," the guidelines read. The new rules followed years of infighting among Google employees, over topics including Google's defense contracts as well as a 2017 memo accusing the company of being an "ideological echo chamber." Amid employee uprisings, Google cut its contract with the Department of Defense and fired the author of the memo, spurring widespread backlash among conservatives.

According to Brendan Fischer, director of federal reform at the Campaign Legal Center, there are no federal laws prohibiting corporations from engaging in nonpartisan voter registration and get-out-the-vote efforts. Companies are prohibited from directly contributing money or in-kind donations to campaigns. And they can only run ads expressly advocating for or against a candidate if it's an independent expenditure and reported to the Federal Election Commission. But nonpartisan activities aren't covered by those restrictions.

"It seems like a stretch to say a genuinely nonpartisan voter registration or get-out-the-vote activity would put Google in the position of violating campaign finance law," Fischer says.

Individual states do have their own laws governing voter registration drives. In some states, lawmakers have deliberately sought to make it more difficult to organize voter registration events, arguing that they're rife with fraud. But Fischer said he's not aware of any state laws that would prohibit corporations from engaging in nonpartisan activities.

Tech companies, including Google, have aggressively promoted voter registration in the past. In both 2016 and 2018, Google incorporated registration reminders in its Google Doodle months before Election Day. This year, Facebook has set a goal of registering 4 million voters.

It's unclear how Facebook handles this with their employees. Its guidelines say employees must keep political activities "separate from work." Asked how that policy would apply to nonpartisan voter registration, a Facebook spokesperson sent Protocol a link to the policy.

Twitter spokesperson Nick Pacilio, meanwhile, said the company has no rules prohibiting employees or groups of employees from registering voters.

The Google spokesperson wouldn't say why the company's corporate voter registration initiatives are more legally sound than employees' efforts, except to say it's simply more difficult to track smaller-scale events among employees to ensure they're staying on the right side of state and federal laws. "If you think about the number of employees that we have, and the fact that 10 employees here and 10 employees there can all create their own individual efforts, that becomes a little more messy than if we just have really clear guidelines on how we contribute as a company," the spokesperson said.

People

Expensify CEO David Barrett: ‘Most CEOs are not bad people, they're just cowards’

"Remember that one time when we almost had civil war? What did you do about it?"

Expensify CEO David Barrett has thoughts on what it means for tech CEOs to claim they act apolitically.

Photo: Expensify

The Trump presidency ends tomorrow. It's a political change in which Expensify founder and CEO David Barrett played a brief, but explosive role.

Barrett became famous last fall — or infamous, depending on whom you ask — for sending an email to the fintech startup's clients, urging them to reject Trump and support President-elect Joe Biden.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Signal at (510)731-8429.

The current state-of-the-art quantum computers are a tangle of wires. And that can't be the case in the future.

Photo: IBM Research

The iconic image of quantum computing is the "Google chandelier," with its hundreds of intricately arranged copper wires descending like the tendrils of a metallic jellyfish. It's a grand and impressive device, but in that tangle of wires lurks a big problem.

"If you're thinking about the long-term prospects of quantum computing, that image should be just terrifying," Jim Clarke, the director of quantum hardware at Intel, told Protocol.

Keep Reading Show less
Dan Garisto
Dan Garisto is a freelance science journalist who specializes in the physical sciences, with an emphasis on particle physics. He has an undergraduate degree in physics and is based in New York.
Election 2020

Google says it’s fighting election lies, but its ads fund them

A new report finds that more than 1,600 brands, from Disney to Procter & Gamble, have advertisements running on sites that push pro-Trump conspiracy theories. The majority of those ads are served by Google.

Google is the most dominant player in programmatic advertising, but it has a spotty record enforcing rules for publishers.

Photo: Alex Tai/Getty Images

Shortly after November's presidential election, a story appeared on the website of far-right personality Charlie Kirk, claiming that 10,000 dead people had returned mail-in ballots in Michigan. But after publishing, a correction appeared at the top of the story, completely debunking the misleading headline, which remains, months later, unchanged.

"We are not aware of a single confirmed case showing that a ballot was actually cast on behalf of a deceased individual," the correction, which quoted Michigan election officials, read.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky
Issie Lapowsky (@issielapowsky) is a senior reporter at Protocol, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University’s Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing. Email Issie.
Politics

Trump got all he needed from Twitter. Now, he still has all the power.

President Trump used Twitter to become the most powerful man in the world. Now, that power is his to keep.

Trump became the most powerful man in the world thanks to Twitter. Now that he's banned, he'll take that power with him.

Photo: Joshua Hoehne/Unsplash

On Friday night, Twitter announced that it was forever banning President Trump from the digital podium where he conducted his presidency and where, for more than a decade, he built an alternate reality where what he said was always the truth.

There are moral arguments for not doing business with the guy who provoked a violent mob to invade the U.S. Capitol, leaving several people dead. There have been moral arguments for years for not doing business with the guy who spent most of his early mornings and late nights filling the site with a relentless stream of pithy, all-caps conspiracy theories about everything from Barack Obama's birthplace to the 2020 election. There are also moral arguments against tech companies muzzling the president of the United States at all.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky
Issie Lapowsky (@issielapowsky) is a senior reporter at Protocol, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University’s Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing. Email Issie.
People

Google’s productivity guru has some advice for you

Here's how Laura Mae Martin helps Google's top execs work smarter.

Laura Mae Martin, Google's executive productivity adviser, works one-on-one with the company's top brass.

Image: Google

If productivity were a product at Google, then Laura Mae Martin would be its product manager.

She's Google's executive productivity adviser, a job she created following a successful 20% project about managing inboxes that she debuted while working in keyword sales. As the company's top expert on productivity, her remit seems simple enough: Make Googlers more efficient in their day-to-day work lives. But in practice, that means working directly with the top executives of a trillion-dollar company to make some of tech's most sought-after talent better at what they do.

Keep Reading Show less
Kevin McAllister

Kevin McAllister ( @k__mcallister) is an associate editor at Protocol, leading the development of Braintrust. Prior to joining the team, he was a rankings data reporter at The Wall Street Journal, where he oversaw structured data projects for the Journal's strategy team.

Latest Stories