Politics

As 2020 election heated up, Google banned employee-led voter registration drives

In the past, groups like the Black Googler Network had organized these events, registering voters in predominantly Black neighborhoods.

As 2020 election heated up, Google banned employee-led voter registration drives

Google's new policy prohibits employees from organizing team events to register voters.

Photo: Ariel Skelley

Last fall, Google gathered leaders of its employee resource groups for a meeting to discuss its policies on political activity. While the company has always prohibited employees from engaging in partisan political activity at work, it had allowed groups like the Black Googler Network to organize nonpartisan voter registration drives.

But as the presidential primary was underway, Google told the staffers gathered at the meeting that it would be putting a stop to that. Google employees, including employee resource groups, would no longer be able to participate in or organize voter registration events, unless they did so in their personal capacity.

Vanessa Williams, a Google product marketing manager who was at the meeting and described it to Protocol, had participated in one of the Black Googler Network voter registration drives in the past. As the only representative of the group at the meeting, Williams said she felt the need to speak up. "One thing I had to flag to the group was there's a specific historical context the Black community was coming from," Williams said. "That type of [rule] is kind of a big deal."

A Google spokesperson confirmed the company made the policy change at the beginning of the year and briefed the company-funded employee resource groups on the change last fall. The spokesperson said the change was an effort to "streamline" the company's policies in response to questions from employees on the type of political activity they could or couldn't engage in. "There are long-standing laws that limit corporate support for political activity, and that encompasses a number of things, including registering to vote," the spokesperson said.

The spokesperson declined to specify any examples of laws preventing employees from participating in nonpartisan voting drives, saying that "campaign finance laws are complex and factually dependent."

Google's policy on political activism generally states that if employees want to participate in political advocacy, it has to happen on their own time, with their own resources, and in their own voice, not the company's. In the past, though, Google did allow groups of employees to participate in voter registration drives, as long as they did so in a nonpartisan way, in partnership with a 501(c)(3) organization and in a way that complied with laws, which vary state-to-state.

On one trip, Williams and other members of the Black Googler Network registered voters in a Black neighborhood in Maryland. While she was there, Williams says she helped educate a man with a felony record about a new law in the state that finally would allow him to vote, a moment that stuck with her.

"It was really great to be able to experience that," she said.

Google's decision to change the policy disappointed Williams, who left the company for a new job in January. It struck her as an attempt by Google to project political neutrality at a time when the company was, Williams says, "being pulled to the left and the right to do things or not do things."

Indeed, shortly before the meeting, Google issued new community guidelines, discouraging employees from discussing politics on internal forums. "While sharing information and ideas with colleagues helps build community, disrupting the workday to have a raging debate over politics or the latest news story does not," the guidelines read. The new rules followed years of infighting among Google employees, over topics including Google's defense contracts as well as a 2017 memo accusing the company of being an "ideological echo chamber." Amid employee uprisings, Google cut its contract with the Department of Defense and fired the author of the memo, spurring widespread backlash among conservatives.

According to Brendan Fischer, director of federal reform at the Campaign Legal Center, there are no federal laws prohibiting corporations from engaging in nonpartisan voter registration and get-out-the-vote efforts. Companies are prohibited from directly contributing money or in-kind donations to campaigns. And they can only run ads expressly advocating for or against a candidate if it's an independent expenditure and reported to the Federal Election Commission. But nonpartisan activities aren't covered by those restrictions.

"It seems like a stretch to say a genuinely nonpartisan voter registration or get-out-the-vote activity would put Google in the position of violating campaign finance law," Fischer says.

Individual states do have their own laws governing voter registration drives. In some states, lawmakers have deliberately sought to make it more difficult to organize voter registration events, arguing that they're rife with fraud. But Fischer said he's not aware of any state laws that would prohibit corporations from engaging in nonpartisan activities.

Tech companies, including Google, have aggressively promoted voter registration in the past. In both 2016 and 2018, Google incorporated registration reminders in its Google Doodle months before Election Day. This year, Facebook has set a goal of registering 4 million voters.

It's unclear how Facebook handles this with their employees. Its guidelines say employees must keep political activities "separate from work." Asked how that policy would apply to nonpartisan voter registration, a Facebook spokesperson sent Protocol a link to the policy.

Twitter spokesperson Nick Pacilio, meanwhile, said the company has no rules prohibiting employees or groups of employees from registering voters.

The Google spokesperson wouldn't say why the company's corporate voter registration initiatives are more legally sound than employees' efforts, except to say it's simply more difficult to track smaller-scale events among employees to ensure they're staying on the right side of state and federal laws. "If you think about the number of employees that we have, and the fact that 10 employees here and 10 employees there can all create their own individual efforts, that becomes a little more messy than if we just have really clear guidelines on how we contribute as a company," the spokesperson said.

Fintech

Election markets are far from a sure bet

Kalshi has big-name backing for its plan to offer futures contracts tied to election results. Will that win over a long-skeptical regulator?

Whether Kalshi’s election contracts could be considered gaming or whether they serve a true risk-hedging purpose is one of the top questions the CFTC is weighing in its review.

Photo illustration: Getty Images; Protocol

Crypto isn’t the only emerging issue on the CFTC’s plate. The futures regulator is also weighing a fintech sector that has similarly tricky political implications: election bets.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has set Oct. 28 as a date by which it hopes to decide whether the New York-based startup Kalshi can offer a form of wagering up to $25,000 on which party will control the House of Representatives and Senate after the midterms. PredictIt, another online market for election trading, has also sued the regulator over its decision to cancel a no-action letter.

Keep Reading Show less
Ryan Deffenbaugh
Ryan Deffenbaugh is a reporter at Protocol focused on fintech. Before joining Protocol, he reported on New York's technology industry for Crain's New York Business. He is based in New York and can be reached at rdeffenbaugh@protocol.com.
Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Enterprise

The Uber verdict shows why mandatory disclosure isn't such a bad idea

The conviction of Uber's former chief security officer, Joe Sullivan, seems likely to change some minds in the debate over proposed cyber incident reporting regulations.

Executives and boards will now be "a whole lot less likely to cover things up," said one information security veteran.

Photo: Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images

If nothing else, the guilty verdict delivered Wednesday in a case involving Uber's former security head will have this effect on how breaches are handled in the future: Executives and boards, according to information security veteran Michael Hamilton, will be "a whole lot less likely to cover things up."

Following the conviction of former Uber chief security officer Joe Sullivan, "we likely will get better voluntary reporting" of cyber incidents, said Hamilton, formerly the chief information security officer of the City of Seattle, and currently the founder and CISO at cybersecurity vendor Critical Insight.

Keep Reading Show less
Kyle Alspach

Kyle Alspach ( @KyleAlspach) is a senior reporter at Protocol, focused on cybersecurity. He has covered the tech industry since 2010 for outlets including VentureBeat, CRN and the Boston Globe. He lives in Portland, Oregon, and can be reached at kalspach@protocol.com.

Climate

Delta and MIT are running flight tests to fix contrails

The research team and airline are running flight tests to determine if it’s possible to avoid the climate-warming effects of contrails.

Delta and MIT just announced a partnership to test how to mitigate persistent contrails.

Photo: Gabriela Natiello/Unsplash

Contrails could be responsible for up to 2% of all global warming, and yet how they’re formed and how to mitigate them is barely understood by major airlines.

That may be changing.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma

Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol covering climate. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at mma@protocol.com.

Entertainment

Inside Amazon’s free video strategy

Amazon has been doubling down on original content for Freevee, its ad-supported video service, which has seen a lot of growth thanks to a deep integration with other Amazon properties.

Freevee’s investment into original programming like 'Bosch: Legacy' has increased by 70%.

Photo: Tyler Golden/Amazon Freevee

Amazon’s streaming efforts have long been all about Prime Video. So the company caught pundits by surprise when, in early 2019, it launched a stand-alone ad-supported streaming service called IMDb Freedive, with Techcrunch calling the move “a bit odd.”

Nearly four years and two rebrandings later, Amazon’s ad-supported video efforts appear to be flourishing. Viewership of the service grew by 138% from 2020 to 2021, according to Amazon. The company declined to share any updated performance data on the service, which is now called Freevee, but a spokesperson told Protocol the performance of originals in particular “exceeded expectations,” leading Amazon to increase investments into original content by 70% year-over-year.

Keep Reading Show less
Janko Roettgers

Janko Roettgers (@jank0) is a senior reporter at Protocol, reporting on the shifting power dynamics between tech, media, and entertainment, including the impact of new technologies. Previously, Janko was Variety's first-ever technology writer in San Francisco, where he covered big tech and emerging technologies. He has reported for Gigaom, Frankfurter Rundschau, Berliner Zeitung, and ORF, among others. He has written three books on consumer cord-cutting and online music and co-edited an anthology on internet subcultures. He lives with his family in Oakland.

Latest Stories
Bulletins