Power

Google wants to (try to) make Google Glass cool again

Also this week: savvy virtual assistants, surveillance without violating people's privacy, and more patents from Big Tech.

Google Glass Enterprise 2

Is making these cool even possible?

Image: Google

This week was so full of fun patent applications that I didn't know where to start. We've got a throwback to 2013, a virtual assistant that knows when I've stopped talking, and headphones that can determine a user's hearing abilities.

But as always, remember that the big tech companies file all kinds of crazy patents for things, and though most never amount to anything, some end up defining the future

Alphabet

A cooler-looking Google Glass

Released in 2013, Google Glass, Google's stab at smart glasses, hit a fever pitch before quietly dying two years later. When it first came out, everyone thought it was the coolest thing on earth: a head-up display! On your face! That can show you your calendar! Countless articles were written about how it looked, what it did, how it worked, how it might violate privacy, and why it failed. The term Glasshole was conceived. My former colleague Kyle Russell was even assaulted while wearing a pair.

Google released version 2.0 to business users in 2019, but the initial excitement over the hardware died down and lost in the annals of tech history. Until now, it seems, at least according to this patent, which outlines a process for making Glass look better and work with glasses and prescription glasses. The original Glass had a tiny display attached to lensless glasses. But by placing a photopolymer lens in between the two pieces of glass that make up typical eyeglasses, Google hopes that the wearer doesn't look as dorky. Jury's still out on that, though.

More-savvy virtual assistants

My home is a smart home. I have a Google speaker or display in every room, I have Nest Cams, I have a Nest Hello and a Nest Learning Thermostat. I never really consider that my house is listening to me, even though I know that it is. At its simplest, I use my devices to turn on lights and play music, and at its most extreme, I use the speakers to enhance books that I'm reading to my kid, using the Read Along with Google feature. But sometimes I wonder if it's still listening even if I've stopped reading or talking to it — and especially when I've started talking about something private.

This patent takes that into consideration and offers a better way for the system to know that I've stopped talking by using various data points — such as my reading speed, other noises that imply I've moved to do something else, coughing — to signal that I've stopped reading.

Identifying explicit video content

YouTube is notorious for allowing objectionable content to seep into various parts of the app: This study shows that its algorithms often recommend false or sexualized content, explicit content is recommended to children, and YouTube still includes health misinformation. YouTube uses machine learning to try to catch some of the objectionable content before it's served up to users, and it's even hired moderators to try tackling the problem. Moderation efforts are working somewhat — in April, the company boasted that "violative view rate" was down 70% from 2017 — but clearly more work needs to be done.

This patent looks at improving how neural networks find objectionable content, using various combinations of inputs, such as comparing it to other videos that contain explicit content; analyzing the tags or title of the video; analyzing certain aspects of the video; and using various machine learning methods, such as triplet loss, to determine whether the video should be flagged.

Amazon

Hey machine, I'm talking to you

You can set up virtual assistants, like the Nest Hub and the Echo, to recognize certain voices at home. That allows the device to serve up personalized information, depending on who's asking it the questions.

This patent takes that scenario and expands on it, laying out a way for voice assistants to recognize different people outside of the home and can use natural language to give it commands. One of the examples provided imagines a coffee shop. A patron walks in, says three words to a voice assistant that's maybe installed in a POS; the machine recognizes that person's voice and pulls up account information.

Once everything is confirmed, the person could say, "I'd like a latte with an extra shot," and the system makes and then serves the coffee drink. At the same time, the computer sends a purchase order to the coffee shop's system. A hot cup of coffee without having to talk to anyone before I've had the coffee sounds like a dream.

Apple

Rejoice, copy editors!

I've been a copy editor for most of my journalism career, which means I'm expected to know how things are spelled, various grammar rules, and how to make sentences sound better. But when I write out a text or email on an iPhone, you'd think that I've never written a sentence in my entire life. My fat fingers often hit the wrong keys, and sometimes if I'm in a hurry, even my sentence structure is embarrassing.

This patent aims to help me and my fellow copy editors by teaching a machine to look out for errors, as well. Using a neural network, my phone would be able to not only correct my spelling, but also compare it to various other words that are spelled the same, and make sure I'm using the appropriate one.

Facebook

Determining hearing abilities

This patent makes so much sense, I'm surprised it hasn't been done yet (and if it has, please email me and let me know!). Headphones as they are made now are pretty much configured for people who have no hearing loss. This patent imagines a set of headphones that can be customized to the user, by doing a hearing assessment right on the spot. After receiving the data, the headphones could automatically adjust to turn up or turn down certain frequency levels or otherwise enhance the audio to help the wearer feel comfortable.

Microsoft

Surveillance without the privacy violations

Cameras are everywhere, monitoring our every move. But when capturing this information, certain steps must be taken to ensure privacy. Blacklisting, or providing rules around what can't be seen, are often prone to errors, which can not only violate people's privacy, but can violate laws as well.

This patent lays out how to improve these methods, using whitelisting methods instead. Teaching the machine to recognize what is allowed, rather than what is not, can help improve this functionality in more-precise ways. In fact, the patent references tests where whitelisting was around 5,000 times more accurate than blacklisting.

Protocol | Enterprise

Startups are pouncing as SaaS giants struggle in the intelligence race

Companies like Salesforce and Workday spent the last two decades building walled gardens around their systems. Now, it's a mad dash to make those ecosystems more open.

Companies want to predict the future, and "systems of intelligence" might be their best bet.

Image: Yuichiro Chino / Getty Images

Take a look at any software vendor's marketing materials and you're sure to see some variation of the word "intelligence" splattered everywhere.

It's part of a tectonic shift happening within enterprise technology. Companies spent the last several years moving their systems to the internet and, along the way, rapidly adopting new applications.

Keep Reading Show less
Joe Williams

Joe Williams is a senior reporter at Protocol covering enterprise software, including industry giants like Salesforce, Microsoft, IBM and Oracle. He previously covered emerging technology for Business Insider. Joe can be reached at JWilliams@Protocol.com. To share information confidentially, he can also be contacted on a non-work device via Signal (+1-309-265-6120) or JPW53189@protonmail.com.


Keep Reading Show less
Nasdaq
A technology company reimagining global capital markets and economies.
Protocol | Workplace

The hottest new perk in tech: A week off for burnout recovery

In an industry where long hours are a "badge of honor," a week of rest may be the best way to retain talent.

Tech companies are giving their employees a week to rest and recover from burnout.

Photo: Kinga Cichewicz/Unsplash

In early May, the founder of Lessonly, a company that makes training software, sent out a companywide email issuing a mandate to all employees. But it wasn't the sort of mandate employees around the world have been receiving related to vaccines and masks. This mandate required that every worker take an entire week off in July.

The announcement took Lessonly's staff by surprise. "We had employees reach out and share that they were emotional, just thankful that they had the opportunity to do this," said Megan Jarvis, who leads the company's talent team and worked on planning the week off.

Keep Reading Show less
Aisha Counts
Aisha J. Counts is a reporting fellow at Protocol, based out of Los Angeles. Previously, she worked for Ernst & Young, where she researched and wrote about the future of work, the gig economy and startups. She is a graduate of the University of Southern California, where she studied business and philosophy.
Power

Chip costs are rising. How will that affect gadget prices?

The global chip shortage is causing component costs to go up, so hardware makers are finding new ways to keep their prices low.

Chips are getting more expensive, but most consumer electronics companies have so far resisted price increases.

Photo: Chris Hondros/Getty Images

How do you get people to pay more for your products while avoiding sticker shock? That's a question consumer electronics companies are grappling with as worldwide chip shortages and component cost increases are squeezing their bottom lines.

One way to do it: Make more expensive and higher-margin products seem like a good deal to customers.

Keep Reading Show less
Janko Roettgers

Janko Roettgers (@jank0) is a senior reporter at Protocol, reporting on the shifting power dynamics between tech, media, and entertainment, including the impact of new technologies. Previously, Janko was Variety's first-ever technology writer in San Francisco, where he covered big tech and emerging technologies. He has reported for Gigaom, Frankfurter Rundschau, Berliner Zeitung, and ORF, among others. He has written three books on consumer cord-cutting and online music and co-edited an anthology on internet subcultures. He lives with his family in Oakland.

Protocol | Policy

Laws want humans to check biased AI. Research shows they can’t.

Policymakers want people to oversee — and override — biased AI. But research suggests there's no evidence to prove humans are up to the task.

The recent trend toward requiring human oversight of automated decision-making systems runs counter to mounting research about humans' inability to effectively override AI tools.

Photo: Jackal Pan/Getty Images

There was a time, not long ago, when a certain brand of technocrat could argue with a straight face that algorithms are less biased decision-makers than human beings — and not be laughed out of the room. That time has come and gone, as the perils of AI bias have entered mainstream awareness.

Awareness of bias hasn't stopped institutions from deploying algorithms to make life-altering decisions about, say, people's prison sentences or their health care coverage. But the fear of runaway AI has led to a spate of laws and policy guidance requiring or recommending that these systems have some sort of human oversight, so machines aren't making the final call all on their own. The problem is: These laws almost never stop to ask whether human beings are actually up to the job.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Latest Stories