Chewy might just be a retail company that uses tech exceptionally well

If a company has to fill my mailbox each week with coupon mailers to use their "tech," I would have to say not really.

A dog in a Chewy box under text that reads "Is this tech?"

Things 100% age out of being tech every day.

Photo: Chewy/Unsplash

Is Chewy tech? From poaching tech talent in Beantown and breaking ground on its first automated fulfillment center to using its Chewy Innovation Blog to wax poetic about the company's "platform experience," the ecommerce site catering to our furry friends has certainly been building a resume for itself.

As Biz Carson wrote in last week's pet-centric Pipeline (Pupline? OK everyone's booing me nevermind), VCs are hungry for investments in the pet space. But is VC enthusiasm enough to brand the pet retailer tech? Some could also point a paw (I'm getting booed again) at the strength of Chewy's ecommerce system, but as we've discussed before, just using tech for retail might not be enough when everyone's doing it.

Chewy's foray into telehealth with its Connect with a Vet offering might be something to consider, and like our muse last week, Chewy is endeavoring — and kind of succeeding! — in taking on Amazon in its niche.

But now it's time to let our intrepid team put it to a vote and see whether the ecommerce good boy can fetch the tech tag it's been barking for (I'm being thrown out of the Protocol office like DJ Jazzy Jeff).

This conversation has been edited slightly for clarity and length.

Becca Evans: Is Chewy tech?

Kate Cox: Chewy the online pet-supply-order company?

Becca: you know it

Issie Lapowsky: read this prompt, thought it was about granola bars and threw my hands up in dismay

Owen Thomas: This is kind of a stand-in for a broader question on whether ecommerce generally is tech, right?

Kate: I was out last week, did the room decide Walmart is tech?

Sarah Roach: maybe we should ask the pets themselves

Ben Pimentel: So not Chewbacca? I think Star Wars is tech

Owen: I submit for your consideration Chewy's GitHub page

Owen: That's a lot of tech right there but

Tom Krazit: @Ben Pimentel I think the preferred nomenclature is "Chewie"

Tomio Geron: is pet food tech?

Owen: Ramona likes deliveries of treat packages but barks at the mailman. I'm not sure what that means for tech.

Kate: I think Chewy is neither more nor less tech than any other ecommerce brand that doesn't also make half the web run.

Owen: It raises the question: Is Amazon's core retail business tech? Or is it just retail that requires a lot of tech to run? Where's the line?

Owen: If we accept Amazon's retail business as tech, which other retail businesses are or aren't tech and why?

Kate: The serious answer is: Amazon is different because it is also a third-party platform and it collects and uses vendor data in a lot of ways — some of which are under investigation — and I think that kind of scale changes the equation.

Kate: The less serious answer is: Was the Sears catalog tech?

Ben Brody: I feel like I'm playing @Owen's song here, but: how I think about Chewy springs a bit from Like, it was considered the ultimate folly that supposedly should have told us the dot-com bubble had gone too far. This debate isn't new!

Ben Brody: Ha, maybe not as far back as that, Kate

Owen: The Sears catalog absolutely used cutting-edge technology of the time — the railroad.

Owen: It created products designed to be shipped by rail and it marketed those same products via the U.S. Postal service, whose reach and speed was being greatly accelerated by the development of railroads.

Kate: Right. And now instead of using the USPS, retailers use the web/apps. There's a reason I reached for catalogs, hehe.

Tom: Was the Roman Empire tech?

Joe Williams: The personalized painting campaign is uber cute.

Tomio: Is fire tech?

Ben Brody: Thanks Tom, now I'm just doing the "what have the Romans ever done for us" scene from "Life of Brian" in my head

Owen: What I'm trying to figure out is what Chewy did differently from, or if it just had way better timing.

Ben Brody: I mean, things can age out of being tech?

Kate: Things 100% age out of being tech every day

Owen: Ironically, the same company bought the domain name and later bought — PetSmart.

Ben Brody: Right! hardly looks hubristic today!

Kate: That's not ironic IMO, that's predictable. Niche retailer want to succeed in reaching more people. Use the internet, which reaches all people. Try again, when online shopping is a thing everyone does, instead of when it's weird

Kate: (I bought some books for class off Amazon in 1999. The general consensus among friends, family, and professors was, "You bought them... where?!")

Owen: Weirdly, though, the private equity firm that now owns PetSmart split up the businesses — so now they're just two companies that share an owner.

Biz: There's definitely a ton of appetite for VCs to fund pet tech companies right now. I just wrote my whole Pipeline column on it last week because we're seeing doggie DNA companies like Embark raise money, telemedicine vets, a whole bunch of DTC fancy food brands. It's a $110 billion industry

Owen: I think this goes back to a recurring question — does venture investment in a sector make that sector tech?

Biz: but as we've talked about before — just because a VC funds it, it doesn't mean its tech. although it could put it on a path of having tech-like business multiples

Biz: you read my mind owen

Owen: Exactly. I think VC and tech are often conflated, though historically VC has invested in many sectors, including new consumer/retail brands.

Megan Rose Dickey: if amazon is tech, chewy is tech

Owen: When I talked to investors in the '90s who were funding ecommerce startups, they viewed them more as consumer investments than tech in many cases, and played up their familiarity with funding consumer brands as an advantage.

Biz: i think there was a point where ecommerce was tech because it was using technology to have an advantage over incumbents in a field (and then hopefully delivering greater returns because of it). But I think I continue to argue that having a website, using technology, etc. is just table-stakes for a retail player in 2021, and I don't consider it a tech company. Just a retail company that uses tech exceptionally well

Kate: Investment in pet everything is hot right now, because Americans are spending a metric buttload of money on their (our) furry friends. I covered a bunch of pet food and product acquisitions in the 2017-2019 world

Megan: ok but chewy delivers ridiculously fast

Megan: if that's not innovation, idk what is

Owen: Ah, Megan, I think you're getting to a question at the heart of this series:

Owen: Is innovation tech?

Biz: Innovation: is it tech

Owen: Biz stop reading my mind, that's CREEPY

Megan: lolol

Kate: Does Chewy do their own logistics, @Megan, or is it UPS or FedEx delivering?

Owen: It's good to have a healthy writer-editor relationship but installing a telepathic implant in my brain is a little beyond

Karyne Levy: Fedex delivery

Tomio: can something low tech be innovative?

Biz: the electric wine bottle opener is life-changing

Owen: Absolutely, Tomio. For example, Brex underwrote corporate cards based on startups' financial prospects rather than the founders' individual creditworthiness. There's nothing tech about that, it's just a business-model shift that had considerable appeal to an underserved sector of the market.

Tomio: yes!

Owen: But Chewy sure acts like a tech company. For example, it added an office in Boston to attract more technical talent. (Don't tell all the Miami-heads that South Florida's technical bench isn't that deep!)

Biz: is hiring an engineer the definition of a tech company now?

Biz: i think the only company i've voted yes for in this series as a tech company is peloton. so i'm going to stick with chewy in the no camp for me

Owen: I can tell you from glancing at's job listings that it has some pretty ambitious ideas around pet health. Imagine tying together ecommerce, vet telemedicine, and pet wearables …

Owen: It's clear that Chewy has to do something besides fast shipping and really great customer service to stay ahead of Amazon. And that may mean incorporating tech more directly into what it does.

Chris: If a company has to fill my mailbox each week with coupon mailers to use their "tech," I would have to say not really

Owen: Direct mail is an underrated marketing technique … and may have a comeback especially as more privacy and data regulation falls into place!

Owen: Is direct mail tech?

Ben Brody: not that you asked, but the direct mail industry has a surprisingly robust lobbying presence

Becca: ok let's put it to a vote

Becca: emoji react to this if chewy is tech

☝️ 4

Becca: and react to this one if you think it's not tech

☝️ 7

Megan: owen

Megan: you can't vote twice!

Chris: wait, are the dog emojis tech?

Owen: Periodic reminder that I will make your pet a petmoji on request

Protocol | Policy

Why Twitch’s 'hate raid' lawsuit isn’t just about Twitch

When is it OK for tech companies to unmask their anonymous users? And when should a violation of terms of service get someone sued?

The case Twitch is bringing against two hate raiders is hardly black and white.

Photo: Caspar Camille Rubin/Unsplash

It isn't hard to figure out who the bad guys are in Twitch's latest lawsuit against two of its users. On one side are two anonymous "hate raiders" who have been allegedly bombarding the gaming platform with abhorrent attacks on Black and LGBTQ+ users, using armies of bots to do it. On the other side is Twitch, a company that, for all the lumps it's taken for ignoring harassment on its platform, is finally standing up to protect its users against persistent violators whom it's been unable to stop any other way.

But the case Twitch is bringing against these hate raiders is hardly black and white. For starters, the plaintiff here isn't an aggrieved user suing another user for defamation on the platform. The plaintiff is the platform itself. Complicating matters more is the fact that, according to a spokesperson, at least part of Twitch's goal in the case is to "shed light on the identity of the individuals behind these attacks," raising complicated questions about when tech companies should be able to use the courts to unmask their own anonymous users and, just as critically, when they should be able to actually sue them for violating their speech policies.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

While it's easy to get lost in the operational and technical side of a transaction, it's important to remember the third component of a payment. That is, the human behind the screen.

Over the last two years, many retailers have seen the benefit of investing in new, flexible payments. Ones that reflect the changing lifestyles of younger spenders, who are increasingly holding onto their cash — despite reports to the contrary. This means it's more important than ever for merchants to take note of the latest payment innovations so they can tap into the savings of the COVID-19 generation.

Keep Reading Show less
Antoine Nougue,

Antoine Nougue is Head of Europe at He works with ambitious enterprise businesses to help them scale and grow their operations through payment processing services. He is responsible for leading the European sales, customer success, engineering & implementation teams and is based out of London, U.K.

Protocol | Fintech

When COVID rocked the insurance market, this startup saw opportunity

Ethos has outraised and outmarketed the competition in selling life insurance directly online — but there's still an $887 billion industry to transform.

Life insurance has been slow to change.

Image: courtneyk/Getty Images

Peter Colis cited a striking statistic that he said led him to launch a life insurance startup: One in twenty children will lose a parent before they turn 15.

"No one ever thinks that will happen to them, but that's the statistics," the co-CEO and co-founder of Ethos told Protocol. "If it's a breadwinning parent, the majority of those families will go bankrupt immediately, within three months. Life insurance elegantly solves this problem."

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at or via Signal at (510)731-8429.

Protocol | Workplace

Remote work is here to stay. Here are the cybersecurity risks.

Phishing and ransomware are on the rise. Is your remote workforce prepared?

Before your company institutes work-from-home-forever plans, you need to ensure that your workforce is prepared to face the cybersecurity implications of long-term remote work.

Photo: Stefan Wermuth/Bloomberg via Getty Images

The delta variant continues to dash or delay return-to-work plans, but before your company institutes work-from-home-forever plans, you need to ensure that your workforce is prepared to face the cybersecurity implications of long-term remote work.

So far in 2021, CrowdStrike has already observed over 1,400 "big game hunting" ransomware incidents and $180 million in ransom demands averaging over $5 million each. That's due in part to the "expanded attack surface that work-from-home creates," according to CTO Michael Sentonas.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma
Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol, where she writes about management, leadership and workplace issues in tech. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at
Protocol | Enterprise

How GitHub COO Erica Brescia runs the coding gold mines

GitHub sits at the center of the world's software-development activity, which makes the Microsoft-owned code repository a major target for hackers and a trend-setter in open source software.

GitHub COO Erica Brescia

Photo: GitHub

An astonishing amount of the code that runs the world's software spends at least part of its life in GitHub. COO Erica Brescia is responsible for making sure that's not a disaster in the making.

Brescia joined GitHub after selling Bitnami, the open-source software deployment tool she co-founded, to VMware in 2019. She's responsible for all operational aspects of GitHub, which was acquired by Microsoft in 2018 for $7.5 billion in one of its largest deals to date.

Keep Reading Show less
Tom Krazit

Tom Krazit ( @tomkrazit) is Protocol's enterprise editor, covering cloud computing and enterprise technology out of the Pacific Northwest. He has written and edited stories about the technology industry for almost two decades for publications such as IDG, CNET, paidContent, and GeekWire, and served as executive editor of Gigaom and Structure.

Latest Stories