People

The perils — and promise — of instant Amazon books in the time of coronavirus

Dozens of COVID-19 books expose the risks of a click-to-publish model, which can be a headache for readers and Amazon alike.

A Kindle with books about coronavirus

Dozens of COVID-19 books have popped up on Amazon through Kindle Direct Publishing since the virus broke out.

Photo: 615 Productions

When coronavirus first appeared in China, April Taylor got curious. She read news reports about the virus and combed scientific journals for information. "I wanted to know what was going on," she said. The more she read, the more concerned she got, and the more she felt compelled to share the information with others.

So she wrote a book and self-published "Wuhan Coronavirus: A Concise & Rational Guide to the 2020 Outbreak (COVID-19)" on Amazon in late January. Taylor's book is one of dozens of COVID-19 books that have popped up on Amazon since the virus broke out. They range from children's books to primers on infectious disease to elaborate conspiracy theories to diaries supposedly written by infected people to plagiarized news articles. The instant explosion of these books in just a few months shows how Amazon's self-publishing service, Kindle Direct Publishing, has fundamentally changed the way books are produced and the risks involved in instant information generation.


Get what matters in tech, in your inbox every morning. Sign up for Source Code.


In some ways, this is KDP working exactly as it's meant to. But COVID-19 also exposes the perils of a click-to-publish model, which can be a headache for readers and Amazon alike. Distinguishing what's good, what's fake and what's plagiarized takes time. Pressing publish does not.

It once took a year to get a book from first draft to publication. Now it takes a few hours. Authors just upload a document, and it's ready for sale. Print books take about a week. And because Amazon doesn't have to foot the bill for up-front costs like marketing or editing, KDP gives authors better royalties and it pays out faster. For lesser-known authors who won't get a big advance from publishing houses, that can be a big draw.

Brian O'Leary, executive director of the Book Industry Study Group, a publishing trade group, said that KDP, along with today's 24-hour news cycle, have pushed the publishing industry to produce work much faster. "There's a feeling that if you don't get out now, or very soon, that you're going to miss the window," he said.

Amazon lets people publish incredibly quickly, and with that comes clear risks for opportunism. And the stakes are especially high when it comes to something as serious as public health information. There's no editor, unless authors find one themselves, and there's no peer review process built-in, as there is in many academic journals.

The biggest risks when it's this easy to publish are that the book will give false information. Indeed, many of the coronavirus titles that popped up in the past few weeks were notably misleading or poor in quality. On Wednesday, Amazon appeared to quietly remove some of the more dubious titles.

Even some of the books that contained correct information were problematic, because they were lifted from news stories. Sometimes the content is plagiarized word for word. Other times plagiarists download the e-books, convert them into PDFs and then input those documents into spinning software that will rearrange some of the words to make the document look original. Sometimes the books end up as complete nonsense. But sometimes it can be hard to spot the difference.

Amazon's guidelines prohibit "infringing or illegal content," and the company told Protocol it had already removed several books that violated those rules. In a statement, a company spokesperson wrote, "Amazon maintains content guidelines for the books it sells, and we continue to evaluate our catalog, listening to customer feedback. We have always required sellers, authors and publishers to provide accurate information on product detail pages, and we remove those that violate our policies."

Taylor isn't a scientist, though she said she's ghostwritten on scientific topics for years. She is a professional writer and specializes mostly in horror and thriller novels. (She decided to publish her COVID-19 book under a pseudonym, Tyler J. Morrison, so she wouldn't confuse her fans.)

As coronavirus spreads, she said she wanted to give people a resource that would be helpful, and she thought a book would reach a bigger audience than a social media post. "I didn't put anything in the book that wasn't confirmed by at least two media sources because I didn't want to spread misinformation," she said. "I didn't want to make it extra panic-inducing or fear-mongering because I didn't think that was going to help anybody."

Related:

Taylor's COVID-19 book was only about 50 pages at first. But she's been updating it as news changes. It's now more than 300 pages.

After her spouse goes to bed, she stays up for hours in their Michigan home researching and writing about COVID-19. "At some point here I'm going to have to cut it off because it's pretty much consumed my life for two and a half months," she said. She said she's noticed books pop up on Amazon plagiarizing her COVID-19 book, which she asked Amazon to take down. She says the company complied, though she also believes Amazon can be somewhat selective about removing books, since they make money from every sale.

For all the books trying to cash-in on COVID-19, few will actually turn much of a profit. "There's a million self-published authors, and most of them don't make money," said Paul Abbassi, CEO of Bookstat, which tracks the publishing industry and e-book sales. KDP e-books can and do sell. Of the top 100 e-books on Amazon, 22 were self-published. But Abbassi points out that those books are the same length and quality as the other, traditionally published books. Those authors often hire editors and work hard to craft books that are original and fun to read. "The only differences are the price and the name recognition of the author," he said.

So far, Taylor's e-book has sold nearly 4,000 copies at $4.99 a pop. But some copies were rented through Kindle Unlimited, which allows readers to pay a monthly fee and download as many participating titles as they want. That means Taylor gets less in royalties. She said that given the amount of work she's done on it, she's probably losing money. But sales tanked when Amazon banned any advertisements about COVID-19 in an attempt to stop price gouging on products like face masks and hand sanitizers. "That is a negative of going through Amazon," Taylor said. "We're all kind of at the mercy of Amazon."

Her book remained on Amazon's site on Wednesday, but others published by pseudonymous authors on the topic of coronavirus had been removed.

Protocol | Workplace

Instacart workers are on strike. How far can it get them?

Instacart activists want a nationwide strike to start today, but many workers are too afraid of the company and feel they can't afford a day off of work.

Gig workers protest in front of an Amazon facility in 2020.

Photo: Michael Nagle/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Starting today, an Instacart organizing group is asking the app's gig workers to go on a nationwide strike to demand better payment structures, benefits and other changes to the way the company treats its workers — but if past strikes are any indication, most Instacart users probably won't even notice.

The majority of Instacart workers on forums like Reddit and Facebook appear either unaware of the planned strike or don't plan to participate because they are skeptical of its power, afraid of retaliation from the company or are too reliant on what they do make from the app to be able to afford to take even one day off of the platform. "Not unless someone is going to pay my bills," "It will never work, you will never be able to get every shopper to organize" and "Last time there was a 'strike' Instacart took away our quality bonus pay," are just a few of the comments Instacart shoppers have left in response to news of the strike.

Keep Reading Show less
Anna Kramer

Anna Kramer is a reporter at Protocol (Twitter: @ anna_c_kramer, email: akramer@protocol.com), where she writes about labor and workplace issues. Prior to joining the team, she covered tech and small business for the San Francisco Chronicle and privacy for Bloomberg Law. She is a recent graduate of Brown University, where she studied International Relations and Arabic and wrote her senior thesis about surveillance tools and technological development in the Middle East.

The way we work has fundamentally changed. COVID-19 upended business dealings and office work processes, putting into hyperdrive a move towards digital collaboration platforms that allow teams to streamline processes and communicate from anywhere. According to the International Data Corporation, the revenue for worldwide collaboration applications increased 32.9 percent from 2019 to 2020, reaching $22.6 billion; it's expected to become a $50.7 billion industry by 2025.

"While consumers and early adopter businesses had widely embraced collaborative applications prior to the pandemic, the market saw five years' worth of new users in the first six months of 2020," said Wayne Kurtzman, research director of social and collaboration at IDC. "This has cemented collaboration, at least to some extent, for every business, large and small."

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Silver

Kate Silver is an award-winning reporter and editor with 15-plus years of journalism experience. Based in Chicago, she specializes in feature and business reporting. Kate's reporting has appeared in the Washington Post, The Chicago Tribune, The Atlantic's CityLab, Atlas Obscura, The Telegraph and many other outlets.

Protocol | China

WeChat promises to stop accessing users’ photo albums amid public outcry

A tech blogger claimed that popular Chinese apps snoop around users' photo libraries, provoking heightened public concerns over privacy.

A survey launched by Sina Tech shows 94% of the some 30,000 responding users said they are not comfortable with apps reading their photo libraries just to allow them to share images faster in chats.

Photo: S3studio via Getty Images

A Chinese tech blogger dropped a bombshell last Friday, claiming on Chinese media that he found that several popular Chinese apps, including the Tencent-owned chat apps WeChat and QQ, as well as the Alibaba-owned ecommerce app Taobao, frequently access iPhone users' photo albums in the background even when those apps are not in use.

The original Weibo post from the tech blogger, using the handle of @Hackl0us, provoked intense debates about user privacy on the Chinese internet and consequently prompted WeChat to announce that it would stop fetching users' photo album data in the background.

Keep Reading Show less
Shen Lu

Shen Lu is a reporter with Protocol | China. Her writing has appeared in Foreign Policy, The New York Times and POLITICO, among other publications. She can be reached at shenlu@protocol.com.

Protocol | Enterprise

As businesses struggle with data, enterprise tech is cleaning up

Enterprise tech's vision of "big data" largely fell flat inside silos. But now, an army of providers think they've figured out the problems. And customers and investors are taking note.

Corporate data tends to settle in silos that makes it harder to understand the bigger picture. Enterprise tech vendors smell a lucrative opportunity.

Photo: Jim Witkowski/Unsplash

Data isn't the new oil; it's the new gold. And in any gold rush, the ones who make the most money in the long run are the tool makers and suppliers.

Enterprise tech vendors have long peddled a vision of corporate America centered around so-called "big data." But there was a big problem: Many of those projects failed to produce a return. An army of new providers think they've finally figured out the problem, and investors and customers are taking note.

Keep Reading Show less
Joe Williams

Joe Williams is a senior reporter at Protocol covering enterprise software, including industry giants like Salesforce, Microsoft, IBM and Oracle. He previously covered emerging technology for Business Insider. Joe can be reached at JWilliams@Protocol.com. To share information confidentially, he can also be contacted on a non-work device via Signal (+1-309-265-6120) or JPW53189@protonmail.com.

Protocol | Policy

What Frances Haugen’s SEC complaint means for the rest of tech

Haugen argues Facebook misled investors by failing to disclose its platforms' harms. If the SEC bites, the rest of tech could be next.

The question is whether the SEC will find the contents of Haugen's complaint relevant to investors' interests.

Photo: Matt McClain-Pool/Getty Images

Whistleblowers like former Facebook staffer Frances Haugen have pretty limited options when it comes to actually seeking redress for the harms they've observed and documented. There's no federal privacy law in the U.S. to speak of, Section 230 protects platforms for online speech and companies like Facebook are under no obligation to share any information with lawmakers, or anyone else, about what's happening on their sites.

But there is one agency that not only governs all publicly-traded companies, including in tech, but also offers whistleblowers like Haugen the opportunity for a payout: the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Latest Stories