LPs make most of the money from VC funds. So who are they?

"We live in Overshare City, right?" VCs are getting more comfortable with disclosing their limited partners — the real money behind their funds.

​Susan and Anne Wojcicki

Susan and Anne Wojcicki are tech executives — and investors in venture capital funds.

Photo: Drew Angerer/Getty Images

When Katie Jacobs Stanton and Alex Roetter unveiled their firm Moxxie Ventures' second fund, they weren't the only names attached to the announcement. Instead, the VCs made a deliberate decision to also disclose the people who had invested in the fund itself: big names like Anne and Susan Wojcicki, Laurene Powell Jobs' Emerson Collective and Goldman Sachs Asset Management.

"As both of us transitioned into the VC world, we're somewhat surprised with how opaque many things are, including the sources of capital," said Roetter, the former Twitter exec and Kitty Hawk president who joined Moxxie as a general partner of its second fund. "We just thought it was a no-brainer to report on something if you say it's important to you."

Venture capitalists have long kept the names of their backers a tightly guarded secret. Some of that came at the insistence of limited partners, or LPs, who are the ones providing the firms the cash they need to invest. Sometimes it's the firms that prefer not to disclose, lest their valuable backer base be swiped by a competing fund.

But in a push for transparency, more venture funds are starting to disclose the makeup of their LP base, and even who some of the individual investors are. Base10 Capital's new $250 million fund highlighted LPs like Florida A&M, the MacArthur Foundation and Plexo Capital. Sequoia Capital advertises that the majority of its funding comes from nonprofits and schools, and includes on its website a list of LPs like the Ford Foundation, MIT, the Smithsonian Institution and Boston Children's Hospital.

A16z founder Marc Andreessen is now known for backing small microfunds as part of his deal strategy. When former a16z crypto investor Jesse Walden announced his new fund, Variant, he told CoinDesk that Andreessen and a16z crypto-fund lead Chris Dixon had backed the fund, signaling his former employer's support.

"There's always been a little bit of attention because I think firms always want to pound their chests on the 'quality' of their investor base," said Ahoy Capital founder Chris Douvos, who is known for his Super LP blog. "For a fund to get an investment from a place like Princeton or Yale or Stanford, it's a real feather in their cap, and those investors tend to be bell cows and a lot of investors will see that as almost a Good Housekeeping seal of approval."

Still, disclosure of fund LPs has been rare. In the early 2000s, Sequoia famously kicked out some of its investors because they were public institutions that had to disclose their return rates through FOIA disclosures. Since then, many firms have kept their investor base under wraps, Douvos said. There's also some firm politics involved. Douvos said some firms prefer to keep LPs in the dark about who the other backers are so that they can play them off each other to pass governance changes.

LPs have their own incentives for keeping their name out of the lights. If a firm announces who some of their LPs are, those investors are often hit up by other funds who are looking for backing. It can be annoying to get the emails, and worse for the GPs, if there is a similar fund with better returns, it leaves a fund's LP base vulnerable to poaching.

"The LP world is kind of very secretive, very opaque, keeping cards close to the chest," Douvos said. "And I think that's changed as well as LPs have made themselves, both as institutions and individuals, kind of eager to trumpet their position in funds that are perceived to be hot."

LPs are also taking a larger part in the conversation, thanks to efforts like OpenLP. So much of public discussion about VC — on Twitter, in blog posts, on podcasts — fixates on the relationships between the VCs and the entrepreneurs. What gets left out: the quiet chats between the GPs and the LPs. OpenLP is trying to lift some of the secrecy by centralizing LP content in one place, and bring LPs into the conversation, said Beezer Clarkson, partner at Sapphire Ventures.

"The industry seemed to be established with, as a norm, that the LPs weren't public," Clarkson said. "There wasn't anywhere near as much perspective on the LP, so we launched OpenLP."

Driving the disclosures is also a push for increased diversity of LPs, since they're the ones receiving the majority of the returns from an investment. There are very few data sources that track the makeup of LPs in the venture industry, and it can be complicated to track given much of the money is going to institutions rather than individuals.

When Seven Seven Six went out to raise its debut fund, it set a target of 50% women and 15% Black and indigenous people among its LPs. It was "very hard but worth doing," founder Alexis Ohanian said in a tweet. The firm promised to release a report on its LP recruiting strategy, but it declined to name individual investors in the fund when asked by Protocol.

For Moxxie's Roetter, it was important to the firm to focus on the "giant and increasing wealth disparity in this country" and bring in diverse limited partners to benefit. The firm ended up with 46% women LPs, who represent 68% of the capital, and 18% BIPOC LPs.

"There's so many LPs out there, and they always have very nondescript, generic names, and it's hard to know who [they are] ... or where the money comes from," Roetter said. Some, like university endowments and nonprofit foundations, are obvious, but finding LPs is still heavily reliant on existing networks. Disclosing who some of the LPs are could help new funds identify capital sources and bring in more people into the venture ecosystem.

But the disclosures could also end up having the opposite of intended effect, and reinforce the haves and have-nots in the venture space, warned Douvos.

"I think that there's a possibility that transparency will increase the have and have-not dynamics, in that most LPs are actually less diligent than they should be and just chase hot brand names and look for signals and seals of approval of a handful of bell cow LPs," Douvos said. "This lemming-like behavior will only increase if it becomes more obvious who the bell cows are backing."

Of course, that can only happen if it becomes the norm to be public about it. The information about a fund's LP base (both in terms of backers' identity and diversity) is slowly, but surely, trickling out.

"In the past 20 years, we've gone from firms being really sensitive about their information being out there to people pounding their chests. We live in Overshare City, right?" Douvos said. "So share all the information you want, as long as it's good."


Kraken CEO defends his ‘back to dictatorship’ crackdown

Jesse Powell says the crypto exchange’s cultural revolution was necessary.

"Some people feel they should be able to be whatever they want to be in the workplace. But there's a line," Powell told Protocol.

Photo: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Kraken CEO Jesse Powell found himself under fire last month for provocative remarks he made that kicked off a contentious workplace battle and shined a light on the crypto exchange’s distinctive corporate culture.

A New York Times report based on leaked Slack messages and employee interviews accused Powell of making insensitive comments on gender and race, sparking heated conversations within Kraken. Powell responded forcefully, laying out new ground rules and principles in an attempt to define the way he wanted the company to operate — sharply at odds in some aspects with the tech industry’s standard practices.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Every day, millions of us press the “order” button on our favorite coffee store's mobile application: Our chosen brew will be on the counter when we arrive. It’s a personalized, seamless experience that we have all come to expect. What we don’t know is what’s happening behind the scenes. The mobile application is sourcing data from a database that stores information about each customer and what their favorite coffee drinks are. It is also leveraging event-streaming data in real time to ensure the ingredients for your personal coffee are in supply at your local store.

Applications like this power our daily lives, and if they can’t access massive amounts of data stored in a database as well as stream data “in motion” instantaneously, you — and millions of customers — won’t have these in-the-moment experiences.

Keep Reading Show less
Jennifer Goforth Gregory
Jennifer Goforth Gregory has worked in the B2B technology industry for over 20 years. As a freelance writer she writes for top technology brands, including IBM, HPE, Adobe, AT&T, Verizon, Epson, Oracle, Intel and Square. She specializes in a wide range of technology, such as AI, IoT, cloud, cybersecurity, and CX. Jennifer also wrote a bestselling book The Freelance Content Marketing Writer to help other writers launch a high earning freelance business.

GitHub’s CEO wants to go passwordless by 2025

Thomas Dohmke sat down with Protocol to talk about what the open-source code hosting site is doing to address security vulnerabilities, including an aim to go passwordless by 2025.

GitHub CEO Thomas Dohmke spoke to Protocol about its plan to go passwordless.

Photo: Vaughn Ridley/Sportsfile for Collision via Getty Images

GitHub CEO Thomas Dohmke wants to get rid of passwords.

Open-source software has been plagued with cybersecurity issues for years, and GitHub and other companies in the space have been taking steps to bolster security. Dohmke knows, however, that to get to the root of the industrywide problem will take more than just corporate action: It will ultimately require a sea change and cultural shift in how developers work.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma

Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol, where she writes about management, leadership and workplace issues in tech. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at mma@protocol.com.


Why foundation models in AI need to be released responsibly

Foundation models like GPT-3 and DALL-E are changing AI forever. We urgently need to develop community norms that guarantee research access and help guide the future of AI responsibly.

Releasing new foundation models doesn’t have to be an all or nothing proposition.

Illustration: sorbetto/DigitalVision Vectors

Percy Liang is director of the Center for Research on Foundation Models, a faculty affiliate at the Stanford Institute for Human-Centered AI and an associate professor of Computer Science at Stanford University.

Humans are not very good at forecasting the future, especially when it comes to technology.

Keep Reading Show less
Percy Liang
Percy Liang is Director of the Center for Research on Foundation Models, a Faculty Affiliate at the Stanford Institute for Human-Centered AI, and an Associate Professor of Computer Science at Stanford University.

The West’s drought could bring about a data center reckoning

When it comes to water use, data centers are the tech industry’s secret water hogs — and they could soon come under increased scrutiny.

Lake Mead, North America's largest artificial reservoir, has dropped to about 1,052 feet above sea level, the lowest it's been since being filled in 1937.

Photo: Mario Tama/Getty Images

The West is parched, and getting more so by the day. Lake Mead — the country’s largest reservoir — is nearing “dead pool” levels, meaning it may soon be too low to flow downstream. The entirety of the Four Corners plus California is mired in megadrought.

Amid this desiccation, hundreds of the country’s data centers use vast amounts of water to hum along. Dozens cluster around major metro centers, including those with mandatory or voluntary water restrictions in place to curtail residential and agricultural use.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).

Latest Stories