Analysis

The trouble with Magic Leap

The much-hyped AR startup is reportedly looking for a buyer. What went wrong?

A woman uses a Magic Leap AR headset

When the Magic Leap One was finally released in 2018, developers didn't quite know what to use it for. Was it an enterprise computing tool, a gaming machine, or the key to a still-to-be-determined Magicverse?

Photo: Chesnot via Getty Images

Revolutionary! Overhyped! The future of computing! A multibillion-dollar failure!

Few companies have elicited as many strong opinions in recent years as has Magic Leap, the augmented reality startup that has raised some $2.6 billion since 2011. Late Wednesday, news that the company may be looking for a buyer gave skeptics some additional ammunition — and made everyone else wonder: What went wrong with Magic Leap?


Get what matters in tech, in your inbox every morning. Sign up for Source Code.


Here are a few key issues the company has struggled with over the years.

A lack of focus

Magic Leap's goal has always been to reinvent computing as we know it — to build a new medium from scratch and redefine how we play, work and consume entertainment. And with $2.6 billion in funding, Magic Leap thought it could do it all: gaming, media, enterprise, and even military contracts.

All the while, the company insisted that it was getting ready to create much more than just hardware: Magic Leap executives have long talked about creating what they called the "Magicverse," which is essentially a spatial information layer for the real world — think of it as a kind of Google Maps for AR, complete with the ability to attach all kinds of data to real-world objects. And if all of that wasn't enough, Magic Leap has also been looking to use blockchain technology for distributed user data repositories.

This lack of focus not only contributed to Magic Leap's massive cash burn, it also complicated selling the developer hardware itself when it was finally released in 2018. Developers simply didn't know what they were supposed to be buying the headset for. Was it an enterprise computing tool, a gaming machine, or the key to a still-to-be-determined Magicverse?

In recent months, Magic Leap has been trying to reinvent itself as an enterprise AR company, complete with a redesigned website, promising that the headset will help customers "rewrite the rules of [their] industry." However, the rebrand may be too late. Plus, actually selling to enterprise customers is a lot harder than it may seem, as the case of failed AR startup Daqri shows.

No foothold in mobile

Apple, Facebook, Snapchat and even Google: Most of Magic Leap's major competitors have started their AR efforts with mobile apps and frameworks. This has allowed them to seed a developer ecosystem and at the same time collect valuable real-world data about use cases and challenges.

Magic Leap doesn't have any foothold in mobile. Instead, it has a comparably small developer community building apps that no ordinary user ever gets to try, as headsets still remain a rare commodity. Effectively, it's testing AR in a lab, with little to no real-world exposure.

The company has for some time realized that it will have to build a bridge between its devices and mobile AR. The company's chief content officer, Rio Caraeff, admitted as much in 2018, saying: "We need an interoperability solution." The following year, Magic Leap began looking for engineers to build a cross-platform framework that could extend its apps to mobile devices, and more recently, it has talked about enabling a "spectator view" on phones.

Still, to this day, Magic Leap's only presence in mobile app stores is its headset companion app, which has been downloaded fewer than 5,000 times on Google Play.

Florida is far away from top tech talent

Ask industry insiders about some of Magic Leap's biggest challenges, and you'll often hear one that has nothing to do with its technology. The company's headquarters has been in Plantation, Florida, ever since its was founded in 2011 — roughly 3000 miles from Silicon Valley, and just as far away from other tech epicenters, including Seattle and Los Angeles. That distance alone has made it much harder for Magic Leap to attract top talent, especially in a hyper-competitive market that includes deep-pocketed giants like Apple, Google and Facebook.

To be fair, there are also some good arguments for being outside of the Valley these days, including ever-increasing Bay Area housing prices. And Magic Leap does have offices in San Francisco and Sunnyvale, as well as a number of other cities around the world. However, there has reportedly been friction between the company's headquarters and its Silicon Valley satellite offices, and the company is still requiring relocation to Florida for many of its open positions.

Speaking on the condition of anonymity, one applicant who went through the company's interview process for an executive role described the issue this way: "They wanted me to relocate, which would have been very difficult. Ft. Lauderdale/Miami was not a viable option, and the commute would have been difficult."

Hard problems, lofty goals

To be fair, even if Magic Leap had addressed a lot of those issues early on, it still might find itself in a difficult situation today. That's because ultimately, the company has been trying to solve some really hard problems. Visual computing is very challenging, and it might still take years until we get the type of device that Magic Leap set out to build.

One of the most consistent voices of reason in the industry has been Facebook's Reality Labs chief scientist Michael Abrash, who warned all the way back in 2012 that consumer-ready AR hardware is "not going to happen anytime soon." Abrash has since frequently updated us on the progress of the technology, telling audiences in 2018 that the technology for socially acceptable AR glasses simply didn't exist yet.

These days, Facebook is working on its own set of AR glasses, as are companies like Snapchat and Apple. But you won't hear much about that work until it's done. That's very different from the approach Magic Leap has taken over the past several years. The company went out early with effects-heavy videos, aiming to sell the idea of visual computing even before it had any hardware to sell.

Splashy marketing may have been necessary to attract the VCs Magic Leap needed to raise billions of dollars. However, it turned into a catch-22 when it became clear that the company's first product wasn't able to deliver on the hype — and it may make it a lot harder to sell Magic Leap's business, especially for the $10 billion valuation quoted by Bloomberg on Wednesday.

A Magic Leap spokesperson declined to comment on a possible sale.

Entertainment

'The Wilds' is a must-watch guilty pleasure and more weekend recs

Don’t know what to do this weekend? We’ve got you covered.

Our favorite things this week.

Illustration: Protocol

The East Coast is getting a little preview of summer this weekend. If you want to stay indoors and beat the heat, we have a few suggestions this week to keep you entertained, like a new season of Amazon Prime’s guilty-pleasure show, “The Wilds,” a new game from Horizon Worlds that’s fun for everyone and a sneak peek from Adam Mosseri into what Instagram is thinking about Web3.

Keep Reading Show less
Janko Roettgers

Janko Roettgers (@jank0) is a senior reporter at Protocol, reporting on the shifting power dynamics between tech, media, and entertainment, including the impact of new technologies. Previously, Janko was Variety's first-ever technology writer in San Francisco, where he covered big tech and emerging technologies. He has reported for Gigaom, Frankfurter Rundschau, Berliner Zeitung, and ORF, among others. He has written three books on consumer cord-cutting and online music and co-edited an anthology on internet subcultures. He lives with his family in Oakland.

Sponsored Content

Why the digital transformation of industries is creating a more sustainable future

Qualcomm’s chief sustainability officer Angela Baker on how companies can view going “digital” as a way not only toward growth, as laid out in a recent report, but also toward establishing and meeting environmental, social and governance goals.

Three letters dominate business practice at present: ESG, or environmental, social and governance goals. The number of mentions of the environment in financial earnings has doubled in the last five years, according to GlobalData: 600,000 companies mentioned the term in their annual or quarterly results last year.

But meeting those ESG goals can be a challenge — one that businesses can’t and shouldn’t take lightly. Ahead of an exclusive fireside chat at Davos, Angela Baker, chief sustainability officer at Qualcomm, sat down with Protocol to speak about how best to achieve those targets and how Qualcomm thinks about its own sustainability strategy, net zero commitment, other ESG targets and more.

Keep Reading Show less
Chris Stokel-Walker

Chris Stokel-Walker is a freelance technology and culture journalist and author of "YouTubers: How YouTube Shook Up TV and Created a New Generation of Stars." His work has been published in The New York Times, The Guardian and Wired.

Workplace

Work expands to fill the time – but only if you let it

The former Todoist productivity expert drops time-blocking tips, lofi beats playlists for concentrating and other knowledge bombs.

“I do hope the productivity space as a whole is more intentional about pushing narratives that are about life versus just work.”

Photo: Courtesy of Fadeke Adegbuyi

Fadeke Adegbuyi knows how to dole out productivity advice. When she was a marketing manager at Doist, she taught users via blogs and newsletters about how to better organize their lives. Doist, the company behind to-do-list app Todoist and messaging app Twist, has pushed remote and asynchronous work for years. Adegbuyi’s job was to translate these ideas to the masses.

“We were thinking about asynchronous communication from a work point of view, of like: What is most effective for doing ambitious and awesome work, and also, what is most advantageous for living a life that feels balanced?” Adegbuyi said.

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at llawrence@protocol.com.

Workplace

It's OK to cry at work

Our comfort with crying at work has changed drastically over the past couple years. But experts said the hard part is helping workers get through the underlying mental health challenges.

Tech workers and workplace mental health experts said discussing emotions at work has become less taboo over the past couple years, but we’re still a ways away from completely normalizing the conversation — and adjusting policies accordingly.

Photo: Teerasak Ainkeaw / EyeEm via Getty Images

Everyone seems to be ugly crying on the internet these days. A new Snapchat filter makes people look like they’re breaking down on television, crying at celebratory occasions or crying when it sounds like they’re laughing. But one of the ways it's been used is weirdly cathartic: the workplace.

In one video, a creator posted a video of their co-worker merely sitting at a desk, presumably giggling or smiling, but the Snapchat tool gave them a pained look on their face. The video was captioned: “When you still have two hours left of your working day.” Another video showed someone asking their co-workers if they enjoy their job. Everyone said yes, but the filter indicated otherwise.

Keep Reading Show less
Sarah Roach

Sarah Roach is a news writer at Protocol (@sarahroach_) and contributes to Source Code. She is a recent graduate of George Washington University, where she studied journalism and mass communication and criminal justice. She previously worked for two years as editor in chief of her school's independent newspaper, The GW Hatchet.

Enterprise

Arm’s new CEO is planning the IPO it sought to avoid last year

Arm CEO Rene Haas told Protocol that Arm will be fine as a standalone company, as it focuses on efficient computing and giving customers a more finished product than a basic chip core design.

Rene Haas is taking Arm on a fresh trajectory.

Photo: Arm

The new path for Arm is beginning to come into focus.

Weeks after Nvidia’s $40 bid to acquire Arm from SoftBank collapsed, the appointment of Rene Haas to replace longtime chief executive Simon Segars has set the business on a fresh trajectory. Haas appears determined to shake up the company, with plans to lay off as much as 15% of the staff ahead of plans to take the company public once again by the end of March next year.

Keep Reading Show less
Max A. Cherney

Max A. Cherney is a senior reporter at Protocol covering the semiconductor industry. He has worked for Barron's magazine as a Technology Reporter, and its sister site MarketWatch. He is based in San Francisco.

Latest Stories
Bulletins