McConnell is killing $2,000 stimulus checks by tying them to Section 230

Both efforts are probably doomed.

McConnell is killing $2,000 stimulus checks by tying them to Section 230

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell teed up a bill to increase government stimulus checks from $600 to $2,000 and repeal Section 230.

Photo: Jim Lo Scalzo/EPA/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is tying the fate of $2,000 stimulus checks to the repeal of Section 230, an effort that will likely doom both pieces of legislation in the Senate.

McConnell on Tuesday teed up a bill to increase government stimulus checks from $600 to $2,000 and repeal Section 230, the law underpinning the modern internet.

"Here's the deal: The Senate is not going to split apart the three issues that President Trump linked together," McConnell said on Wednesday, referring to the $2,000 checks, Section 230 and an election fraud study.

Democrats have emphasized that those provisions would be a non-starter and amount to a "poison pill" that makes passing the $2,000 checks impossible.

Even top Republican senators sounded skeptical of the effort before it was officially announced by McConnell. GOP Sen. Susan Collins, who is typically a swing vote, told Protocol she believes Section 230 should be "reformed" but does not support repeal and does not believe it should be tied to the prospect of stimulus checks.

And Sen. John Cornyn, a high-ranking Republican with a close relationship with McConnell, said he doesn't believe Section 230 is "germane" to the COVID relief issues at hand.

Trump over the weekend demanded that the Senate pass legislation to increase payments to Americans to $2,000 while repealing Section 230. He said that was part of the deal he struck with congressional leaders in order for him to sign the $2.3 trillion COVID relief and government spending package.

McConnell acknowledged Trump's request on Tuesday, saying he requested to have the issues "linked." He promised that the Senate would "begin a process to bring these priorities into focus" this week.

Aides and lobbyists told Protocol that it's almost impossible that McConnell has secured enough votes in the Senate to pass legislation that would increase checks to $2,000 and repeal Section 230. It appears to be a political move that allows McConnell to appease some of the president's top priorities without passing difficult legislation, they said.

"The American people overwhelmingly support $2,000 relief checks," said Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden, who helped write the original Section 230 statute. "Mitch McConnell knows that blocking $2,000 relief checks is politically toxic for Sens. Loeffler and Perdue, so he's going to tie the checks to a poison pill like rewriting our Internet laws. It's a classic McConnell move: Use process gimmicks to kill popular policies and try to deflect the blame."

Even some of the senators most intent on reforming the bedrock internet law said this legislative effort has little to do with tech companies and their legal protections.

"I'm hardly shy about criticizing Section 230, but making a lifeline for struggling families contingent on a half-baked, meat-ax evisceration of the law is cruel and stupid," said Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal, who introduced the EARN IT Act, which would narrow tech's legal protections. "Americans deserve relief without delay, and reforming Section 230 deserves its own debate — one that I've helped lead in Congress, and which I look forward to continuing with a more serious, thoughtful administration in January."

Democratic Sen. Brian Schatz, who has also introduced legislation to tweak the controversial law, said this is not "a serious lawmaking effort."

"I have a bipartisan bill that simply updates the law in practical ways, but the reason no one is talking about it is BECAUSE it is a serious attempt at making a law," Schatz said.

The vote is set to be held later this week. McConnell could still choose to hold a vote on the House-passed bill to increase stimulus payments to $2,000.

Read the bill below.

New McConnell Bill.pdf

Update: This article was updated at 12:45 p.m. Wednesday to include Mitch McConnell's comments.


Nobody will help Big Tech prevent online terrorism but itself

There’s no will in Congress or the C-suites of social media giants for a new approach, but smaller platforms would have room to step up — if they decided to.

Timothy Kujawski of Buffalo lights candles at a makeshift memorial as people gather at the scene of a mass shooting at Tops Friendly Market at Jefferson Avenue and Riley Street on Sunday, May 15, 2022 in Buffalo, NY. The fatal shooting of 10 people at a grocery store in a historically Black neighborhood of Buffalo by a young white gunman is being investigated as a hate crime and an act of racially motivated violent extremism, according to federal officials.

Photo: Kent Nishimura / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images

The shooting in Buffalo, New York, that killed 10 people over the weekend has put the spotlight back on social media companies. Some of the attack was livestreamed, beginning on Amazon-owned Twitch, and the alleged shooter appears to have written about how his racist motivations arose from misinformation on smaller or fringe sites including 4chan.

In response, policymakers are directing their anger at tech platforms, with New York Governor Kathy Hochul calling for the companies to be “more vigilant in monitoring” and for “a legal responsibility to ensure that such hate cannot populate these sites.”

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Sponsored Content

Foursquare data story: leveraging location data for site selection

We take a closer look at points of interest and foot traffic patterns to demonstrate how location data can be leveraged to inform better site selecti­on strategies.

Imagine: You’re the leader of a real estate team at a restaurant brand looking to open a new location in Manhattan. You have two options you’re evaluating: one site in SoHo, and another site in the Flatiron neighborhood. Which do you choose?

Keep Reading Show less

We're answering all your questions about the crypto crash.

Photo: Chris Liverani/Unsplash

People started talking about another crypto winter in January, when falling prices had wiped out $1 trillion in value from November’s peak. Prices rallied back in March, restoring some of the losses. Then crypto fell hard again, with bitcoin down more than 60% from its all-time high and other cryptocurrencies harder hit. The market’s message was clear: Crypto winter was no longer coming. It’s here.

If you’ve got questions about the crypto crash, the Protocol Fintech team has answers.

Keep Reading Show less

How the founders of HalloApp plan to fix social media

Former WhatsApp execs talk about lessons learned building their privacy-focused platform.

Image: HalloApp

Stop me if you've heard this one before: An app that promises to be the anti-Facebook is focusing on real connections instead of ads and brands. Of course, this has been tried before. There’s an entire digital graveyard littered with the corpses of apps that tried and failed to offer a compelling alternative to the inescapable social network. But maybe two former Facebook employees who were instrumental at WhatsApp know the secret to drawing in users — and keeping them.

Neeraj Arora and Michael Donohue, who served as WhatsApp’s chief business officer and engineering director, respectively, started HalloApp in late 2019, dubbing it the “first real-relationship network.” Arora helped negotiate WhatsApp’s $22 billion sale to Meta (then known as Facebook Inc.) in 2014. He realized after joining the social giant that Facebook’s advertising-focused business model wasn’t serving its users and set out to create an alternative.

Keep Reading Show less
Nat Rubio-Licht

Nat Rubio-Licht is a Los Angeles-based news writer at Protocol. They graduated from Syracuse University with a degree in newspaper and online journalism in May 2020. Prior to joining the team, they worked at the Los Angeles Business Journal as a technology and aerospace reporter.


Business travel is Big Tech’s next climate challenge

Tech companies are waking up to the dangers business flights pose to the climate. Now, they’re trying to help employees figure out how to choose modes of travel that emit less carbon pollution.

Despite the fact that companies are focused more on cutting carbon, few have specific guidelines for individual employees on how to choose flights.

Photo: Gary Lopater via Unsplash

There’s no way around it: Business flights are frying the planet.

About 90% of business travel carbon emissions come from flying, and just 1% of travelers — many of whom fly for work — are responsible for 50% of all air travel carbon pollution. As the tech industry continues to make sweeping net zero pledges, actually getting there will require making smarter choices when it comes to flying.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma

Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol, where she writes about management, leadership and workplace issues in tech. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at mma@protocol.com.

Latest Stories