Power

Microsoft's new cloud gaming service is more about the cloud than gaming

Project xCloud is no Netflix for video games, but it could still turn into a massive business opportunity.

Xbox Game Pass app

Coming soon to an iPhone near you?

Photo: Rafael Henrique/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

Microsoft is getting serious about cloud gaming. The Xbox maker will add its Project xCloud game-streaming service to its Game Pass Ultimate subscription tier in September, Phil Spencer, Microsoft's head of gaming, announced in a blog post Thursday morning. This will enable Game Pass Ultimate subscribers to stream more than 100 games directly from the cloud to compatible phones and tablets.

xCloud may not be the much-touted "Netflix for games" just yet — but for Microsoft, that may not even be the ultimate goal. The company's positioning of cloud gaming as an add-on to an existing service shows that even with its gaming division, everything still goes back to selling more-lucrative cloud services contracts.

Microsoft first began testing Project xCloud with a handful of games in September, and the company isn't alone in using the cloud to deliver console-quality games to less powerful devices. xCloud is competing with similar services from Sony, Nvidia and Google, and there have long been rumblings about Amazon developing its own game-streaming service.

Microsoft revealed earlier this year that it now has more than 10 million paying Game Pass subscribers. The company didn't break out how many of those subscribers are paying for the $15-a-month Ultimate tier, but xCloud could be a powerful upsell incentive: xCloud users will be able to play games together with close to 100 million Xbox Live subscribers, begin a game on their Xbox, and then continue at the exact same spot on their mobile device, "just like you do with the popular movie and music streaming services," as Spencer put it.

That being said, the service will only be available in some markets, and it's still unclear whether xCloud will be available on iOS devices, as Apple has blocked similar moves in the past.

xCloud might be likened to Netflix and Spotify, but the fact that it is being positioned as an add-on to an existing subscription tier shows that the company isn't quite there yet. The same is true for Microsoft's key cloud gaming competitors: Sony's PlayStation Now service is based on a similar all-in subscription model, offering access to over 800 games for a monthly fee of $9.99, or $60 annually. However, PlayStation Now is thus far only available on PCs and the company's PS4 console, and the company hasn't committed to mobile game streaming.

Google's Stadia service does bring console gaming to mobile, albeit without a real console. Consumers only need a compatible controller and a Chromecast Ultra streaming adapter to play Stadia games on their TV, and the service is also available on mobile and PCs. But while PS Now and xCloud are based on an all-you-can-eat subscription model, Stadia instead relies on a more traditional pay-per-game business, while offering a limited number of "free" games to consumers who pay $10 per month.

Nvidia's GeForce Now offers consumers the ability to stream games they already own as well as free-to-play games to mobile devices, underpowered PCs, and the company's own Nvidia Shield TV streaming device. This approach has faced significant pushback from game publishers, many of which often strike platform-exclusive deals with mobile, PC and console app stores. Some major publishers, including Activision Blizzard, have removed their titles as a result, which could help explain why the service has seen a somewhat slow start. Earlier this year, Nvidia said that the service was used by "hundreds of thousands of members." For comparison, Sony's PlayStation Now service hit 2.2 million paying subscribers in May.

However, for Nvidia, Google and Microsoft, cloud gaming isn't just about paying consumers. The companies are also looking to strengthen key parts of their existing businesses. In the case of Nvidia, that business is selling chips. "Cloud gaming helps to democratize ray tracing and also drive developers to optimize for low-latency as well as decouple the gaming experience from the PC," said Moor Insights & Strategy analyst Anshel Sag. In other words: Nvidia's end game is about enabling cloud gaming as an industry, not necessarily running a cloud gaming service. "It's about moving more GPUs by doing all that," he said.

Google and Microsoft, on the other hand, have been busy competing with each other in the cloud computing space, and cloud gaming is just another application to run on their cloud infrastructure. "It's 100% about Azure vs. Google Cloud Platform," Sag said. Stadia could be a powerful case study as Google is looking to sell cloud streaming technology to the video game industry — in much the same way that Amazon built a cloud computing infrastructure to support its own store and then started selling that technology to other businesses.

Likewise, xCloud may help Microsoft sell additional Game Pass subscriptions, but the resulting revenue is chump change compared to lucrative cloud computing contracts the company could gain from selling xCloud's technology to publishers who may want to control their own streaming library of games instead of giving a cut to a third-party streaming platform. In the last quarter alone, Microsoft's commercial cloud business generated over $13 billion, a jump of 39% over the same period the year before. "Everything Microsoft does as a company is framed around one question," Sag said: "Does it drive Azure usage?"

The same is likely true for Amazon's efforts, which are now pegged for a 2021 launch. However, cloud gaming services do need to have access to popular titles to attract enough interest from consumers. That puts Microsoft, which operates more than a dozen game studios in-house, at a key advantage over the competition. Case in point: Amazon's first in-house game, Crucible, bombed so badly that the company pulled the public release just a few days after its launch.

Protocol | Workplace

Instacart workers are on strike. How far can it get them?

Instacart activists want a nationwide strike to start today, but many workers are too afraid of the company and feel they can't afford a day off of work.

Gig workers protest in front of an Amazon facility in 2020.

Photo: Michael Nagle/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Starting today, an Instacart organizing group is asking the app's gig workers to go on a nationwide strike to demand better payment structures, benefits and other changes to the way the company treats its workers — but if past strikes are any indication, most Instacart users probably won't even notice.

The majority of Instacart workers on forums like Reddit and Facebook appear either unaware of the planned strike or don't plan to participate because they are skeptical of its power, afraid of retaliation from the company or are too reliant on what they do make from the app to be able to afford to take even one day off of the platform. "Not unless someone is going to pay my bills," "It will never work, you will never be able to get every shopper to organize" and "Last time there was a 'strike' Instacart took away our quality bonus pay," are just a few of the comments Instacart shoppers have left in response to news of the strike.

Keep Reading Show less
Anna Kramer

Anna Kramer is a reporter at Protocol (Twitter: @ anna_c_kramer, email: akramer@protocol.com), where she writes about labor and workplace issues. Prior to joining the team, she covered tech and small business for the San Francisco Chronicle and privacy for Bloomberg Law. She is a recent graduate of Brown University, where she studied International Relations and Arabic and wrote her senior thesis about surveillance tools and technological development in the Middle East.

The way we work has fundamentally changed. COVID-19 upended business dealings and office work processes, putting into hyperdrive a move towards digital collaboration platforms that allow teams to streamline processes and communicate from anywhere. According to the International Data Corporation, the revenue for worldwide collaboration applications increased 32.9 percent from 2019 to 2020, reaching $22.6 billion; it's expected to become a $50.7 billion industry by 2025.

"While consumers and early adopter businesses had widely embraced collaborative applications prior to the pandemic, the market saw five years' worth of new users in the first six months of 2020," said Wayne Kurtzman, research director of social and collaboration at IDC. "This has cemented collaboration, at least to some extent, for every business, large and small."

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Silver

Kate Silver is an award-winning reporter and editor with 15-plus years of journalism experience. Based in Chicago, she specializes in feature and business reporting. Kate's reporting has appeared in the Washington Post, The Chicago Tribune, The Atlantic's CityLab, Atlas Obscura, The Telegraph and many other outlets.

Protocol | China

WeChat promises to stop accessing users’ photo albums amid public outcry

A tech blogger claimed that popular Chinese apps snoop around users' photo libraries, provoking heightened public concerns over privacy.

A survey launched by Sina Tech shows 94% of the some 30,000 responding users said they are not comfortable with apps reading their photo libraries just to allow them to share images faster in chats.

Photo: S3studio via Getty Images

A Chinese tech blogger dropped a bombshell last Friday, claiming on Chinese media that he found that several popular Chinese apps, including the Tencent-owned chat apps WeChat and QQ, as well as the Alibaba-owned ecommerce app Taobao, frequently access iPhone users' photo albums in the background even when those apps are not in use.

The original Weibo post from the tech blogger, using the handle of @Hackl0us, provoked intense debates about user privacy on the Chinese internet and consequently prompted WeChat to announce that it would stop fetching users' photo album data in the background.

Keep Reading Show less
Shen Lu

Shen Lu is a reporter with Protocol | China. Her writing has appeared in Foreign Policy, The New York Times and POLITICO, among other publications. She can be reached at shenlu@protocol.com.

Protocol | Enterprise

As businesses struggle with data, enterprise tech is cleaning up

Enterprise tech's vision of "big data" largely fell flat inside silos. But now, an army of providers think they've figured out the problems. And customers and investors are taking note.

Corporate data tends to settle in silos that makes it harder to understand the bigger picture. Enterprise tech vendors smell a lucrative opportunity.

Photo: Jim Witkowski/Unsplash

Data isn't the new oil; it's the new gold. And in any gold rush, the ones who make the most money in the long run are the tool makers and suppliers.

Enterprise tech vendors have long peddled a vision of corporate America centered around so-called "big data." But there was a big problem: Many of those projects failed to produce a return. An army of new providers think they've finally figured out the problem, and investors and customers are taking note.

Keep Reading Show less
Joe Williams

Joe Williams is a senior reporter at Protocol covering enterprise software, including industry giants like Salesforce, Microsoft, IBM and Oracle. He previously covered emerging technology for Business Insider. Joe can be reached at JWilliams@Protocol.com. To share information confidentially, he can also be contacted on a non-work device via Signal (+1-309-265-6120) or JPW53189@protonmail.com.

Protocol | Policy

What Frances Haugen’s SEC complaint means for the rest of tech

Haugen argues Facebook misled investors by failing to disclose its platforms' harms. If the SEC bites, the rest of tech could be next.

The question is whether the SEC will find the contents of Haugen's complaint relevant to investors' interests.

Photo: Matt McClain-Pool/Getty Images

Whistleblowers like former Facebook staffer Frances Haugen have pretty limited options when it comes to actually seeking redress for the harms they've observed and documented. There's no federal privacy law in the U.S. to speak of, Section 230 protects platforms for online speech and companies like Facebook are under no obligation to share any information with lawmakers, or anyone else, about what's happening on their sites.

But there is one agency that not only governs all publicly-traded companies, including in tech, but also offers whistleblowers like Haugen the opportunity for a payout: the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Latest Stories