Power

Microsoft's new cloud gaming service is more about the cloud than gaming

Project xCloud is no Netflix for video games, but it could still turn into a massive business opportunity.

Xbox Game Pass app

Coming soon to an iPhone near you?

Photo: Rafael Henrique/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

Microsoft is getting serious about cloud gaming. The Xbox maker will add its Project xCloud game-streaming service to its Game Pass Ultimate subscription tier in September, Phil Spencer, Microsoft's head of gaming, announced in a blog post Thursday morning. This will enable Game Pass Ultimate subscribers to stream more than 100 games directly from the cloud to compatible phones and tablets.

xCloud may not be the much-touted "Netflix for games" just yet — but for Microsoft, that may not even be the ultimate goal. The company's positioning of cloud gaming as an add-on to an existing service shows that even with its gaming division, everything still goes back to selling more-lucrative cloud services contracts.

Microsoft first began testing Project xCloud with a handful of games in September, and the company isn't alone in using the cloud to deliver console-quality games to less powerful devices. xCloud is competing with similar services from Sony, Nvidia and Google, and there have long been rumblings about Amazon developing its own game-streaming service.

Microsoft revealed earlier this year that it now has more than 10 million paying Game Pass subscribers. The company didn't break out how many of those subscribers are paying for the $15-a-month Ultimate tier, but xCloud could be a powerful upsell incentive: xCloud users will be able to play games together with close to 100 million Xbox Live subscribers, begin a game on their Xbox, and then continue at the exact same spot on their mobile device, "just like you do with the popular movie and music streaming services," as Spencer put it.

That being said, the service will only be available in some markets, and it's still unclear whether xCloud will be available on iOS devices, as Apple has blocked similar moves in the past.

xCloud might be likened to Netflix and Spotify, but the fact that it is being positioned as an add-on to an existing subscription tier shows that the company isn't quite there yet. The same is true for Microsoft's key cloud gaming competitors: Sony's PlayStation Now service is based on a similar all-in subscription model, offering access to over 800 games for a monthly fee of $9.99, or $60 annually. However, PlayStation Now is thus far only available on PCs and the company's PS4 console, and the company hasn't committed to mobile game streaming.

Google's Stadia service does bring console gaming to mobile, albeit without a real console. Consumers only need a compatible controller and a Chromecast Ultra streaming adapter to play Stadia games on their TV, and the service is also available on mobile and PCs. But while PS Now and xCloud are based on an all-you-can-eat subscription model, Stadia instead relies on a more traditional pay-per-game business, while offering a limited number of "free" games to consumers who pay $10 per month.

Nvidia's GeForce Now offers consumers the ability to stream games they already own as well as free-to-play games to mobile devices, underpowered PCs, and the company's own Nvidia Shield TV streaming device. This approach has faced significant pushback from game publishers, many of which often strike platform-exclusive deals with mobile, PC and console app stores. Some major publishers, including Activision Blizzard, have removed their titles as a result, which could help explain why the service has seen a somewhat slow start. Earlier this year, Nvidia said that the service was used by "hundreds of thousands of members." For comparison, Sony's PlayStation Now service hit 2.2 million paying subscribers in May.

However, for Nvidia, Google and Microsoft, cloud gaming isn't just about paying consumers. The companies are also looking to strengthen key parts of their existing businesses. In the case of Nvidia, that business is selling chips. "Cloud gaming helps to democratize ray tracing and also drive developers to optimize for low-latency as well as decouple the gaming experience from the PC," said Moor Insights & Strategy analyst Anshel Sag. In other words: Nvidia's end game is about enabling cloud gaming as an industry, not necessarily running a cloud gaming service. "It's about moving more GPUs by doing all that," he said.

Google and Microsoft, on the other hand, have been busy competing with each other in the cloud computing space, and cloud gaming is just another application to run on their cloud infrastructure. "It's 100% about Azure vs. Google Cloud Platform," Sag said. Stadia could be a powerful case study as Google is looking to sell cloud streaming technology to the video game industry — in much the same way that Amazon built a cloud computing infrastructure to support its own store and then started selling that technology to other businesses.

Likewise, xCloud may help Microsoft sell additional Game Pass subscriptions, but the resulting revenue is chump change compared to lucrative cloud computing contracts the company could gain from selling xCloud's technology to publishers who may want to control their own streaming library of games instead of giving a cut to a third-party streaming platform. In the last quarter alone, Microsoft's commercial cloud business generated over $13 billion, a jump of 39% over the same period the year before. "Everything Microsoft does as a company is framed around one question," Sag said: "Does it drive Azure usage?"

The same is likely true for Amazon's efforts, which are now pegged for a 2021 launch. However, cloud gaming services do need to have access to popular titles to attract enough interest from consumers. That puts Microsoft, which operates more than a dozen game studios in-house, at a key advantage over the competition. Case in point: Amazon's first in-house game, Crucible, bombed so badly that the company pulled the public release just a few days after its launch.

Entertainment

Niantic’s future hinges on mapping the metaverse

The maker of Pokémon Go is hoping the metaverse will deliver its next big break.

Niantic's new standalone messaging and social app, Campfire, is a way to get players organizing and meeting up in the real world. It launches today for select Pokémon Go players.

Image: Niantic

Pokémon Go sent Niantic to the moon. But now the San Francisco-based augmented reality developer has returned to earth, and it’s been trying to chart its way back to the stars ever since. The company yesterday announced layoffs of about 8% of its workforce (about 85 to 90 people) and canceled four projects, Bloomberg reported, signaling another disappointment for the studio that still generates about $1 billion in revenue per year from Pokémon Go.

Finding its next big hit has been Niantic’s priority for years, and the company has been coming up short. For much of the past year or so, Niantic has turned its attention to the metaverse, with hopes that its location-based mobile games, AR tech and company philosophy around fostering physical connection and outdoor exploration can help it build what it now calls the “real world metaverse.”

Keep Reading Show less
Nick Statt

Nick Statt is Protocol's video game reporter. Prior to joining Protocol, he was news editor at The Verge covering the gaming industry, mobile apps and antitrust out of San Francisco, in addition to managing coverage of Silicon Valley tech giants and startups. He now resides in Rochester, New York, home of the garbage plate and, completely coincidentally, the World Video Game Hall of Fame. He can be reached at nstatt@protocol.com.

Every day, millions of us press the “order” button on our favorite coffee store's mobile application: Our chosen brew will be on the counter when we arrive. It’s a personalized, seamless experience that we have all come to expect. What we don’t know is what’s happening behind the scenes. The mobile application is sourcing data from a database that stores information about each customer and what their favorite coffee drinks are. It is also leveraging event-streaming data in real time to ensure the ingredients for your personal coffee are in supply at your local store.

Applications like this power our daily lives, and if they can’t access massive amounts of data stored in a database as well as stream data “in motion” instantaneously, you — and millions of customers — won’t have these in-the-moment experiences.

Keep Reading Show less
Jennifer Goforth Gregory
Jennifer Goforth Gregory has worked in the B2B technology industry for over 20 years. As a freelance writer she writes for top technology brands, including IBM, HPE, Adobe, AT&T, Verizon, Epson, Oracle, Intel and Square. She specializes in a wide range of technology, such as AI, IoT, cloud, cybersecurity, and CX. Jennifer also wrote a bestselling book The Freelance Content Marketing Writer to help other writers launch a high earning freelance business.
Climate

Supreme Court takes a sledgehammer to greenhouse gas regulations

The court ruled 6-3 that the EPA cannot use the Clean Air Act to regulate power plant greenhouse gas emissions. That leaves a patchwork of policies from states, utilities and, increasingly, tech companies to pick up the slack.

The Supreme Court struck a major blow to the federal government's ability to regulate greenhouse gases.

Eric Lee/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Striking down the right to abortion may be the Supreme Court's highest-profile decision this term. But on Thursday, the court handed down an equally massive verdict on the federal government's ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. In the case of West Virginia v. EPA, the court decided that the agency has no ability to regulate greenhouse gas pollution under the Clean Air Act. Weakening the federal government's powers leaves a patchwork of states, utilities and, increasingly, tech companies to pick up the slack in reducing carbon pollution.

Keep Reading Show less
Brian Kahn

Brian ( @blkahn) is Protocol's climate editor. Previously, he was the managing editor and founding senior writer at Earther, Gizmodo's climate site, where he covered everything from the weather to Big Oil's influence on politics. He also reported for Climate Central and the Wall Street Journal. In the even more distant past, he led sleigh rides to visit a herd of 7,000 elk and boat tours on the deepest lake in the U.S.

Fintech

Can crypto regulate itself? The Lummis-Gillibrand bill hopes so.

Creating the equivalent of the stock markets’ FINRA for crypto is the ideal, but experts doubt that it will be easy.

The idea of creating a government-sanctioned private regulatory association has been drawing more attention in the debate over how to rein in a fast-growing industry whose technological quirks have baffled policymakers.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Regulating crypto is complicated. That’s why Sens. Cynthia Lummis and Kirsten Gillibrand want to explore the creation of a private sector group to help federal regulators do their job.

The bipartisan bill introduced by Lummis and Gillibrand would require the CFTC and the SEC to work with the crypto industry to look into setting up a self-regulatory organization to “facilitate innovative, efficient and orderly markets for digital assets.”

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Enterprise

Alperovitch: Cybersecurity defenders can’t be on high alert every day

With the continued threat of Russian cyber escalation, cybersecurity and geopolitics expert Dmitri Alperovitch says it’s not ideal for the U.S. to oscillate between moments of high alert and lesser states of cyber readiness.

Dmitri Alperovitch (the co-founder and former CTO of CrowdStrike) speaks at RSA Conference 2022.

Photo: RSA Conference

When it comes to cybersecurity vigilance, Dmitri Alperovitch wants to see more focus on resiliency of IT systems — and less on doing "surges" around particular dates or events.

For instance, whatever Russia is doing at the moment.

Keep Reading Show less
Kyle Alspach

Kyle Alspach ( @KyleAlspach) is a senior reporter at Protocol, focused on cybersecurity. He has covered the tech industry since 2010 for outlets including VentureBeat, CRN and the Boston Globe. He lives in Portland, Oregon, and can be reached at kalspach@protocol.com.

Latest Stories
Bulletins