Entertainment

Why Xbox's Phil Spencer thinks Minecraft is a blueprint for the metaverse

Xbox chief Phil Spencer talks with Protocol about Microsoft’s vision for the metaverse and the promise of player and creator freedom.

Phil Spencer wearing a black jacket and smiling while talking at E3

For Xbox head Phil Spencer, the lessons learned from Minecraft’s success are informing where gaming needs to go from here.

Photo: Christian Petersen/Getty Images

When Phil Spencer thinks about the tech and gaming industries’ newfound obsession with the metaverse, the Xbox chief’s mind goes to Minecraft. It’s a logical leap. The sandbox creation tool, the bestselling video game of all time and one of Spencer’s most crucial acquisitions back in 2014, is in its own way a kind of proto-metaverse. Inspiring many of gaming’s biggest and most popular modern titles, Minecraft was among the first of its kind to facilitate player creations that take on entire lives of their own, a games-within-a-game approach to design.

“Minecraft is really an open creation tool, where people can go and create things, share them through our community marketplace and sell them to other members of the community. And I think that openness inside of Minecraft is such a critical part in terms of what it's become,” Spencer told Protocol in an interview last week.

Minecraft is unique in both its scope and size and that it permeates almost every platform imaginable, even in virtual places where it cannot be played. On YouTube, the game passed a staggering milestone with more than 1 trillion views on the video platform, Microsoft announced last week. “So many of those views — really all of those views — are of creations not that we made as Xbox or Mojang, but really what creators have done inside of Minecraft and shared with the rest of the world. And I just think it shows the power of a social and open creator platform,” Spencer said.

For Spencer, who is among the core group of executives at Microsoft empowered to steer the company forward, the lessons learned from Minecraft’s success are informing where he believes gaming needs to go from here. In particular, the growth of player-created virtual worlds illustrates what ingredients Spencer said are required for the metaverse to shed its dystopian roots and succeed as more than just a buzzword being slapped onto existing products and platforms and used to sell promises about the future.

“I draw some analogies to the web,” Spencer said. “We felt like we had this really open platform for creation and consumption. But frankly, there were some companies that really created and captured some of the control of that web, whether it's the control of the discovery or the monetization or the social, which meant some of what happens on the web today doesn't necessarily feel as open as I think we would all like it to be.”

Spencer pointed to discourse around the metaverse and how it harkens back to ideas the gaming industry has been kicking around for decades. Games like Second Life and influential massively multiplayer online titles like Ultima Online and World of Warcraft helped give form to ideas from science fiction around virtual worlds, digital alter egos and entire social systems mediated through screens and systems. But Spencer said it is Minecraft — and the power and agency that it hands players to become architects of their own online experiences — that provides the most promise.

“We're spending a lot of time as leaders coming together talking about the learnings that we've had and how the technical underpinnings might come together. But more fundamental to me is why Microsoft? Like, why is this metaverse that a lot of people are focusing on, why is it better for players? Why is it better for creators?” Spencer said. “I think it's easy for a lot of tech companies to describe why the metaverse might be better for their company. But we've just learned that if we put the player at the center, to use my gaming vocabulary again, and try to build an ecosystem that works around their needs and creator needs, that the platform dynamic will take off.”

Microsoft, more so than perhaps any other tech or gaming company, already owns and operates many of the pieces that may play an instrumental role inwhatever shape the metaverse takes. The company runs Xbox, a global gaming platform and digital store serving software now on virtually any screen with an internet connection, and it has the HoloLens hardware group and AltspaceVR and Mesh platforms for AR, VR and mixed reality experiences. It has Windows, Office and Teams, its trifecta of productivity and workplace collaboration tools, and the Azure cloud platform powering it all.

It raises the question: What’s stopping Microsoft from building this all itself, connecting it together and doing corporate battle with Meta and Mark Zuckerberg’s grand ambitions to keep his social networking company at the forefront of the attention economy? Spencer said the teams in charge of these various divisions are indeed meeting weekly, to develop for instance new games that make use of the Mesh platform’s 3D digital avatars.

Yet Spencer, who’s worked at Microsoft since he started as an intern 33 years ago, said he sees the metaverse not as another business frontier to conquer, but as an opportunity to avoid replicating the level of locked-down ecosystem control of the internet’s current generation. Instead, he said, companies can and should try and re-create the level of freedom and creativity that gave birth to Web 2.0 in the first place. That will require openness, interoperability and a lack of corporate self-interest that may run counter to Big Tech’s obsessive fixation on growth, profits and ironclad control of digital commerce.

“What we had [with Windows] was a platform where if you had a compiler and an ability to distribute code, you had free access to the other customers that were on the platform,” he said. “There wasn't one store that everybody had to go through in order to distribute what they were doing. There wasn't one social that everybody had to use. It was an open platform.”

Spencer points to Xbox, and how the platform exists now on many devices both as a way to serve first-party games like the newly launched Halo Infinite and third-party titles that are complementary to the Xbox business and, in a traditional view, in competition with some elements of it, too. “We're kind of in a unique position in that people play Minecraft on our platform. They play Roblox on our platform. They play Fortnite on our platform,” Spencer said. “We don't actually view Roblox or Fortnite as competitors to what we're doing. They're critical partners in the progress that we're making as a gaming platform company.”

It sounds familiar, and in many ways it’s a similar pitch to the one Zuckerberg made when, in October, he rebranded Facebook and set his company on a path toward realizing a metaverse driven by virtual and augmented reality. It requires companies working together, creating new standards and opening the door to levels of interoperability that right now feel all but impossible.

But Spencer, and his track record at Microsoft, make him a more convincing steward of such a vision, if only by looking at the turnaround at Xbox over the last decade. Spencer took over in 2014 after the disastrous launch of the Xbox One. In the span of a half-decade, he took the Xbox business from arguably its least relevant phase to an industry leader once more. The company built a bridge between the Xbox platform and Windows 10, gave players the ability to play and purchase software across platforms and launched Xbox Game Pass, a subscription product now counting tens of millions of customers.

Spencer’s reorientation of the Xbox business, away from sales and toward a services-first ecosystem, has forced Microsoft’s prime competitor Sony to start building its own version of Game Pass. Microsoft’s willingness to experiment, created arguably out of necessity after the PlayStation 4 outsold the Xbox One roughly two to one, has also been instrumental in helping break down barriers once considered sacrosanct by the game industry’s biggest corporate titans, like cross-platform play and purchasing across platforms. (Microsoft, unlike most game developers, also owns the primary store it distributes through, meaning it’s not in most cases paying a middleman a 30% cut.) In many ways, these benefits are the necessary precursors to the types of transmedia and cross-platform experiences the metaverse promises.

“I want to be able to experience the things I own on any screen that can render those,” he said. “I want to be able to have the experiences I have anywhere. I want to have them with the people I want to experience them with and it requires a lot of cloud infrastructure to make that happen. It requires, like I said, a real open approach.”

Spencer said this approach will be how Microsoft tackles the metaverse going forward. “We will go at this on the metaverse side with the same sensibilities that we've had in gaming, that people should be able to play the games they want, where they want to play them, with the people they want to play with. Because we've actually thought that in the end that opens up the largest experience for creators and for players," Spencer said.

“Because if it's not better for the players, and the creators, you'll lose,” he added. “You have to start with that as a core principle.”

Fintech

Apple's new payments tech won't kill Square

It could be used in place of the Square dongle, but it's far short of a full-fledged payments service.

The Apple system would reportedly only handle contactless payments.

Photo: Nathan Dumlao/Unsplash

Apple is preparing a product to enable merchants to accept contactless payments via iPhones without additional hardware, according to Bloomberg.

While this may seem like a move to compete with Block and its Square merchant unit in point-of-sale payments, that’s unlikely. The Apple service is using technology from its acquisition of Mobeewave in 2020 that enables contactless payments using NFC technology.

Keep Reading Show less
Tomio Geron

Tomio Geron ( @tomiogeron) is a San Francisco-based reporter covering fintech. He was previously a reporter and editor at The Wall Street Journal, covering venture capital and startups. Before that, he worked as a staff writer at Forbes, covering social media and venture capital, and also edited the Midas List of top tech investors. He has also worked at newspapers covering crime, courts, health and other topics. He can be reached at tgeron@protocol.com or tgeron@protonmail.com.

Sponsored Content

A CCO’s viewpoint on top enterprise priorities in 2022

The 2022 non-predictions guide to what your enterprise is working on starting this week

As Honeywell’s global chief commercial officer, I am privileged to have the vantage point of seeing the demands, challenges and dynamics that customers across the many sectors we cater to are experiencing and sharing.

This past year has brought upon all businesses and enterprises an unparalleled change and challenge. This was the case at Honeywell, for example, a company with a legacy in innovation and technology for over a century. When I joined the company just months before the pandemic hit we were already in the midst of an intense transformation under the leadership of CEO Darius Adamczyk. This transformation spanned our portfolio and business units. We were already actively working on products and solutions in advanced phases of rollouts that the world has shown a need and demand for pre-pandemic. Those included solutions in edge intelligence, remote operations, quantum computing, warehouse automation, building technologies, safety and health monitoring and of course ESG and climate tech which was based on our exceptional success over the previous decade.

Keep Reading Show less
Jeff Kimbell
Jeff Kimbell is Senior Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer at Honeywell. In this role, he has broad responsibilities to drive organic growth by enhancing global sales and marketing capabilities. Jeff has nearly three decades of leadership experience. Prior to joining Honeywell in 2019, Jeff served as a Partner in the Transformation Practice at McKinsey & Company, where he worked with companies facing operational and financial challenges and undergoing “good to great” transformations. Before that, he was an Operating Partner at Silver Lake Partners, a global leader in technology and held a similar position at Cerberus Capital LP. Jeff started his career as a Manufacturing Team Manager and Engineering Project Manager at Procter & Gamble before becoming a strategy consultant at Bain & Company and holding executive roles at Dell EMC and Transamerica Corporation. Jeff earned a B.S. in electrical engineering at Kansas State University and an M.B.A. at Dartmouth College.
China

Why does China's '996' overtime culture persist?

A Tencent worker’s open criticism shows why this work schedule is hard to change in Chinese tech.

Excessive overtime is one of the plights Chinese workers are grappling with across sectors.

Photo: VCG/VCG via Getty Images

Workers were skeptical when Chinese Big Tech called off its notorious and prevalent overtime policy: “996,” a 12-hour, six-day work schedule. They were right to be: A recent incident at gaming and social media giant Tencent proves that a deep-rooted overtime culture is hard to change, new policy or not.

Defiant Tencent worker Zhang Yifei, who openly challenged the company’s overtime culture, reignited wide discussion of the touchy topic this week. What triggered Zhang's criticism, according to his own account, was his team’s positive attitude toward overtime. His team, which falls under WeCom — a business communication and office collaboration tool similar to Slack — announced its in-house Breakthrough Awards. The judges’ comments to one winner highly praised them for logging “over 20 hours of intense work nonstop,” to help meet the deadline for launching a marketing page.

Keep Reading Show less
Shen Lu

Shen Lu covers China's tech industry.

Boost 2

Can Matt Mullenweg save the internet?

He's turning Automattic into a different kind of tech giant. But can he take on the trillion-dollar walled gardens and give the internet back to the people?

Matt Mullenweg, CEO of Automattic and founder of WordPress, poses for Protocol at his home in Houston, Texas.
Photo: Arturo Olmos for Protocol

In the early days of the pandemic, Matt Mullenweg didn't move to a compound in Hawaii, bug out to a bunker in New Zealand or head to Miami and start shilling for crypto. No, in the early days of the pandemic, Mullenweg bought an RV. He drove it all over the country, bouncing between Houston and San Francisco and Jackson Hole with plenty of stops in national parks. In between, he started doing some tinkering.

The tinkering is a part-time gig: Most of Mullenweg’s time is spent as CEO of Automattic, one of the web’s largest platforms. It’s best known as the company that runs WordPress.com, the hosted version of the blogging platform that powers about 43% of the websites on the internet. Since WordPress is open-source software, no company technically owns it, but Automattic provides tools and services and oversees most of the WordPress-powered internet. It’s also the owner of the booming ecommerce platform WooCommerce, Day One, the analytics tool Parse.ly and the podcast app Pocket Casts. Oh, and Tumblr. And Simplenote. And many others. That makes Mullenweg one of the most powerful CEOs in tech, and one of the most important voices in the debate over the future of the internet.

Keep Reading Show less
David Pierce

David Pierce ( @pierce) is Protocol's editorial director. Prior to joining Protocol, he was a columnist at The Wall Street Journal, a senior writer with Wired, and deputy editor at The Verge. He owns all the phones.

Entertainment

Spoiler alert: We’re already in the beta-metaverse

300 million people use metaverse-like platforms — Fortnite, Roblox and Minecraft — every month. That equals the total user base of the internet in 1999.

A lot of us are using platforms that can be considered metaverse prototypes.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

What does it take to build the metaverse? What building blocks do we need, how can companies ensure that the metaverse is going to be inclusive, and how do we know that we have arrived in the 'verse?

This week, we convened a panel of experts for Protocol Entertainment’s first virtual live event, including Epic Games Unreal Engine VP and GM Marc Petit, Oasis Consortium co-founder and President Tiffany Xingyu Wang and Emerge co-founder and CEO Sly Lee.

Keep Reading Show less
Janko Roettgers

Janko Roettgers (@jank0) is a senior reporter at Protocol, reporting on the shifting power dynamics between tech, media, and entertainment, including the impact of new technologies. Previously, Janko was Variety's first-ever technology writer in San Francisco, where he covered big tech and emerging technologies. He has reported for Gigaom, Frankfurter Rundschau, Berliner Zeitung, and ORF, among others. He has written three books on consumer cord-cutting and online music and co-edited an anthology on internet subcultures. He lives with his family in Oakland.

Enterprise

Lyin’ AI: OpenAI launches new language model despite toxic tendencies

Research company OpenAI says this year’s language model is less toxic than GPT-3. But the new default, InstructGPT, still has tendencies to make discriminatory comments and generate false information.

The new default, called InstructGPT, still has tendencies to make discriminatory comments and generate false information.

Illustration: Pixabay; Protocol

OpenAI knows its text generators have had their fair share of problems. Now the research company has shifted to a new deep-learning model it says works better to produce “fewer toxic outputs” than GPT-3, its flawed but widely-used system.

Starting Thursday, a new model called InstructGPT will be the default technology served up through OpenAI’s API, which delivers foundational AI into all sorts of chatbots, automatic writing tools and other text-based applications. Consider the new system, which has been in beta testing for the past year, to be a work in progress toward an automatic text generator that OpenAI hopes is closer to what humans actually want.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories
Bulletins