Republican senator slams conservative tech lobbyists to their faces

Sen. Mike Lee, a top lawmaker on antitrust, told right-leaning tech trade group NetChoice that conservative defenders of the industry were standing in the way of innovation.

Sen. Mike Lee

Sen. Mike Lee has challenged tech's antitrust defenders.

Photo: Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

Republican Sen. Mike Lee had harsh words for those on his own side who say that conservatives should support the tech antitrust status quo — and he delivered them directly to people making that case.

During a virtual speech Tuesday hosted by the right-leaning lobbying group NetChoice, which counts Big Tech companies like Amazon and Google among its membership, Lee said that conservative defenders of the industry were the ones politicizing antitrust, not those who question tech's power.

"Frankly one of the biggest impediments to opportunity and innovation is groups that go around telling conservatives that if you support the consumer welfare standard that you have to support Big Tech," said Lee, referring to antitrust analysis championed by conservatives like Robert Bork.

Tech companies have carefully watched Lee, the senior senator from Utah and the top GOP member of the Senate's subcommittee on competition law, because he's in a position to negotiate with — or resist — Democrats over how to rein in Big Tech, and his criticism of companies was growing louder even before the Tuesday speech.

Lee, who formerly chaired the panel, had flirted with skepticism of Big Tech in the past, but his position meant in recent years that he was one of several obstacles to progressive proposals to alter competition law, including a shift away from Bork's emphasis on price increases. Even in his speech on Tuesday, he accused progressives of trying to bring far-left economic and social theories into antitrust analysis, and to dupe conservatives into following along.

Yet over the last year or so, Lee has joined the strange bipartisan alliance interested in antitrust reform. He is one of several prominent Republicans, for instance, who claim that tech's alleged censorship of right-wing voices, personalities and topics demonstrates power by the companies and suggests that the bipartisan interest in antitrust reform may have merit.

"The idea that Big Tech operates in a functioning free market can no longer be taken as a serious position," Lee said.

In his speech, Lee essentially cast progressive antitrust reformers, including those in the House who have signed on to sweeping bipartisan proposals to rein in tech's power through competition law, on the same plane of danger as his conservative hosts.

"When well-compensated lobbyists and their nonprofit proxies attempt to pervert conservative economic and legal philosophy into a defense of Big Tech monopolists, antitrust policy and consumers suffer," Lee said.

Tech companies say they do not silence people based on their political beliefs and that they face robust competition. NetChoice in particular has been at the forefront of the defense, leveraging their political positioning on the right to assure lawmakers that the companies are just trying to maintain safe online environments and to innovate for customers before rivals do.

The group has also reiterated that any potential bias is protected by the First Amendment, and speech issues are not part of antitrust analysis. Lee agreed with the latter point, but he raised examples like Apple and Google's removal of the conservative social media site Parler from their mobile app stores following the Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol and social media suspensions of former President Donald Trump's accounts. He said this "prejudice and disdain shown towards conservatives" was a "warning sign" of a market power.

"Conservative anger at Big Tech is real, and it's entirely justified," Lee said.

Earlier in June, Lee released his own antitrust reform bill, and it had all the hallmarks of an opening bid for negotiation with Democrats. It would codify Bork's approach, but it would tighten rules around mergers that have allowed tech giants to grow to their massive size. It would also empower the Justice Department to collect massive damages on behalf of consumers.

At the end of the speech, a lawyer for NetChoice who was acting as master of ceremonies for the event called Lee a "hard act to follow."


How I decided to leave the US and pursue a tech career in Europe

Melissa Di Donato moved to Europe to broaden her technology experience with a different market perspective. She planned to stay two years. Seventeen years later, she remains in London as CEO of Suse.

“It was a hard go for me in the beginning. I was entering inside of a company that had been very traditional in a sense.”

Photo: Suse

Click banner image for more How I decided seriesA native New Yorker, Melissa Di Donato made a life-changing decision back in 2005 when she packed up for Europe to further her career in technology. Then with IBM, she made London her new home base.

Today, Di Donato is CEO of Germany’s Suse, now a 30-year-old, open-source enterprise software company that specializes in Linux operating systems, container management, storage, and edge computing. As the company’s first female leader, she has led Suse through the coronavirus pandemic, a 2021 IPO on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange, and the acquisitions of Kubernetes management startup Rancher Labs and container security company NeuVector.

Keep Reading Show less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

UiPath had a rocky few years. Rob Enslin wants to turn it around.

Protocol caught up with Enslin, named earlier this year as UiPath’s co-CEO, to discuss why he left Google Cloud, the untapped potential of robotic-process automation, and how he plans to lead alongside founder Daniel Dines.

Rob Enslin, UiPath's co-CEO, chats with Protocol about the company's future.

Photo: UiPath

UiPath has had a shaky history.

The company, which helps companies automate business processes, went public in 2021 at a valuation of more than $30 billion, but now the company’s market capitalization is only around $7 billion. To add insult to injury, UiPath laid off 5% of its staff in June and then lowered its full-year guidance for fiscal year 2023 just months later, tanking its stock by 15%.

Keep Reading Show less
Aisha Counts

Aisha Counts (@aishacounts) is a reporter at Protocol covering enterprise software. Formerly, she was a management consultant for EY. She's based in Los Angeles and can be reached at acounts@protocol.com.


Figma CPO: We can do more with Adobe

Yuhki Yamashita thinks Figma might tackle video or 3D objects someday.

Figman CPO Yuhki Yamashita told Protocol about Adobe's acquisition of the company.

Photo: Figma

Figma CPO Yuhki Yamashita’s first design gig was at The Harvard Crimson, waiting for writers to file their stories so he could lay them out in Adobe InDesign. Given his interest in computer science, pursuing UX design became the clear move. He worked on Outlook at Microsoft, YouTube at Google, and user experience at Uber, where he was a very early user of Figma. In 2019, he became a VP of product at Figma; this past June, he became CPO.

“Design has been really near and dear to my heart, which is why when this opportunity came along to join Figma and rethink design, it was such an obvious opportunity,” Yamashita said.

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at llawrence@protocol.com.


Microsoft lays out its climate advocacy goals

The tech giant has staked out exactly what kind of policies it will support to decarbonize the world and clean up the grid.

Microsoft published two briefs explaining what new climate policies it will advocate for.

Photo by Jeremy Bezanger on Unsplash

The tech industry has no shortage of climate goals, but they’ll be very hard to achieve without the help of sound public policy.

Microsoft published two new briefs on Sept. 22 explaining what policies it will advocate for in the realm of reducing carbon and cleaning up the grid. With policymakers in the U.S. and around the world beginning to weigh more stringent climate policies (or in the U.S.’s case, any serious climate policies at all), the briefs will offer a measuring stick for whether Microsoft is living up to its ideals.

Keep Reading Show less
Brian Kahn

Brian ( @blkahn) is Protocol's climate editor. Previously, he was the managing editor and founding senior writer at Earther, Gizmodo's climate site, where he covered everything from the weather to Big Oil's influence on politics. He also reported for Climate Central and the Wall Street Journal. In the even more distant past, he led sleigh rides to visit a herd of 7,000 elk and boat tours on the deepest lake in the U.S.

Latest Stories