One startup is doing what Magic Leap should've done from the start

"Magic Leap has sucked a lot of funding out of the room." AR startup Mira has shifted from consumer to business customers, and it seems to have found its audience.

Mira AR glasses

Mira's prototype AR headset for workers at Orica.

Photo: Courtesy of Mira

There was a time, not so long ago, when it seemed as if the future of computing lay in augmented reality — an evolution that was just around the corner. We were going to play games with virtual characters flying around our living rooms, catch up with distant friends appearing as holograms in front of us, and replace the office desktop with a pair of connected glasses.

Magic Leap, the most prominent AR startup of the time, was on its way to raising more than $3 billion in funding over a decade from firms like Google, Warner Bros., Alibaba and AT&T. After years of secrecy, it released its first headset in 2018. But it was not well-received by customers. Last month, founder Rony Abowitz announced he would be stepping down as CEO, while the company pivoted to enterprise offerings.

It's a common outcome with consumer product startups. The old aphorism in tech — "hardware is hard" — underlines the belief that the opportunity to invest in making physical goods is often outweighed by the difficulty of getting people to buy something new. For many startups, the model has unfolded the same way: come up with an idea, secure funding to turn it into a reality, realize it's much harder to build at scale than you thought, run out of cash, fold.

That could well have been the fate of Mira, an AR headset startup founded in 2017, which aimed to bring low-cost augmented reality games and experiences to regular people. But the company came to realize the steep pitch of the mountain it was climbing and switched things up, adopting a focus on business applications that may well have secured the company's long-term success. It's a path that other companies wishing to jump head-first into consumer products would do well to heed.

Frankenstein tech

Before they were co-founders, they were classmates. Benjamin Taft, Montana Reed and Matt Stern met in 2016 as undergraduates at USC, as part of an innovation program run by music moguls and Beats By Dre partners Jimmy Iovine and Dr. Dre. One of the classes centered around making technology more human, Taft said, and captured the students' interests at around the same time that the Kickstarter campaign for the original Oculus Rift was kicking off.

The young men had some experience in the virtual reality industry. Stern had worked at Sony on PSVR, and Taft had been at Daqri, an AR headset company that recently suffered its own spectacular collapse. They became enamored with the technology and its potential.

The group decided they wanted to get into augmented reality, still a burgeoning field at the time. They pooled their money to buy a Microsoft HoloLens developer kit, which then cost $5,000. "If we weren't working on AR," Taft explained, "we weren't working on the future," While they enjoyed using the HoloLens, they found it too cumbersome and expensive for students and developers who wanted to build AR applications. They figured that what the market was lacking was an accessible AR device. So they hacked together $100 worth of smartphone parts they bought off Alibaba, 3D-printed a headset around an iPhone, and chopped apart a plastic fishbowl to make the lens.

Still in contact with Iovine, the nascent team showed him a demo on their Frankenstein's monster of a machine, playing a Bruce Springsteen concert in AR (Iovine had been Springsteen's producer early in his career). He liked it enough to put them in touch with Sequoia Capital, which saw sufficient potential in the early demos to lead their seed round.

The group turned their hacky demo into a production headset in 2017, which is when I was first shown a demo. The technology worked well, allowing me to play games with the co-founders on a table in front of us, using my own phone strapped into a Mira headset. But there was a downside: Wearing the gear sort of made you look like Dark Helmet from "Spaceballs."

This reporter wearing a Mira headset in 2017.Photo: Mike Murphy/Protocol

This may well have factored into why the company failed to find much of a consumer audience. But really, Mira was looking to find developers interested in creating applications in which aesthetics wouldn't matter as much. After all, who cares what you look like if you're in your own living room playing with friends? What they hadn't considered, not yet, was that one one of those situations might revolve around using AR to make workplaces safer.

An unexpected pivot

But that's exactly what one company on the other side of the world was thinking. A group from Australian company Orica, one of the biggest manufacturers of explosives in the world, sent Mira an email showing the team that they'd taken one of Mira's developer kits and jury-rigged it into a helmet. "It was like their fishbowl moment," Taft said. Orica was using it to replace a paper-based safety checklist process the company traditionally relied on for workers packing explosives. "Operators show up to work with a pit in their stomach," Taft said, "because if they mess up, their wives and kids won't see them again."

Using those paper checklists, an Orica engineer who had a problem and needed help might have waited hours for a call — or days if someone with the necessary expertise needed to come out. With an AR system, the thinking went, workers could move through their processes knowing exactly where each item in their checklist was. If there was a problem, a colleague could call into the headset and show them exactly what they needed to do.

Orica reached out to see if Mira could make a more ruggedized version of its headset, plus software for its safety checklist. The explosives company had tried to digitize in the past, but devices like tablets and laptops aren't exactly designed for people wearing gloves or other protective equipment. Something worn on your face, incorporating a protective lens, would leave engineers' hands free to safely complete their work.

Mira's original prototype for an enterprise-focused helmet.Photo: Courtesy of Mira

So Mira got out the arts-and-crafts supplies again. The team bought a climbing helmet and used a hot-glue gun to affix a camera and the rest of its tech to it. The team hard-coded one of Orica's checklists into its existing app (which runs on iOS), and with the company's blessing spent two weeks in the Western Australia desert at an Orica office near a mining facility, testing what they'd built. It helped them to understand the engineers' workflows and what they needed most to get things done.

The headsets brought a more abstract benefit: peace of mind. Workers began to feel safer in their operating environments, as they trusted their colleagues were completing the checklists. "You can fake a [paper] checklist, but you can't fake Mira," Taft said. Operators took it upon themselves to teach other employees how to use the headsets and responded to the devices enthusiastically. "It wasn't like corporate throwing an iPad at them," Taft said.

After two weeks of tests, Mira presented their results to Orica. The company was satisfied enough to sponsor Mira taking six months to develop a full enterprise model of its headset. The team made a dustproof, waterproof headset with a long-life battery and tinted lenses so it could be used outdoors. But the hardware was only half of the equation: Mira took all of the safety workflows that Orica had had on paper and digitized them. The startup also built a web-based system, so anyone in the company could log in and easily build new safety workflows as needed.

Mira ran a 90-day pilot over the summer of 2019 with its enterprise-grade software and hardware, completing 1,000 run-throughs of its software with 90 operators. According to Taft, Orica's compliance success rate for safety checklists jumped from about 40% to around 90% when using Mira. Late last month, the company kicked off a global rollout of the technology in 30 countries across six continents. "We invited a different voice into the conversation of what AR can do," Taft said.

Hands-on, high stress

Mira's long-term vision is still to create consumer-friendly devices, but its experiences in the enterprise world have changed the founders' thinking on how to get there. Starting with consumers — who need the simplest, easiest-to-use and often cheapest devices — is a Herculean effort. Stern noted that other consumer AR devices like the one made by Meta, which shuttered in 2019, aim to replace the computer. "That's an insanely large problem to tackle," he said.

Instead, Mira plans to forge ahead with new business partners in a bid to refine the technology. The company is looking into other hands-on, high-stress industries that face similar struggles as Orica, such as oil and gas, consumer-goods production and heavy-industry manufacturing.

The goal, Taft said, is to show the value of AR in niche areas and grow from there. Some of the earliest adopters of technology like email, personal computers and BlackBerrys were business users, said Tuong Nguyen, a senior analyst at Gartner. Accountants needed calculators and tabulation software found on early PCs, leading businesses to buy them. The use cases piled up, and now we all carry supercomputers in our pockets. Mira's pivot to enterprise "makes sense," Nguyen said, given that conquering a few verticals is a less daunting task than taking on the multifaceted consumer market.

Mira sells dozens of its enterprise devices for the price of a single Microsoft HoloLens. When asked about their current financial health, the founders said: "We are generating a very comfortable amount of revenue for a company of our size."

The team realized early on that they didn't want to follow the often unsuccessful model of taking a ton of VC funding and using it to subsidize hardware costs and grow rapidly while trying to figure out the business model. "The hardware doesn't scale out of the lab in a lot of cases," Taft said. Mira has obtained $6.5 million in funding since its inception, about 42 times less than Daqri and roughly 461 times less than Magic Leap. (The team said they're now in the process of raising additional funds.)

Mira's second-generation headset in use at Orica. Photo: Courtesy of Mira

Since Magic Leap's CEO stepped down, the company has attempted to right the ship by finding an enterprise audience. But Magic Leap may struggle, according to Mira, as the proprietary hardware and software will be difficult to sell to IT and procurement departments that are looking to simplify and secure their companies' workflows. Mira's product, on the other hand, runs on iOS. "We're the anti-Magic Leap," Taft said.

That being said, Nguyen argues AR platforms are such a dramatic step-change for companies that they may not shy away from integrating new hardware and software — as long as the value is there. "One of the issues here," Nguyen said, "is change management." He offered an analogy: "You've been using this shoe to hammer this nail. Well, I just invented something that does this better, and you'll really need this thing called a hammer to help you be more effective and efficient."

Like most companies, Mira is riding out the coronavirus outbreak primarily from home offices, and Stern said the pandemic was driving more interest in hands-free products, especially in manufacturing and fulfillment. "COVID-19 is accelerating digital transformation that we didn't expect," Taft said.

The company's goal is to grow as the world opens back up. The team recently brought on a new VP of engineering, Peter Molettiere, who held the same role at Fitbit, to help build new products. "Magic Leap has sucked a lot of funding out of the room," Taft said, "but our customers really need what we're building."

There are big challenges ahead. No one knows when the world will fully open, or how deep the recession will be. Major tech companies could jump into the same market; Apple, for one, has long been rumored to be working on an AR headset, and anything it produces eventually bleeds from the consumer to the enterprise market. The broader concern is that many companies simply won't buy into AR.

For now, Mira is looking ahead optimistically. The founders aren't beholden to large tranches of venture capital to stay alive, they said, and are getting the sort of case studies under their belt that encourage bigger customers. Now they'll have to show that what they have is more than just digital smoke and mirrors. "We are absolutely betting," Stern said, "that there will be a paradigm shift in the ways that people do work moving forward."

This post has been updated with the correct spelling of Peter Molettiere’s name.

Protocol | Workplace

Instacart workers are on strike. How far can it get them?

Instacart activists want a nationwide strike to start today, but many workers are too afraid of the company and feel they can't afford a day off of work.

Gig workers protest in front of an Amazon facility in 2020.

Photo: Michael Nagle/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Starting today, an Instacart organizing group is asking the app's gig workers to go on a nationwide strike to demand better payment structures, benefits and other changes to the way the company treats its workers — but if past strikes are any indication, most Instacart users probably won't even notice.

The majority of Instacart workers on forums like Reddit and Facebook appear either unaware of the planned strike or don't plan to participate because they are skeptical of its power, afraid of retaliation from the company or are too reliant on what they do make from the app to be able to afford to take even one day off of the platform. "Not unless someone is going to pay my bills," "It will never work, you will never be able to get every shopper to organize" and "Last time there was a 'strike' Instacart took away our quality bonus pay," are just a few of the comments Instacart shoppers have left in response to news of the strike.

Keep Reading Show less
Anna Kramer

Anna Kramer is a reporter at Protocol (Twitter: @ anna_c_kramer, email:, where she writes about labor and workplace issues. Prior to joining the team, she covered tech and small business for the San Francisco Chronicle and privacy for Bloomberg Law. She is a recent graduate of Brown University, where she studied International Relations and Arabic and wrote her senior thesis about surveillance tools and technological development in the Middle East.

The way we work has fundamentally changed. COVID-19 upended business dealings and office work processes, putting into hyperdrive a move towards digital collaboration platforms that allow teams to streamline processes and communicate from anywhere. According to the International Data Corporation, the revenue for worldwide collaboration applications increased 32.9 percent from 2019 to 2020, reaching $22.6 billion; it's expected to become a $50.7 billion industry by 2025.

"While consumers and early adopter businesses had widely embraced collaborative applications prior to the pandemic, the market saw five years' worth of new users in the first six months of 2020," said Wayne Kurtzman, research director of social and collaboration at IDC. "This has cemented collaboration, at least to some extent, for every business, large and small."

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Silver

Kate Silver is an award-winning reporter and editor with 15-plus years of journalism experience. Based in Chicago, she specializes in feature and business reporting. Kate's reporting has appeared in the Washington Post, The Chicago Tribune, The Atlantic's CityLab, Atlas Obscura, The Telegraph and many other outlets.

Protocol | China

WeChat promises to stop accessing users’ photo albums amid public outcry

A tech blogger claimed that popular Chinese apps snoop around users' photo libraries, provoking heightened public concerns over privacy.

A survey launched by Sina Tech shows 94% of the some 30,000 responding users said they are not comfortable with apps reading their photo libraries just to allow them to share images faster in chats.

Photo: S3studio via Getty Images

A Chinese tech blogger dropped a bombshell last Friday, claiming on Chinese media that he found that several popular Chinese apps, including the Tencent-owned chat apps WeChat and QQ, as well as the Alibaba-owned ecommerce app Taobao, frequently access iPhone users' photo albums in the background even when those apps are not in use.

The original Weibo post from the tech blogger, using the handle of @Hackl0us, provoked intense debates about user privacy on the Chinese internet and consequently prompted WeChat to announce that it would stop fetching users' photo album data in the background.

Keep Reading Show less
Shen Lu

Shen Lu is a reporter with Protocol | China. Her writing has appeared in Foreign Policy, The New York Times and POLITICO, among other publications. She can be reached at

Protocol | Enterprise

As businesses struggle with data, enterprise tech is cleaning up

Enterprise tech's vision of "big data" largely fell flat inside silos. But now, an army of providers think they've figured out the problems. And customers and investors are taking note.

Corporate data tends to settle in silos that makes it harder to understand the bigger picture. Enterprise tech vendors smell a lucrative opportunity.

Photo: Jim Witkowski/Unsplash

Data isn't the new oil; it's the new gold. And in any gold rush, the ones who make the most money in the long run are the tool makers and suppliers.

Enterprise tech vendors have long peddled a vision of corporate America centered around so-called "big data." But there was a big problem: Many of those projects failed to produce a return. An army of new providers think they've finally figured out the problem, and investors and customers are taking note.

Keep Reading Show less
Joe Williams

Joe Williams is a senior reporter at Protocol covering enterprise software, including industry giants like Salesforce, Microsoft, IBM and Oracle. He previously covered emerging technology for Business Insider. Joe can be reached at To share information confidentially, he can also be contacted on a non-work device via Signal (+1-309-265-6120) or

Protocol | Policy

What Frances Haugen’s SEC complaint means for the rest of tech

Haugen argues Facebook misled investors by failing to disclose its platforms' harms. If the SEC bites, the rest of tech could be next.

The question is whether the SEC will find the contents of Haugen's complaint relevant to investors' interests.

Photo: Matt McClain-Pool/Getty Images

Whistleblowers like former Facebook staffer Frances Haugen have pretty limited options when it comes to actually seeking redress for the harms they've observed and documented. There's no federal privacy law in the U.S. to speak of, Section 230 protects platforms for online speech and companies like Facebook are under no obligation to share any information with lawmakers, or anyone else, about what's happening on their sites.

But there is one agency that not only governs all publicly-traded companies, including in tech, but also offers whistleblowers like Haugen the opportunity for a payout: the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Latest Stories