People

So you want to be a space tourist

Richard Branson and Jeff Bezos are both going into space this month. Here's what you need to know if you are contemplating your own suborbital journey, from a conversation with the man training Virgin Galactic's space tourists.

A space-flight trainee.

A NASTAR trainee completes his space training course.

Photo: NASTAR

Richard Branson will fly into space on Virgin Galactic's newly-approved rocket in nine days, beating Jeff Bezos, his brother and veteran aviator Wally Funk by about a week. Branson and Bezos have officially leveled up the bucket list for billionaire club activities. If you, too, are interested in commercial space tourism, you're not alone. In fact, if you're thinking about it only now, you're actually behind the times compared to many of the rich and famous.

In Southampton, Pennsylvania, hundreds of people — including all of Virgin Galactic's future amateur astronauts — have been training for commercial space flight at the only FAA-approved high-performance human centrifuge in the Western Hemisphere, and hundreds more are scheduled to take their turns in the coming months. The National Aerospace Training and Research Center houses that centrifuge, and it offers commercial space training programs to introduce potential space travelers to the gravitational forces they will experience on an actual flight. It also teaches them how to cope with that physical experience. Protocol sat down with NASTAR'S COO, Glenn King, to learn what it takes for the average person to prep for a trip to space.

Technically, there are no legal rules or regulations for commercial space flight. While NASA astronauts might train for two years or more for their missions, all that the FAA requires of commercial, non-governmental missions is that people are given some form of training, though that could be as little as a half-hour safety video, according to King. Instead, it lets the commercial companies set their own rules, which King said is the reason he expects that commercial space flight will become increasingly common in the next few years.

But while some establishments do their own training, most contract with NASTAR, which has been working with the people who will be flying with Virgin Galactic, Axiom (the company planning luxury satellite hotels), SpaceX and other companies' flights this year and years after. NASTAR just finished training SpaceX's "Inspiration4" crew, which — if it launches as planned in September — will travel on the first vehicle to orbit the Earth and visit the International Space Station with only commercial, amateur tourists on board.

"Our centrifuge spins around at varying [revolutions per minute] to replicate G-forces. We can program that machine to provide the exact same G-forces at the exact same requirements as the vehicles," King said.

The main difference between a space flight and an airplane ride is the "G-force," or the acceleration you feel on your body. Human bodies on Earth experience 1 G, which keeps our feet on the ground. The acceleration and angle required to break from Earth's orbit create G-forces that are many times the weight of our own bodies (3 Gs to 5 Gs, usually), an experience that can be both physically and psychologically alarming and even dangerous.

People can train for this experience by building up their body's tolerance in the centrifuge. NASTAR'S machine simulates different types of takeoffs based on the rocket in question; for people preparing for Virgin Galactic flights, for example, the centrifuge will simulate the feeling of a horizontal takeoff that slowly angles vertically (in comparison to rockets that shoot upward vertically from takeoff). The company also adds audio and visual cues that replicate what people will see and hear on their actual flight.

"The people going into space go through this training program to understand what they are going to go through. They need to understand this is not like a commercial airline flight, this is extremely different," King said. "If you've ever ridden a roller coaster at an amusement park, coming out of the bottom of the turns, just for a very short duration, you're experiencing G-forces."

Actual astronauts are often chosen in part for their extraordinary physical fitness and mental health; people with varying health levels, heart conditions or other illnesses or disabilities would usually be disqualified from consideration for space flight. In addition to its regular training, NASTAR has also developed certification programs with medical monitoring to train people with varying degrees of health problems, both to certify their safety and prepare them to manage their conditions while in space.

"I just trained people with prosthetic devices, diabetes, pacemakers — normally in the past these were all disqualifiers, but now with proper training, conditioning and monitoring, they can be safe," King said. "I have not yet run across a disqualifying factor. I just finished training a gentleman from Argentina who has had polio since he was a child."

King hopes that the medical monitoring tools will allow space companies to widen their customer base. He envisions a future where this kind of training is commonplace, and where people with the means can take suborbital flights to travel from the U.S. to Australia, or to satellite hotels in orbit like the one Axiom plans to develop. Hundreds of people — maybe even thousands in total — have already bought their tickets for when this future becomes a reality. The planned SpaceX Starship (the ship Elon Musk wants to use for Mars journeys, already under development and testing in Texas) will be so large that 100 people could easily fit inside it, according to King.

"As it becomes more commonplace and the price point gets lower and lower, more and more people will start taking these trips. People will be going from Point A to Point B on Earth in under an hour," King said.

A version of this story appeared in Friday morning's Source Code newsletter.

Protocol | Workplace

Productivity apps can’t stop making money

ClickUp had one of the biggest Series C funding rounds ever. Here's how it matches up to the other productivity unicorns.

ClickUp made $400 million in its series C funding round.

Photo: ClickUp

Productivity platform ClickUp announced a milestone today. The company raised $400 million, which is one of the biggest series C funding rounds in the workplace productivity market ever. The round, led by Andreessen Horowitz and Tiger Global, put the private company at a $4 billion valuation post-money.

In case it's not clear: This is a massive amount of money. It shows how hot the productivity space is right now, with some predicting the market size could reach almost $120 billion by 2028. In a world of hybrid workers, all-in-one tool platforms are all the rage among both startups and productivity stalwarts. Companies everywhere want to escape tool overwhelm, where work is spread across dozens of apps.

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at llawrence@protocol.com.

If you've ever tried to pick up a new fitness routine like running, chances are you may have fallen into the "motivation vs. habit" trap once or twice. You go for a run when the sun is shining, only to quickly fall off the wagon when the weather turns sour.

Similarly, for many businesses, 2020 acted as the storm cloud that disrupted their plans for innovation. With leaders busy grappling with the pandemic, innovation frequently got pushed to the backburner. In fact, according to McKinsey, the majority of organizations shifted their focus mainly to maintaining business continuity throughout the pandemic.

Keep Reading Show less
Gaurav Kataria
Group Product Manager, Trello at Atlassian
The Supreme Court of the United States
Photo: Angel Xavier Viera-Vargas

If a company resolved a data breach in the past, does it need to disclose the potential negative fallout of that breach as a risk to investors later on? In a new petition asking the Supreme Court to take up the question, Alphabet is arguing emphatically: no. And it's using the ol' "the past is history, tomorrow's a mystery" defense.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Protocol | Workplace

Facebook’s hiring crisis: Engineers are turning down offers

"All of you are now starting to experience that major imbalance between supply and demand — and it doesn't feel good," a recruiting leader wrote in an internal memo.

Here are all the Facebook Papers stories
Image: Getty Images, Protocol

Facebook cannot find enough candidates to meet engineering demand, especially in the Bay Area, and has struggled and failed to meet early 2021 recruiting goals, according to a detailed internal memo outlining recruitment strategy and hiring pains.

The company also failed to meet hiring goals in 2019, which frustrated CEO Mark Zuckerberg, and it built an ad-hoc team of leaders to create an emergency plan to address the painful shortage, according to disclosures made to the Securities and Exchange Commission and provided to Congress in redacted form by Frances Haugen's legal counsel. A consortium of news organizations, including Protocol, has reviewed the redacted versions received by Congress.

Keep Reading Show less
Anna Kramer

Anna Kramer is a reporter at Protocol (Twitter: @ anna_c_kramer, email: akramer@protocol.com), where she writes about labor and workplace issues. Prior to joining the team, she covered tech and small business for the San Francisco Chronicle and privacy for Bloomberg Law. She is a recent graduate of Brown University, where she studied International Relations and Arabic and wrote her senior thesis about surveillance tools and technological development in the Middle East.

Theranos trial reveals DeVos family invested $100 million

The family committed "on the spot" to double its investment, an investment adviser said. Meanwhile, the jury lost another two members, with two alternates left.

Betsy DeVos' family invested $100 million in Theranos, an investment adviser said.

Photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images

Lisa Peterson, a wealth manager for the DeVos family, testified in Elizabeth Holmes's criminal fraud trial Tuesday, as prosecutors continued to highlight allegations about how the Theranos CEO courted investors in the once-high-flying blood-testing startup.

An email presented by the defense revealed that the family committed to doubling their investment in Theranos to $100 million "on the spot" during a 2014 visit to company headquarters.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma
Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol, where she writes about management, leadership and workplace issues in tech. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at mma@protocol.com.
Latest Stories