An illustration featuring the words "BIG LIE" in red, dwarfing icons bearing the logos of Twitter and Meta
Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Social media isn’t ready for the next Big Lie

Protocol Policy

Hello and welcome to Protocol Policy! Today, I’m dreading the thing you’re dreading too. We’ll get to it, but there will also be Vonage’s settlement with the FTC, China’s tech plans, and Nick Clegg’s very British enjoyment of Musk’s travails.

A sequel no one asked for

U.S. election infrastructure is exceedingly secure, and voter fraud here is so rare it’s comparable to your annual chances of getting struck by lightning. Despite this, former President Donald Trump and a long list of allies in the Republican Party have spent the last two years questioning the overall integrity of the U.S. election system. Many of those allies are now candidates themselves, and their coordinated attack on the country’s status as a democracy is not a relic of 2020. Some have already started repeating these “Big Lie” charges ahead of next week’s midterms. And the social platforms that help them spread their message have prepared few measures to stop it.

In short, many of the efforts from companies — including Twitter, Meta, and YouTube — to protect 2022’s elections look a lot like the measures the platforms took in 2020.

  • The platforms had made (some) genuine progress on the threats from 2016 or so. Many of their policies, for instance, focus on coordinated inauthentic behavior, like foreign botnets and Chinese or Russian interference campaigns.
  • Social networks have also put pretty expansive rules in place around lies that would stop people from voting — such as when polls close or who is eligible to cast a ballot.
  • The services have also tried to plug some remaining holes with resource pages posting accurate information, limits on ads about political topics, or more invoking of policies forbidding certain types of harmful misinformation.

But many lies about the security of the whole system and the reliability of the general results still don’t fall under these policies, and such content often slips through moderation nets because it’s not clear what rules apply.

Twitter could be making the problem worse, especially given Elon Musk gutting half the company’s staff in the last 24 hours.

  • In terms of policy, Twitter actually goes a little further than some of its peers, limiting “misleading claims intended to undermine public confidence in an election.”
  • Musk also punted on bringing Trump back onto the platform for a few weeks, pushing off any decision until after the election.
  • The company, though, had its hands full enforcing its rules even before the cuts.
  • Its coming changes to verification will also allow bad actors to pay just a few bucks to pose as reliable sources of information and further the flood of lies, particularly during what’s expected to be slow counting and certification of results.

Meta seems to have mostly recycled its 2020 playbook, despite reporting that suggested the company’s three platforms were particularly helpful in supercharging the original Big Lie — focused on Biden’s election — in the leadup to Jan. 6.

  • In laying out its plans for the midterms, Meta said it might append labels to “content discussing the integrity of the election.”
  • The parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp said users disliked the volume of labels it applied last time around, though, so it suggested any labeling that does occur will only happen on posts that reach a certain level of virality.

Other platforms’ approaches don’t necessarily inspire confidence either.

  • YouTube, in addition to the usual bans on incitement and lies about the voting process, prohibits “false claims that widespread fraud, errors, or glitches occurred in certain past elections to determine heads of government.” The company said it has also taken down such claims about 2020.
  • That sounds like a policy tailor-made for confronting the new Big Lie with its firmness and specificity — except it doesn’t apply to claims about 2022, which is both current and a contest when the president isn’t on the ballot.
  • TikTok actually says it will go so far as to remove misinformation that undermines “public trust in civic institutions and processes such as … elections,” although its record is thin and staff turnover may threaten its efforts even as it becomes a major news source.
  • Reddit’s policies seem to focus on detecting attempts to intimidate voters or suppress turnout (like lies about when polls close), as well as the site’s usual ban on calls to violence.

Many Republicans will win election contests fairly next week. It’s quite possible there’ll be enough of them that they’ll take control in one or both chambers in Congress. There’s real risk, though, that some will seek to overturn legitimate losses — or even that a few Democrats will sense an opening for bad behavior — by fostering doubts about whether the U.S. can still pull off real elections. The social networks seem mostly to be hoping they have the tools to tackle that. It’s not clear they do.

— Ben Brody (email | twitter)

In Washington

The Department of Justice is set to investigate Adobe’s blockbuster $20 billion acquisition of Figma, a direct competitor,according to Politico. The probe is expected to include a merger review as well as an investigation into Adobe’s overall acquisition history.

Ericsson subsidiary Vonage settled with the Federal Trade Commission for $100 million. The agency sued Vonage over allegations the company made it difficult for customers to cancel phone service while also charging termination fees.


The news is out! Join the Financial Technology Association’s inaugural Fintech Summit: Shaping the Future of Finance, produced in partnership with Protocol. Taking place in Washington, D.C., on November 16th, the Summit will examine the most pressing issues in fintech.

Learn more and reserve your spot here.

On Protocol

Protocol analyzed data from the Chinese Communist Party’s National Congress speeches going back as far as 1992. We found key tech trends in this year’s speech from Xi, including a renewed focus on the environment, a shift in emphasis from poverty alleviation to national security, and a push for economic self-sufficiency.

Protocol’s Climate Team has a preview of the upcoming United Nations Conference of the Parties meeting in Egypt. Christian Kroll, a venture partner at World Fund, told Protocol: “I’m afraid that these big corporations are hijacking the agenda and making it less ambitious. I’ve seen that happen over the last year, and it’s painful to see big companies that could be doing so much more getting away with unambitious sustainability targets, like going carbon neutral by 2050, when it’s way too late.”

Around the world

TikTok clarified that EU users’ data can be accessed by employees around the world. Ireland’s data watchdog is conducting a study into the export of EU user data to China, The Guardian reports. TikTok says it’s in compliance with EU laws, including one that requires protections for EU citizen data being processed outside the bloc.

The EU might soon require Airbnb to provide basic data on usage,according to Reuters.

In the media, culture, and metaverse

Updates from a very chaotic week at Twitter:

  • Musk began mass layoffs of Twitter employees Thursday night. Employees all across the organization are affected, including in trust, engineering, legal, marketing, and sales. Internal documents obtained by The Washington Post showed employees were concerned about Twitter’s ability to remain running after losing so many people.
  • A group of one-time Twitter employees is suing the company for allegedly violating state and federal labor laws. The group alleges that Twitter didn’t provide sufficient warning for the layoffs as required by the federal WARN Act and California WARN Act.
  • Advertisers such as General Mills, Pfizer, and Volkswagen paused advertisements on Twitter over concerns about the direction of the company, according to The Wall Street Journal.
  • Twitter plans to start charging for $8 per month for verification as soon as next week, Bloomberg reported.

In data

12% and 14%: The percentage of their workforce Chime and Stripe plan to lay off, respectively. Chime co-founder and CEO Chris Britt said the layoffs were intended to position the firm for success "regardless of market conditions." Stripe co-founders Patrick and John Collison wrote that the cost reductions were needed to “adapt ourselves appropriately for the world we’re headed into.”


At the #FTAFintechSummit, we’re gathering the most important players in fintech, from founders to policy experts, regulators, and industry leaders. You’ll get access to discussions on the fintech transformations driving competition, breaking down barriers to financial services, and shaping the future of finance.

RSVP today.

'Welcome to the club'

Nick Clegg had a message for Elon Musk: “Welcome to the club.” The president of global affairs at Meta was responding to Musk’s assertion that “being attacked by both right & left simultaneously is a good sign.” “You can't keep everybody happy, and certainly [not] in the United States,” Clegg said at Fortune’s CEO Initiative 2022 yesterday. “Half the country thinks that you're taking too much content down; the other half thinks you should take down more.”

Thanks for reading — see you Monday!

Recent Issues