Here’s the latest super-sized seed fund

"This is a golden age in startups like we've never seen before," said NFX's Pete Flint. His firm just raised a $450 million fund for seed investments.

NFX partners

NFX partners are hunting for more startups to fund.

Photo: NFX

There's a bifurcation happening in seed funding, where the big, multi-stage firms are raising larger and larger seed funds to compete on dollars and the seed funds are becoming more specialized to compete on expertise. NFX is hoping to win over founders by doing both.

The venture capital firm plans to announce a new $450 million fund Tuesday as the arms race in seed funding continues. The fund size puts it as one of the largest out there, beating out Andreessen Horowitz's $400 million seed-specific fund announced in August and just short of Greylock's $500 million reserve announced in September.

"There's funds trying to be the world's best at the seed, and the world's best at the [series] A, and the world's best at the [series] B. They're all our friends and they're great people, but they're doing a lot of stuff," said NFX general partner Pete Flint. "We only want to be the world's best at the seed, that is our singular focus and we have no other business model so we're going to make it work."

NFX started in 2015 with a focus on placing seed investments in startups driven by network effects (hence the name). Its bets include now-public companies like DoorDash, Poshmark, Lyft and Twist Bioscience. The goal with the new fund is not only to double down on network-effects businesses, but to continue to grow its own flywheel of startups helping each other as part of its portfolio. The firm said it expects to invest in an additional 70 companies with the new cash.

The fund size will help NFX compete with heavyweights like Greylock and a16z when it comes to dollars, but Flint thinks the firm also has an advantage in the seed specialist side. The rise of investor-operators has also put pressure on seed funds as founders are choosing to take money from solo capitalists and fellow CEOs over traditional venture firms. "The founders are going to investor-operators and everyone knows that," serial entrepreneur Hiten Shah had previously told Protocol.

Flint likes to consider his team as part of that category, but with an institution behind it and a sole focus on its investments. The NFX team includes former operators like Flint, who co-founded Trulia, and James Currier, who has founded four different companies. Israel-based general partner Gigi Levy-Weiss is a two-time CEO.

"I think founders are absolutely right that they should be looking for investor-operators," Flint said. "I also think that this job is a pretty serious job as well. Having someone who is leading a round, but also leading a company is probably not a great idea."

As part of the firm's third fund, it's also adding Omri Amirav-Drory as a general partner. It had previously signed on Morgan Beller, one of the creators of the Facebook-backed Libra cryptocurrency project (now known as Diem).

While NFX is more of a generalist firm, Flint said that it will be leaning into Beller's crypto expertise and Amirav-Drory's background as founder of NFX-backed Genome Compiler to invest more in the intersection of biology and tech.

With the new fund, NFX isn't changing investment strategies beyond rounding out the expertise on the team, Flint said. The firm wants to continue to be the first institutional check into a company and lead the rounds, whether it's at the pre-seed or seed funding level, although where exactly that level is in a fast-moving market that's seeing the price of seed rounds explode is hard to know. "We could put a number on it but I think it'll probably be out of date next week," Flint joked.

"I'd say it was clear as of six months ago that you'd see pre-seeds at a sub-$10 million valuation," he added. "But I think there's this really gray area between what pre-seed and seed is right now, and, frankly, I think that's okay."

While seed rounds may be larger today (and potentially still ballooning in size), Flint said the decision to go bigger with a fund isn't a reaction to the price of rounds, but the size of the opportunity for startups right now.

"This is a golden age in startups like we've never seen before. It seems COVID [created] this sort of societal change that, really, startups like to operate in and fill the unmet needs that happen today," Flint said. "Talent is coming out of these big companies and then you're seeing capital come to match that activity."


This carbon capture startup wants to clean up the worst polluters

The founder and CEO of point-source carbon capture company Carbon Clean discusses what the startup has learned, the future of carbon capture technology, as well as the role of companies like his in battling the climate crisis.

Carbon Clean CEO Aniruddha Sharma told Protocol that fossil fuels are necessary, at least in the near term, to lift the living standards of those who don’t have access to cars and electricity.

Photo: Carbon Clean

Carbon capture and storage has taken on increasing importance as companies with stubborn emissions look for new ways to meet their net zero goals. For hard-to-abate industries like cement and steel production, it’s one of the few options that exist to help them get there.

Yet it’s proven incredibly challenging to scale the technology, which captures carbon pollution at the source. U.K.-based company Carbon Clean is leading the charge to bring down costs. This year, it raised a $150 million series C round, which the startup said is the largest-ever funding round for a point-source carbon capture company.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma

Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol covering climate. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

Why companies cut staff after raising millions

Are tech firms blowing millions in funding just weeks after getting it? Experts say it's more complicated than that.

Bolt, Trade Republic, HomeLight, and Stord all drew attention from funding announcements that happened just weeks or days before layoffs.

Photo: Pulp Photography/Getty Images

Fintech startup Bolt was one of the first tech companies to slash jobs, cutting 250 employees, or a third of its staff, in May. For some workers, the pain of layoffs was a shock not only because they were the first, but also because the cuts came just four months after Bolt had announced a $355 million series E funding round and achieved a peak valuation of $11 billion.

“Bolt employees were blind sided because the CEO was saying just weeks ago how everything is fine,” an anonymous user wrote on the message board Blind. “It has been an extremely rough day for 1/3 of Bolt employees,” another user posted. “Sadly, I was one of them who was let go after getting a pay-raise just a couple of weeks ago.”

Keep Reading Show less
Nat Rubio-Licht

Nat Rubio-Licht is a Los Angeles-based news writer at Protocol. They graduated from Syracuse University with a degree in newspaper and online journalism in May 2020. Prior to joining the team, they worked at the Los Angeles Business Journal as a technology and aerospace reporter.


The fight to define the carbon offset market's future

The world’s largest carbon offset issuer is fighting a voluntary effort to standardize the industry. And the fate of the climate could hang in the balance.

It has become increasingly clear that scaling the credit market will first require clear standards and transparency.

Kevin Frayer/Getty Images

There’s a major fight brewing over what kind of standards will govern the carbon offset market.

A group of independent experts looking to clean up the market’s checkered record and the biggest carbon credit issuer on the voluntary market is trying to influence efforts to define what counts as a quality credit. The outcome could make or break an industry increasingly central to tech companies meeting their net zero goals.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (


White House AI Bill of Rights lacks specific guidance for AI rules

The document unveiled today by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy is long on tech guidance, but short on restrictions for AI.

While the document provides extensive suggestions for how to incorporate AI rights in technical design, it does not include any recommendations for restrictions on the use of controversial forms of AI.

Photo: Ana Lanza/Unsplash

It was a year in the making, but people eagerly anticipating the White House Bill of Rights for AI will have to continue waiting for concrete recommendations for future AI policy or restrictions.

Instead, the document unveiled today by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy is legally non-binding and intended to be used as a handbook and a “guide for society” that could someday inform government AI legislation or regulations.

Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights features a list of five guidelines for protecting people in relation to AI use:

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories