Opal's quest to reinvent the webcam

Webcams are bad. They’re also crucially important to the future of work. So what does it take to make them better?

A white Opal camera on top of a laptop.

The $300 Opal is meant to be more "high-end camera" than "webcam."

Photo: Opal

At some point over the last two years, millions of tech employees everywhere have come to the same conclusion: “Wow, my webcam sucks.” After days, weeks, months of conducting Zoom calls through the blurry haze of a MacBook Air camera, techies everywhere started to get fed up. Some rigged up elaborate replacements that turned a DSLR into a webcam; others mounted their smartphones; dedicated webcams, even the ones that barely suck less than the Air, became so popular that they were out of stock for months at a time.

Veeraj Chugh and Stefan Sohlstrom decided to fix their webcam problem in a different way: by building a better one. Chugh and Sohlstrom are the co-founders of Opal, which is the name of both the company they created and the webcam it’s launching on Tuesday. At $300, it’s among the most expensive devices on the market. But Chugh and Sohlstrom think people will pay the steep price as they come to recognize how much better they look on calls and how much that can matter. More than that, they think Opal is at the forefront of a home-office revolution, a burst of new startups and products designed to make remote work better.

Chugh and Sohlstrom began talking about webcams in the summer of 2020, while they were working together at Uber, after having their own wow-webcams-suck moments. “Just like everyone else,” Sohlstrom said, “we went straight to Zoom. And for me, I was like, ‘Wow, this is way worse than in person.’” The two men began discussing a simple question: Why are webcams so bad? Sohlstrom, a lifelong photography enthusiast, began digging into camera software and Photoshop filters, looking for ways to make himself look better. Chugh went to Alibaba and bought dozens of different webcams to test and take apart.

They discovered that there’s a pretty big reason why most webcams suck: There hasn’t been much incentive to make them better. Even the webcam giants like Logitech admit that, to some extent, they’d fallen asleep at the webcam wheel pre-pandemic because nobody seemed to care. “We're like, all right, we're at 90% market share, our products are pretty good, no one's really doing anything new there,” Scott Wharton, who runs Logitech’s video collaboration business, told me earlier this year. The pandemic, and the rush of demand for home-office gear, caught all these companies off guard.

Veeraj Chugh and Stefan Sohlstrom posing for a portrait. Veeraj Chugh and Stefan Sohlstrom are the co-founders of Opal.Photo: Opal

But the better diagnosis of the webcam business, Chugh said, is because even the ones with high-end hardware don’t have the software chops to match. A high-end sensor and fast chip is wasted without the right software and neural processing engines, and the best software can’t solve for badly captured light. “It’s because hardware companies make webcams,” Sohlstrom said. “The companies that make that kind of stuff, they’re not necessarily known for computational photography and computer vision. Whereas if you take your iPhone, and you look at the difference between the last four of them … it’s not really hardware, right?” In recent years Apple, Samsung, Google and others have shifted from competing over megapixels to adding automated filters, software that can turn a blurry picture into a crisp picture, and much more.

At first, they had thought building a webcam might be a fun side hustle, or something they did just for themselves. But the more they looked at the space, the more they realized others might want the same thing they did. They also realized getting it right wouldn’t be easy. By the end of 2020, they’d both quit their jobs to start a webcam company. They started to put together a team, beginning with Kenny Sweet, who has worked on everything from Beats headphones to Dell laptops.

From the very beginning, the Opal team made a clear distinction internally. They weren’t just building a better webcam. There’s a whole supply chain and feature set made just for webcams, from the chassis to the chip to the images sensor, and Opal wanted no part of it. “As soon as you start talking to webcam vendors and webcam suppliers,” Chugh said, “you're literally picking between D+ and D- options.” Instead, they decided to build the best camera they possibly could, and then just mount it to a user’s computer. They bought processors from Intel and sensors from Sony, and cobbled together something approximating a smartphone without a screen and all the radios. They built a mesh of microphones to improve the audio experience and are working on the ever-complicated problem of canceling echos and background noise.

Some suppliers were actually surprised by how high Opal was aiming, Chugh said. “That was when we knew we were onto something good, when people were like, ‘Are you sure? For a webcam, this feels a little high-end.’ And we’re like, yeah, that’s the point.” Sweet and the design team took inspiration from Dieter Rams’ minimalism and Teenage Engineering’s emphasis on the technology, and built a camera that looks less like an eye perched atop your monitor and more like, well, a camera.

All along, Sohlstrom said, the hardware has developed ahead of the software. When we got on a Zoom call to talk about Opal — Chugh and I using Opal cameras, Sohlstrom on his MacBook camera because the Opal software he was currently running was too buggy — Sohlstrom acknowledged that even as Opal launches, there are big bugs to fix. The camera Opal sent me to try has a tendency to constantly search for focus, which he noticed immediately and said would be fixed in the next day or so. But in a way, that’s the point: Opal believes it’s shipping a webcam that’s already better than the one you’re currently using, and it will get even better over time. The hardware is just a platform for the ever-iterating software.

In the run-up to launch, Sohlstrom and his team are working on optimizing the camera for every video-chat app on the market, which itself is a huge amount of work. They’re mostly focused on the Mac, he said, where “it’s all this technology that is, frankly, old and untouched and unloved by Apple.” They spent months building manual controls so users can tweak brightness and bokeh and focus to their liking. Opal hopes most users will never need any of these settings, and can just plug in their camera and look great. But people who drop $300 on a webcam are also more likely than most to want to tweak their settings.

A black Opal camera on top of a laptop screen. Opal's camera looks nice, but ultimately the hardware is only half the battle. Maybe not even half.Photo: Opal

The team is already starting to dream about what it can do with all the extra hardware power it has, too. Nearly all of the camera’s processing happens on the device itself, which both gives Opal extra control over the system and means it can do more without overloading the user’s computer. “We actually built a gesture-control engine,” Sohlstrom said, “that can basically recognize your hands … and allow you to use gestures to control different parts of your computer.” You could mute yourself with a closed-mouth gesture, or drop a hand-raise in Zoom by literally raising your hand. Or — and this is Sohlstrom’s favorite — what if you could end a Zoom call just by waving at the screen, instead of doing the awkward dance of finding the Leave button? Opal could eventually support AR features, metaverse-style avatars and much more.

The camera that’s shipping now is still something of a beta test. Chugh and Sohlstrom said they’re confident people will like the Opal better than their existing webcams — it helps that that’s an incredibly low bar — and then be along for the ride as the device gets even better. Given the price, though, the team doesn’t have much room for error, so they’ve been expanding the pool of Opal users slowly even though they say 16,000 people are currently on a waitlist to buy one. “We’re shipping out first in the hundreds, then the thousands, then the tens of thousands,” Sohlstrom said.

Exactly how big that market will get is the other question facing Opal. The company’s not necessarily attempting to eat the whole webcam industry. It just wants to make the high end much higher. “I think our target market is people who make a living on Zoom,” Chugh said. “Those people aren’t looking for value … what those people want is best in class.” Opal is betting that just as Instagram and FaceTime turned cameras into the most important feature of smartphones, Zoom and Teams might do the same for PCs. A few years from now, we won’t all be rectangles on a black screen talking to each other. We’ll be something more immersive, something more interesting. And that only works if the camera does.


Niantic’s future hinges on mapping the metaverse

The maker of Pokémon Go is hoping the metaverse will deliver its next big break.

Niantic's new standalone messaging and social app, Campfire, is a way to get players organizing and meeting up in the real world. It launches today for select Pokémon Go players.

Image: Niantic

Pokémon Go sent Niantic to the moon. But now the San Francisco-based augmented reality developer has returned to earth, and it’s been trying to chart its way back to the stars ever since. The company yesterday announced layoffs of about 8% of its workforce (about 85 to 90 people) and canceled four projects, Bloomberg reported, signaling another disappointment for the studio that still generates about $1 billion in revenue per year from Pokémon Go.

Finding its next big hit has been Niantic’s priority for years, and the company has been coming up short. For much of the past year or so, Niantic has turned its attention to the metaverse, with hopes that its location-based mobile games, AR tech and company philosophy around fostering physical connection and outdoor exploration can help it build what it now calls the “real world metaverse.”

Keep Reading Show less
Nick Statt

Nick Statt is Protocol's video game reporter. Prior to joining Protocol, he was news editor at The Verge covering the gaming industry, mobile apps and antitrust out of San Francisco, in addition to managing coverage of Silicon Valley tech giants and startups. He now resides in Rochester, New York, home of the garbage plate and, completely coincidentally, the World Video Game Hall of Fame. He can be reached at

Every day, millions of us press the “order” button on our favorite coffee store's mobile application: Our chosen brew will be on the counter when we arrive. It’s a personalized, seamless experience that we have all come to expect. What we don’t know is what’s happening behind the scenes. The mobile application is sourcing data from a database that stores information about each customer and what their favorite coffee drinks are. It is also leveraging event-streaming data in real time to ensure the ingredients for your personal coffee are in supply at your local store.

Applications like this power our daily lives, and if they can’t access massive amounts of data stored in a database as well as stream data “in motion” instantaneously, you — and millions of customers — won’t have these in-the-moment experiences.

Keep Reading Show less
Jennifer Goforth Gregory
Jennifer Goforth Gregory has worked in the B2B technology industry for over 20 years. As a freelance writer she writes for top technology brands, including IBM, HPE, Adobe, AT&T, Verizon, Epson, Oracle, Intel and Square. She specializes in a wide range of technology, such as AI, IoT, cloud, cybersecurity, and CX. Jennifer also wrote a bestselling book The Freelance Content Marketing Writer to help other writers launch a high earning freelance business.

Supreme Court takes a sledgehammer to greenhouse gas regulations

The court ruled 6-3 that the EPA cannot use the Clean Air Act to regulate power plant greenhouse gas emissions. That leaves a patchwork of policies from states, utilities and, increasingly, tech companies to pick up the slack.

The Supreme Court struck a major blow to the federal government's ability to regulate greenhouse gases.

Eric Lee/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Striking down the right to abortion may be the Supreme Court's highest-profile decision this term. But on Thursday, the court handed down an equally massive verdict on the federal government's ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. In the case of West Virginia v. EPA, the court decided that the agency has no ability to regulate greenhouse gas pollution under the Clean Air Act. Weakening the federal government's powers leaves a patchwork of states, utilities and, increasingly, tech companies to pick up the slack in reducing carbon pollution.

Keep Reading Show less
Brian Kahn

Brian ( @blkahn) is Protocol's climate editor. Previously, he was the managing editor and founding senior writer at Earther, Gizmodo's climate site, where he covered everything from the weather to Big Oil's influence on politics. He also reported for Climate Central and the Wall Street Journal. In the even more distant past, he led sleigh rides to visit a herd of 7,000 elk and boat tours on the deepest lake in the U.S.


Can crypto regulate itself? The Lummis-Gillibrand bill hopes so.

Creating the equivalent of the stock markets’ FINRA for crypto is the ideal, but experts doubt that it will be easy.

The idea of creating a government-sanctioned private regulatory association has been drawing more attention in the debate over how to rein in a fast-growing industry whose technological quirks have baffled policymakers.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Regulating crypto is complicated. That’s why Sens. Cynthia Lummis and Kirsten Gillibrand want to explore the creation of a private sector group to help federal regulators do their job.

The bipartisan bill introduced by Lummis and Gillibrand would require the CFTC and the SEC to work with the crypto industry to look into setting up a self-regulatory organization to “facilitate innovative, efficient and orderly markets for digital assets.”

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.


Alperovitch: Cybersecurity defenders can’t be on high alert every day

With the continued threat of Russian cyber escalation, cybersecurity and geopolitics expert Dmitri Alperovitch says it’s not ideal for the U.S. to oscillate between moments of high alert and lesser states of cyber readiness.

Dmitri Alperovitch (the co-founder and former CTO of CrowdStrike) speaks at RSA Conference 2022.

Photo: RSA Conference

When it comes to cybersecurity vigilance, Dmitri Alperovitch wants to see more focus on resiliency of IT systems — and less on doing "surges" around particular dates or events.

For instance, whatever Russia is doing at the moment.

Keep Reading Show less
Kyle Alspach

Kyle Alspach ( @KyleAlspach) is a senior reporter at Protocol, focused on cybersecurity. He has covered the tech industry since 2010 for outlets including VentureBeat, CRN and the Boston Globe. He lives in Portland, Oregon, and can be reached at

Latest Stories