Opal's quest to reinvent the webcam

Webcams are bad. They’re also crucially important to the future of work. So what does it take to make them better?

A white Opal camera on top of a laptop.

The $300 Opal is meant to be more "high-end camera" than "webcam."

Photo: Opal

At some point over the last two years, millions of tech employees everywhere have come to the same conclusion: “Wow, my webcam sucks.” After days, weeks, months of conducting Zoom calls through the blurry haze of a MacBook Air camera, techies everywhere started to get fed up. Some rigged up elaborate replacements that turned a DSLR into a webcam; others mounted their smartphones; dedicated webcams, even the ones that barely suck less than the Air, became so popular that they were out of stock for months at a time.

Veeraj Chugh and Stefan Sohlstrom decided to fix their webcam problem in a different way: by building a better one. Chugh and Sohlstrom are the co-founders of Opal, which is the name of both the company they created and the webcam it’s launching on Tuesday. At $300, it’s among the most expensive devices on the market. But Chugh and Sohlstrom think people will pay the steep price as they come to recognize how much better they look on calls and how much that can matter. More than that, they think Opal is at the forefront of a home-office revolution, a burst of new startups and products designed to make remote work better.

Chugh and Sohlstrom began talking about webcams in the summer of 2020, while they were working together at Uber, after having their own wow-webcams-suck moments. “Just like everyone else,” Sohlstrom said, “we went straight to Zoom. And for me, I was like, ‘Wow, this is way worse than in person.’” The two men began discussing a simple question: Why are webcams so bad? Sohlstrom, a lifelong photography enthusiast, began digging into camera software and Photoshop filters, looking for ways to make himself look better. Chugh went to Alibaba and bought dozens of different webcams to test and take apart.

They discovered that there’s a pretty big reason why most webcams suck: There hasn’t been much incentive to make them better. Even the webcam giants like Logitech admit that, to some extent, they’d fallen asleep at the webcam wheel pre-pandemic because nobody seemed to care. “We're like, all right, we're at 90% market share, our products are pretty good, no one's really doing anything new there,” Scott Wharton, who runs Logitech’s video collaboration business, told me earlier this year. The pandemic, and the rush of demand for home-office gear, caught all these companies off guard.

Veeraj Chugh and Stefan Sohlstrom posing for a portrait.Veeraj Chugh and Stefan Sohlstrom are the co-founders of Opal.Photo: Opal

But the better diagnosis of the webcam business, Chugh said, is because even the ones with high-end hardware don’t have the software chops to match. A high-end sensor and fast chip is wasted without the right software and neural processing engines, and the best software can’t solve for badly captured light. “It’s because hardware companies make webcams,” Sohlstrom said. “The companies that make that kind of stuff, they’re not necessarily known for computational photography and computer vision. Whereas if you take your iPhone, and you look at the difference between the last four of them … it’s not really hardware, right?” In recent years Apple, Samsung, Google and others have shifted from competing over megapixels to adding automated filters, software that can turn a blurry picture into a crisp picture, and much more.

At first, they had thought building a webcam might be a fun side hustle, or something they did just for themselves. But the more they looked at the space, the more they realized others might want the same thing they did. They also realized getting it right wouldn’t be easy. By the end of 2020, they’d both quit their jobs to start a webcam company. They started to put together a team, beginning with Kenny Sweet, who has worked on everything from Beats headphones to Dell laptops.

From the very beginning, the Opal team made a clear distinction internally. They weren’t just building a better webcam. There’s a whole supply chain and feature set made just for webcams, from the chassis to the chip to the images sensor, and Opal wanted no part of it. “As soon as you start talking to webcam vendors and webcam suppliers,” Chugh said, “you're literally picking between D+ and D- options.” Instead, they decided to build the best camera they possibly could, and then just mount it to a user’s computer. They bought processors from Intel and sensors from Sony, and cobbled together something approximating a smartphone without a screen and all the radios. They built a mesh of microphones to improve the audio experience and are working on the ever-complicated problem of canceling echos and background noise.

Some suppliers were actually surprised by how high Opal was aiming, Chugh said. “That was when we knew we were onto something good, when people were like, ‘Are you sure? For a webcam, this feels a little high-end.’ And we’re like, yeah, that’s the point.” Sweet and the design team took inspiration from Dieter Rams’ minimalism and Teenage Engineering’s emphasis on the technology, and built a camera that looks less like an eye perched atop your monitor and more like, well, a camera.

All along, Sohlstrom said, the hardware has developed ahead of the software. When we got on a Zoom call to talk about Opal — Chugh and I using Opal cameras, Sohlstrom on his MacBook camera because the Opal software he was currently running was too buggy — Sohlstrom acknowledged that even as Opal launches, there are big bugs to fix. The camera Opal sent me to try has a tendency to constantly search for focus, which he noticed immediately and said would be fixed in the next day or so. But in a way, that’s the point: Opal believes it’s shipping a webcam that’s already better than the one you’re currently using, and it will get even better over time. The hardware is just a platform for the ever-iterating software.

In the run-up to launch, Sohlstrom and his team are working on optimizing the camera for every video-chat app on the market, which itself is a huge amount of work. They’re mostly focused on the Mac, he said, where “it’s all this technology that is, frankly, old and untouched and unloved by Apple.” They spent months building manual controls so users can tweak brightness and bokeh and focus to their liking. Opal hopes most users will never need any of these settings, and can just plug in their camera and look great. But people who drop $300 on a webcam are also more likely than most to want to tweak their settings.

A black Opal camera on top of a laptop screen.Opal's camera looks nice, but ultimately the hardware is only half the battle. Maybe not even half.Photo: Opal

The team is already starting to dream about what it can do with all the extra hardware power it has, too. Nearly all of the camera’s processing happens on the device itself, which both gives Opal extra control over the system and means it can do more without overloading the user’s computer. “We actually built a gesture-control engine,” Sohlstrom said, “that can basically recognize your hands … and allow you to use gestures to control different parts of your computer.” You could mute yourself with a closed-mouth gesture, or drop a hand-raise in Zoom by literally raising your hand. Or — and this is Sohlstrom’s favorite — what if you could end a Zoom call just by waving at the screen, instead of doing the awkward dance of finding the Leave button? Opal could eventually support AR features, metaverse-style avatars and much more.

The camera that’s shipping now is still something of a beta test. Chugh and Sohlstrom said they’re confident people will like the Opal better than their existing webcams — it helps that that’s an incredibly low bar — and then be along for the ride as the device gets even better. Given the price, though, the team doesn’t have much room for error, so they’ve been expanding the pool of Opal users slowly even though they say 16,000 people are currently on a waitlist to buy one. “We’re shipping out first in the hundreds, then the thousands, then the tens of thousands,” Sohlstrom said.

Exactly how big that market will get is the other question facing Opal. The company’s not necessarily attempting to eat the whole webcam industry. It just wants to make the high end much higher. “I think our target market is people who make a living on Zoom,” Chugh said. “Those people aren’t looking for value … what those people want is best in class.” Opal is betting that just as Instagram and FaceTime turned cameras into the most important feature of smartphones, Zoom and Teams might do the same for PCs. A few years from now, we won’t all be rectangles on a black screen talking to each other. We’ll be something more immersive, something more interesting. And that only works if the camera does.


Judge Zia Faruqui is trying to teach you crypto, one ‘SNL’ reference at a time

His decisions on major cryptocurrency cases have quoted "The Big Lebowski," "SNL," and "Dr. Strangelove." That’s because he wants you — yes, you — to read them.

The ways Zia Faruqui (right) has weighed on cases that have come before him can give lawyers clues as to what legal frameworks will pass muster.

Photo: Carolyn Van Houten/The Washington Post via Getty Images

“Cryptocurrency and related software analytics tools are ‘The wave of the future, Dude. One hundred percent electronic.’”

That’s not a quote from "The Big Lebowski" — at least, not directly. It’s a quote from a Washington, D.C., district court memorandum opinion on the role cryptocurrency analytics tools can play in government investigations. The author is Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui.

Keep ReadingShow less
Veronica Irwin

Veronica Irwin (@vronirwin) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol covering fintech. Previously she was at the San Francisco Examiner, covering tech from a hyper-local angle. Before that, her byline was featured in SF Weekly, The Nation, Techworker, Ms. Magazine and The Frisc.

The financial technology transformation is driving competition, creating consumer choice, and shaping the future of finance. Hear from seven fintech leaders who are reshaping the future of finance, and join the inaugural Financial Technology Association Fintech Summit to learn more.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Financial Technology Association (FTA) represents industry leaders shaping the future of finance. We champion the power of technology-centered financial services and advocate for the modernization of financial regulation to support inclusion and responsible innovation.

AWS CEO: The cloud isn’t just about technology

As AWS preps for its annual re:Invent conference, Adam Selipsky talks product strategy, support for hybrid environments, and the value of the cloud in uncertain economic times.

Photo: Noah Berger/Getty Images for Amazon Web Services

AWS is gearing up for re:Invent, its annual cloud computing conference where announcements this year are expected to focus on its end-to-end data strategy and delivering new industry-specific services.

It will be the second re:Invent with CEO Adam Selipsky as leader of the industry’s largest cloud provider after his return last year to AWS from data visualization company Tableau Software.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.

Image: Protocol

We launched Protocol in February 2020 to cover the evolving power center of tech. It is with deep sadness that just under three years later, we are winding down the publication.

As of today, we will not publish any more stories. All of our newsletters, apart from our flagship, Source Code, will no longer be sent. Source Code will be published and sent for the next few weeks, but it will also close down in December.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bennett Richardson

Bennett Richardson ( @bennettrich) is the president of Protocol. Prior to joining Protocol in 2019, Bennett was executive director of global strategic partnerships at POLITICO, where he led strategic growth efforts including POLITICO's European expansion in Brussels and POLITICO's creative agency POLITICO Focus during his six years with the company. Prior to POLITICO, Bennett was co-founder and CMO of Hinge, the mobile dating company recently acquired by Match Group. Bennett began his career in digital and social brand marketing working with major brands across tech, energy, and health care at leading marketing and communications agencies including Edelman and GMMB. Bennett is originally from Portland, Maine, and received his bachelor's degree from Colgate University.


Why large enterprises struggle to find suitable platforms for MLops

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, and as larger enterprises go from deploying hundreds of models to thousands and even millions of models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

Photo: artpartner-images via Getty Images

On any given day, Lily AI runs hundreds of machine learning models using computer vision and natural language processing that are customized for its retail and ecommerce clients to make website product recommendations, forecast demand, and plan merchandising. But this spring when the company was in the market for a machine learning operations platform to manage its expanding model roster, it wasn’t easy to find a suitable off-the-shelf system that could handle such a large number of models in deployment while also meeting other criteria.

Some MLops platforms are not well-suited for maintaining even more than 10 machine learning models when it comes to keeping track of data, navigating their user interfaces, or reporting capabilities, Matthew Nokleby, machine learning manager for Lily AI’s product intelligence team, told Protocol earlier this year. “The duct tape starts to show,” he said.

Keep ReadingShow less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories