Fintech

America might finally get open banking — but not without a fight

Proposed rulemaking on Dodd-Frank Section 1033 could fundamentally reshape American finance.

Unlocking a bank

New rules about the sharing of financial data could fundamentally reshape American fintech.

Image: sorbetto / Getty Images

Late last week, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau quietly published a statement that could fundamentally change the fintech industry.

The catchily-named "Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Consumer Access to Financial Records" (colloquially known as the ANPR) explained that the CFPB plans to create new regulation to implement Section 1033 of the Dodd-Frank Act, and is seeking stakeholder input before it does so. Yes, that's a lot of jargon. But look past that, and the consequences are significant: The future of fintech is now on the line.

The Dodd-Frank Act is a behemoth of financial legislation, passed in the aftermath of the last financial crisis. It sought to overhaul the system and revive trust in a sector where that was deeply lacking. In doing so, it also laid the groundwork for the following decade's fintech boom. That's partly down to the unassuming Section 1033. "It says consumers have the right to access their financial account information in a machine-readable format," Plaid's global head of policy, John Pitts, told Protocol. That allows companies like Mint to aggregate your accounts, for instance, and lets cash-flow based lenders access your bank details so they can effectively underwrite loans. It's the closest thing the U.S. has to something like the U.K.'s Open Banking regime, or the EU's Payment Services Directive 2. Section 1033, Pitts said, "underpins all of fintech."

Despite its importance, the CFPB hasn't formally implemented it. After a request for information in November 2016, it issued a set of non-binding principles the following year. But the lack of formal regulation has caused problems. As the CFPB noted, "there are indications that some emerging market practices may not reflect the access rights described in Section 1033." Plaid has encountered some of those issues itself, Pitts said: Some banks refuse to share customers' interest rate charges, he said, on the basis that the charges are proprietary information. Others are worried about enabling competition, it seems. "We have ... seen a bank include language in a contract saying Plaid may not connect a customer with any service that might cause that customer to leave this bank," Pitts said.

The CFPB clearly summed up the issue: "Competitive dynamics mean that data holders may have an incentive to restrict access by certain data users."

Formal regulation that defines just who can access data and when they can do it may offer a solution. The single most important line of this ANPR, according to Pitts, is the following: "Authorized data access holds the potential to intensify competition and innovation in many, perhaps even most, consumer financial markets." The key, he thinks, is the focus on competition, a theme that regularly repeats throughout the ANPR. "That's surprising for an agency that does not have competition jurisdiction," he said.

Overall, the ANPR indicates to Pitts that the agency is "not going small." It seems, he said, that the CFPB has recognized just how critical data-sharing is to the future of finance. The bureau is indicating that it sees this as "a critical regulatory piece of infrastructure," he said — something worth devoting its time to, given the repercussions for the entire financial industry.

But doing so won't be easy. There are some thorny debates to be had, some of which have no easy answers. Banks and fintechs may disagree about what the scope of the data is: whether banks are obligated to share interest rate data, for instance. They'll also have to figure out who's in control: If a customer wants to connect their bank account to a company the bank thinks is a fraud, is the bank allowed to stop them? If so, what's stopping the bank from preventing customers from accessing legitimate companies that the bank deems illegitimate? And if not, who's liable when something goes wrong? In a statement last year, the American Banking Association said that data aggregators like Plaid ought to be designated financial institutions, and subject to the rules that come with that — including being liable when something goes wrong.

Issues like that are complicated. But Pitts is hopeful that they'll be worked out without too much animosity. "I actually am not expecting [banks] to lobby in the other direction," he said, noting that everyone is just "working in the interest of their customers." And he's not bothered about the banking industry's vast lobbying budgets, either. "Money and influence matters, but policy and consumer demand also matters," he said. Plus, he added, "the CFPB is supposed to be insulated from that type of money and lobbying — so fingers crossed."

Surprisingly for a policy debate in 2020, Section 1033 "seems to be a non-partisan, non-political issue right now," Pitts said. No politicians are strongly supporting either side. But as things progress, that might change: The level of attention being given to it now "gives it some possibility that it gets picked up as an issue," he said.

There's plenty of time for that to happen. Once the Federal Register prints the CFPB's ANPR, a 90-day comment window will open, giving the public plenty of time to respond to the ANPR's 111 questions. After that, the CFPB will put together proposed rules, before another comment period — eventually ending with actual regulation. "You should think of [the ANPR] as the start of a two- to four-year process," Pitts said. By which time Europe will probably have new rules, and we can repeat the whole cycle again.

Climate

A pro-China disinformation campaign is targeting rare earth miners

It’s uncommon for cyber criminals to target private industry. But a new operation has cast doubt on miners looking to gain a foothold in the West in an apparent attempt to protect China’s upper hand in a market that has become increasingly vital.

It is very uncommon for coordinated disinformation operations to target private industry, rather than governments or civil society, a cybersecurity expert says.

Photo: Goh Seng Chong/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Just when we thought the renewable energy supply chains couldn’t get more fraught, a sophisticated disinformation campaign has taken to social media to further complicate things.

Known as Dragonbridge, the campaign has existed for at least three years, but in the last few months it has shifted its focus to target several mining companies “with negative messaging in response to potential or planned rare earths production activities.” It was initially uncovered by cybersecurity firm Mandiant and peddles narratives in the Chinese interest via its network of thousands of fake social media accounts.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).

Some of the most astounding tech-enabled advances of the next decade, from cutting-edge medical research to urban traffic control and factory floor optimization, will be enabled by a device often smaller than a thumbnail: the memory chip.

While vast amounts of data are created, stored and processed every moment — by some estimates, 2.5 quintillion bytes daily — the insights in that code are unlocked by the memory chips that hold it and transfer it. “Memory will propel the next 10 years into the most transformative years in human history,” said Sanjay Mehrotra, president and CEO of Micron Technology.

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Fintech

Ripple’s CEO threatens to leave the US if it loses SEC case

CEO Brad Garlinghouse said a few countries have reached out to Ripple about relocating.

"There's no doubt that if the SEC doesn't win their case against us that that is good for crypto in the United States,” Brad Garlinghouse told Protocol.

Photo: Stephen McCarthy/Sportsfile for Collision via Getty Images

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said the crypto company will move to another country if it loses in its legal battle with the SEC.

Garlinghouse said he’s confident that Ripple will prevail against the federal regulator, which accused the company of failing to register roughly $1.4 billion in XRP tokens as securities.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Policy

The Supreme Court’s EPA ruling is bad news for tech regulation, too

The justices just gave themselves a lot of discretion to smack down agency rules.

The ruling could also endanger work on competition issues by the FTC and net neutrality by the FCC.

Photo: Geoff Livingston/Getty Images

The Supreme Court’s decision last week gutting the Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions didn’t just signal the conservative justices’ dislike of the Clean Air Act at a moment of climate crisis. It also served as a warning for anyone that would like to see more regulation of Big Tech.

At the heart of Chief Justice John Roberts’ decision in West Virginia v. EPA was a codification of the “major questions doctrine,” which, he wrote, requires “clear congressional authorization” when agencies want to regulate on areas of great “economic and political significance.”

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Enterprise

Microsoft and Google are still using emotion AI, but with limits

Microsoft said accessibility goals overrode problems with emotion recognition and Google offers off-the-shelf emotion recognition technology amid growing concern over the controversial AI.

Emotion recognition is a well-established field of computer vision research; however, AI-based technologies used in an attempt to assess people’s emotional states have moved beyond the research phase.

Photo: Microsoft

Microsoft said last month it would no longer provide general use of an AI-based cloud software feature used to infer people’s emotions. However, despite its own admission that emotion recognition technology creates “risks,” it turns out the company will retain its emotion recognition capability in an app used by people with vision loss.

In fact, amid growing concerns over development and use of controversial emotion recognition in everyday software, both Microsoft and Google continue to incorporate the AI-based features in their products.

“The Seeing AI person channel enables you to recognize people and to get a description of them, including an estimate of their age and also their emotion,” said Saqib Shaikh, a software engineering manager and project lead for Seeing AI at Microsoft who helped build the app, in a tutorial about the product in a 2017 Microsoft video.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories
Bulletins