People

Tech service workers are essential. They want to be treated like it.

Nora Morales, a janitor at Google, told Protocol tech offices would "fall apart" without service workers.

Service workers in Silicon Valley protest layoffs.

Silicon Valley's service workers want to see better wages and better benefits.

Photo: SEIU-USWW

Nora Morales loses a lot of sleep over how she's going to make rent, keep up with her car insurance and deal with the rising costs of health insurance. She's been working throughout the pandemic — as a janitor at Google, she is considered an essential worker — but she's been living paycheck to paycheck.

Morales simply wants to be paid enough money "so that we can continue to thrive as people and live in our homes and live comfortable lives without stressing about making ends meet every single month," she told Protocol through a translator.

While the vast majority of workers across Silicon Valley were working from home during the pandemic, Morales was one of the many service workers who kept going in to work.

Her employer, Brilliant General Maintenance, contracts with Google to provide service workers for its offices. BGM gave Morales and her coworkers the option to receive pay without working, but "we were worried about what the future would hold," she said. They feared that one day the company would decide to stop paying her and other janitors.

Those fears are not groundless: Service workers at many other tech companies lost their jobs throughout the pandemic. In September, for example, Yahoo (when still owned by Verizon) laid off 91 tech cafeteria workers. Companies such as Lyft, Dropbox and Salesforce similarly cut janitor positions amid the pandemic.

As tech companies gear up to bring white-collar employees back to the office, Morales and other essential workers want to make sure their employers meet their needs and appreciate their labor. This week, Google revised its remote work and return-to-office policies to allow more flexibility for full-time employees. For contractors such as Morales, Google said vendors have already identified who needs to be working from a Google office based on what Google has identified as its needs, a spokesperson for the company told Protocol.

Silicon Valley Rising, a coalition of labor advocates that aims to make the tech industry more equitable, wants to ensure companies that have treated workers well during the pandemic continue to do so. A big priority for workers and advocacy groups is to ensure companies support their contractor workforces and "keep them whole," Maria Noel Fernandez, campaign director for Silicon Valley Rising, told Protocol.

"And that there's no exploitation of the moment to use it as a way to get rid of workers who are organized, or get rid of contracts that are organized," she said.

Fernandez hopes that's not the case, but said she's seen anti-union companies in the past use transitions as an excuse to not support workers.

"I think it's something we're watching and being careful about," she told Protocol. "And hoping that the work over the last several years, the work that subcontracted workers service workers have put into having a voice and trying to lift the veil of being an invisible workforce of tech, that we suddenly now don't, go back five years."

Five years ago, there were thousands of service workers, primarily people of color, who didn't have a voice on the job, she said. They lacked access to health care, sick days and "all the benefits that we would expect companies the size and stature of the tech companies in Silicon Valley to really be providing for all workers and ensuring are there for all workers."

Pushing beyond the bare minimum

Service Employees International Union-United Service Workers West is one of the major unions that represents about 20,000 janitors and 10,000 security officers in the tech industry. With contract renegotiations on the horizon, SEIU-USWW has its eyes set on improving the economic conditions of workers.

The median hourly wage for janitors in Santa Clara County, where many tech campuses are located, is $16.94, according to the California Employment Development Department. For security officers, it's $17.81.

Meanwhile, the current minimum wage in California is $14 an hour for employers with 26 or more employees, and $13 per hour for employers with 25 or fewer employees. By 2023, California's minimum wage will be $15 an hour. But $15 an hour in California is still not enough for workers, SEIU-USWW President David Huerta told Protocol.

"We have to be well beyond that," he said.

Huerta recognizes that many workers make above the minimum wage but said the "gap between minimum wage and what security officers and janitors make is closing. It's getting smaller. And so we want to ensure that workers who have been providing an essential service, and continue to provide essential services, have an hourly wage that gives them the ability to have a good quality of life in California."

Huerta pointed to the rising costs of health care and the cost of housing in the region. "The cost of labor has to keep up with that," he said.

Morales, who is also a member of SEIU-USWW, agrees. She, too, wants to see better wages in her next union contract.

"What we're making now is no longer enough for me," she said.

SEIU-USWW has not landed on an exact dollar amount but the goal with the upcoming negotiations is to address socioeconomic inequities in California.

"The pandemic exposed many vulnerabilities already in our economy — issues that have demonstrated the racial bias in this country," Huerta said. "The fact that security officers and custodians are predominantly Black, brown, immigrant workers, the cost of their labor and the value that they provide needs to be recognized."

As California's economy officially reopens on June 15, Huerta sees it as representing a time to make society more equitable.

"Without us, the reality is that these locations are inoperable," Huerta said

Better, consistent benefits

Jesus Castrejon has continued to work as a security officer at Google throughout the pandemic, he told Protocol. Castrejon, who is a member of SEIU-USWW, helps ensure the premises are secure, and that those who are in the office are abiding by COVID-19 safety precautions.

Castrejon said he was apprehensive at first about coming into the office. But he said he felt reassured when he saw how seriously Google was taking sanitation procedures. Castrejon was also just happy to have a job.

For the first couple of months, Castrejon received hazard pay from his employer, Securitas, which provides security officers to Google.

"It was really great, but it didn't last," he said. "And we didn't get an explanation on that. But we didn't really question it because, you know, we don't want to complain. We have our jobs and we're working. So it's better than a lot of companies that may have laid off their employees."

Protocol reached out to Securitas for comment but did not hear back.

Castrejon said working in security at Google has been the best job he's ever had — but that doesn't mean he doesn't want more from his employer. In addition to wanting hazard pay back, Castrejon said he would like to see Securitas cover employees' health care premiums.

As a security officer, Castrejon and his colleagues interact with a number of people throughout the day. They're responsible for taking temperatures, ensuring people wear masks and determining whether someone is supposed to be there. That makes them more susceptible to potentially interacting with someone who may have COVID-19.

Full healthcare coverage would be great, he said, since "we're that first line of people" that employees and visitors encounter.

The union also wants to see guarantees that workers will be able to quarantine with pay, if necessary.

"We don't know how long this pandemic is going to last," Huerta said. "We still don't have an end date on this."

Huerta is also not under the impression that this will be the last pandemic. That's why he wants to make sure there are certain safeguards in place that companies are legally obligated to follow.

"I think these workers are going to be very critical to the sustainability of our economy once we repopulate these facilities," Huerta said. "And their success is going to be in my opinion, is going to be equal to the success we can demonstrate in our economy, if we're able to repopulate in a way that's safe and sustainable."

Calling essential workers 'heroes' is not enough anymore

Silicon Valley Rising is explicitly focused on exploring how the economy can rebuild itself in a way that takes into account the needs of essential workers. A few weeks ago, the organization launched the Essential Workers Council to help center the needs and voices of workers as local governments are thinking about the path forward.

Through the past year, there has been a lot of talk about how essential workers are "heroes," and many memes about their day-to-day realities, Fernandez said. And yet, "when we think about our organizing and our work over the last year, it has been an uphill battle to win the basic needs that workers have needed through this pandemic."

Through the council, Fernandez hopes to be able to shine a light on what workers need "and be very clear that calling them heroes isn't enough anymore."

The council is actively working on determining what they will need to get through the next few months. What's top-of-mind is what housing will look like post-pandemic, the cost of healthcare and emergency paid sick leave.

"Workers actually have needed that for years," Fernandez said. "So what does it actually look like for the recovery to be an opportunity to not go back to a system that wasn't working for workers? "

For Morales, she wants to see continued support and continued recognition for her labor at her workplace.

"We do a job that is very necessary and very needed." she said. "During this pandemic we've been appreciated, and I want this recognition to continue very long after it ends. Without janitors, such as myself, the workplace would fall apart and I want our jobs to be continued to be respected and recognized."

Policy

The Supreme Court’s EPA ruling is bad news for tech regulation, too

The justices just gave themselves a lot of discretion to smack down agency rules.

The ruling could also endanger work on competition issues by the FTC and net neutrality by the FCC.

Photo: Geoff Livingston/Getty Images

The Supreme Court’s decision last week gutting the Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions didn’t just signal the conservative justices’ dislike of the Clean Air Act at a moment of climate crisis. It also served as a warning for anyone that would like to see more regulation of Big Tech.

At the heart of Chief Justice John Roberts’ decision in West Virginia v. EPA was a codification of the “major questions doctrine,” which, he wrote, requires “clear congressional authorization” when agencies want to regulate on areas of great “economic and political significance.”

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Some of the most astounding tech-enabled advances of the next decade, from cutting-edge medical research to urban traffic control and factory floor optimization, will be enabled by a device often smaller than a thumbnail: the memory chip.

While vast amounts of data are created, stored and processed every moment — by some estimates, 2.5 quintillion bytes daily — the insights in that code are unlocked by the memory chips that hold it and transfer it. “Memory will propel the next 10 years into the most transformative years in human history,” said Sanjay Mehrotra, president and CEO of Micron Technology.

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Enterprise

Microsoft and Google are still using emotion AI, but with limits

Microsoft said accessibility goals overrode problems with emotion recognition and Google offers off-the-shelf emotion recognition technology amid growing concern over the controversial AI.

Emotion recognition is a well established field of computer vision research; however, AI-based technologies used in an attempt to assess people’s emotional states have moved beyond the research phase.

Photo: Microsoft

Microsoft said last month it would no longer provide general use of an AI-based cloud software feature used to infer people’s emotions. However, despite its own admission that emotion recognition technology creates “risks,” it turns out the company will retain its emotion recognition capability in an app used by people with vision loss.

In fact, amid growing concerns over development and use of controversial emotion recognition in everyday software, both Microsoft and Google continue to incorporate the AI-based features in their products.

“The Seeing AI person channel enables you to recognize people and to get a description of them, including an estimate of their age and also their emotion,” said Saqib Shaikh, a software engineering manager and project lead for Seeing AI at Microsoft who helped build the app, in a tutorial about the product in a 2017 Microsoft video.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Climate

How I decided to shape Microsoft’s climate agenda

Lucas Joppa went from studying ecology to shaping one of the tech industry’s most robust climate plans. Here’s why — and why CEOs should consider hiring more people like him.

Lucas Joppa, chief environmental officer of Microsoft, told Protocol about the company's plans.

Photo: David Ryder/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Click banner image for more How I decided series

Microsoft has set a number of lofty climate and environmental goals. Forget net zero: It wants to be carbon negative by 2030. Ditto for water.

Keep Reading Show less
Brian Kahn

Brian ( @blkahn) is Protocol's climate editor. Previously, he was the managing editor and founding senior writer at Earther, Gizmodo's climate site, where he covered everything from the weather to Big Oil's influence on politics. He also reported for Climate Central and the Wall Street Journal. In the even more distant past, he led sleigh rides to visit a herd of 7,000 elk and boat tours on the deepest lake in the U.S.

Fintech

There’s a secret hub for fintech talent: Look south

Far from Silicon Valley and Wall Street, Atlanta has long been a hub for payments technology.

Atlanta hasn’t gotten its share of the fintech buzz, perhaps because its founders are less prone to tweetstorming.

Illustration: iStock/Getty Images Plus; Protocol

San Francisco has Square, Stripe and Plaid. But Atlanta has CoreCard, Kabbage and CheckFree. It also lays claim to pioneering charge cards, electronic payments and ATMs. Many of the everyday innovations in fintech we’ve come to rely on have the Atlanta metropolitan area to thank.

Yet Atlanta hasn’t gotten its share of the fintech buzz, perhaps because its founders are less prone to tweetstorming and its products don’t have developers rhapsodizing about APIs. Atlanta’s fintech scene has developed around a stabler, more cautious ethos: less move fast and break things, more stay safe and build things. At a time when fintech valuations have fallen sharply from their lofty peaks and regulators are circling, that may make Atlanta a more favorable place to place fintech bets, whether that means founding a company, investing or hiring local talent.

Keep Reading Show less
Veronica Irwin

Veronica Irwin (@vronirwin) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol covering fintech. Previously she was at the San Francisco Examiner, covering tech from a hyper-local angle. Before that, her byline was featured in SF Weekly, The Nation, Techworker, Ms. Magazine and The Frisc.

Latest Stories
Bulletins