People

Amazon’s non-compete agreement 'unfairly handcuffed' her: How one senior manager is pushing back

Charlotte Newman is still working for Amazon while suing the company for harassment and discrimination.

Amazon’s non-compete agreement 'unfairly handcuffed' her: How one senior manager is pushing back

Charlotte Newman is suing her employer, Amazon, alleging discrimination and harassment.

Photo: Tayo Kuku

"Too direct." "Too aggressive." "Scary."

A manager at Amazon called Charlotte Newman all of those things, Newman alleged in a recently-filed lawsuit against her employer. Her suit also alleged sexual assault from a manager as well as a systemic pattern of discrimination rooted in both sexism and racism.

Perhaps surprisingly, Newman has continued to work at Amazon during the legal process — partly because of a non-compete agreement she signed as part of the terms of her employment. Newman's non-compete agreement prohibits her from taking similar roles for 18 months upon leaving Amazon. Non-compete agreements are rare in Silicon Valley because California does not allow them to be enforced, but tech workers elsewhere can face them, and Amazon is known for its strict non-competes. A current piece of legislation, the Workforce Mobility Act, aims to limit the use of them nationwide.

In a conversation with Protocol, Newman spoke about the mistreatment she experienced at Amazon, her hopes for the Workforce Mobility Act and what she hopes to see from Amazon moving forward.

Down-leveling, harassment and demoralization

Newman first began working at Amazon in January 2017, after serving as the economic policy advisor to Senator Cory Booker for three years. Newman applied for a public policy senior manager position but was hired at a level below, the lawsuit states. Newman said she found herself doing the work of a senior-level manager within a few months of joining Amazon, without seeing any increase in pay or title.

During that time, Newman's manager, Steven Block, used racially-coded language to communicate with her, she said. The suit alleges Block said she was "too direct" and "too aggressive."

It really stung when he called her "scary," Newman told Protocol. "I went home and cried that day."

That was "particularly demoralizing," she said. At that point, it became clear that "he was not going to see me as a full human being."

Newman tried to have a conversation with Block about why calling her "scary" was problematic, she said, but he was not receptive to the feedback. She said she also experienced other types of microaggressions at work, such as when a white coworker suggested she take a photo with a Jambalaya wine bottle.

"There were also these moments where I think there was just a culture that was created where people felt emboldened to, or like they had permission to say and do things towards me that were, I think, motivated by bias in some way," she said. "It sort of recalled caricatures of Black people."

Newman said she also faced harassment from Andres Maz, a senior manager and later director of public policy for Amazon Web Services. Maz allegedly sexually assaulted Newman during a work dinner, in which he groped her upper thigh, according to the complaint. After that dinner, Maz allegedly begged her to have sex with him. The lawsuit further details a plethora of inappropriate behavior by Maz between 2017 and 2019.

Newman filed a written complaint to Amazon in June 2020, as well as an administrative complaint with the Washington, D.C. Office of Human Rights in September 2020. In October, Amazon fired Maz and told Newman it would look into whether discrimination has affected her career advancement at the company. But Amazon has not yet done anything to address the professional and financial harm she's experienced, according to the suit.

Amazon's investigation also found that Block made racially-charged comments toward Newman, but simply required that he complete diversity training.

"We do not tolerate discrimination or harassment of any kind," an Amazon spokesperson said in a statement to Protocol. "We immediately investigated Ms. Newman's sexual harassment claim and fired her harasser. The investigation also resulted in corrective action and additional training requirements for those in her reporting line. We also reviewed Ms. Newman's interview process, leveling and onboarding, and determined that she was properly placed in her role at the company. We are currently investigating the new allegations included in the lawsuit."

Newman was hesitant to come forward about her experiences, but felt inspired by the conversations and awareness around racial justice in light of the killing of George Floyd.

"I started thinking about why it was important for me to speak up," she said. Her hope is that sharing her story will help push Amazon and the tech industry as a whole toward more equitable treatment of employees of color and women.

The insidiousness of non-compete agreements

Newman wanted to leave Amazon after those interactions with Maz, but the non-compete agreement she signed with the company made it hard to do that.

While employed and for the 18 months following separation from Amazon, employees are not able to engage in any work that competes or aims to compete with any Amazon product or service. Amazon has its hands in variety of businesses, including ecommerce, cloud services, media, smart devices and so much more.

"It's a very broad blanket non-compete" that lasts 18 months, she said. Newman asked Amazon to be released from it last October after she came forward about the harassment and discrimination.

"And what I was told was that the company doesn't release employees from non-competes," she said.

It's true: Amazon takes non-compete agreements very seriously. In July 2019, Amazon sued former AWS executive Philip Moyer for joining Google's cloud team. Amazon declined to explain to Protocol why it requires employees to sign non-compete agreements.

Amazon's filed suit against Moyer happened around the same time Newman was thinking about leaving the company to go do similar work somewhere else. But Newman felt scared, given how Amazon treated Moyer.

"It was alarming to see that these weren't just words on a page," she said of the agreement. "Sometimes you're told that companies don't really enforce non-competes, but I have seen repeatedly over my time at the company that Amazon does in fact enforce non-competes."

Beyond Moyer, Newman said Amazon enforced the non-compete agreement against someone she knew personally.

"It caused me a great deal of pause," she said.

Newman's experiences at Amazon have led her to examine workplace policies. In doing so, she came across the Workforce Mobility Act, which was reintroduced in February. The bipartisan bill is designed to stop the use of non-compete agreements in many circumstances. Proponents of the bill argue that non-compete agreements such as Amazon's harm workers and stifle innovation. Those in favor of non-compete agreements generally argue that they're necessary in order for businesses to protect trade secrets.

"It's just time to have greater scrutiny and real regulatory and legislative action," Newman said. "We're just at a point where, without that, workers like myself are left to just kind of fend for themselves without some of the protection that you would expect."

Staying silent 'preserves the status quo'

Newman's peers cautioned her about the potential risks of coming forward. But Newman said she "was far worse off" by not saying anything.

"You have to speak up and use your voice," she said. Staying silent "just preserves the status quo."

A number of other Amazon employees from underrepresented backgrounds have shared with Newman their personal stories of being down-leveled and facing microaggressions at work. Those stories from colleagues have reaffirmed to Newman that coming forward was the right thing to do.

"I just want people to understand that while this is one person's account, it's also reflective of many, many other stories that people have where they might have children, or spouses, or many other reasons why they don't feel comfortable coming forward or why they are afraid to put their job at risk," she said. "I just want to be clear that my story is really one of many other stories just like this."

Newman also wants people to know that there is a "real toll" that these experiences take on employees, and especially on Black employees and other employees of color.

"It's an emotional and mental tax," she said, holding back tears.

A future at Amazon

In November 2020, Newman left her public policy position to join a different team within AWS. She wasn't convinced Amazon would protect her from retaliation, since she still had to communicate with Maz while going through the investigation process, so she decided another team was the best way forward for her. In her new role, Newman oversees AWS's startups strategy, focused on underrepresented founders.

"I'm very passionate about creating a level playing field for entrepreneurs so that they have access to the resources they need to execute and to build," she said. "And if I can do that work at Amazon and make a difference, great. I think time will tell as to whether it's a place I can continue to stay. And I think that for me, it's also predicated not just on my ability to do my job but how Amazon responds to this moment."

Newman wants to see Amazon put a more robust system in place to support survivors of harassment and abuse at the company. She also recommends Amazon stop down-leveling job candidates.

Internal Amazon data, for example, shows large disparities in performance review ratings between Black and white employees, Recode reported in February.

This year, Amazon says it will "inspect any statistically significant demographic differences" in performance ratings to try to determine the root causes.

"I want to see the company actually make real changes and not things around the margins so that the day-to-day lives of Black employees and other employees of color actually improve," she said. "It's not enough to just increase numbers. There needs to be a real focus on changing the systemic patterns. Without actually attacking those real core issues, there's a real question around whether it will make sense for me personally going forward."

May 3, 2021 6:50pm PT: This story has been updated to clarify that non-compete agreements are illegal in California.

Facebook wants to be a metaverse company. What about Facebook.com?

Will the metaverse kill Facebook's legacy apps and services?

Will the metaverse replace Facebook's existing apps and services?

Photo: Kirill Kudryavtsev/AFP via Getty Images

At this week's Facebook Connect conference, Mark Zuckerberg is expected to unveil additional details about his company's quest to build the metaverse. That includes a new generation of social media services that brings real-time communication to AR, VR and other platforms, complete with varying degrees of embodied presence (in the future, we'll all be avatars).

Facebook has been spending heavily on this endeavor, including more than $10 billion in 2021 alone. During Thursday's Connect keynote, Zuckerberg is expected to share a few more details on what all this money is being spent on, including an update on the company's social VR world, called Horizon.

Keep Reading Show less
Janko Roettgers

Janko Roettgers (@jank0) is a senior reporter at Protocol, reporting on the shifting power dynamics between tech, media, and entertainment, including the impact of new technologies. Previously, Janko was Variety's first-ever technology writer in San Francisco, where he covered big tech and emerging technologies. He has reported for Gigaom, Frankfurter Rundschau, Berliner Zeitung, and ORF, among others. He has written three books on consumer cord-cutting and online music and co-edited an anthology on internet subcultures. He lives with his family in Oakland.

If you've ever tried to pick up a new fitness routine like running, chances are you may have fallen into the "motivation vs. habit" trap once or twice. You go for a run when the sun is shining, only to quickly fall off the wagon when the weather turns sour.

Similarly, for many businesses, 2020 acted as the storm cloud that disrupted their plans for innovation. With leaders busy grappling with the pandemic, innovation frequently got pushed to the backburner. In fact, according to McKinsey, the majority of organizations shifted their focus mainly to maintaining business continuity throughout the pandemic.

Keep Reading Show less
Gaurav Kataria
Group Product Manager, Trello at Atlassian

There’s a platform war brewing in the NFT gaming space

Valve's NFT ban has created the makings of a platform war in the burgeoning blockchain gaming space.

Play-to-earn is a whole new paradigm, based on creating real-world value out of in-game items and other forms of digital goods using non-fungible tokens, cryptocurrency and other blockchain technologies.

Image: Axie Infinity

The worlds of crypto and video games are fast colliding. The combination, dubbed "play-to-earn" and more broadly part of the decentralization movement known as "web3," could result in a whole new generation of gaming experiences with real-world economies and new player incentives. This, in turn, could radically upend traditional business models in the game industry.

That is, of course, if the traditional platform gatekeepers in gaming decide to open their doors. Right now, many of them are shut, leaving these games in their corners of the internet, and it's not clear what it might take to get the most powerful companies in the industry to open their arms to these new technologies. Meanwhile, the blockchain gaming market has become one of the fastest-growing segments in the game industry, and it's showing no signs of stopping.

Keep Reading Show less
Nick Statt
Nick Statt is Protocol's video game reporter. Prior to joining Protocol, he was news editor at The Verge covering the gaming industry, mobile apps and antitrust out of San Francisco, in addition to managing coverage of Silicon Valley tech giants and startups. He now resides in Rochester, New York, home of the garbage plate and, completely coincidentally, the World Video Game Hall of Fame. He can be reached at nstatt@protocol.com.
Protocol | Policy

5 things to know about FCC nominee Gigi Sohn

The veteran of some of the earliest tech policy fights is a longtime consumer champion and net-neutrality advocate.

Gigi Sohn, who President Joe Biden nominated to serve on the FCC, is a longtime net-neutrality advocate.

Photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images

President Joe Biden on Tuesday nominated Gigi Sohn to serve as a Federal Communications Commissioner, teeing up a Democratic majority at the agency that oversees broadband issues after months of delay.

Like Lina Khan, who Biden picked in June to head up the Federal Trade Commission, Sohn is a progressive favorite. And if confirmed, she'll take up a position in an agency trying to pull policy levers on net neutrality, privacy and broadband access even as Congress is stalled.

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Protocol | Workplace

Adobe wants a more authentic NFT world

Adobe's Content Credentials feature will allow Creative Cloud subscribers to attach edit-tracking information to Photoshop files. The goal is to create a more trustworthy NFT market and digital landscape.

Adobe's Content Credentials will allow users to attach their identities to an image

Image: Adobe

Remember the viral, fake photo of Kurt Cobain and Biggie Smalls that duped and delighted the internet in 2017? Doctored images manipulate people and erode trust and we're not great at spotting them. The entire point of the emerging NFT art market is to create valuable and scarce digital files and when there isn't an easy way to check for an image's origin and edits, there's a problem. What if someone steals an NFT creator's image and pawns it off as their own? As a hub for all kinds of multimedia, Adobe feels a responsibility to combat misinformation and provide a safe space for NFT creators. That's why it's rolling out Content Credentials, a record that can be attached to a Photoshop file of a creator's identity and includes any edits they made.

Users can connect their social media addresses and crypto wallet addresses to images in Photoshop. This further proves the image creator's identity, but it's also helpful in determining the creators of NFTs. Adobe has partnered with NFT marketplaces KnownOrigin, OpenSea, Rarible and SuperRare in this effort. "Today there's not a way to know that the NFT you're buying was actually created by a true creator," said Adobe General Counsel Dana Rao. "We're allowing the creator to show their identity and attach it to the image."

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at llawrence@protocol.com.

Latest Stories