The game industry’s great exclusivity race is all about securing the future

New hardware and subscription services will always need exclusive content.

A screenshot of PS5 exclusive Returnal from Sony-owned studio Housemarque.

Sony and Microsoft are scooping up new studios left and right to build out exclusive libraries.

Image: Housemarque

Video game exclusivity is more important than ever. The business strategy, a controversial one in the gaming community, involves acquiring the rights to software either through contract or acquisition to ensure it cannot be purchased or played on a competitor's device. For big console-makers like Microsoft and Sony, exclusive software is critical to obtaining and retaining people who buy the hardware. And increasingly, the best way to get such software is to buy established studios and then fund and oversee new projects, either using existing series or all-new ones.

In the context of, say, television, exclusivity is a perfectly normal approach to acquiring customers: Subscribe to Netflix for the latest season of "Stranger Things," and no one bats an eye. Historically, gaming fans have also flocked to their platform of choice, treating one distinct box's library as a matter of corporate identity to be enjoyed as a reward for consumer loyalty and years of dedicated spending.

But those boxes have become less differentiated over the years from both one another and the PC platform. That has in some cases made exclusivity feel more like a shrewd way to punish players who don't pony up for one platform over another, rather than build something that takes advantage of the platform's unique strengths. Buying a new console isn't like subscribing to a month of Hulu, after all.

Yet there's a good reason why exclusive games still dominate the industry, and why exclusivity will rule the post-hardware future once games can be streamed like TV shows and movies straight to your TV or streaming stick of choice. Being able to play, or watch, something you can't get anywhere else remains the largest motivator to buy into an ecosystem. And that means acquiring more and more intellectual property and the studios that can shepherd it from an amorphous idea into a consumer product.

Big game publishers, and especially platform owners like Microsoft and Sony, today operate more and more like multimedia ecosystems, diversifying their businesses across a variety of screens and content types in a way most reminiscent of streaming TV. Once a customer is inside that ecosystem, it's easier to sell them everything else — be it a subscription service, a Fortnite skin or a physical accessory. Additionally, having a robust series of subsidiaries making exclusive content is a smart way to ensure you can stay in business if, say, cloud gaming and subscription services turn the entire industry on its head in five or 10 years.

"Effectively, everyone is trying to reach enough scale to insulate their business from competition down the line. Intellectual property and consumer-centric infrastructure are critical components for Microsoft, Sony and others to future-proof themselves," said Joost van Dreunen, a video game analyst and investor who sold his market intelligence firm SuperData Research to Nielsen in 2018.

"Exclusive intellectual property signals to consumers that one catalogue is more deserving of their time and money than another," he added. "We see in streaming video, for instance, that a single successful documentary like 'Tiger King' or a series like 'Game of Thrones' can drive adoption among subscribers."

The exclusivity war never ended

A few years ago, it seemed like the walls of exclusivity were fracturing. Sony gave in and began enabling cross-play, which allows players on PlayStation consoles to play with their friends on Switch, Xbox and PC. Microsoft has for years now released new games on both Xbox devices alongside PC, often with the ability to move your progression and purchases across platforms.

But all the while, both Microsoft and Sony were quietly amassing ever-larger first-party empires. And with the launch of new console hardware in November, it's become impossible to ignore just how important exclusivity is to maintaining a competitive edge and getting consumers to buy hardware and subscribe to services.

Sony last year purchased Insomniac Games, a longtime partner and the studio behind the massively successful Spider-Man reboot. The company has since released another PlayStation exclusive, Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart, and is working to further build out the Spider-Man franchise. Last week, Sony purchased Housemarque, another PlayStation partner and the developer behind the PS5 exclusive Returnal. And just days later, Sony announced its purchase of Nixxes, a studio known for creating PC ports so its exclusive games can, years down the line, expand beyond the PlayStation platform, but only at Sony's discretion.

Facebook has also gone on a studio buying spree in the virtual reality space, scooping up BigBox VR and Downpour Interactive in the course of the last three months. The company now owns five formerly-independent game developers that are all making Oculus exclusive titles.

"At the end of the day, you don't buy a PlayStation 5 because you like the chipset in there," said Survios CEO Seth Gerson. The developer, best known for VR titles, this year branched out beyond VR into traditional console development. "The same is true in VR. You're not buying it because of lock-in. You're buying it because it's the type of content, the type of experience and the type of presence."

Microsoft's purchase of Bethesda Softworks, the company behind huge hits like The Elder Scrolls and Fallout, for $7.5 billion was the most transparent and ambitious exclusivity play the industry has seen in years. Though the company waited months to reveal its strategy, Microsoft announced at E3 last month it would be putting all Bethesda games on Xbox Game Pass, its subscription offering modeled similarly to Netflix and other streaming media services. It's also keeping them off PlayStation platforms, though you can still play the titles on a PC (running Windows, of course).

The common theme here is that all three platform owners have an ecosystem they want to sell. Sony wants people to buy new PS5s and to pay for PlayStation Plus; Microsoft wants people to buy an Xbox (or a PC) and subscribe to Game Pass; and Facebook wants people to buy an Oculus Quest 2 and buy all their software through the Oculus Store.

With the pandemic-induced surge in game-playing among the general public combined with huge amounts of investment pouring into the space, it's reasonable to expect the rate of acquisitions to increase to ensure those ecosystems keep adding new users. "A combination of cheap capital, a surge in consumer spending on interactive entertainment, the entry of Big Tech into gaming and the launch of a new hardware generation has made it easier for incumbent platform holders to justify larger acquisitions and related expenditures," van Dreunen said.

Changing winds of exclusivity

It wasn't always the case that exclusivity meant snapping up as many studios as you could. A decade ago, third-party developers were more inclined to accept exclusivity contracts if it meant increased financial stability and a guarantee of marketing support. This was especially true for indie developers during the sixth and seventh console generations, with Microsoft and Sony often competing against one another to secure exclusive rights to high-profile indie titles at launch.

But as gaming has diversified across more platforms, including mobile devices and the Nintendo Switch, and the difference between platforms has reduced, fewer game developers are eager to restrict their potential audience to just one box and risk putting all their eggs in one basket.

"For a medium-sized studio to only distribute via one of the digital stores or consoles means they are making it that much harder to recoup their initial investment among a smaller addressable audience," van Dreunen said. "Commercial success in video games today is the result of an ongoing process of investing in content add-ons, specials, community efforts, sales and finding ways to increase a game's value." Games, van Dreunen added, have to act like assets that appreciate over time, and it no longer makes sense to pursue a business model of recouping development costs solely through selling units.

It's also simply safer to be acquired by a big platform owner these days. Severe dysfunctions in the U.S. labor market for gaming have resulted in routine studio closures, perpetual rounds of layoffs, and cost-cutting and restructuring that can often kill projects mid-flight. All the while, game development costs have continued to rise and game prices have remained static or dropped to zero, as studios now try to recoup costs and earn profit through in-game purchases and add-ons. Having Microsoft, Sony or Facebook writing the checks means months to years of reassurance.

"Game makers today are confronting increasing marketing costs and a fragmented market landscape between PC, console and mobile. To do well in such a market requires nerves of steel and loads of money," van Dreunen said. "For many it is then better to sell the studio and continue to focus on making games, rather than getting sucked into chasing novel technologies, get wrapped up in growing costs and complexity of marketing, and risk falling between the cracks as large tech firms seek to buy out the rights to your game and have it disappear in some opaque subscription lineup."

The remnants of the bygone exclusivity era can be seen in Sony's awkward State of Play presentation, in which the company dedicated a significant portion of its livestream event yesterday to a game developed by an Xbox-owned studio. Deathloop, created by ZeniMax-owned Arkane Studios, is a timed PlayStation exclusive, a deal that Microsoft is honoring despite now owning ZeniMax and all of its subsidiaries as part of the Bethesda deal.

Any future games developed by Arkane will surely be exclusive to the Xbox and PC platforms as part of Microsoft's Game Pass strategy. But you can be sure Sony is less likely to make such deals in the future in favor of investing in studios it may eventually acquire, like Insomniac and Housemarque.

Exclusivity was a hallmark of the very earliest game consoles, and it dominated the burgeoning video game industry in the '90s when Nintendo, Sony and Sega made drastically different hardware. Yet all these years later, exclusivity is still a dominating force in the industry for many of the same reasons, even though the available platforms today have few meaningful differences.

In an attention economy bursting at the seams with ways to spend our time and money, something unique will always win out over a commodity experience. And Microsoft, Sony and Facebook are spending big to make sure their ecosystems have as many unique experiences as possible.

Workplace

It's OK to cry at work

Our comfort with crying at work has changed drastically over the past couple years. But experts said the hard part is helping workers get through the underlying mental health challenges.

Tech workers and workplace mental health experts said discussing emotions at work has become less taboo over the past couple years, but we’re still a ways away from completely normalizing the conversation — and adjusting policies accordingly.

Photo: Teerasak Ainkeaw / EyeEm via Getty Images

Everyone seems to be ugly crying on the internet these days. A new Snapchat filter makes people look like they’re breaking down on television, crying at celebratory occasions or crying when it sounds like they’re laughing. But one of the ways it's been used is weirdly cathartic: the workplace.

In one video, a creator posted a video of their co-worker merely sitting at a desk, presumably giggling or smiling, but the Snapchat tool gave them a pained look on their face. The video was captioned: “When you still have two hours left of your working day.” Another video showed someone asking their co-workers if they enjoy their job. Everyone said yes, but the filter indicated otherwise.

Keep Reading Show less
Sarah Roach

Sarah Roach is a news writer at Protocol (@sarahroach_) and contributes to Source Code. She is a recent graduate of George Washington University, where she studied journalism and mass communication and criminal justice. She previously worked for two years as editor in chief of her school's independent newspaper, The GW Hatchet.

Sponsored Content

Foursquare data story: leveraging location data for site selection

We take a closer look at points of interest and foot traffic patterns to demonstrate how location data can be leveraged to inform better site selecti­on strategies.

Imagine: You’re the leader of a real estate team at a restaurant brand looking to open a new location in Manhattan. You have two options you’re evaluating: one site in SoHo, and another site in the Flatiron neighborhood. Which do you choose?

Keep Reading Show less
Enterprise

Arm’s new CEO is planning the IPO it sought to avoid last year

Arm CEO Rene Haas told Protocol that Arm will be fine as a standalone company, as it focuses on efficient computing and giving customers a more finished product than a basic chip core design.

Rene Haas is taking Arm on a fresh trajectory.

Photo: Arm

The new path for Arm is beginning to come into focus.

Weeks after Nvidia’s $40 bid to acquire Arm from SoftBank collapsed, the appointment of Rene Haas to replace longtime chief executive Simon Segars has set the business on a fresh trajectory. Haas appears determined to shake up the company, with plans to lay off as much as 15% of the staff ahead of plans to take the company public once again by the end of March next year.

Keep Reading Show less
Max A. Cherney

Max A. Cherney is a senior reporter at Protocol covering the semiconductor industry. He has worked for Barron's magazine as a Technology Reporter, and its sister site MarketWatch. He is based in San Francisco.

Policy

The great onshoring: Inside the transcontinental chip race

The second annual Trade and Technology Council emphasized the centrality of semiconductor onshoring to U.S.-EU military objectives.

For chip manufacturers, free-flowing subsidies for now might come at the cost of a potential overcapacity problem in the longer term.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

The prospect of global conflict permeated the room at this year’s Trade and Technology Council, which concluded in France earlier this week. The second annual gathering of U.S. and EU officials yielded a joint statement that mentioned some form of “Russia” or “Ukraine” more frequently than “technology,” “regulation,” “investment,” “security” or “competition.”

The conflict in Ukraine, having already escalated into a U.S. proxy war, seemingly convinced the EU to fall in line with the American tech policy agenda.

Keep Reading Show less
Hirsh Chitkara

Hirsh Chitkara ( @HirshChitkara) is a reporter at Protocol focused on the intersection of politics, technology and society. Before joining Protocol, he helped write a daily newsletter at Insider that covered all things Big Tech. He's based in New York and can be reached at hchitkara@protocol.com.

Climate

2- and 3-wheelers dominate oil displacement by EVs

Increasingly widespread EV adoption is starting to displace the use of oil, but there's still a lot of work to do.

More electric mopeds on the road could be an oil demand game-changer.

Photo: Humphrey Muleba/Unsplash

Electric vehicles are starting to make a serious dent in oil use.

Last year, EVs displaced roughly 1.5 million barrels per day, according to a new analysis from BloombergNEF. That is more than double the share EVs displaced in 2015. The majority of the displacement is coming from an unlikely source.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).

Latest Stories
Bulletins