The game industry’s great exclusivity race is all about securing the future

New hardware and subscription services will always need exclusive content.

A screenshot of PS5 exclusive Returnal from Sony-owned studio Housemarque.

Sony and Microsoft are scooping up new studios left and right to build out exclusive libraries.

Image: Housemarque

Video game exclusivity is more important than ever. The business strategy, a controversial one in the gaming community, involves acquiring the rights to software either through contract or acquisition to ensure it cannot be purchased or played on a competitor's device. For big console-makers like Microsoft and Sony, exclusive software is critical to obtaining and retaining people who buy the hardware. And increasingly, the best way to get such software is to buy established studios and then fund and oversee new projects, either using existing series or all-new ones.

In the context of, say, television, exclusivity is a perfectly normal approach to acquiring customers: Subscribe to Netflix for the latest season of "Stranger Things," and no one bats an eye. Historically, gaming fans have also flocked to their platform of choice, treating one distinct box's library as a matter of corporate identity to be enjoyed as a reward for consumer loyalty and years of dedicated spending.

But those boxes have become less differentiated over the years from both one another and the PC platform. That has in some cases made exclusivity feel more like a shrewd way to punish players who don't pony up for one platform over another, rather than build something that takes advantage of the platform's unique strengths. Buying a new console isn't like subscribing to a month of Hulu, after all.

Yet there's a good reason why exclusive games still dominate the industry, and why exclusivity will rule the post-hardware future once games can be streamed like TV shows and movies straight to your TV or streaming stick of choice. Being able to play, or watch, something you can't get anywhere else remains the largest motivator to buy into an ecosystem. And that means acquiring more and more intellectual property and the studios that can shepherd it from an amorphous idea into a consumer product.

Big game publishers, and especially platform owners like Microsoft and Sony, today operate more and more like multimedia ecosystems, diversifying their businesses across a variety of screens and content types in a way most reminiscent of streaming TV. Once a customer is inside that ecosystem, it's easier to sell them everything else — be it a subscription service, a Fortnite skin or a physical accessory. Additionally, having a robust series of subsidiaries making exclusive content is a smart way to ensure you can stay in business if, say, cloud gaming and subscription services turn the entire industry on its head in five or 10 years.

"Effectively, everyone is trying to reach enough scale to insulate their business from competition down the line. Intellectual property and consumer-centric infrastructure are critical components for Microsoft, Sony and others to future-proof themselves," said Joost van Dreunen, a video game analyst and investor who sold his market intelligence firm SuperData Research to Nielsen in 2018.

"Exclusive intellectual property signals to consumers that one catalogue is more deserving of their time and money than another," he added. "We see in streaming video, for instance, that a single successful documentary like 'Tiger King' or a series like 'Game of Thrones' can drive adoption among subscribers."

The exclusivity war never ended

A few years ago, it seemed like the walls of exclusivity were fracturing. Sony gave in and began enabling cross-play, which allows players on PlayStation consoles to play with their friends on Switch, Xbox and PC. Microsoft has for years now released new games on both Xbox devices alongside PC, often with the ability to move your progression and purchases across platforms.

But all the while, both Microsoft and Sony were quietly amassing ever-larger first-party empires. And with the launch of new console hardware in November, it's become impossible to ignore just how important exclusivity is to maintaining a competitive edge and getting consumers to buy hardware and subscribe to services.

Sony last year purchased Insomniac Games, a longtime partner and the studio behind the massively successful Spider-Man reboot. The company has since released another PlayStation exclusive, Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart, and is working to further build out the Spider-Man franchise. Last week, Sony purchased Housemarque, another PlayStation partner and the developer behind the PS5 exclusive Returnal. And just days later, Sony announced its purchase of Nixxes, a studio known for creating PC ports so its exclusive games can, years down the line, expand beyond the PlayStation platform, but only at Sony's discretion.

Facebook has also gone on a studio buying spree in the virtual reality space, scooping up BigBox VR and Downpour Interactive in the course of the last three months. The company now owns five formerly-independent game developers that are all making Oculus exclusive titles.

"At the end of the day, you don't buy a PlayStation 5 because you like the chipset in there," said Survios CEO Seth Gerson. The developer, best known for VR titles, this year branched out beyond VR into traditional console development. "The same is true in VR. You're not buying it because of lock-in. You're buying it because it's the type of content, the type of experience and the type of presence."

Microsoft's purchase of Bethesda Softworks, the company behind huge hits like The Elder Scrolls and Fallout, for $7.5 billion was the most transparent and ambitious exclusivity play the industry has seen in years. Though the company waited months to reveal its strategy, Microsoft announced at E3 last month it would be putting all Bethesda games on Xbox Game Pass, its subscription offering modeled similarly to Netflix and other streaming media services. It's also keeping them off PlayStation platforms, though you can still play the titles on a PC (running Windows, of course).

The common theme here is that all three platform owners have an ecosystem they want to sell. Sony wants people to buy new PS5s and to pay for PlayStation Plus; Microsoft wants people to buy an Xbox (or a PC) and subscribe to Game Pass; and Facebook wants people to buy an Oculus Quest 2 and buy all their software through the Oculus Store.

With the pandemic-induced surge in game-playing among the general public combined with huge amounts of investment pouring into the space, it's reasonable to expect the rate of acquisitions to increase to ensure those ecosystems keep adding new users. "A combination of cheap capital, a surge in consumer spending on interactive entertainment, the entry of Big Tech into gaming and the launch of a new hardware generation has made it easier for incumbent platform holders to justify larger acquisitions and related expenditures," van Dreunen said.

Changing winds of exclusivity

It wasn't always the case that exclusivity meant snapping up as many studios as you could. A decade ago, third-party developers were more inclined to accept exclusivity contracts if it meant increased financial stability and a guarantee of marketing support. This was especially true for indie developers during the sixth and seventh console generations, with Microsoft and Sony often competing against one another to secure exclusive rights to high-profile indie titles at launch.

But as gaming has diversified across more platforms, including mobile devices and the Nintendo Switch, and the difference between platforms has reduced, fewer game developers are eager to restrict their potential audience to just one box and risk putting all their eggs in one basket.

"For a medium-sized studio to only distribute via one of the digital stores or consoles means they are making it that much harder to recoup their initial investment among a smaller addressable audience," van Dreunen said. "Commercial success in video games today is the result of an ongoing process of investing in content add-ons, specials, community efforts, sales and finding ways to increase a game's value." Games, van Dreunen added, have to act like assets that appreciate over time, and it no longer makes sense to pursue a business model of recouping development costs solely through selling units.

It's also simply safer to be acquired by a big platform owner these days. Severe dysfunctions in the U.S. labor market for gaming have resulted in routine studio closures, perpetual rounds of layoffs, and cost-cutting and restructuring that can often kill projects mid-flight. All the while, game development costs have continued to rise and game prices have remained static or dropped to zero, as studios now try to recoup costs and earn profit through in-game purchases and add-ons. Having Microsoft, Sony or Facebook writing the checks means months to years of reassurance.

"Game makers today are confronting increasing marketing costs and a fragmented market landscape between PC, console and mobile. To do well in such a market requires nerves of steel and loads of money," van Dreunen said. "For many it is then better to sell the studio and continue to focus on making games, rather than getting sucked into chasing novel technologies, get wrapped up in growing costs and complexity of marketing, and risk falling between the cracks as large tech firms seek to buy out the rights to your game and have it disappear in some opaque subscription lineup."

The remnants of the bygone exclusivity era can be seen in Sony's awkward State of Play presentation, in which the company dedicated a significant portion of its livestream event yesterday to a game developed by an Xbox-owned studio. Deathloop, created by ZeniMax-owned Arkane Studios, is a timed PlayStation exclusive, a deal that Microsoft is honoring despite now owning ZeniMax and all of its subsidiaries as part of the Bethesda deal.

Any future games developed by Arkane will surely be exclusive to the Xbox and PC platforms as part of Microsoft's Game Pass strategy. But you can be sure Sony is less likely to make such deals in the future in favor of investing in studios it may eventually acquire, like Insomniac and Housemarque.

Exclusivity was a hallmark of the very earliest game consoles, and it dominated the burgeoning video game industry in the '90s when Nintendo, Sony and Sega made drastically different hardware. Yet all these years later, exclusivity is still a dominating force in the industry for many of the same reasons, even though the available platforms today have few meaningful differences.

In an attention economy bursting at the seams with ways to spend our time and money, something unique will always win out over a commodity experience. And Microsoft, Sony and Facebook are spending big to make sure their ecosystems have as many unique experiences as possible.


How I decided to leave the US and pursue a tech career in Europe

Melissa Di Donato moved to Europe to broaden her technology experience with a different market perspective. She planned to stay two years. Seventeen years later, she remains in London as CEO of Suse.

“It was a hard go for me in the beginning. I was entering inside of a company that had been very traditional in a sense.”

Photo: Suse

Click banner image for more How I decided seriesA native New Yorker, Melissa Di Donato made a life-changing decision back in 2005 when she packed up for Europe to further her career in technology. Then with IBM, she made London her new home base.

Today, Di Donato is CEO of Germany’s Suse, now a 30-year-old, open-source enterprise software company that specializes in Linux operating systems, container management, storage, and edge computing. As the company’s first female leader, she has led Suse through the coronavirus pandemic, a 2021 IPO on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange, and the acquisitions of Kubernetes management startup Rancher Labs and container security company NeuVector.

Keep Reading Show less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

UiPath had a rocky few years. Rob Enslin wants to turn it around.

Protocol caught up with Enslin, named earlier this year as UiPath’s co-CEO, to discuss why he left Google Cloud, the untapped potential of robotic-process automation, and how he plans to lead alongside founder Daniel Dines.

Rob Enslin, UiPath's co-CEO, chats with Protocol about the company's future.

Photo: UiPath

UiPath has had a shaky history.

The company, which helps companies automate business processes, went public in 2021 at a valuation of more than $30 billion, but now the company’s market capitalization is only around $7 billion. To add insult to injury, UiPath laid off 5% of its staff in June and then lowered its full-year guidance for fiscal year 2023 just months later, tanking its stock by 15%.

Keep Reading Show less
Aisha Counts

Aisha Counts (@aishacounts) is a reporter at Protocol covering enterprise software. Formerly, she was a management consultant for EY. She's based in Los Angeles and can be reached at


Figma CPO: We can do more with Adobe

Yuhki Yamashita thinks Figma might tackle video or 3D objects someday.

Figman CPO Yuhki Yamashita told Protocol about Adobe's acquisition of the company.

Photo: Figma

Figma CPO Yuhki Yamashita’s first design gig was at The Harvard Crimson, waiting for writers to file their stories so he could lay them out in Adobe InDesign. Given his interest in computer science, pursuing UX design became the clear move. He worked on Outlook at Microsoft, YouTube at Google, and user experience at Uber, where he was a very early user of Figma. In 2019, he became a VP of product at Figma; this past June, he became CPO.

“Design has been really near and dear to my heart, which is why when this opportunity came along to join Figma and rethink design, it was such an obvious opportunity,” Yamashita said.

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at


Microsoft lays out its climate advocacy goals

The tech giant has staked out exactly what kind of policies it will support to decarbonize the world and clean up the grid.

Microsoft published two briefs explaining what new climate policies it will advocate for.

Photo by Jeremy Bezanger on Unsplash

The tech industry has no shortage of climate goals, but they’ll be very hard to achieve without the help of sound public policy.

Microsoft published two new briefs on Sept. 22 explaining what policies it will advocate for in the realm of reducing carbon and cleaning up the grid. With policymakers in the U.S. and around the world beginning to weigh more stringent climate policies (or in the U.S.’s case, any serious climate policies at all), the briefs will offer a measuring stick for whether Microsoft is living up to its ideals.

Keep Reading Show less
Brian Kahn

Brian ( @blkahn) is Protocol's climate editor. Previously, he was the managing editor and founding senior writer at Earther, Gizmodo's climate site, where he covered everything from the weather to Big Oil's influence on politics. He also reported for Climate Central and the Wall Street Journal. In the even more distant past, he led sleigh rides to visit a herd of 7,000 elk and boat tours on the deepest lake in the U.S.

Latest Stories