Policy

Here's why airlines, the FAA and tech are fighting about the 5G rollout

A two-year saga following telecom providers’ 5G technology came to a head the last two weeks. Let’s get caught up.

An illustration of an airplane flying around a 5G tower

Airlines say 5G technology could interfere with a sensor used to detect a plane’s distance from the ground or other objects.

Image: Namthip Muanthongthae/Getty Images

The long awaited C-Band 5G rollout has been off to a rocky start.

The deployment of C-Band spectrum, which wireless carriers have praised as the key to wider 5G accessibility and faster network speeds, has been marred by controversy over safety concerns and delays. Telecom companies and aviation experts are still butting heads over whether the latest flavor of 5G and air travel can safely co-exist, a fight which has grounded flights and inevitably pissed off airlines.

Here’s a breakdown of the battle over 5G.

What is the matter with 5G?

The Federal Aviation Administration and several airlines say that the use of C-Band frequencies for 5G will interfere with airplane altimeters, devices used to monitor a plane’s altitude and distance from other objects in low-visibility conditions. This is mainly because these systems operate in close proximity to the C-Band frequency, posing a risk of signal interference. In a worst-case scenario, the altimeters could indicate an incorrect altitude, and offer no signal that the device was malfunctioning. In some cases, this altimeter data feeds into other control systems, potentially causing other knock-on effects.

The FCC approved the C-Band 5G rollout in 2020, saying that two years of technical analysis brought them to the conclusion that potential interference was a non-issue. The FAA obviously disagrees. This sparked a public, months-long feud between some of the biggest companies in the world and one of the most powerful agencies in the U.S. government.

Who's fighting with whom?

Verizon and AT&T have made some of the biggest bets on C-Band spectrum, spending more than $70 billion combined for licenses at an FCC auction in late February. The spectrum they bought has a longer range than the mmWave spectrum, which mainly serves cities and venues, and is much faster than the long-range low-band 5G spectrum. Verizon spent more than $45.5 billion for around 3,500 of those licenses, and AT&T snagged more than 1,600 licenses for $23.4 billion.

Their opposition is the FAA and major airlines, which have feared that 5G signals could pose safety threats to planes landing in low-visibility weather conditions.

Why is this happening now?

The FCC and the FAA were not on the same page about the risks posed by C-Band 5G.

Back in 2020, the FCC decided to free up the C-Band spectrum for 5G. It had previously been utilized in part by satellite companies, but the agency decided to relocate them in the interest of advancing 5G wireless capabilities. The FCC also concluded that “the limits we set for the 3.7 GHz Service are sufficient to protect aeronautical services in the 4.2-4.4 GHz band.” It pointed to the fact that France, Germany and Austria had already started making their own arrangements for C-Band 5G, with no worries about airports or aviation. In other words: They assured everyone this whole airline issue wouldn’t happen.

It turns out the airline industry’s penchant for delaying things extends to the agency that regulates it. The FAA waited until Nov. 2, 2021 — a little over a month away from the scheduled C-Band deployment — to issue a Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin requesting that airline manufacturers test their radio equipment ahead of the scheduled Dec. 5 deployment of C-Band 5G. They (rather optimistically) hoped that the companies would be able to assess the safety risks in that time frame. When that didn’t happen, the FAA had to pull the emergency lever and request a delay.

So, what’s the status of the rollout?

Three words: delays, delays, delays. Here’s a rough timeline of what’s happened so far:

Nov. 2, 2021: The FAA issued its bulletin requesting that airline manufacturers test their radio equipment ahead of the scheduled Dec. 5 deployment of C-Band 5G. In a little over a month, they wanted these companies to “voluntarily provide to federal authorities specific information related to altimeter design and functionality, specifics on deployment and usage of radio altimeters in aircraft, and that they test and assess their equipment in conjunction with federal authorities.”

Nov. 4, 2021: AT&T and Verizon agreed to a voluntary delay to give the FAA more time to address signal interference concerns. This shifted the anticipated deployment date from Dec. 5, 2021 to Jan. 5, 2022.

Dec. 31, 2021: Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg and FAA Administrator Steve Dickson sent a letter to the CEOs of the telecom giants requesting a further delay. They set a goal for full deployment of C-Band 5G by the end of March, “barring unforeseen technical challenges or new safety concerns.”

Jan. 2, 2022: Verizon and AT&T denied the request. They said the concerns over signal interference were unwarranted. Nevertheless, they offered to adapt the same C-Band exclusion zones utilized in France, which the companies called “one of the most conservative [approaches] in the world.”

Jan. 3, 2022: The wireless carriers changed course and agreed to another two-week postponement.

Jan. 16, 2022: The FAA announced that it cleared “an estimated 45 percent of the U.S. commercial fleet to perform low-visibility landings at many of the airports where 5G C-band will be deployed on Jan. 19.”

Jan. 17, 2022: Executives representing major U.S. airlines sent a dire warning to senior government officials. They wrote in a letter: “Immediate intervention is needed to avoid significant operational disruption to air passengers, shippers, supply chain and delivery of needed medical supplies.” This time, rather than request another full delay of C-Band deployment, they asked that “5G be implemented everywhere in the country except within the approximate 2 miles (3.2 km) of airport runways.”

Jan. 18, 2022: AT&T and Verizon agreed to a voluntary third delay of full C-Band 5G deployment. This time, however, they only limited C-Band 5G signals near select runways. President Biden claimed this concession would still allow “more than 90 percent of wireless tower deployment to occur as scheduled.”

Jan. 19, 2022: Emirates, Japan Airlines and Air India canceled a select few international flights set to land in the U.S. due to concerns that Boeing 777 hadn’t yet been cleared. The FAA then issued new approvals that cleared “an estimated 62 percent of the U.S. commercial fleet to perform low-visibility landings at airports where wireless companies deployed 5G C-band.”

What’s next?

The FAA announced on Jan. 28 that it had reached an agreement with Verizon and AT&T on how to expand 5G service while enabling more aircraft safely land at “key airports." Verizon and AT&T provided the FAA with precise data and locations of wireless transmitters, which the FAA used to “determine that it is possible to safely and more precisely map the size and shape of the areas around airports where 5G signals are mitigated.”

In other words, a solution appears to be on the way. Until then? “Passengers should check with their airlines for latest flight schedules."

Updated Jan. 28 with the latest from the FAA.

Policy

Musk’s texts reveal what tech’s most powerful people really want

From Jack Dorsey to Joe Rogan, Musk’s texts are chock-full of überpowerful people, bending a knee to Twitter’s once and (still maybe?) future king.

“Maybe Oprah would be interested in joining the Twitter board if my bid succeeds,” one text reads.

Photo illustration: Patrick Pleul/picture alliance via Getty Images; Protocol

Elon Musk’s text inbox is a rarefied space. It’s a place where tech’s wealthiest casually commit to spending billions of dollars with little more than a thumbs-up emoji and trade tips on how to rewrite the rules for how hundreds of millions of people around the world communicate.

Now, Musk’s ongoing legal battle with Twitter is giving the rest of us a fleeting glimpse into that world. The collection of Musk’s private texts that was made public this week is chock-full of tech power brokers. While the messages are meant to reveal something about Musk’s motivations — and they do — they also say a lot about how things get done and deals get made among some of the most powerful people in the world.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Fintech

Circle’s CEO: This is not the time to ‘go crazy’

Jeremy Allaire is leading the stablecoin powerhouse in a time of heightened regulation.

“It’s a complex environment. So every CEO and every board has to be a little bit cautious, because there’s a lot of uncertainty,” Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire told Protocol at Converge22.

Photo: Circle

Sitting solo on a San Francisco stage, Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire asked tennis superstar Serena Williams what it’s like to face “unrelenting skepticism.”

“What do you do when someone says you can’t do this?” Allaire asked the athlete turned VC, who was beaming into Circle’s Converge22 convention by video.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Enterprise

Is Salesforce still a growth company? Investors are skeptical

Salesforce is betting that customer data platform Genie and new Slack features can push the company to $50 billion in revenue by 2026. But investors are skeptical about the company’s ability to deliver.

Photo: Marlena Sloss/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Salesforce has long been enterprise tech’s golden child. The company said everything customers wanted to hear and did everything investors wanted to see: It produced robust, consistent growth from groundbreaking products combined with an aggressive M&A strategy and a cherished culture, all operating under the helm of a bombastic, but respected, CEO and team of well-coiffed executives.

Dreamforce is the embodiment of that success. Every year, alongside frustrating San Francisco residents, the over-the-top celebration serves as a battle cry to the enterprise software industry, reminding everyone that Marc Benioff’s mighty fiefdom is poised to expand even deeper into your corporate IT stack.

Keep Reading Show less
Joe Williams

Joe Williams is a writer-at-large at Protocol. He previously covered enterprise software for Protocol, Bloomberg and Business Insider. Joe can be reached at JoeWilliams@Protocol.com. To share information confidentially, he can also be contacted on a non-work device via Signal (+1-309-265-6120) or JPW53189@protonmail.com.

Policy

The US and EU are splitting on tech policy. That’s putting the web at risk.

A conversation with Cédric O, the former French minister of state for digital.

“With the difficulty of the U.S. in finding political agreement or political basis to legislate more, we are facing a risk of decoupling in the long term between the EU and the U.S.”

Photo: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Cédric O, France’s former minister of state for digital, has been an advocate of Europe’s approach to tech and at the forefront of the continent’s relations with U.S. giants. Protocol caught up with O last week at a conference in New York focusing on social media’s negative effects on society and the possibilities of blockchain-based protocols for alternative networks.

O said watching the U.S. lag in tech policy — even as some states pass their own measures and federal bills gain momentum — has made him worry about the EU and U.S. decoupling. While not as drastic as a disentangling of economic fortunes between the West and China, such a divergence, as O describes it, could still make it functionally impossible for companies to serve users on both sides of the Atlantic with the same product.

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Latest Stories
Bulletins