Policy

Amazon's MGM deal has lawmakers calling for bigger merger enforcement

Tech-skeptical lawmakers on both sides of the aisle see making mergers harder for big tech firms as a key goal, and the $8 billion deal has them calling for action

Amazon's MGM deal has lawmakers calling for bigger merger enforcement

Lawmakers looking to reform antitrust have used Amazon's proposed deal for MGM to highlight the need for renewed merger enforcement.

Photo Illustration: Pavlo Gonchar/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images

Amazon's purchase of MGM for more than $8 billion has U.S. lawmakers, who are pushing to reform antitrust laws, renewing their emphasis on mergers.

"Amazon's proposed purchase of MGM reinforces what we already know — they are laser-focused on expanding and entrenching their monopoly power," Democratic Rep. David Cicilline, who led a monthslong probe of big tech companies that heard testimony from Jeff Bezos and other CEOs, said on Twitter. "That's bad for workers, consumers, and small businesses."

As head of a subcommittee on competition law, Cicilline is one of the primary lawmakers looking to change antitrust as a way to rein in the power of Big Tech and other concentrated sectors, but the ranks of those interested in such changes have grown on both sides of the aisle.

"It's critical that mergers and acquisitions involving monopoly companies experiencing tremendous and exponential growth are met with a greater level of scrutiny," said the top Republican on Cicilline's panel, Rep. Ken Buck, on Twitter alongside the news of the MGM deal.

Cicilline and Buck have repeatedly said they're working toward agreement on proposed changes to antitrust law, at a time when Google and Apple are facing lawsuits over allegedly abusing their dominance of certain markets. Yet the bread and butter of competition law has always been on spotting and stopping anticompetitive mergers and acquisitions, and Cicilline, Buck and other members of Congress have said that making mergers more difficult for the biggest tech firms is an area where it's important — and possible — to find a bipartisan plan quickly. (Anticompetitive mergers are also the focus of the government cases against Facebook.)

Under current law, Amazon's deal may face little scrutiny because of the fierce competition for both video streaming and production, but some lawmakers increasingly see much M&A by the biggest corporate players as suspect on its own, in part because tech giants grew to their current size through deals that enforcers routinely approved.

In February, Democratic Sen. Amy Klobuchar, who heads the Senate counterpart to Cicilline's committee, proposed a bill that would forbid mergers that lessen competition "more than a de minimus amount," rather than the current standard of substantially lessening competition. She has also proposed a bill, which received bipartisan support in committee earlier in May, that would raise the fees that companies pay when they disclose the biggest pending deals. That money would go toward funding increased enforcement.

"The Department of Justice must conduct a thorough investigation to ensure that this deal won't risk harming competition," she said in a statement in response to the proposed tie-up.

The purchase attracted the ire of liberal groups that demand more enforcement of antitrust laws against tech, but Republican Sen. Josh Hawley, who has criticized tech in response to conservative allegations that the companies censor rightwing voices and content, also weighed in on the deal. He tweeted Wednesday that, given Amazon's power in ecommerce, shipping and cloud, the company "shouldn't be permitted to buy anything else." He has proposed simply banning mergers by companies worth more than $100 billion.

Although there's a growing group of tech-skeptical Republicans who have backed calls for aggressive antitrust law and enforcement, legal changes would likely still require agreement from more-traditional GOP lawmakers who think competition law should stay out of the way of American business and worry that new merger rules could have far-reaching effects beyond tech.

Yet as they debate, Amazon isn't only facing scrutiny of its deals: The announcement of its hopes to buy MGM also came a day after the District of Columbia sued the company. While Attorney General Karl Racine's lawsuit doesn't focus on acquisitions, it alleges that Amazon's price policies for independent merchants who sell through its site stop other ecommerce platforms from gaining a foothold and force consumers to pay for the fees Amazon levies.

Climate

A pro-China disinformation campaign is targeting rare earth miners

It’s uncommon for cyber criminals to target private industry. But a new operation has cast doubt on miners looking to gain a foothold in the West in an apparent attempt to protect China’s upper hand in a market that has become increasingly vital.

It is very uncommon for coordinated disinformation operations to target private industry, rather than governments or civil society, a cybersecurity expert says.

Photo: Goh Seng Chong/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Just when we thought the renewable energy supply chains couldn’t get more fraught, a sophisticated disinformation campaign has taken to social media to further complicate things.

Known as Dragonbridge, the campaign has existed for at least three years, but in the last few months it has shifted its focus to target several mining companies “with negative messaging in response to potential or planned rare earths production activities.” It was initially uncovered by cybersecurity firm Mandiant and peddles narratives in the Chinese interest via its network of thousands of fake social media accounts.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).

Some of the most astounding tech-enabled advances of the next decade, from cutting-edge medical research to urban traffic control and factory floor optimization, will be enabled by a device often smaller than a thumbnail: the memory chip.

While vast amounts of data are created, stored and processed every moment — by some estimates, 2.5 quintillion bytes daily — the insights in that code are unlocked by the memory chips that hold it and transfer it. “Memory will propel the next 10 years into the most transformative years in human history,” said Sanjay Mehrotra, president and CEO of Micron Technology.

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Fintech

Ripple’s CEO threatens to leave the US if it loses SEC case

CEO Brad Garlinghouse said a few countries have reached out to Ripple about relocating.

"There's no doubt that if the SEC doesn't win their case against us that that is good for crypto in the United States,” Brad Garlinghouse told Protocol.

Photo: Stephen McCarthy/Sportsfile for Collision via Getty Images

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said the crypto company will move to another country if it loses in its legal battle with the SEC.

Garlinghouse said he’s confident that Ripple will prevail against the federal regulator, which accused the company of failing to register roughly $1.4 billion in XRP tokens as securities.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Policy

The Supreme Court’s EPA ruling is bad news for tech regulation, too

The justices just gave themselves a lot of discretion to smack down agency rules.

The ruling could also endanger work on competition issues by the FTC and net neutrality by the FCC.

Photo: Geoff Livingston/Getty Images

The Supreme Court’s decision last week gutting the Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions didn’t just signal the conservative justices’ dislike of the Clean Air Act at a moment of climate crisis. It also served as a warning for anyone that would like to see more regulation of Big Tech.

At the heart of Chief Justice John Roberts’ decision in West Virginia v. EPA was a codification of the “major questions doctrine,” which, he wrote, requires “clear congressional authorization” when agencies want to regulate on areas of great “economic and political significance.”

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Enterprise

Microsoft and Google are still using emotion AI, but with limits

Microsoft said accessibility goals overrode problems with emotion recognition and Google offers off-the-shelf emotion recognition technology amid growing concern over the controversial AI.

Emotion recognition is a well established field of computer vision research; however, AI-based technologies used in an attempt to assess people’s emotional states have moved beyond the research phase.

Photo: Microsoft

Microsoft said last month it would no longer provide general use of an AI-based cloud software feature used to infer people’s emotions. However, despite its own admission that emotion recognition technology creates “risks,” it turns out the company will retain its emotion recognition capability in an app used by people with vision loss.

In fact, amid growing concerns over development and use of controversial emotion recognition in everyday software, both Microsoft and Google continue to incorporate the AI-based features in their products.

“The Seeing AI person channel enables you to recognize people and to get a description of them, including an estimate of their age and also their emotion,” said Saqib Shaikh, a software engineering manager and project lead for Seeing AI at Microsoft who helped build the app, in a tutorial about the product in a 2017 Microsoft video.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories
Bulletins