Policy

Sometimes it just doesn’t work: Why Apple is finally letting its customers fix their iPhones

Apple was the right-to-repair movement's biggest opponent. Facing regulatory pressure, it seems it's finally listening.

An Apple logo on a grid

Until recently, consumers could face tall obstacles when seeking outside repair help, let alone trying to fix things themselves. Big Tech device-makers, particularly Apple, wanted to keep it that way.

Image: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

If your iPhone stops working, what do you do? Usually, you take it to the Apple Store, where an Apple Genius Bar employee can assist you. But maybe the repair is too pricy, or you don't live near an Apple Store. Maybe your local repair technician offers a significant discount. Until recently, consumers could face tall obstacles when seeking outside repair help, let alone trying to fix things themselves. Big Tech device-makers, particularly Apple, spent a fair amount of energy keeping it that way, limiting access to necessary parts and device manuals that would allow consumers to pay someone else for a fix and extend the life of their hardware.

But Wednesday, Apple changed its tune: The company will allow users to fix their own iPhones starting in early 2022. The program will start in the U.S. with the iPhone 12 and iPhone 13, but is expected to expand to include M1 Macs and other countries throughout the year. To access parts, users will first have to read Apple's Repair Manual. Then they can place an order for the required tools through Apple's Self Service Repair Online Store.

Apple did not immediately respond to comment.

This is a dramatic reversal of a longtime policy for Apple, which has historically been a formidable opponent to right-to-repair. Apple often claims that granting third parties access to Apple's repair tools could compromise consumer safety. The company, which is known for quiet defensive plays in Washington and state capitals, also backs trade groups such as TechNet, which has been lobbying against right-to-repair legislation in multiple states.

The right-to-repair movement has been swiftly gaining momentum, however, at both the state and federal levels. After a FTC report finding "scant evidence" justifying repair restrictions, the commission voted in July to fight these restrictions in a display of bipartisanship inside an agency facing partisan divisions and gridlock. Increased access to third-party repair showed up as part of President Biden's July executive order on tech and competition and New York's State Senate this year passed a right-to-repair act. Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak publicly backed the movement.

For right-to-repair activists, the news is both shocking and exciting. "This has been an all-out war we've engaged in for over 18 years with Apple," said Kyle Wiens, CEO of iFixit, which helps Americans repair devices. "It's such a huge flip." There had been signs Apple might acquiesce, though. Earlier in November, for example, iFixit published its discovery that Apple disabled Face ID on iPhone 13s with independently repaired screens. Apple said five days later it would update the software that disabled Face ID.

Apple also expanded access to Apple parts in 2019 with the launch of its Independent Repair Provider program. Before that, independent technicians had to pay to become "authorized service providers" and receive genuine Apple parts. Wednesday's move is an even bigger deal, because it opens up repair information to the general public.

As to why Apple may have reversed course, Wiens suggests Apple moved after pressure from a growing body of legislation. Twenty seven different states have introduced right-to-repair bills, all based on the Repair Association's legislative template. "They're staring down a double-barrel," Wiens said. "If right-to-repair passed, they would have been required to do this anyway. They're not going above and beyond what the proposed laws say."

The FTC's rare display of unanimity in pushing back against device-makers on the issue may also have suggested to Apple that it wouldn't escape the issue at the federal level either, even when Republicans eventually retake power at the agency under a future administration.

Apple said the self-service program is intended for "individual technicians with the knowledge and experience to repair electronic devices," not just casual users. Wiens takes issue with this framing, as he thinks "if you design a product right, anybody should be able to fix it." In his view, if anybody from a young tech nerd to a clueless grandma can fix your product, you're doing it right.

Wiens started iFixit with the belief that repair manuals shouldn't be secret — they should be a fundamental human right. "If we're going to put these products out in the world and go through the effort of manufacturing them, with global warming and CO2 emissions, we need to have a plan for making these things stand the test of time," Wiens said.

It's unclear whether Apple's announcement will move the needle for other companies, but it certainly ramps up the pressure. Microsoft has already made some overtures, caving to shareholder requests in October to make its devices more repair-friendly. The movement hasn't fully taken hold of Big Tech yet, but if any of the current legislation passes, companies will be forced to listen.

Policy

Musk’s texts reveal what tech’s most powerful people really want

From Jack Dorsey to Joe Rogan, Musk’s texts are chock-full of überpowerful people, bending a knee to Twitter’s once and (still maybe?) future king.

“Maybe Oprah would be interested in joining the Twitter board if my bid succeeds,” one text reads.

Photo illustration: Patrick Pleul/picture alliance via Getty Images; Protocol

Elon Musk’s text inbox is a rarefied space. It’s a place where tech’s wealthiest casually commit to spending billions of dollars with little more than a thumbs-up emoji and trade tips on how to rewrite the rules for how hundreds of millions of people around the world communicate.

Now, Musk’s ongoing legal battle with Twitter is giving the rest of us a fleeting glimpse into that world. The collection of Musk’s private texts that was made public this week is chock-full of tech power brokers. While the messages are meant to reveal something about Musk’s motivations — and they do — they also say a lot about how things get done and deals get made among some of the most powerful people in the world.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Fintech

Circle’s CEO: This is not the time to ‘go crazy’

Jeremy Allaire is leading the stablecoin powerhouse in a time of heightened regulation.

“It’s a complex environment. So every CEO and every board has to be a little bit cautious, because there’s a lot of uncertainty,” Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire told Protocol at Converge22.

Photo: Circle

Sitting solo on a San Francisco stage, Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire asked tennis superstar Serena Williams what it’s like to face “unrelenting skepticism.”

“What do you do when someone says you can’t do this?” Allaire asked the athlete turned VC, who was beaming into Circle’s Converge22 convention by video.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Enterprise

Is Salesforce still a growth company? Investors are skeptical

Salesforce is betting that customer data platform Genie and new Slack features can push the company to $50 billion in revenue by 2026. But investors are skeptical about the company’s ability to deliver.

Photo: Marlena Sloss/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Salesforce has long been enterprise tech’s golden child. The company said everything customers wanted to hear and did everything investors wanted to see: It produced robust, consistent growth from groundbreaking products combined with an aggressive M&A strategy and a cherished culture, all operating under the helm of a bombastic, but respected, CEO and team of well-coiffed executives.

Dreamforce is the embodiment of that success. Every year, alongside frustrating San Francisco residents, the over-the-top celebration serves as a battle cry to the enterprise software industry, reminding everyone that Marc Benioff’s mighty fiefdom is poised to expand even deeper into your corporate IT stack.

Keep Reading Show less
Joe Williams

Joe Williams is a writer-at-large at Protocol. He previously covered enterprise software for Protocol, Bloomberg and Business Insider. Joe can be reached at JoeWilliams@Protocol.com. To share information confidentially, he can also be contacted on a non-work device via Signal (+1-309-265-6120) or JPW53189@protonmail.com.

Policy

The US and EU are splitting on tech policy. That’s putting the web at risk.

A conversation with Cédric O, the former French minister of state for digital.

“With the difficulty of the U.S. in finding political agreement or political basis to legislate more, we are facing a risk of decoupling in the long term between the EU and the U.S.”

Photo: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Cédric O, France’s former minister of state for digital, has been an advocate of Europe’s approach to tech and at the forefront of the continent’s relations with U.S. giants. Protocol caught up with O last week at a conference in New York focusing on social media’s negative effects on society and the possibilities of blockchain-based protocols for alternative networks.

O said watching the U.S. lag in tech policy — even as some states pass their own measures and federal bills gain momentum — has made him worry about the EU and U.S. decoupling. While not as drastic as a disentangling of economic fortunes between the West and China, such a divergence, as O describes it, could still make it functionally impossible for companies to serve users on both sides of the Atlantic with the same product.

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Latest Stories
Bulletins