Biden promised to digitize the government. Getting it done won't be easy.

A December executive order requires federal agencies to overhaul clunky systems. Meet the team trying to make that happen.

the White House

The dramatic uptick in people relying on government services, combined with the move to remote work, rendered inconvenient government processes downright painful.

Photo: Joe Daniel Price/Getty Images

Early last year, top White House officials embarked on a fact-finding mission with technical leaders inside government agencies. They wanted to know the answer to a specific question: If there was anything federal agencies could do to improve the average American’s experience interacting with the government, what would it be?

The list, of course, was a long one.

Before the pandemic began, anything having to do with filling out government paperwork — renewing passports, filing for assistance, applying for permits — ranked somewhere near getting a root canal on most Americans’ list of favorite activities. Since COVID-19, it’s been more like getting a root canal without novocaine. The dramatic uptick in people relying on government services, combined with the move to remote work, rendered inconvenient government processes downright painful. Like, good luck faxing that form that requires a wet signature to an office in D.C. — no one’s stepped foot in there for months. Not that most government websites are much better.

“COVID really shined a light on the fact that there were some interactions people had with the government that needed to be improved, full stop,” said Clare Martorana, chief information officer of the United States, who was among the officials involved in these conversations.

Throughout last year, Martorana, agency officials and others narrowed that wish list to the realm of the possible. And last month, President Biden codified it in an executive order which requires 17 agencies to make 36 specific upgrades that will ideally make Americans' experience dealing with the government suck less. That list includes creating a fully digital passport renewal process and an online system for applying for disaster assistance, among other changes that revolve around major life events. All of it, the White House said when the order was announced, is on track for completion within a year.

It’s an extraordinary technological, design and policy lift for a government that has, you could say, a few other items on its to-do list. This week’s rollout of a new federal COVID-19 test distribution website already got off to a rocky start. Similar efforts to modernize government by the White House and Congress have come and gone without making much of a perceptible dent in the vast bureaucracy of the U.S. government. Now, it’s up to a small army of technologists across agencies and inside the White House to buck that trend and turn Biden’s words into action.

Follow the form to 1933

At least some of that work will fall to Mina Hsiang, the new administrator of the United States Digital Service, who was part of the team that famously swooped in to save Healthcare.gov’s calamitous launch in 2013. That digital response team later gave birth to the U.S. Digital Service, where Hsiang spent a two-year stint before founding a spinoff digital team inside the Department of Health and Human Services.

Hsiang left government to work in the health care sector in late 2017, but returned to the White House last year to find that a lot has changed since those early years. “In my first term, if I walked into an agency to work on a program, there were no user researchers — like nobody,” she said. “Now, you always walk in and there are many things still for us to do, but most programs have a user researcher and understand the concept of user experience.”

 Mina Hsiang Mina Hsiang, administrator of the United States Digital Service.Photo: White House

That will be key to implementing the changes outlined in this particular executive order. The order “is a change in frame,” said Jen Pahlka, former deputy chief technology officer of the United States and founder of the nonprofit Code for America. “[It says] if it is burdensome on the customer, it is a problem.”

One reason why government applications and forms have become so tediously detailed and take hours to complete is because, traditionally, every relevant agency — and lawyer for that agency — gets to have a say in what goes on the form, often with little regard for what that means for the people filling it out.

And those forms can have a needlessly long lifespan. “If you follow a form, you sometimes follow it back to 1933,” said Jodi Leo, chief delivery officer at the tech firm Nava. That’s not hyperbole. Nava recently helped the Department of Veterans Affairs overhaul its clunky benefit appeals process, which had left thousands of veterans stuck in limbo. By removing a single form that dated back to 1933 from that process, Leo said, the VA was able to significantly cut down on the amount of time veterans had to wait to get an appeal processed.

Other times, government requirements border on nonsensical for the task at hand, like requiring natural disaster victims to navigate multiple government websites with extensive supporting documentation, when everything they own may have been washed away.

But past efforts to modernize these services have often focused too much attention on the technology itself, while failing to address the flawed policies and overly detailed requirements underpinning that technology. The new order, Hsiang stresses, is not just about technology.

“If you have a terrible process, and then you codify it in technology, it will be terrible technology,” said Hsiang. “A lot of this is much more about setting a tone. At any fork in the road where there are two options, choose the thing that's better for the user.”

Tripling down

There are other reasons to believe this order may have more luck than earlier attempts. For one thing, Congress poured $200 million into the USDS last year and $1 billion into the Technology Modernization Fund as part of the American Rescue Plan last year. It’s less than they need, said Matt Lira, former special assistant to President Trump for Innovation Policy and Initiatives, but still, “That’s more funding than they’ve ever had.” Prior to the American Rescue Plan, the TMF had only ever received $175 million.

Lira said the Trump White House had considered a similar executive order and even drafted a proposal last fall. But the change in administration cut that idea short. And he argues such a mandate wouldn’t have been possible earlier in Trump’s term. “The institutional capacity wasn’t there to do it,” he said.

Lira said he’s encouraged that the Biden administration has “tripled down” on this issue, noting the particular significance of having people like Hsiang and Martorana involved. Like Hsiang, Martorana also worked for the USDS, where she focused on digital modernization of the VA, and later was CIO of the Office of Personnel Management. “I’ve long been optimistic that people with that depth of experience would get to these leadership positions,” Lira said. “That has finally occurred, and that’s really exciting.”

Clare Martorana Clare Martorana, the U.S. CIO.Photo: White House

Hsiang, Martorana and their teams will be heavily involved in guiding agencies through this process, but, Hsiang said, “The agencies are the ones who really own these commitments.”

The challenge ahead

For all of the advantages Biden’s plan has over prior attempts, it’s hardly a sure thing. Even with experienced leaders in the White House and a new generation of user researchers scattered throughout government agencies, Martorana said there are currently “thousands” of open tech and cybersecurity positions across the government. Poaching talent away from cushy tech jobs has been a struggle since the earliest days of USDS, but it was a particular challenge during the Trump administration, given the ideological differences between the president and the largely left-leaning tech workforce.

“We always had to have the conversation about the apolitical nature of this work,” Lira said of recruiting in the Trump years. The Biden administration may not have to have quite the same talk, but hiring may prove challenging nonetheless.

Another substantial difficulty will be breaking down silos between government agencies that all operate a little differently and even have their own definitions of what does or doesn’t make a person eligible for a given government program. Building cleaner user interfaces will require simplifying those definitions and convincing agencies to sacrifice some specificity and legalese for the sake of simplicity. That may also require the USDS and 18F, another digital services group within the federal government, to harmonize their work. A recent Government Accountability Office report found that the two groups often offer agencies “duplicative IT guidance” and lacked “an established, documented coordination approach.”

But perhaps the biggest obstacle the administration faces in actually seeing these promises through is that it’s dealing with so many other competing crises, Pahlka said: “In six months, is this still going to be the biggest priority?”

She argues, of course, that it should be. As COVID-19 has clearly shown, fixing broken government systems isn’t a distraction from core issues: It is a core issue. “Staying on customer experience and improving those services is how you deal with the crisis,” Pahlka said. “Our crises are always worse because we haven’t developed these capacities.”



While we were all Zooming, the Zoom team was thinking ahead and designing new offerings that could continue to enable seamless collaboration, communication and connectivity while evolving with the shifting workplace culture. Protocol sat down with Yuan to talk about Zoom's evolution, the future of work and the Zoom products he's most excited about.

Learn more


What the economic downturn means for pay packages

The war for talent rages on, but dynamics are shifting back to the employers.

Compensation packages could start to look different as companies reshuffle the balance of cash and equity.

Illustration: Nuthawut Somsuk/Getty Images

The market is turning. Tech stocks are slumping — which is bad news for employees — and even industry powerhouses are slowing hiring and laying people off. Tech talent is still in high demand, but compensation packages could start to look different as companies recruit.

“It’s a little bit like whiplash,” compensation consultant Ashish Raina said of the downturn. Raina, who mainly works with startups that have 200 to 800 employees, previously worked as the director of Talent at Index Ventures and head of Compensation and Talent Analytics at Box. “I do think there’s going to be an interesting reckoning in terms of pay increases going forward, how that pay is delivered.”

Keep Reading Show less
Allison Levitsky
Allison Levitsky is a reporter at Protocol covering workplace issues in tech. She previously covered big tech companies and the tech workforce for the Silicon Valley Business Journal. Allison grew up in the Bay Area and graduated from UC Berkeley.
Sponsored Content

Why the digital transformation of industries is creating a more sustainable future

Qualcomm’s chief sustainability officer Angela Baker on how companies can view going “digital” as a way not only toward growth, as laid out in a recent report, but also toward establishing and meeting environmental, social and governance goals.

Three letters dominate business practice at present: ESG, or environmental, social and governance goals. The number of mentions of the environment in financial earnings has doubled in the last five years, according to GlobalData: 600,000 companies mentioned the term in their annual or quarterly results last year.

But meeting those ESG goals can be a challenge — one that businesses can’t and shouldn’t take lightly. Ahead of an exclusive fireside chat at Davos, Angela Baker, chief sustainability officer at Qualcomm, sat down with Protocol to speak about how best to achieve those targets and how Qualcomm thinks about its own sustainability strategy, net zero commitment, other ESG targets and more.

Keep Reading Show less
Chris Stokel-Walker

Chris Stokel-Walker is a freelance technology and culture journalist and author of "YouTubers: How YouTube Shook Up TV and Created a New Generation of Stars." His work has been published in The New York Times, The Guardian and Wired.


How 'Zuck Bucks' saved the 2020 election — and fueled the Big Lie

The true story of how Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan’s $419 million donation became the 2020 election’s most enduring conspiracy theory.

Mark Zuckerberg is smack in the center of one of the 2020 election’s multitudinous conspiracies.

Illustration: Mike McQuade; Photos: Getty Images

If Mark Zuckerberg could have imagined the worst possible outcome of his decision to insert himself into the 2020 election, it might have looked something like the scene that unfolded inside Mar-a-Lago on a steamy evening in early April.

There in a gilded ballroom-turned-theater, MAGA world icons including Kellyanne Conway, Corey Lewandowski, Hope Hicks and former president Donald Trump himself were gathered for the premiere of “Rigged: The Zuckerberg Funded Plot to Defeat Donald Trump.”

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.


From frenzy to fear: Trading apps grapple with anxious investors

After riding the stock-trading wave last year, trading apps like Robinhood have disenchanted customers and jittery investors.

Retail stock trading is still an attractive business, as shown by the news that crypto exchange FTX is dipping its toes in the market by letting some U.S. customers trade stocks.

Photo: Lam Yik/Bloomberg via Getty Images

For a brief moment, last year’s GameStop craze made buying and selling stocks cool, even exciting, for a new generation of young investors. Now, that frenzy has turned to fear.

Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev pointed to “a challenging macro environment” marked by rising prices and interest rates and a slumping market in a call with analysts explaining his company’s lackluster results. The downturn, he said, was something “most of our customers have never experienced in their lifetimes.”

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.


Broadcom is reportedly in talks to acquire VMware

It hasn't been long since it left the ownership of Dell Technologies.

Photo: Yichuan Cao/NurPhoto via Getty Images

Broadcom is said to be in discussions with VMware to buy the cloud computing company for as much as $50 billion.

Keep Reading Show less
Jamie Condliffe

Jamie Condliffe ( @jme_c) is the executive editor at Protocol, based in London. Prior to joining Protocol in 2019, he worked on the business desk at The New York Times, where he edited the DealBook newsletter and wrote Bits, the weekly tech newsletter. He has previously worked at MIT Technology Review, Gizmodo, and New Scientist, and has held lectureships at the University of Oxford and Imperial College London. He also holds a doctorate in engineering from the University of Oxford.

Latest Stories