Policy

Russian sanctions could be a legal landmine for messaging apps

Human rights advocates are urging Biden not to let sanctions interfere with the free flow of information in Russia.

Police block Red Square ahead of a planned unsanctioned protest against Russia's invasion of Ukraine in central Moscow.

As global sanctions against Russia escalate, tech companies and human rights groups alike are now worried that they will soon find themselves in murky legal territory.

Photo: Alexander Nemenvo/AFP via Getty Images

Since Russia began its invasion of Ukraine, U.S. tech giants like Meta and Google have insisted on keeping lines of communication open inside Russia as much as possible, if only to ensure that Russian people have access to information that hasn’t been censored or spun up by the government.

But as global sanctions against Russia escalate, tech companies and human rights groups alike are now worried that they will soon find themselves in murky legal territory.

On Thursday, dozens of digital rights groups, including some backed by U.S. tech giants, sent an open letter to the Biden administration expressing their concern about current legal uncertainty and called on the U.S. and other governments to make it clear that apps and other services that enable personal communication by Russian people are not implicated by sanctions.

“It is not clear whether the U.S. government explicitly authorizes the lawful provision of even the most simple internet applications, services, or software in Russia at the moment,” reads the letter, signed by groups including Access Now, the Center for Democracy and Technology, Wikimedia Foundation and others.

The letter notes that Cogent, a major provider of internet infrastructure to Russia, has already pulled out of the country, citing sanctions as one reason. “The economic sanctions put in place as a result of the invasion and the increasingly uncertain security situation make it impossible for Cogent to continue to provide you with service,” Cogent reportedly wrote in a message to customers.

The groups behind the letter argue that any restrictions on Russian people’s access to the internet would “further isolate the embattled pro-democracy and anti-war activists, and impede the ability of NGOs, human rights groups, journalists, and attorneys inside and outside Russia to provide critical information to citizens about the current state of affairs and their rights.”

The groups are asking for the U.S. government to specifically authorize services that enable communication — think free messaging apps and browsers — and to keep these concerns in mind if and when additional sanctions are introduced.

In other countries where the U.S. has broader sanctions, including Iran, it has at times issued special exemptions, called general licenses, for personal communication technology. It’s why Google has managed to serve ads from U.S. companies in Iran, Syria and Cuba. It may not be a great deal for advertisers who aren’t particularly interested in the Syrian market, but it’s at least not illegal.

These licenses are key to getting risk-averse legal teams inside U.S. tech companies to feel comfortable continuing operations, said Jason Pielemeier, deputy director of the Global Network Initiative, a non-profit group that works with large tech companies including Meta and Google, as well as civil rights groups, to promote free expression online. “Compliance lawyers within companies are the most conservative people on earth. Their job is to make sure the companies don’t come anywhere close to breaking the law,” he said.

Prior to working for GNI, Pielemeier worked for the State Department’s human rights bureau, where he said he once had to go on a roadtrip to Silicon Valley just to implore tech companies to take advantage of the communications exemptions in Iran. “We were like, ‘We really mean it. We put this exception in place for a reason. We want you to use it,’” Pielemeier said.

The groups behind the letter are asking the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control to issue a similar license for personal communications in Russia.

That might be somewhat premature. A spokesperson for the Treasury said the agency issues those licenses when a jurisdictional ban is in place. Right now, the Russia ban is targeted at specific individuals and institutions, meaning personal communications tech among Russian people is allowed by default. Where the U.S. has sanctioned entire regions, as in Donetsk and Luhansk, it has already issued general licenses authorizing telecommunications and mail as well as personal communications.

Still, human rights advocates and tech companies are mostly concerned about what’s coming next and whether the free flow of communication in and out of Russia will remain a top priority. That’s true of U.S. sanctions, but also sanctions from other prominent Western governments.

Already, tech companies are facing tremendous pressure to pull out of Russia altogether. Some of that is internal pressure from the Russian government, which has imposed new censorship responsibilities on companies, prompting TikTok to restrict new content there. Facebook, meanwhile, has had no choice in the matter, after the Russian government blocked the platform entirely inside the country.

But a lot of the pressure is coming from global governments and top Ukrainian officials themselves. Through the letter, advocates are warning the Biden administration not to institutionalize that pressure through sanctions.

“We want to make sure whatever we do in the name of the Ukrainian people and in the name of condemning Russian aggression is consistent with human rights norms,” Pielemeier said. “If in the haste to condemn and respond, we undermine that foundation of commitment to and demonstrated reliance on those international rules, we undermine our message and potentially give Putin and the Russians ammunition to fire back against Western governments.”

Fintech

Judge Zia Faruqui is trying to teach you crypto, one ‘SNL’ reference at a time

His decisions on major cryptocurrency cases have quoted "The Big Lebowski," "SNL," and "Dr. Strangelove." That’s because he wants you — yes, you — to read them.

The ways Zia Faruqui (right) has weighed on cases that have come before him can give lawyers clues as to what legal frameworks will pass muster.

Photo: Carolyn Van Houten/The Washington Post via Getty Images

“Cryptocurrency and related software analytics tools are ‘The wave of the future, Dude. One hundred percent electronic.’”

That’s not a quote from "The Big Lebowski" — at least, not directly. It’s a quote from a Washington, D.C., district court memorandum opinion on the role cryptocurrency analytics tools can play in government investigations. The author is Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui.

Keep Reading Show less
Veronica Irwin

Veronica Irwin (@vronirwin) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol covering fintech. Previously she was at the San Francisco Examiner, covering tech from a hyper-local angle. Before that, her byline was featured in SF Weekly, The Nation, Techworker, Ms. Magazine and The Frisc.

The financial technology transformation is driving competition, creating consumer choice, and shaping the future of finance. Hear from seven fintech leaders who are reshaping the future of finance, and join the inaugural Financial Technology Association Fintech Summit to learn more.

Keep Reading Show less
FTA
The Financial Technology Association (FTA) represents industry leaders shaping the future of finance. We champion the power of technology-centered financial services and advocate for the modernization of financial regulation to support inclusion and responsible innovation.
Enterprise

AWS CEO: The cloud isn’t just about technology

As AWS preps for its annual re:Invent conference, Adam Selipsky talks product strategy, support for hybrid environments, and the value of the cloud in uncertain economic times.

Photo: Noah Berger/Getty Images for Amazon Web Services

AWS is gearing up for re:Invent, its annual cloud computing conference where announcements this year are expected to focus on its end-to-end data strategy and delivering new industry-specific services.

It will be the second re:Invent with CEO Adam Selipsky as leader of the industry’s largest cloud provider after his return last year to AWS from data visualization company Tableau Software.

Keep Reading Show less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.

Image: Protocol

We launched Protocol in February 2020 to cover the evolving power center of tech. It is with deep sadness that just under three years later, we are winding down the publication.

As of today, we will not publish any more stories. All of our newsletters, apart from our flagship, Source Code, will no longer be sent. Source Code will be published and sent for the next few weeks, but it will also close down in December.

Keep Reading Show less
Bennett Richardson

Bennett Richardson ( @bennettrich) is the president of Protocol. Prior to joining Protocol in 2019, Bennett was executive director of global strategic partnerships at POLITICO, where he led strategic growth efforts including POLITICO's European expansion in Brussels and POLITICO's creative agency POLITICO Focus during his six years with the company. Prior to POLITICO, Bennett was co-founder and CMO of Hinge, the mobile dating company recently acquired by Match Group. Bennett began his career in digital and social brand marketing working with major brands across tech, energy, and health care at leading marketing and communications agencies including Edelman and GMMB. Bennett is originally from Portland, Maine, and received his bachelor's degree from Colgate University.

Enterprise

Why large enterprises struggle to find suitable platforms for MLops

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, and as larger enterprises go from deploying hundreds of models to thousands and even millions of models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

Photo: artpartner-images via Getty Images

On any given day, Lily AI runs hundreds of machine learning models using computer vision and natural language processing that are customized for its retail and ecommerce clients to make website product recommendations, forecast demand, and plan merchandising. But this spring when the company was in the market for a machine learning operations platform to manage its expanding model roster, it wasn’t easy to find a suitable off-the-shelf system that could handle such a large number of models in deployment while also meeting other criteria.

Some MLops platforms are not well-suited for maintaining even more than 10 machine learning models when it comes to keeping track of data, navigating their user interfaces, or reporting capabilities, Matthew Nokleby, machine learning manager for Lily AI’s product intelligence team, told Protocol earlier this year. “The duct tape starts to show,” he said.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories
Bulletins