Russian sanctions could be a legal landmine for messaging apps

Human rights advocates are urging Biden not to let sanctions interfere with the free flow of information in Russia.

Police block Red Square ahead of a planned unsanctioned protest against Russia's invasion of Ukraine in central Moscow.

As global sanctions against Russia escalate, tech companies and human rights groups alike are now worried that they will soon find themselves in murky legal territory.

Photo: Alexander Nemenvo/AFP via Getty Images

Since Russia began its invasion of Ukraine, U.S. tech giants like Meta and Google have insisted on keeping lines of communication open inside Russia as much as possible, if only to ensure that Russian people have access to information that hasn’t been censored or spun up by the government.

But as global sanctions against Russia escalate, tech companies and human rights groups alike are now worried that they will soon find themselves in murky legal territory.

On Thursday, dozens of digital rights groups, including some backed by U.S. tech giants, sent an open letter to the Biden administration expressing their concern about current legal uncertainty and called on the U.S. and other governments to make it clear that apps and other services that enable personal communication by Russian people are not implicated by sanctions.

“It is not clear whether the U.S. government explicitly authorizes the lawful provision of even the most simple internet applications, services, or software in Russia at the moment,” reads the letter, signed by groups including Access Now, the Center for Democracy and Technology, Wikimedia Foundation and others.

The letter notes that Cogent, a major provider of internet infrastructure to Russia, has already pulled out of the country, citing sanctions as one reason. “The economic sanctions put in place as a result of the invasion and the increasingly uncertain security situation make it impossible for Cogent to continue to provide you with service,” Cogent reportedly wrote in a message to customers.

The groups behind the letter argue that any restrictions on Russian people’s access to the internet would “further isolate the embattled pro-democracy and anti-war activists, and impede the ability of NGOs, human rights groups, journalists, and attorneys inside and outside Russia to provide critical information to citizens about the current state of affairs and their rights.”

The groups are asking for the U.S. government to specifically authorize services that enable communication — think free messaging apps and browsers — and to keep these concerns in mind if and when additional sanctions are introduced.

In other countries where the U.S. has broader sanctions, including Iran, it has at times issued special exemptions, called general licenses, for personal communication technology. It’s why Google has managed to serve ads from U.S. companies in Iran, Syria and Cuba. It may not be a great deal for advertisers who aren’t particularly interested in the Syrian market, but it’s at least not illegal.

These licenses are key to getting risk-averse legal teams inside U.S. tech companies to feel comfortable continuing operations, said Jason Pielemeier, deputy director of the Global Network Initiative, a non-profit group that works with large tech companies including Meta and Google, as well as civil rights groups, to promote free expression online. “Compliance lawyers within companies are the most conservative people on earth. Their job is to make sure the companies don’t come anywhere close to breaking the law,” he said.

Prior to working for GNI, Pielemeier worked for the State Department’s human rights bureau, where he said he once had to go on a roadtrip to Silicon Valley just to implore tech companies to take advantage of the communications exemptions in Iran. “We were like, ‘We really mean it. We put this exception in place for a reason. We want you to use it,’” Pielemeier said.

The groups behind the letter are asking the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control to issue a similar license for personal communications in Russia.

That might be somewhat premature. A spokesperson for the Treasury said the agency issues those licenses when a jurisdictional ban is in place. Right now, the Russia ban is targeted at specific individuals and institutions, meaning personal communications tech among Russian people is allowed by default. Where the U.S. has sanctioned entire regions, as in Donetsk and Luhansk, it has already issued general licenses authorizing telecommunications and mail as well as personal communications.

Still, human rights advocates and tech companies are mostly concerned about what’s coming next and whether the free flow of communication in and out of Russia will remain a top priority. That’s true of U.S. sanctions, but also sanctions from other prominent Western governments.

Already, tech companies are facing tremendous pressure to pull out of Russia altogether. Some of that is internal pressure from the Russian government, which has imposed new censorship responsibilities on companies, prompting TikTok to restrict new content there. Facebook, meanwhile, has had no choice in the matter, after the Russian government blocked the platform entirely inside the country.

But a lot of the pressure is coming from global governments and top Ukrainian officials themselves. Through the letter, advocates are warning the Biden administration not to institutionalize that pressure through sanctions.

“We want to make sure whatever we do in the name of the Ukrainian people and in the name of condemning Russian aggression is consistent with human rights norms,” Pielemeier said. “If in the haste to condemn and respond, we undermine that foundation of commitment to and demonstrated reliance on those international rules, we undermine our message and potentially give Putin and the Russians ammunition to fire back against Western governments.”


Inside Amazon’s free video strategy

Amazon has been doubling down on original content for Freevee, its ad-supported video service, which has seen a lot of growth thanks to a deep integration with other Amazon properties.

Freevee’s investment into original programming like 'Bosch: Legacy' has increased by 70%.

Photo: Tyler Golden/Amazon Freevee

Amazon’s streaming efforts have long been all about Prime Video. So the company caught pundits by surprise when, in early 2019, it launched a stand-alone ad-supported streaming service called IMDb Freedive, with Techcrunch calling the move “a bit odd.”

Nearly four years and two rebrandings later, Amazon’s ad-supported video efforts appear to be flourishing. Viewership of the service grew by 138% from 2020 to 2021, according to Amazon. The company declined to share any updated performance data on the service, which is now called Freevee, but a spokesperson told Protocol the performance of originals in particular “exceeded expectations,” leading Amazon to increase investments into original content by 70% year-over-year.

Keep Reading Show less
Janko Roettgers

Janko Roettgers (@jank0) is a senior reporter at Protocol, reporting on the shifting power dynamics between tech, media, and entertainment, including the impact of new technologies. Previously, Janko was Variety's first-ever technology writer in San Francisco, where he covered big tech and emerging technologies. He has reported for Gigaom, Frankfurter Rundschau, Berliner Zeitung, and ORF, among others. He has written three books on consumer cord-cutting and online music and co-edited an anthology on internet subcultures. He lives with his family in Oakland.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

Wall Street is warming up to crypto

Secure, well-regulated technology infrastructure could draw more large banks to crypto.

Technology infrastructure for crypto has begun to mature.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Despite a downturn in crypto markets, more large institutional investors are seeking to invest in crypto.

One factor holding them back is a lack of infrastructure for large institutions compared to what exists in the traditional, regulated capital markets.

Keep Reading Show less
Tomio Geron

Tomio Geron ( @tomiogeron) is a San Francisco-based reporter covering fintech. He was previously a reporter and editor at The Wall Street Journal, covering venture capital and startups. Before that, he worked as a staff writer at Forbes, covering social media and venture capital, and also edited the Midas List of top tech investors. He has also worked at newspapers covering crime, courts, health and other topics. He can be reached at tgeron@protocol.com or tgeron@protonmail.com.


How I decided to go all-in on a federal contract — before assignment

Amanda Renteria knew Code for America could help facilitate access to expanded child tax credits. She also knew there was no guarantee her proof of concept would convince others — but tried anyway.

Code for America CEO Amanda Renteria explained how it's helped people claim the Child Tax Credit.

Photo: Code for America

Click banner image for more How I decided series

After the American Rescue Plan Act passed in March 2021, the U.S. government expanded child tax credits to provide relief for American families during the pandemic. The legislation allowed some families to nearly double their tax benefits per child, which was especially critical for low-income families, who disproportionately bore the financial brunt of the pandemic.

Keep Reading Show less
Hirsh Chitkara

Hirsh Chitkara ( @HirshChitkara) is a reporter at Protocol focused on the intersection of politics, technology and society. Before joining Protocol, he helped write a daily newsletter at Insider that covered all things Big Tech. He's based in New York and can be reached at hchitkara@protocol.com.


This carbon capture startup wants to clean up the worst polluters

The founder and CEO of point-source carbon capture company Carbon Clean discusses what the startup has learned, the future of carbon capture technology, as well as the role of companies like his in battling the climate crisis.

Carbon Clean CEO Aniruddha Sharma told Protocol that fossil fuels are necessary, at least in the near term, to lift the living standards of those who don’t have access to cars and electricity.

Photo: Carbon Clean

Carbon capture and storage has taken on increasing importance as companies with stubborn emissions look for new ways to meet their net zero goals. For hard-to-abate industries like cement and steel production, it’s one of the few options that exist to help them get there.

Yet it’s proven incredibly challenging to scale the technology, which captures carbon pollution at the source. U.K.-based company Carbon Clean is leading the charge to bring down costs. This year, it raised a $150 million series C round, which the startup said is the largest-ever funding round for a point-source carbon capture company.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma

Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol covering climate. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at mma@protocol.com.

Latest Stories