Policy

Does your internet suck? Consumer Reports wants to help.

More than 40 groups led by Consumer Reports are trying to build the case for government to do more on broadband competition.

Woman reads bill and pays via tablet

Broadband Together hopes to review at least 30,000 bills to learn how much users are paying for internet.

Photo: JGI/Jamie Grill/Getty Images

What's in your broadband bill? Consumer Reports wants to know — and hopefully, to make it cheaper.

More than 40 consumer, privacy and digital rights groups, led by Consumer Reports, launched a drive today asking people to send in their internet bills as part of a campaign to push down prices for, and boost the quality of, internet service through increased competition.

The group effort, known as Broadband Together, hopes to review at least 30,000 bills to learn how much users are paying and figure out where competition is scarce for internet service.

Broadband Together's launch comes as the Biden administration has thrown support behind increasing broadband access as part of an infrastructure bill and taken steps to try to increase competition, including in a sweeping order last week.

"To create a better marketplace, we need to know the truth about our internet prices and fees," Jonathan Schwantes, senior policy counsel for Consumer Reports, said in a release. "Shockingly, some bills don't even list the price consumers are paying for internet service."

To participate, consumers will upload PDF copies of their bills to a website that extracts the pricing and service information, Schwantes told Protocol in an interview. The ZIP code is the only personally-identifiable information the website extracts, although the accompanying survey asks optional demographic questions, and the bills are only shared with Consumer Reports.

Consumers then take an online speed test to figure out their upload and download speeds. Not all entries will be useful, the organization admits. In particular, service bundles, in which companies provide some combination of internet, TV and phone services together, may not clearly break out the cost of each service, and Consumer Reports isn't taking paper bills for the time being. But Schwantes is optimistic that the coalition will receive enough bills that he and others can get good data on local price, service, speed and more.

"Once we do that, we can tell you what the ISPs are charging, and then really with enough data, [we can] start figuring out, why is that same plan cheaper in that ZIP code versus that ZIP code?" Schwantes said.

He said he fully expects the answer to come down to competition: Where it's robust, plans will likely be cheaper and offer better speeds. Where it's not, consumers will be paying more for less. If the results do support that conclusion, the group then plans to promote a series of potential reforms. Many focus on government support of internet service, particularly in areas where it might be too expensive for new commercial networks to launch as rivals offering lower prices than incumbent providers.

"Where there's not competition and consumers are stuck, the only person who can help them out is the government," Schwantes said. "You should have some version of a low-cost plan."

Of course, the shape and effectiveness of such low-cost plans is an open question. The $3.2 billion in federal funding for internet access that came out of the pandemic has faced a glitchy rollout, including difficulty reaching the tens of millions of people it aims to help and also issues such as Spectrum's effort to funnel users into full-price service down the road.

State-level action also faces an uphill battle. The telecom industry in June succeeded in its lawsuit to block a first-in-the-nation discount program in New York state. Nearly two dozen states also have outright bans or other significant roadblocks in place to networks that state and local governments might build or run.

The telecom industry, which says that broadband competition is robust and prices are decreasing broadly, has cast municipal broadband efforts as unnecessary expenses on the taxpayer for poor networks. Instead, industry groups push for public-private partnerships like the network that Consolidated Communications is building out for 500 customers in Eastbrook, Maine.

Still, the time might be opportune for Broadband Together's push — particularly if legislators are still debating an infrastructure package in the fall, when Schwantes said he expects results.

Biden's Friday executive order on competition likewise contains provisions addressing residential broadband. One request asks Federal Communications Commission to require reports from broadband providers about prices for internet services and to generate standard consumer labels about broadband services, based on ubiquitous nutritional information labels.

Schwantes said that while the broadband labels, which the FCC had proposed in the Obama administration before abandoning them under the Trump administration, might be a "cuter" solution than massive government support for internet service, it's also a "no-brainer."

"Just looking at all of these bills can make the case for that as well," he said.

Because the FCC is an independent agency, the administration's requests are non-binding. The commission is also evenly split between Republican and Democratic members until Biden nominates a fifth commissioner.

Still, Broadband Together may have history on its side. The inspiration for the project came in part from similar work Consumer Reports did on hidden fees in cable TV bills. Consumers on the group's list delivered more than 5,000 bills in two weeks, which is part of why Schwantes is optimistic about meeting or exceeding his goal with a long list of partners. The resulting 2019 report helped the group succeed in its push for a law bringing more transparency to fees.

The coalition's steering committee also includes Public Knowledge, Access Now, the American Library Association, Color of Change, the National Hispanic Media Coalition and more. Many of the groups are veteran Washington policy organizations, with several focusing on Black, Hispanic and rural communities where access or affordability issues may be particularly acute.

Workplace

It's OK to cry at work

Our comfort with crying at work has changed drastically over the past couple years. But experts said the hard part is helping workers get through the underlying mental health challenges.

Tech workers and workplace mental health experts said discussing emotions at work has become less taboo over the past couple years, but we’re still a ways away from completely normalizing the conversation — and adjusting policies accordingly.

Photo: Teerasak Ainkeaw / EyeEm via Getty Images

Everyone seems to be ugly crying on the internet these days. A new Snapchat filter makes people look like they’re breaking down on television, crying at celebratory occasions or crying when it sounds like they’re laughing. But one of the ways it's been used is weirdly cathartic: the workplace.

In one video, a creator posted a video of their co-worker merely sitting at a desk, presumably giggling or smiling, but the Snapchat tool gave them a pained look on their face. The video was captioned: “When you still have two hours left of your working day.” Another video showed someone asking their co-workers if they enjoy their job. Everyone said yes, but the filter indicated otherwise.

Keep Reading Show less
Sarah Roach

Sarah Roach is a news writer at Protocol (@sarahroach_) and contributes to Source Code. She is a recent graduate of George Washington University, where she studied journalism and mass communication and criminal justice. She previously worked for two years as editor in chief of her school's independent newspaper, The GW Hatchet.

Sponsored Content

Foursquare data story: leveraging location data for site selection

We take a closer look at points of interest and foot traffic patterns to demonstrate how location data can be leveraged to inform better site selecti­on strategies.

Imagine: You’re the leader of a real estate team at a restaurant brand looking to open a new location in Manhattan. You have two options you’re evaluating: one site in SoHo, and another site in the Flatiron neighborhood. Which do you choose?

Keep Reading Show less
Enterprise

Arm’s new CEO is planning the IPO it sought to avoid last year

Arm CEO Rene Haas told Protocol that Arm will be fine as a standalone company, as it focuses on efficient computing and giving customers a more finished product than a basic chip core design.

Rene Haas is taking Arm on a fresh trajectory.

Photo: Arm

The new path for Arm is beginning to come into focus.

Weeks after Nvidia’s $40 bid to acquire Arm from SoftBank collapsed, the appointment of Rene Haas to replace longtime chief executive Simon Segars has set the business on a fresh trajectory. Haas appears determined to shake up the company, with plans to lay off as much as 15% of the staff ahead of plans to take the company public once again by the end of March next year.

Keep Reading Show less
Max A. Cherney

Max A. Cherney is a senior reporter at Protocol covering the semiconductor industry. He has worked for Barron's magazine as a Technology Reporter, and its sister site MarketWatch. He is based in San Francisco.

Policy

The great onshoring: Inside the transcontinental chip race

The second annual Trade and Technology Council emphasized the centrality of semiconductor onshoring to U.S.-EU military objectives.

For chip manufacturers, free-flowing subsidies for now might come at the cost of a potential overcapacity problem in the longer term.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

The prospect of global conflict permeated the room at this year’s Trade and Technology Council, which concluded in France earlier this week. The second annual gathering of U.S. and EU officials yielded a joint statement that mentioned some form of “Russia” or “Ukraine” more frequently than “technology,” “regulation,” “investment,” “security” or “competition.”

The conflict in Ukraine, having already escalated into a U.S. proxy war, seemingly convinced the EU to fall in line with the American tech policy agenda.

Keep Reading Show less
Hirsh Chitkara

Hirsh Chitkara ( @HirshChitkara) is a reporter at Protocol focused on the intersection of politics, technology and society. Before joining Protocol, he helped write a daily newsletter at Insider that covered all things Big Tech. He's based in New York and can be reached at hchitkara@protocol.com.

Climate

2- and 3-wheelers dominate oil displacement by EVs

Increasingly widespread EV adoption is starting to displace the use of oil, but there's still a lot of work to do.

More electric mopeds on the road could be an oil demand game-changer.

Photo: Humphrey Muleba/Unsplash

Electric vehicles are starting to make a serious dent in oil use.

Last year, EVs displaced roughly 1.5 million barrels per day, according to a new analysis from BloombergNEF. That is more than double the share EVs displaced in 2015. The majority of the displacement is coming from an unlikely source.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).

Latest Stories
Bulletins