Policy

Does your internet suck? Consumer Reports wants to help.

More than 40 groups led by Consumer Reports are trying to build the case for government to do more on broadband competition.

Woman reads bill and pays via tablet

Broadband Together hopes to review at least 30,000 bills to learn how much users are paying for internet.

Photo: JGI/Jamie Grill/Getty Images

What's in your broadband bill? Consumer Reports wants to know — and hopefully, to make it cheaper.

More than 40 consumer, privacy and digital rights groups, led by Consumer Reports, launched a drive today asking people to send in their internet bills as part of a campaign to push down prices for, and boost the quality of, internet service through increased competition.

The group effort, known as Broadband Together, hopes to review at least 30,000 bills to learn how much users are paying and figure out where competition is scarce for internet service.

Broadband Together's launch comes as the Biden administration has thrown support behind increasing broadband access as part of an infrastructure bill and taken steps to try to increase competition, including in a sweeping order last week.

"To create a better marketplace, we need to know the truth about our internet prices and fees," Jonathan Schwantes, senior policy counsel for Consumer Reports, said in a release. "Shockingly, some bills don't even list the price consumers are paying for internet service."

To participate, consumers will upload PDF copies of their bills to a website that extracts the pricing and service information, Schwantes told Protocol in an interview. The ZIP code is the only personally-identifiable information the website extracts, although the accompanying survey asks optional demographic questions, and the bills are only shared with Consumer Reports.

Consumers then take an online speed test to figure out their upload and download speeds. Not all entries will be useful, the organization admits. In particular, service bundles, in which companies provide some combination of internet, TV and phone services together, may not clearly break out the cost of each service, and Consumer Reports isn't taking paper bills for the time being. But Schwantes is optimistic that the coalition will receive enough bills that he and others can get good data on local price, service, speed and more.

"Once we do that, we can tell you what the ISPs are charging, and then really with enough data, [we can] start figuring out, why is that same plan cheaper in that ZIP code versus that ZIP code?" Schwantes said.

He said he fully expects the answer to come down to competition: Where it's robust, plans will likely be cheaper and offer better speeds. Where it's not, consumers will be paying more for less. If the results do support that conclusion, the group then plans to promote a series of potential reforms. Many focus on government support of internet service, particularly in areas where it might be too expensive for new commercial networks to launch as rivals offering lower prices than incumbent providers.

"Where there's not competition and consumers are stuck, the only person who can help them out is the government," Schwantes said. "You should have some version of a low-cost plan."

Of course, the shape and effectiveness of such low-cost plans is an open question. The $3.2 billion in federal funding for internet access that came out of the pandemic has faced a glitchy rollout, including difficulty reaching the tens of millions of people it aims to help and also issues such as Spectrum's effort to funnel users into full-price service down the road.

State-level action also faces an uphill battle. The telecom industry in June succeeded in its lawsuit to block a first-in-the-nation discount program in New York state. Nearly two dozen states also have outright bans or other significant roadblocks in place to networks that state and local governments might build or run.

The telecom industry, which says that broadband competition is robust and prices are decreasing broadly, has cast municipal broadband efforts as unnecessary expenses on the taxpayer for poor networks. Instead, industry groups push for public-private partnerships like the network that Consolidated Communications is building out for 500 customers in Eastbrook, Maine.

Still, the time might be opportune for Broadband Together's push — particularly if legislators are still debating an infrastructure package in the fall, when Schwantes said he expects results.

Biden's Friday executive order on competition likewise contains provisions addressing residential broadband. One request asks Federal Communications Commission to require reports from broadband providers about prices for internet services and to generate standard consumer labels about broadband services, based on ubiquitous nutritional information labels.

Schwantes said that while the broadband labels, which the FCC had proposed in the Obama administration before abandoning them under the Trump administration, might be a "cuter" solution than massive government support for internet service, it's also a "no-brainer."

"Just looking at all of these bills can make the case for that as well," he said.

Because the FCC is an independent agency, the administration's requests are non-binding. The commission is also evenly split between Republican and Democratic members until Biden nominates a fifth commissioner.

Still, Broadband Together may have history on its side. The inspiration for the project came in part from similar work Consumer Reports did on hidden fees in cable TV bills. Consumers on the group's list delivered more than 5,000 bills in two weeks, which is part of why Schwantes is optimistic about meeting or exceeding his goal with a long list of partners. The resulting 2019 report helped the group succeed in its push for a law bringing more transparency to fees.

The coalition's steering committee also includes Public Knowledge, Access Now, the American Library Association, Color of Change, the National Hispanic Media Coalition and more. Many of the groups are veteran Washington policy organizations, with several focusing on Black, Hispanic and rural communities where access or affordability issues may be particularly acute.

A 'Soho house for techies': VCs place a bet on community

Contrary is the latest venture firm to experiment with building community spaces instead of offices.

Contrary NYC is meant to re-create being part of a members-only club where engineers and entrepreneurs can hang out together, have a space to work, and host events for people in tech.

Photo: Courtesy of Contrary

In the pre-pandemic times, Contrary’s network of venture scouts, founders, and top technologists reflected the magnetic pull Silicon Valley had on the tech industry. About 80% were based in the Bay Area, with a smattering living elsewhere. Today, when Contrary asked where people in its network were living, the split had changed with 40% in the Bay Area and another 40% living in or planning to move to New York.

It’s totally bifurcated now, said Contrary’s founder Eric Tarczynski.

Keep Reading Show less
Biz Carson

Biz Carson ( @bizcarson) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol, covering Silicon Valley with a focus on startups and venture capital. Previously, she reported for Forbes and was co-editor of Forbes Next Billion-Dollar Startups list. Before that, she worked for Business Insider, Gigaom, and Wired and started her career as a newspaper designer for Gannett.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Fintech

Binance CEO wrestles with the 'Chinese company' label

Changpeng "CZ" Zhao, who leads crypto’s largest marketplace, is pushing back on attempts to link Binance to Beijing.

Despite Binance having to abandon its country of origin shortly after its founding, critics have portrayed the exchange as a tool of the Chinese government.

Photo: Akio Kon/Bloomberg via Getty Images

In crypto, he is known simply as CZ, head of one of the industry’s most dominant players.

It took only five years for Binance CEO and co-founder Changpeng Zhao to build his company, which launched in 2017, into the world’s biggest crypto exchange, with 90 million customers and roughly $76 billion in daily trading volume, outpacing the U.S. crypto powerhouse Coinbase.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Enterprise

How I decided to leave the US and pursue a tech career in Europe

Melissa Di Donato moved to Europe to broaden her technology experience with a different market perspective. She planned to stay two years. Seventeen years later, she remains in London as CEO of Suse.

“It was a hard go for me in the beginning. I was entering inside of a company that had been very traditional in a sense.”

Photo: Suse

Click banner image for more How I decided seriesA native New Yorker, Melissa Di Donato made a life-changing decision back in 2005 when she packed up for Europe to further her career in technology. Then with IBM, she made London her new home base.

Today, Di Donato is CEO of Germany’s Suse, now a 30-year-old, open-source enterprise software company that specializes in Linux operating systems, container management, storage, and edge computing. As the company’s first female leader, she has led Suse through the coronavirus pandemic, a 2021 IPO on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange, and the acquisitions of Kubernetes management startup Rancher Labs and container security company NeuVector.

Keep Reading Show less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.

Enterprise

UiPath had a rocky few years. Rob Enslin wants to turn it around.

Protocol caught up with Enslin, named earlier this year as UiPath’s co-CEO, to discuss why he left Google Cloud, the untapped potential of robotic-process automation, and how he plans to lead alongside founder Daniel Dines.

Rob Enslin, UiPath's co-CEO, chats with Protocol about the company's future.

Photo: UiPath

UiPath has had a shaky history.

The company, which helps companies automate business processes, went public in 2021 at a valuation of more than $30 billion, but now the company’s market capitalization is only around $7 billion. To add insult to injury, UiPath laid off 5% of its staff in June and then lowered its full-year guidance for fiscal year 2023 just months later, tanking its stock by 15%.

Keep Reading Show less
Aisha Counts

Aisha Counts (@aishacounts) is a reporter at Protocol covering enterprise software. Formerly, she was a management consultant for EY. She's based in Los Angeles and can be reached at acounts@protocol.com.

Latest Stories
Bulletins