Policy

Most tech policy shops want to protect tech. Bumble’s wants to protect women.

The company has poached talent from Twitter and Facebook to work on laws that aim to curb the harm women face both online and off.

Whitney Wolfe Herd

Bumble's policy team aims to "make the internet safer for women.'"

Photo: Taylor Hill/Getty Images

Lisa Roman arrived at Twitter just in time for the techlash.

It was 2018, and Roman had spent her career in government, working for the Department of Defense in Baghdad and coordinating U.S. policy related to Syria both for the State Department and the White House National Security Council.

But the pace of things on Twitter's public policy team was chaotic even for her. "A lot of our day-to-day jobs, as you can imagine in the public policy shop, were starting to become extremely reactionary," Roman said. "You would sort of wake up and your agenda was set for you, because you woke up to an email from one of the campaigns or a letter from Congress."

By the fall of 2020, as the frenetic pace in tech was peaking in the run-up to the U.S. election, Roman was looking for a job that would allow her to set the agenda, not the other way around. And she found that job in a somewhat unlikely place: the dating app Bumble.

Around that time, Bumble CEO Whitney Wolfe Herd was looking to start an internal policy team of her own, but one with a decidedly different set of stated goals than other tech policy teams have. "I said, 'Well, what is it exactly that you're looking for? Are you worried about this set of conversations resulting in a law that will impact the business?'" Roman remembers asking Wolfe Herd. "She's like, 'No. I need someone to come and help make the internet safer for women.'"

Roman joined Bumble as its vice president of global public policy last October, and has since begun building a small but experienced female-led team with an unusual mission, as far as tech policy shops go. While most tech teams in D.C. are working overtime to stop legislation that could hurt tech, Bumble's team is also actively pushing legislation across the country to stop behavior that hurts women — both online and off.

In September, Roman hired Payton Iheme, who spent five years on Facebook's public policy team, to head up Bumble's work in North America and Latin America. Like Roman, Iheme had an unconventional path to the tech industry, serving in the U.S. Army from the age of 17 and later working in the White House. "I was very keen on global problems, and I was drawn to tech being able to help, at scale, solve some of those," Iheme said.

But as relationships soured between the government and the tech industry, Iheme said, "I felt that I was not able to make those types of impact." Especially after George Floyd's murder and the Capitol riot — during which Iheme was deployed as an active member of the National Guard — Iheme said she started thinking harder about "where you want to put your energy." She decided she could make a bigger difference focusing on a more narrow set of issues.

Bumble's nascent policy team has focused for the most part on legislation related to unsolicited intimate imagery, work that began before either Roman or Iheme joined the company. In 2019, Wolfe Herd herself testified before lawmakers in Texas, where the company is based, on a bill that made it a misdemeanor to send unsolicited lewd photos, with violators subject to fines of $500. Wolfe Herd was motivated to speak not just on behalf of Bumble's users, but based on her own experiences with online harassment. Wolfe Herd famously filed a sexual harassment suit against Tinder, the rival dating app she co-founded before starting Bumble.

"If indecent exposure is a crime on the streets, then why is it not on your phone or computer?" Wolfe Herd asked lawmakers at the time. "We have to call on you because as tech companies, we can only do so much. Please help us fill the gaps where we fall short."

That bill was signed into law in 2019, inspiring the company to build a team that could push similar laws in other states. "Folks stepped back and were like: 'Wow, we could do this all the time,'" Roman said.

Bumble's policy team now consists of four people, including another former Facebook staffer, Jansen Wolf, and Nima Elmi, who spent five years at the World Economic Forum and served as a senior adviser to the Minister of Foreign Affairs in Somaliland. The team has worked to push bills similar to the Texas law in New York and California, and even became a co-sponsor on California's SB 53, known as the FLASH Act, which was introduced by state Sen. Connie Leyva in December 2020. Wolfe Herd testified in support of that bill too, but it has yet to pass out of the legislature. "I very much appreciate Bumble's continued commitment to ensuring the online safety of women through sensible and important legislation like S.B. 53," Leyva told Protocol in a statement.

Last week, Bumble expanded this work outside of the U.S., launching another anti-cyberflashing initiative targeting the U.K. government.

While Bumble's focus has been on online harms to women, the company has backed laws to prevent offline harms women face as well. Shortly after Iheme began at Bumble, she wrote a letter to Gov. Gavin Newsom asking him to sign a bill introduced by Assemblymember Cristina Garcia which would outlaw "stealthing," a term that refers to removing a condom without consent. Newsom signed the bill in October, making California the only state to explicitly outlaw stealthing as a form of sexual battery.

"We like to show up where other women are showing up to help support women, and this is one of these examples," Iheme said. "[Garcia] had been doing amazing work for several years to try to get that bill to pass, and we were just happy to help lift that work."

One of the biggest issues now facing women in the U.S. is a wave of new restrictions on abortion access. That's particularly true in Bumble's home state of Texas, where the recently enacted SB 8 banned nearly all abortions after six weeks. Bumble has made philanthropic donations to support women in Texas, and Wolfe Herd spoke out against SB 8 when it became law. But Roman said the company won't likely insert itself in policy conversations related to reproductive rights, given the size of its policy team. "We have to remain narrowly scoped in order to have the impact that I think we seek," Roman said. "Entire organizations do nothing but fight for reproductive rights and have existed for decades and are far better resourced and in a better position to take on that fight than we are."

Even as Iheme and Roman advocate for women, they said they are still actively involved in more traditional tech policy issues. Efforts to protect vulnerable groups online often run headlong into efforts to preserve tech platforms' legal protections, particularly when it comes to Section 230 immunity, which Bumble and other platforms benefit from. Some have argued, for instance, for a federal revenge porn exception to Section 230 immunity that would hold platforms liable for hosting that content. But tech interest groups have generally been wary of efforts to chip away at their liability protections, even through narrow exceptions.

Roman insists Bumble wouldn't be, in part because the company has already developed tools that automatically blur images that appear to contain nudity. "You sort of base how strong your position would be, for or against something, based on how risky it is to you," Roman said. "Our risk in that particular, very narrow situation will be pretty low."

Not every tech platform would make that calculus. But most tech platforms are not led by women. That makes a difference, according to Iheme. In any company, she said, women have to not only get a seat at the table, but they have to be able to speak and be heard at that table too. "All of those things indicate if you're able to shape policy and influence decisions," she said, noting that having women in a range of leadership positions, not just in the CEO slot, helps at Bumble.

The work Bumble is doing on women's issues may seem far afield from the core interests of a tech company, but Iheme and Roman argue it's anything but. They point out that every platform deals with harms against women, who are, Roman said, "presumably 50% of their customers."

"This is not just core to our business. This is core to Facebook's business. This is core to Twitter's business," she said. "We actually don't know why they haven't been talking about this aspect of it in their discussions or joining us at these tables."

Policy

Musk’s texts reveal what tech’s most powerful people really want

From Jack Dorsey to Joe Rogan, Musk’s texts are chock-full of überpowerful people, bending a knee to Twitter’s once and (still maybe?) future king.

“Maybe Oprah would be interested in joining the Twitter board if my bid succeeds,” one text reads.

Photo illustration: Patrick Pleul/picture alliance via Getty Images; Protocol

Elon Musk’s text inbox is a rarefied space. It’s a place where tech’s wealthiest casually commit to spending billions of dollars with little more than a thumbs-up emoji and trade tips on how to rewrite the rules for how hundreds of millions of people around the world communicate.

Now, Musk’s ongoing legal battle with Twitter is giving the rest of us a fleeting glimpse into that world. The collection of Musk’s private texts that was made public this week is chock-full of tech power brokers. While the messages are meant to reveal something about Musk’s motivations — and they do — they also say a lot about how things get done and deals get made among some of the most powerful people in the world.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Fintech

Circle’s CEO: This is not the time to ‘go crazy’

Jeremy Allaire is leading the stablecoin powerhouse in a time of heightened regulation.

“It’s a complex environment. So every CEO and every board has to be a little bit cautious, because there’s a lot of uncertainty,” Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire told Protocol at Converge22.

Photo: Circle

Sitting solo on a San Francisco stage, Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire asked tennis superstar Serena Williams what it’s like to face “unrelenting skepticism.”

“What do you do when someone says you can’t do this?” Allaire asked the athlete turned VC, who was beaming into Circle’s Converge22 convention by video.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Enterprise

Is Salesforce still a growth company? Investors are skeptical

Salesforce is betting that customer data platform Genie and new Slack features can push the company to $50 billion in revenue by 2026. But investors are skeptical about the company’s ability to deliver.

Photo: Marlena Sloss/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Salesforce has long been enterprise tech’s golden child. The company said everything customers wanted to hear and did everything investors wanted to see: It produced robust, consistent growth from groundbreaking products combined with an aggressive M&A strategy and a cherished culture, all operating under the helm of a bombastic, but respected, CEO and team of well-coiffed executives.

Dreamforce is the embodiment of that success. Every year, alongside frustrating San Francisco residents, the over-the-top celebration serves as a battle cry to the enterprise software industry, reminding everyone that Marc Benioff’s mighty fiefdom is poised to expand even deeper into your corporate IT stack.

Keep Reading Show less
Joe Williams

Joe Williams is a writer-at-large at Protocol. He previously covered enterprise software for Protocol, Bloomberg and Business Insider. Joe can be reached at JoeWilliams@Protocol.com. To share information confidentially, he can also be contacted on a non-work device via Signal (+1-309-265-6120) or JPW53189@protonmail.com.

Policy

The US and EU are splitting on tech policy. That’s putting the web at risk.

A conversation with Cédric O, the former French minister of state for digital.

“With the difficulty of the U.S. in finding political agreement or political basis to legislate more, we are facing a risk of decoupling in the long term between the EU and the U.S.”

Photo: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Cédric O, France’s former minister of state for digital, has been an advocate of Europe’s approach to tech and at the forefront of the continent’s relations with U.S. giants. Protocol caught up with O last week at a conference in New York focusing on social media’s negative effects on society and the possibilities of blockchain-based protocols for alternative networks.

O said watching the U.S. lag in tech policy — even as some states pass their own measures and federal bills gain momentum — has made him worry about the EU and U.S. decoupling. While not as drastic as a disentangling of economic fortunes between the West and China, such a divergence, as O describes it, could still make it functionally impossible for companies to serve users on both sides of the Atlantic with the same product.

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Latest Stories
Bulletins