Tim Cook, Ted Cruz and the strange politics of tech antitrust

Democrats and Republicans have found the tech reform debate scrambles traditional party politics — and the Apple CEO and Texas senator have found themselves chatting.

Capitol building

The Senate Judiciary Committee advanced a bill on Thursday that could remake the tech industry.

Photo: PartTime Portraits/Unsplash

Strange alliances formed ahead of Thursday's vote to advance a key antitrust bill to the Senate floor, with frequent foes like Sens. Amy Klobuchar and Ted Cruz supporting the measure, and prominent Democrats including California Sen. Dianne Feinstein pushing back against it.

Ultimately the bill moved out of the Senate Judiciary Committee by a vote of 16-6 after a surprisingly speedy debate (at least, speedy for the Senate). Even some of the lawmakers who called for further changes agreed to move the bill forward — a sign that the itch to finally regulate Big Tech after years of congressional inaction is intensifying, even as the issue scrambles traditional party politics in a way that could threaten its final passage.

The bipartisan measure, which is led by Klobuchar and would ban self-preferencing by Big Tech platforms such as Amazon or Google, represents the most serious and far-reaching proposal to remake the mightiest tech businesses. The American Innovation and Choice Online Act prohibits online gatekeepers from "favoring their own products or services," and would largely prevent Google, for instance, from giving a boost to its own local search results over Yelp's. It has brought out an unusual coalition, uniting Democrats hoping to extend competition rules with Republicans who object to platforms’ treatment of conservative speech.

“We have a lot of support for this bill,” Klobuchar said early in the session.

On the other side, the bill’s opponents consisted largely of the usual suspects: Republicans who have been historically sympathetic to business leaders who themselves are loud opponents of the bill. Some other lawmakers, from both sides of the aisle, expressed concerns about the measure’s effect on issues like privacy.

Yet it was California Democrats, concerned about a measure that would target some of the biggest employers in their state, who exposed perhaps the biggest fissures.

“It’s specifically designed to target a small number of specific companies, most of which are headquartered in my home state,” Feinstein complained, saying that she had heard that some federal agencies might have concerns about the bill’s effect on national security. Some lawmakers have worried that provisions designed to stop Big Tech from hoarding data as a way to box out rivals could allow foreign companies to obtain useful information, or even that an assault on U.S. tech giants could give China a leg up.

Klobuchar later jumped in to defend her bill against her longtime colleague, calling Feinstein's allegation a “bold statement” that she believed was "not true.”

Despite her concerns, Feinstein ultimately voted to advance the bill, as did several other senators who said they wanted to see additional changes before final passage. Those included Democrats Patrick Leahy and Alex Padilla (the other senator from California), as well as Cruz and John Kennedy, both Republicans.

Cruz and Cook

During the hearing, Klobuchar said the bill was informed by extensive consultation and scholarship, answering concerns from lawmakers and the tech industry that the full committee had not held a hearing on the measure.

Big Tech companies and trade groups, including the powerful U.S. Chamber of Commerce, have lobbied furiously in opposition to the bill with a flurry of letters and public statements arguing that the bill did not have sufficient legislative hearing and that it posed a danger to privacy and popular services.

There’s been lobbying behind the scenes too: At one point during the hearing, Cruz said he’d spent 40 minutes on the phone with Tim Cook on Wednesday, during which the Apple CEO worried the bill would “erect obstacles to Apple giving consumers the ability to opt out of apps monitoring what they’re doing online,” Cruz said.

Apple has spent recent years feuding with Meta, and the conflict got particularly hot last year when Apple allowed users to opt out of Facebook and other apps' tracking on the iPhone.

Klobuchar and Chuck Grassley, the bill’s co-sponsor and the top Republican on the judiciary panel, successfully introduced changes that Klobuchar said would protect users’ ability to opt out of third-party data sharing and would ensure that firms could still offer popular add-on subscription services, such as Amazon Prime or Google Maps.

Apple didn’t respond to requests for comment on the conversation. Cruz ultimately voted to move the bill out of committee, despite calling Cook’s concerns reasonable.

‘Get to a yes’

While the bill is ostensibly about antitrust, Thursday’s debate also included familiar partisan debates about what the bill would mean for regulating speech online. Like several Republicans who spoke, Cruz urged the panel to do more to address conservative allegations that social media platforms silence right-wing speech. On the opposite end of the spectrum, Padilla, the California Democrat, said the measure would actually do too much to tip the scales away from content moderation because a provision within it could allow services like, say, Parler to argue that blocking them is anticompetitive.

“This provision can be a gift to bad actors seeking to prevent platforms from blocking business users that peddle hate speech or … election disinformation,” he said.

Several Republicans also worried that the bill gave too much power to the Federal Trade Commission and other agencies, and offered little opportunity for companies to argue that their conduct benefits consumers more than it hurts them — a common antitrust defense.

“I have questions about who’s covered by the law, what it permits and what’s going to happen in terms of enforcement,” said Republican Thom Tillis, who prepared dozens of amendments, though he didn’t bring them up for a vote and said he hoped “to work to get to a yes.”

Klobuchar originally introduced the bill last fall, after several months of work, many of which were devoted to modifying a proposal that grew out of the House’s 16-month investigation into Big Tech’s competitive practices.

Although the House proposal was also bipartisan, Klobuchar will still need a filibuster-proof majority to pass her version in the Senate, meaning she and her allies will need to spend more time at the negotiating table. The fact that Klobuchar’s bill has such broad and high-level support on both sides of the aisle has excited tech critics. Yet the complicated politics and conflicting calls for further changes signal that the bill still has to overcome the intense legislative inertia that has doomed many other efforts, even as time runs out in the current Congress.

“Nearly 40 years later, we are still here without a single piece of meaningful competition legislation addressing the massive economy that [the internet] has created,” Klobuchar said in her introduction. “This is our moment.”



Michael Pryor, co-founder of Trello (now a part of Atlassian), explains what he's learned along the way and his advice for other companies that are looking to build a truly collaborative culture that keeps employees feeling connected — from wherever they choose to work.

Learn more


Musk’s texts reveal what tech’s most powerful people really want

From Jack Dorsey to Joe Rogan, Musk’s texts are chock-full of überpowerful people, bending a knee to Twitter’s once and (still maybe?) future king.

“Maybe Oprah would be interested in joining the Twitter board if my bid succeeds,” one text reads.

Photo illustration: Patrick Pleul/picture alliance via Getty Images; Protocol

Elon Musk’s text inbox is a rarefied space. It’s a place where tech’s wealthiest casually commit to spending billions of dollars with little more than a thumbs-up emoji and trade tips on how to rewrite the rules for how hundreds of millions of people around the world communicate.

Now, Musk’s ongoing legal battle with Twitter is giving the rest of us a fleeting glimpse into that world. The collection of Musk’s private texts that was made public this week is chock-full of tech power brokers. While the messages are meant to reveal something about Musk’s motivations — and they do — they also say a lot about how things get done and deals get made among some of the most powerful people in the world.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

Circle’s CEO: This is not the time to ‘go crazy’

Jeremy Allaire is leading the stablecoin powerhouse in a time of heightened regulation.

“It’s a complex environment. So every CEO and every board has to be a little bit cautious, because there’s a lot of uncertainty,” Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire told Protocol at Converge22.

Photo: Circle

Sitting solo on a San Francisco stage, Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire asked tennis superstar Serena Williams what it’s like to face “unrelenting skepticism.”

“What do you do when someone says you can’t do this?” Allaire asked the athlete turned VC, who was beaming into Circle’s Converge22 convention by video.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.


Is Salesforce still a growth company? Investors are skeptical

Salesforce is betting that customer data platform Genie and new Slack features can push the company to $50 billion in revenue by 2026. But investors are skeptical about the company’s ability to deliver.

Photo: Marlena Sloss/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Salesforce has long been enterprise tech’s golden child. The company said everything customers wanted to hear and did everything investors wanted to see: It produced robust, consistent growth from groundbreaking products combined with an aggressive M&A strategy and a cherished culture, all operating under the helm of a bombastic, but respected, CEO and team of well-coiffed executives.

Dreamforce is the embodiment of that success. Every year, alongside frustrating San Francisco residents, the over-the-top celebration serves as a battle cry to the enterprise software industry, reminding everyone that Marc Benioff’s mighty fiefdom is poised to expand even deeper into your corporate IT stack.

Keep Reading Show less
Joe Williams

Joe Williams is a writer-at-large at Protocol. He previously covered enterprise software for Protocol, Bloomberg and Business Insider. Joe can be reached at JoeWilliams@Protocol.com. To share information confidentially, he can also be contacted on a non-work device via Signal (+1-309-265-6120) or JPW53189@protonmail.com.


The US and EU are splitting on tech policy. That’s putting the web at risk.

A conversation with Cédric O, the former French minister of state for digital.

“With the difficulty of the U.S. in finding political agreement or political basis to legislate more, we are facing a risk of decoupling in the long term between the EU and the U.S.”

Photo: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Cédric O, France’s former minister of state for digital, has been an advocate of Europe’s approach to tech and at the forefront of the continent’s relations with U.S. giants. Protocol caught up with O last week at a conference in New York focusing on social media’s negative effects on society and the possibilities of blockchain-based protocols for alternative networks.

O said watching the U.S. lag in tech policy — even as some states pass their own measures and federal bills gain momentum — has made him worry about the EU and U.S. decoupling. While not as drastic as a disentangling of economic fortunes between the West and China, such a divergence, as O describes it, could still make it functionally impossible for companies to serve users on both sides of the Atlantic with the same product.

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Latest Stories