In Congress, social media habits are becoming as polarized as politics, according to a new report

The report found Democrats couldn't stop talking about Trump in 2020. For Republicans, the word Biden barely registered.

American flag with crack through middle

A new Pew report paints a picture of how Republicans and Democrats shape both their losses and their victories online.

Image: No-Mad/Getty Images

In the runup to the 2020 election, the one word Democrats in Congress used on social media more than any other was "Trump." As for Republicans? The name Biden didn't even make the top 10.

These findings come from a new report by the Pew Research Center that analyzed how members of Congress from different political parties used social media during the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections. Their findings suggest that lawmakers' social media habits are becoming as polarized as their politics.

Pew researchers analyzed the Facebook and Twitter posts of Congress members during the 2016 and 2020 election cycles to see not only how their use of the platform changed over time, but also how their social media strategies diverged by party. By sorting these posts according to their most frequently used words and other distinctive characteristics, the Pew researchers paint a clear picture of how the two parties have sought to shape both their losses and their victories online.

The researchers looked at the words that were used most distinctively by each party, which is to say, the words that were used more by one party than the other at different times. After Biden won the 2020 election, for instance, Republican mentions of the words "recount," "fraud" and "irregularity" rose, compared to the period before the election. When Trump won in 2016, on the other hand, the most distinctly used phrase from Democrats was "President-elect Trump."

Pew's analysis of the words used by each party also revealed differences in their messaging. For Democrats, Pew found the most distinctive terms were ones that dealt with issues of equality, voting, COVID-19 and health care, while Republicans used the words "bless," "Israel," "defund" and "liberal" disproportionately. And while "health" and "COVID" were among the top 10 words used most frequently by Democratic lawmakers in 2020, for Republicans, those same terms ranked 46th and 18th respectively.

The words politicians used tell only part of the story. The links they share tell the other. The most recent election saw an increase in what the researchers call "'link polarization," which the researchers define as the proportion of links that are "shared primarily or exclusively by members of one party." In 2016, just over half of the links shared by lawmakers went to domains used "predominantly or exclusively by members of one party," and in 2020 this figure grew to 67%.

Some of those domains include party-specific fundraising sites or even candidates' own websites, but others include partisan news outlets like Breitbart and Newsmax. The research clearly illustrated just how much the news diets of politicians in different parties diverge, with the median Democratic legislator linking to 50 different domains during the 2020 election, and the median Republican sharing from just 19.

Even as politicians grew more polarized in terms of the links they shared between the 2016 and 2020 elections, however, a smaller percentage of posts contained links in 2020, compared to 2016. It's not that lawmakers were posting less. In fact, legislators posted on social media platforms more and with greater engagement during the 2020 election cycle than in 2016. They were just relying less on third-party sources.

Although Pew researchers didn't attribute this shift to any one phenomenon, one possibility is that between 2016 and 2020, lawmakers felt more inclined to use their own voices, rather than rely on news outlets or outside experts. If these trends persist, that could drive both political parties even farther into their own echo chambers – both online and off.


Crypto’s big crash

Is the tech superbubble about to burst?

red and blue light streaks
Photo by Maxim Hopman on Unsplash

This week, we're diving into the crypto crash. What led luna to fall off a cliff? Are we seeing the dot-com bust, part two? Protocol fintech editor Owen Thomas explains it all to us. Then entertainment reporter Janko Roettgers joins us to share the inside scoop on his exclusive interview with Mark Zuckerberg. We learn why Meta is betting it all on the metaverse and Brian finally gets to ask the most pressing question on his mind this week: What does Mark smell like?

And finally, Caitlin and Brian take a moment to reminisce about the iPod, which was put out to pasture this week after more than two decades on the market.

Keep Reading Show less
Caitlin McGarry

Caitlin McGarry is the news editor at Protocol.

Sponsored Content

Foursquare data story: leveraging location data for site selection

We take a closer look at points of interest and foot traffic patterns to demonstrate how location data can be leveraged to inform better site selecti­on strategies.

Imagine: You’re the leader of a real estate team at a restaurant brand looking to open a new location in Manhattan. You have two options you’re evaluating: one site in SoHo, and another site in the Flatiron neighborhood. Which do you choose?

Keep Reading Show less

Say goodbye to unicorns. The cloud centaurs are here.

Protocol caught up with Bessemer Venture Partners’ Kent Bennett to discuss the state of the cloud, the new SaaS models poised to make a dent on the industry and why the firm developed a new SaaS milestone.

Bessemer Venture Partners developed a new SaaS milestone that it’s calling the “centaur,” for startups that reach over $100 million in annual recurring revenue.

Photo: Bessemer Venture Partners

Kent Bennett thinks the SaaS business model is the “greatest business model in the history of the planet.” As a partner at Bessemer Venture Partners, it’s fitting that he’s bullish on the cloud: Bennett was one of the main authors of Bessemer’s annual State of the Cloud report, which gives a bird's eye view of what’s happening in the cloud economy.

In the report, Bessemer analyzed everything from the new ways SaaS companies are trying to monetize their software to what areas are still underserved by SaaS. The firm also developed a new SaaS milestone that it’s calling the “centaur,” for startups that reach over $100 million in annual recurring revenue.

Keep Reading Show less
Aisha Counts

Aisha Counts (@aishacounts) is a reporter at Protocol covering enterprise software. Formerly, she was a management consultant for EY. She's based in Los Angeles and can be reached at acounts@protocol.com.


The future of electrification, according to Google Trends

People are searching more often for how to electrify their lives, from induction stoves to e-bikes.

From “induction stove” to “home EV charging,” search interest is rising.

Photo: Michael Tuszynski via Unsplash

Feeling cynical about the state of the climate? Well, it’s hardly a guarantee of a liveable climate, but a peek at Google Trends might provide a glimmer of hope.

People are increasingly ready for the all-electric future at home and on the road. From “induction stove” to “home EV charging,” search interest is rising. And while climate change is certainly not up to the individual to solve — that’s mainly on governments and corporations — shifts in public tastes can bring about policy changes. Fast. (See: outdoor dining in major cities; marriage equality.)

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).

What Elon's Twitter 'hold' even means

The answers to all the Musk-iest Twitter acquisition questions.

Keep in mind that Elon Musk isn't exactly known for telling the truth.

Photo illustration: Getty Images; Unsplash; Protocol

Elon Musk can tweet anything he likes, because he’s Elon Musk, and he’s buying Twitter, and free speech is awesome. What he can’t do is make false tweets true.

Musk said Friday that the Twitter deal was temporarily on hold while he looked into a report that spam bots and other fake accounts made up less than 5% of its users. He added, hours after his first tweet, that he was “still committed to [the] acquisition.” Investors promptly sold off shares of Twitter, thinking that Musk’s words somehow had meaning, embodied intent or otherwise had an impact on the world. They did not, eppur si muove, and yet the stock market moved.

Keep Reading Show less
Owen Thomas

Owen Thomas is a senior editor at Protocol overseeing venture capital and financial technology coverage. He was previously business editor at the San Francisco Chronicle and before that editor-in-chief at ReadWrite, a technology news site. You're probably going to remind him that he was managing editor at Valleywag, Gawker Media's Silicon Valley gossip rag. He lives in San Francisco with his husband and Ramona the Love Terrier, whom you should follow on Instagram.

Latest Stories