Chip subsidies are popular in Congress. They still might fail.

The Democrats have an ambitious legislative agenda following the July recess. Chip subsidies hang in the balance, and Sen. Mitch McConnell wants Democrats to stay focused on them.


USICA — and its $52 billion in subsidies for domestic chip manufacturing — no longer seems to be a sure thing.

Photo: Chris Ratcliffe/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Congressional Democrats are in need of a signature legislative win ahead of the midterms, and the United States Innovation and Competition Act could be exactly that. Chipmakers including Intel, Samsung and TSMC have forged ahead with plans to build fabrication facilities in the U.S., trusting that Congress will eventually sort things out and pass the bill.

But with Congress currently suspended for a tense July recess, the USICA — and its $52 billion in subsidies for domestic chip manufacturing — no longer seems to be a sure thing.

The industry’s patience is wearing thin. In June, Intel made the largely symbolic move of delaying its groundbreaking ceremony for its Ohio fabrication facility, which ultimately could involve an investment of around $100 billion. A TSMC board member also recently warned the timing of the $12 billion Arizona factory completion would depend on Congress passing subsidies.

Major industry players are heading to D.C. to lobby for the subsidies, which have significant bipartisan support but are ensnared in thousand-page-long bills, their political baggage dragging them down.

IBM’s vice president of government and regulatory affairs, Chris Padilla, said the company plans to fly employees to D.C. in the coming weeks to hold hundreds of meetings with policymakers. “We’re planning to spend this month making an all-out push,” he told Protocol.

Unfortunately for Democrats, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell understands their need for a legislative win and intends to use it against them. At the end of June, he tweeted: “Let me be perfectly clear: there will be no bipartisan USICA as long as Democrats are pursuing a partisan reconciliation bill.”

Meanwhile, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer is forging ahead with an ambitious legislative agenda that includes USICA and a new version of the failed Build Back Better bill. The resurrected Build Back Better deal is expected to introduce prescription drug pricing reforms, extend Affordable Care Act subsidies, raise some taxes and provide as much as $300 billion in subsidies for green energy initiatives. Further complicating things, Democrats also face pressure to make good on long-awaited promises to pass their tech antitrust bills and to codify Roe v. Wade.

“What could happen from all this is that you wind up getting nothing,” said Padilla. He added that as Congress nears the end of session, “everything gets linked to everything else — and then what you get usually is a grand bargain or nothing.”

Even if the Democrats go along with McConnell’s demand to only focus on USICA, the reconciliation process won’t be easy. The House and Senate both already passed versions of the bill, but with major differences in partisan slants: The House’s COMPETES Act passed with only one Republican vote in February, while the Senate USICA bill passed with a healthy bipartisan coalition of 68 votes at the end of March.

“It is critical to get the bipartisan Innovation Act to the president’s desk before the end of August,” Rep. Ro Khanna, one of the bill’s co-sponsors, told Protocol. “We cannot continue to blow by deadline after deadline for a bill to create thousands of good, paying jobs and ensure the United States remains competitive with China.”

Key differences between the House and Senate versions center on trade and immigration: Only the House version of the bill includes a renewal of trade adjustment assistance programs and plans to expand the immigration system for high-skilled tech workers. The proposed immigration reforms exempt foreign-born workers with doctoral degrees in STEM fields from annual green card limits that often force them to leave the U.S.

These difficulties won’t easily be resolved, so the chip industry has a backup plan: get the subsidies stripped out and passed on their own.

One Republican staffer told Protocol the USICA package seems to be falling down the priority list for Democrats. The staffer said Democrats are now more inclined to focus on issues that would appeal to voters ahead of midterms, such as the drug pricing reforms.

The semiconductor subsidies aren’t likely to do much for voters, unless maybe they happen to live near proposed facilities. Congressional approval ratings have continued their steady decline to just 16% in June. Inflation, gun control and abortion access have emerged as key issues heading into elections. McConnell’s bargain would force the Democrats to prioritize USICA, with the intended consequence of hamstringing a bill that includes tax hikes.

That leaves the possibility that nothing at all gets passed — not USICA, and not the skinny package focusing on subsidies. In that case, the chip industry would likely find itself working with a Republican, business-friendly Congress after midterms, and it would still have a shot at getting the subsidies then.

That makes it all a question of timing: The chip industry and its champions in government have argued that nations such as Japan, Germany and France will lure chipmakers away from the U.S. with their own subsidy packages, which are already on the table.

“Mark my words ... if Labor Day comes and goes and this Chips Act isn't passed by Congress, these companies will not wait, and they will expand in other countries,” Commerce Department Secretary Gina Raimondo warned at the end of June.


How GM plans to make its ambitious EV goals reality

The automaker's chief sustainability officer is optimistic that GM is well-positioned to rapidly scale up the EV side of its business.

"I think everything that’s been put in place to support the transition will be a real positive for the industry and for the country."

Photo: Eva Marie Uzcategui/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Automakers are on the cusp of an entirely new era.

The transition to electric vehicles is quickly becoming more than just theoretical: More models are coming onto the scene every day. This week, the Inflation Reduction Act was signed into law, enshrining a new structure for EV tax credits and offering a boost to domestic critical mineral mining. The transition isn’t coming a moment too soon, given that the transportation sector makes up the largest share of greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).

As management teams at financial institutions look for best practices to make part of their regular toolkit, they are reaching most for the ones that increase the speed and reduce the risk of large-scale change.

That forward-thinking approach can lead financial institutions to leverage AI technology, which can help give decision-makers trusted tools to solve integral challenges vital to the health of the business. One of the leading providers of AI and machine-learning software, DataRobot continues to attract clients in financial services who want to de-risk their AI investments and rapidly scale AI to almost every part of their operations, resulting in improved productivity and higher customer satisfaction.

Keep Reading Show less
David Silverberg
David Silverberg is a Toronto-based freelance journalist, editor and writing coach. He writes for The Washington Post, BBC News, Business Insider, The Toronto Star, New Scientist, Fodor's, and several alumni magazines. He also writes for brands such as 23andme, Shopify and Bold Commerce. He has served as editor of B2B News Network, Canada's only B2B news magazine, and Digital Journal, a leading pioneer in citizen journalism. Find more about him at www.davidsilverberg.ca

How Embracer Group bought ‘Lord of the Rings’ rights for a bargain

The Swedish holding company, known best for its gaming acquisitions, bought the rights to “The Lord of the Rings.” But the deal is much more complicated than it seems.

Who really owns LOTR's rights?

Photo: New Line/WireImage

A new stakeholder has entered the complex licensing web of “The Lord of the Rings,” and the landmark deal has further complicated the already messy media empire surrounding author J.R.R. Tolkien’s fantasy epic.

The buyer, the acquisition-hungry Swedish gaming conglomerate known as Embracer Group, has purchased Middle-earth Enterprises, and with it the associated film, video game, board game, merchandise, theater production and theme park rights to the core LOTR book trilogy and “The Hobbit'' from its previous owner, The Saul Zaentz Company. Formerly Tolkien Enterprises, Zaentz’s holding group has held onto the rights since purchasing them from United Artists in 1976. (Tolkien initially sold them to UA in 1969, four years before his death.)

Keep Reading Show less
Nick Statt

Nick Statt is Protocol's video game reporter. Prior to joining Protocol, he was news editor at The Verge covering the gaming industry, mobile apps and antitrust out of San Francisco, in addition to managing coverage of Silicon Valley tech giants and startups. He now resides in Rochester, New York, home of the garbage plate and, completely coincidentally, the World Video Game Hall of Fame. He can be reached at nstatt@protocol.com.


Upstart has a new plan to sell Wall Street on its loans

The AI-powered lender will hold some loans on its balance sheet as it seeks partners for long-term capital.

Despite the current struggles, Upstart views the marketplace model as the best way to write to keep its loan business growing.

Photo: Upstart

After a revenue drop its CEO called “unacceptable,” the leadership at fintech lender Upstart is making a bet on the strength of its ability to underwrite loans with AI.

The San Mateo company is planning to leave some loans on its balance sheet that investors do not want to buy, as concerns about the economy shift Wall Street away from backing riskier consumer debt. Rather than pull back on its lending in response, the company said it will hold some loans as it seeks longer-term capital partners.

Keep Reading Show less
Ryan Deffenbaugh
Ryan Deffenbaugh is a reporter at Protocol focused on fintech. Before joining Protocol, he reported on New York's technology industry for Crain's New York Business. He is based in New York and can be reached at rdeffenbaugh@protocol.com.

Does your boss sound a little funny? It might be an audio deepfake

Voice deepfake attacks against enterprises, often aimed at tricking corporate employees into transferring money to the attackers, are on the rise. And at least in some cases, they’re succeeding.

Audio deepfakes are a new spin on the impersonation tactics that have long been used in social engineering and phishing attacks, but most people aren’t trained to disbelieve their ears.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

As a cyberattack investigator, Nick Giacopuzzi’s work now includes responding to growing attacks against businesses that involve deepfaked voices — and has ultimately left him convinced that in today's world, "we need to question everything."

In particular, Giacopuzzi has investigated multiple incidents where an attacker deployed fabricated audio, created with the help of AI, that purported to be an executive or a manager at a company. You can guess how it went: The fake boss asked an employee to urgently transfer funds. And in some cases, it’s worked, he said.

Keep Reading Show less
Kyle Alspach

Kyle Alspach ( @KyleAlspach) is a senior reporter at Protocol, focused on cybersecurity. He has covered the tech industry since 2010 for outlets including VentureBeat, CRN and the Boston Globe. He lives in Portland, Oregon, and can be reached at kalspach@protocol.com.

Latest Stories