Protocol | Policy

Glitches and confusion are blocking some from FCC internet discounts

Americans eligible for the Emergency Broadband Benefit program say they're getting rejected by Comcast and Spectrum after being approved by the FCC. But why?

Glitches and confusion are blocking some from FCC internet discounts

Comcast is a participant in the FCC's Emergency Broadband Benefit program.

Photo illustration: Igor Golovniov/Getty Images

Louis Corsaro first heard he might be eligible for a new government-funded discount on his internet bills from his internet provider, Comcast. Corsaro, a spokesperson for Point Park University, received an email in May about the Federal Communications Commission's Emergency Broadband Benefit program and followed the instructions to apply through the FCC's verification site.

He answered questions about who he is and why he qualified — his daughter has a disability and is on Medicaid — and soon received an email back. "Your application has been approved," the email read. It included instructions to sign up with his internet service provider, so Corsaro went to Comcast's website and filled out the required form.

Soon after, he was rejected.

Over the last several weeks, Corsaro said he's reapplied and been rejected by Comcast another three times. He's followed the circuitous trails of automated FCC phone lines that all lead to dead ends and appealed to the kindness of mystified Comcast agents, who have told him again and again that he needs to finish the FCC's verification process. "I keep telling them, 'I've been approved. There's nothing to finish,'" Corsaro said.

He's not alone. A nursing student in California, who asked to remain anonymous to protect information about her income status, told Protocol she's been experiencing the same problems with Spectrum. Like Corsaro, she also received an email from the FCC saying she was approved. And like Corsaro, she's also been repeatedly rejected by Spectrum and told to complete the FCC eligibility screening. "It seems like everyone is very confused," she said. "Once they do their application on their end, everything just goes into the void."

The FCC announced this week it had already signed up 2.3 million households for the Emergency Broadband Benefit, which was designed to help people during the pandemic. But while the agency is heralding these numbers as a success, the program appears to be plagued by ongoing issues that are causing some ISPs to block eligible Americans from accessing up to $50 a month off of their internet bills. Those delays have real consequences for people like Corsaro: The $3.2 billion pot of funding is only expected to last a matter of months.

'Wish I could fire Spectrum'

It's hard to know how widespread the problem is, but several Reddit threads include comments from users caught in the same cycle Corsaro described with both Comcast and Spectrum. One Redditor said they'd made more than 10 calls and even a trip to a local Comcast Xfinity store but still hadn't sorted out the situation. "One customer rep even flat out told me I'd have the best luck getting it by changing providers which is probably what I'm going to do since my contract is up next month," they wrote.

Another user described a similarly Kafkaesque journey with Spectrum, during which they received multiple emails asking them to complete the FCC's verification process after they'd already been approved. When the Redditor finally gave up and asked Spectrum to cancel their application, they said a Spectrum rep couldn't even find the application in the system. "Wish I could fire Spectrum, but they unfortunately have a monopoly in my area for internet and they know it," the Redditor wrote.

Corsaro struggled for weeks to get a clear answer as to why his application was being held up. Some customer service agents said the problem was on his end. Some told him it was an internal issue Comcast was trying to solve. One said that some information from the FCC's verifier site isn't properly transferring to Comcast's system. Corsaro thought he saw a light at the end of the tunnel when that rep offered to manually input the missing information into Comcast's system — but that plan failed too.

It was only after Protocol contacted Comcast for this story that Corsaro got a call saying his case had been "elevated" on Wednesday. Corsaro said a Comcast rep explained that the problem stemmed from the fact that Comcast's website didn't initially include a field to enter his daughter's name, and his daughter's Medicaid coverage is what made him eligible for the program. "She took my daughter's info and redid the application," Corsaro said. "She said she will call me every day until it is resolved."

Elm Street v. Elm St.

While Corsaro's issue might be somewhat unique, another possible explanation for some of the problems people are facing is simply lousy database matching between the Universal Services Administrative Co., which is the FCC-designated organization that runs the program, and the internet service providers themselves.

It turns out even the smallest differences in how people enter their data into the different systems can trip them up — for example, writing Elm St. in one and Elm Street in the other. "We've learned in these early days of the program that the information consumers provide to an Internet provider must exactly match, to the letter, abbreviation, and number, the information they enter in the National Verifier," Comcast spokesperson Joel Shadle said in a statement. He noted that Comcast is "continually working with the FCC and USAC to make the process easy to navigate."

Corsaro said one customer service rep along the way did ask him whether he'd entered his middle name during the FCC verification process, but he couldn't remember, and the verifier site didn't offer him any way to check. Besides, the idea that such a small discrepancy could be the issue seemed like a problem all on its own. "Here you have the last four digits of my social, my name, my address, all this identifying information, and I'm getting declined because of a middle name?" Corsaro said. "There's clearly massive issues here."

FCC press secretary Paloma Perez said the agency is aware of the issue and is "working closely with consumer groups and participating providers to make sure that eligible households are enrolled in the program with the provider of their choice and receiving the benefit. We are also trouble-shooting challenges that would be expected when standing up a program of this size and this quickly."

Perez pointed to a bulletin USAC sent to internet providers this week, announcing a series of updates that might address some of these problems, including giving providers like Comcast and Spectrum easier ways to look up their customers. Instead of having to enter customers' information "exactly as it appears on the consumer's National Verifier application," the bulletin reads, beginning June 24, providers will be able to look customers up "using only the consumer's application ID from the National Verifier, their first and last name, and their date of birth."

Spectrum spokesperson Rich Ruggiero said these changes "will address the enrollment challenges that can result — regardless of provider — if the customer's [personally identifying information] doesn't match exactly with was on their application with the verifier." Comcast's Shadle also said the USAC updates should "further streamline this process for customers."

But that change is still weeks away and more than a month since the emergency broadband program launched. The matching problem is also hardly the only issue customers are experiencing trying to get enrolled in the program. Both Corsaro and the nursing student reached out to Protocol after reading our earlier story about how Spectrum is requiring all applicants to the program to agree at the outset to receive continued service at non-discounted prices once the program ends.

For Corsaro, the process of calling Comcast daily has been a headache, but a manageable one. While he says the discount would certainly help, his family already has internet access, and he has the time and ability to keep following up. It's the bigger picture that concerns him. "There are probably people in much more dire situations than me, who need this more than I do," he said. "I wonder what happens when they aren't able to follow up ... and follow up."

Google’s latest plans for Chromecast are all about free TV

The company is in talks to add dozens of free linear channels to its newest streaming dongle.

Google launched its new Google TV service a year ago. Now, the company wants to add free TV channels to it.

Photo: Google

Google is looking to make its Chromecast streaming device more appealing to cord cutters. The company has plans to add free TV channels to Google TV, the Android-based smart TV platform that powers Chromecast as well as select smart TVs from companies including Sony and TCL, Protocol has learned.

To achieve this, Google has held talks with companies distributing so-called FAST (free, ad-supported streaming television) channels, according to multiple industry insiders. These channels have the look and feel of traditional linear TV networks, complete with ad breaks and on-screen graphics. Free streaming channels could launch on Google TV as early as this fall, but the company may also wait to announce the initiative in conjunction with its smart TV partners in early 2022.

Keep Reading Show less
Janko Roettgers

Janko Roettgers (@jank0) is a senior reporter at Protocol, reporting on the shifting power dynamics between tech, media, and entertainment, including the impact of new technologies. Previously, Janko was Variety's first-ever technology writer in San Francisco, where he covered big tech and emerging technologies. He has reported for Gigaom, Frankfurter Rundschau, Berliner Zeitung, and ORF, among others. He has written three books on consumer cord-cutting and online music and co-edited an anthology on internet subcultures. He lives with his family in Oakland.

While it's easy to get lost in the operational and technical side of a transaction, it's important to remember the third component of a payment. That is, the human behind the screen.

Over the last two years, many retailers have seen the benefit of investing in new, flexible payments. Ones that reflect the changing lifestyles of younger spenders, who are increasingly holding onto their cash — despite reports to the contrary. This means it's more important than ever for merchants to take note of the latest payment innovations so they can tap into the savings of the COVID-19 generation.

Keep Reading Show less
Antoine Nougue,Checkout.com

Antoine Nougue is Head of Europe at Checkout.com. He works with ambitious enterprise businesses to help them scale and grow their operations through payment processing services. He is responsible for leading the European sales, customer success, engineering & implementation teams and is based out of London, U.K.

Protocol | Policy

Iris scans for food in Jordanian refugee camps

More than 80% of the refugees in Jordanian camps now use iris scans to pay for their groceries. Refugee advocates say this is a huge future privacy problem.

A refugee uses their iris to access their account.

Photo: KHALIL MAZRAAWI/AFP via Getty Images

Every day, tens of thousands of refugees in the two main camps in Jordan pay for their groceries and withdraw their cash not with a card, but with a scan of their eye.

Nowhere in the United States can someone pay for groceries with an iris scan (though the Department of Homeland Security is considering collecting iris scans from U.S. immigrants, and Clear uses iris scans to verify identities for paying customers at airports) — but in the Jordanian refugee camps, biometric scanners are an everyday sight at grocery stores and ATMs. More than 80% of the 33,000-plus refugees who receive cash assistance and (most of them Syrian) and live in these camps use the United Nations' Refugee Agency iris-scanning system, which verifies identity through eye scans in order to distribute cash and food refugee assistance. Refugees can opt out of the program, but verifying identity without it is so complex that most do not.

Keep Reading Show less
Anna Kramer

Anna Kramer is a reporter at Protocol (Twitter: @ anna_c_kramer, email: akramer@protocol.com), where she writes about labor and workplace issues. Prior to joining the team, she covered tech and small business for the San Francisco Chronicle and privacy for Bloomberg Law. She is a recent graduate of Brown University, where she studied International Relations and Arabic and wrote her senior thesis about surveillance tools and technological development in the Middle East.

Protocol | China

Weibo is muzzling users for discussing a landmark #metoo case

A number of accounts have been suspended, even deleted, after voicing support for the plaintiff.

Photo: Photo by Kevin Frayer/Getty Images

As a Beijing court dismissed China's landmark sexual harassment case on Tuesday, Weibo censors acted to muzzle a number of accounts that voiced support for the accuser, or even simply discussed the trial beforehand.

In 2018, the plaintiff Zhou Xiaoxuan, better known by the nickname Xianzi, filed a high-profile #MeToo case against Zhu Jun, a renowned state broadcast show host. Zhou claimed that Zhu sexually harassed her while she was an intern on Zhu's show in 2014. Chinese web users have closely followed the civil suit, which has also drawn international media attention.

Keep Reading Show less
Shen Lu

Shen Lu is a reporter with Protocol | China. Her writing has appeared in Foreign Policy, The New York Times and POLITICO, among other publications. She can be reached at shenlu@protocol.com.

Protocol | Enterprise

Take that, Slack: ServiceNow gets a little closer to Microsoft Teams

ServiceNow is expanding its decade-long partnership with Microsoft as both companies intensify their rivalry with Salesforce.

Microsoft and ServiceNow's "coopetition" is aimed at a higher goal: undermining Salesforce, which is fast becoming the main rival for both vendors.

Photo: Uwe Anspach/Getty Images

For ServiceNow, Microsoft is the lesser of two evils compared to Salesforce.

After ditching Slack for Teams following the Salesforce acquisition, ServiceNow is deepening its decade-long partnership with Microsoft, promising co-development of new products and fresh integration capabilities within Teams, it plans to announce Thursday.

Keep Reading Show less
Joe Williams

Joe Williams is a senior reporter at Protocol covering enterprise software, including industry giants like Salesforce, Microsoft, IBM and Oracle. He previously covered emerging technology for Business Insider. Joe can be reached at JWilliams@Protocol.com. To share information confidentially, he can also be contacted on a non-work device via Signal (+1-309-265-6120) or JPW53189@protonmail.com.

Latest Stories