Glitches and confusion are blocking some from FCC internet discounts

Americans eligible for the Emergency Broadband Benefit program say they're getting rejected by Comcast and Spectrum after being approved by the FCC. But why?

Glitches and confusion are blocking some from FCC internet discounts

Comcast is a participant in the FCC's Emergency Broadband Benefit program.

Photo illustration: Igor Golovniov/Getty Images

Louis Corsaro first heard he might be eligible for a new government-funded discount on his internet bills from his internet provider, Comcast. Corsaro, a spokesperson for Point Park University, received an email in May about the Federal Communications Commission's Emergency Broadband Benefit program and followed the instructions to apply through the FCC's verification site.

He answered questions about who he is and why he qualified — his daughter has a disability and is on Medicaid — and soon received an email back. "Your application has been approved," the email read. It included instructions to sign up with his internet service provider, so Corsaro went to Comcast's website and filled out the required form.

Soon after, he was rejected.

Over the last several weeks, Corsaro said he's reapplied and been rejected by Comcast another three times. He's followed the circuitous trails of automated FCC phone lines that all lead to dead ends and appealed to the kindness of mystified Comcast agents, who have told him again and again that he needs to finish the FCC's verification process. "I keep telling them, 'I've been approved. There's nothing to finish,'" Corsaro said.

He's not alone. A nursing student in California, who asked to remain anonymous to protect information about her income status, told Protocol she's been experiencing the same problems with Spectrum. Like Corsaro, she also received an email from the FCC saying she was approved. And like Corsaro, she's also been repeatedly rejected by Spectrum and told to complete the FCC eligibility screening. "It seems like everyone is very confused," she said. "Once they do their application on their end, everything just goes into the void."

The FCC announced this week it had already signed up 2.3 million households for the Emergency Broadband Benefit, which was designed to help people during the pandemic. But while the agency is heralding these numbers as a success, the program appears to be plagued by ongoing issues that are causing some ISPs to block eligible Americans from accessing up to $50 a month off of their internet bills. Those delays have real consequences for people like Corsaro: The $3.2 billion pot of funding is only expected to last a matter of months.

'Wish I could fire Spectrum'

It's hard to know how widespread the problem is, but several Reddit threads include comments from users caught in the same cycle Corsaro described with both Comcast and Spectrum. One Redditor said they'd made more than 10 calls and even a trip to a local Comcast Xfinity store but still hadn't sorted out the situation. "One customer rep even flat out told me I'd have the best luck getting it by changing providers which is probably what I'm going to do since my contract is up next month," they wrote.

Another user described a similarly Kafkaesque journey with Spectrum, during which they received multiple emails asking them to complete the FCC's verification process after they'd already been approved. When the Redditor finally gave up and asked Spectrum to cancel their application, they said a Spectrum rep couldn't even find the application in the system. "Wish I could fire Spectrum, but they unfortunately have a monopoly in my area for internet and they know it," the Redditor wrote.

Corsaro struggled for weeks to get a clear answer as to why his application was being held up. Some customer service agents said the problem was on his end. Some told him it was an internal issue Comcast was trying to solve. One said that some information from the FCC's verifier site isn't properly transferring to Comcast's system. Corsaro thought he saw a light at the end of the tunnel when that rep offered to manually input the missing information into Comcast's system — but that plan failed too.

It was only after Protocol contacted Comcast for this story that Corsaro got a call saying his case had been "elevated" on Wednesday. Corsaro said a Comcast rep explained that the problem stemmed from the fact that Comcast's website didn't initially include a field to enter his daughter's name, and his daughter's Medicaid coverage is what made him eligible for the program. "She took my daughter's info and redid the application," Corsaro said. "She said she will call me every day until it is resolved."

Elm Street v. Elm St.

While Corsaro's issue might be somewhat unique, another possible explanation for some of the problems people are facing is simply lousy database matching between the Universal Services Administrative Co., which is the FCC-designated organization that runs the program, and the internet service providers themselves.

It turns out even the smallest differences in how people enter their data into the different systems can trip them up — for example, writing Elm St. in one and Elm Street in the other. "We've learned in these early days of the program that the information consumers provide to an Internet provider must exactly match, to the letter, abbreviation, and number, the information they enter in the National Verifier," Comcast spokesperson Joel Shadle said in a statement. He noted that Comcast is "continually working with the FCC and USAC to make the process easy to navigate."

Corsaro said one customer service rep along the way did ask him whether he'd entered his middle name during the FCC verification process, but he couldn't remember, and the verifier site didn't offer him any way to check. Besides, the idea that such a small discrepancy could be the issue seemed like a problem all on its own. "Here you have the last four digits of my social, my name, my address, all this identifying information, and I'm getting declined because of a middle name?" Corsaro said. "There's clearly massive issues here."

FCC press secretary Paloma Perez said the agency is aware of the issue and is "working closely with consumer groups and participating providers to make sure that eligible households are enrolled in the program with the provider of their choice and receiving the benefit. We are also trouble-shooting challenges that would be expected when standing up a program of this size and this quickly."

Perez pointed to a bulletin USAC sent to internet providers this week, announcing a series of updates that might address some of these problems, including giving providers like Comcast and Spectrum easier ways to look up their customers. Instead of having to enter customers' information "exactly as it appears on the consumer's National Verifier application," the bulletin reads, beginning June 24, providers will be able to look customers up "using only the consumer's application ID from the National Verifier, their first and last name, and their date of birth."

Spectrum spokesperson Rich Ruggiero said these changes "will address the enrollment challenges that can result — regardless of provider — if the customer's [personally identifying information] doesn't match exactly with was on their application with the verifier." Comcast's Shadle also said the USAC updates should "further streamline this process for customers."

But that change is still weeks away and more than a month since the emergency broadband program launched. The matching problem is also hardly the only issue customers are experiencing trying to get enrolled in the program. Both Corsaro and the nursing student reached out to Protocol after reading our earlier story about how Spectrum is requiring all applicants to the program to agree at the outset to receive continued service at non-discounted prices once the program ends.

For Corsaro, the process of calling Comcast daily has been a headache, but a manageable one. While he says the discount would certainly help, his family already has internet access, and he has the time and ability to keep following up. It's the bigger picture that concerns him. "There are probably people in much more dire situations than me, who need this more than I do," he said. "I wonder what happens when they aren't able to follow up ... and follow up."


Judge Zia Faruqui is trying to teach you crypto, one ‘SNL’ reference at a time

His decisions on major cryptocurrency cases have quoted "The Big Lebowski," "SNL," and "Dr. Strangelove." That’s because he wants you — yes, you — to read them.

The ways Zia Faruqui (right) has weighed on cases that have come before him can give lawyers clues as to what legal frameworks will pass muster.

Photo: Carolyn Van Houten/The Washington Post via Getty Images

“Cryptocurrency and related software analytics tools are ‘The wave of the future, Dude. One hundred percent electronic.’”

That’s not a quote from "The Big Lebowski" — at least, not directly. It’s a quote from a Washington, D.C., district court memorandum opinion on the role cryptocurrency analytics tools can play in government investigations. The author is Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui.

Keep ReadingShow less
Veronica Irwin

Veronica Irwin (@vronirwin) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol covering fintech. Previously she was at the San Francisco Examiner, covering tech from a hyper-local angle. Before that, her byline was featured in SF Weekly, The Nation, Techworker, Ms. Magazine and The Frisc.

The financial technology transformation is driving competition, creating consumer choice, and shaping the future of finance. Hear from seven fintech leaders who are reshaping the future of finance, and join the inaugural Financial Technology Association Fintech Summit to learn more.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Financial Technology Association (FTA) represents industry leaders shaping the future of finance. We champion the power of technology-centered financial services and advocate for the modernization of financial regulation to support inclusion and responsible innovation.

AWS CEO: The cloud isn’t just about technology

As AWS preps for its annual re:Invent conference, Adam Selipsky talks product strategy, support for hybrid environments, and the value of the cloud in uncertain economic times.

Photo: Noah Berger/Getty Images for Amazon Web Services

AWS is gearing up for re:Invent, its annual cloud computing conference where announcements this year are expected to focus on its end-to-end data strategy and delivering new industry-specific services.

It will be the second re:Invent with CEO Adam Selipsky as leader of the industry’s largest cloud provider after his return last year to AWS from data visualization company Tableau Software.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.

Image: Protocol

We launched Protocol in February 2020 to cover the evolving power center of tech. It is with deep sadness that just under three years later, we are winding down the publication.

As of today, we will not publish any more stories. All of our newsletters, apart from our flagship, Source Code, will no longer be sent. Source Code will be published and sent for the next few weeks, but it will also close down in December.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bennett Richardson

Bennett Richardson ( @bennettrich) is the president of Protocol. Prior to joining Protocol in 2019, Bennett was executive director of global strategic partnerships at POLITICO, where he led strategic growth efforts including POLITICO's European expansion in Brussels and POLITICO's creative agency POLITICO Focus during his six years with the company. Prior to POLITICO, Bennett was co-founder and CMO of Hinge, the mobile dating company recently acquired by Match Group. Bennett began his career in digital and social brand marketing working with major brands across tech, energy, and health care at leading marketing and communications agencies including Edelman and GMMB. Bennett is originally from Portland, Maine, and received his bachelor's degree from Colgate University.


Why large enterprises struggle to find suitable platforms for MLops

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, and as larger enterprises go from deploying hundreds of models to thousands and even millions of models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

Photo: artpartner-images via Getty Images

On any given day, Lily AI runs hundreds of machine learning models using computer vision and natural language processing that are customized for its retail and ecommerce clients to make website product recommendations, forecast demand, and plan merchandising. But this spring when the company was in the market for a machine learning operations platform to manage its expanding model roster, it wasn’t easy to find a suitable off-the-shelf system that could handle such a large number of models in deployment while also meeting other criteria.

Some MLops platforms are not well-suited for maintaining even more than 10 machine learning models when it comes to keeping track of data, navigating their user interfaces, or reporting capabilities, Matthew Nokleby, machine learning manager for Lily AI’s product intelligence team, told Protocol earlier this year. “The duct tape starts to show,” he said.

Keep ReadingShow less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories