Policy

‘The Eye of Sauron is looking elsewhere’: How Twitter and Google really feel about Facebook’s troubles

From dumping bad news to cleaning up their own products, Facebook's rivals tend to like when lawmakers focus on their competitor, but some feel there's also real risk to them in Washington's anger.

Twitter Facebook and Android icons

The backlash against Facebook could spill over and hurt other tech companies.

Image: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

For an entire week now, Facebook has dominated nearly every headline — and Twitter and Google are probably enjoying it.

Washington's frustration with Facebook — now Meta, apparently — is a near constant in tech policy, but policymakers' ire at the company has grown in recent weeks thanks to the extensive documents still being made public. Tech companies that aren't Facebook, meanwhile, often feel more than a smidge of schadenfreude seeing a competitor's difficulties, even as they try to avoid scrutiny of their own. Still, rival services also worry that the intensified fury of lawmakers and regulators may well turn on them.

"If you're at a tech company that has had its turn in the barrel, you're often grateful that someone else is in the barrel," said Adam Kovacevich, a former Google policy director. "I think it is very tempting for tech company lobbyists to say, 'Thank God someone else is in the spotlight.'"

The Facebook Papers have greatly brightened that very spotlight. The documents from whistleblower Frances Haugen launched a blockbuster series of reports across several media outlets, portraying the company as putting profits over safety, worsening the mental health of depressed teens and facilitating international political division and human trafficking, among many, many other concerns.

Despite perennial congressional gridlock, lawmakers say they're furious about the mounting revelations, and agencies are reportedly investigating.

Nu Wexler — who has worked as a spokesman for Twitter, Google and Facebook itself — said that while going through a tough news cycle like the one Facebook is now enduring, he'd wake up to messages from European reporters and go to sleep with ones from Asia-based journalists still coming in. All this while his bosses coordinated their response through every Facebook tool, occasionally including personal Messenger accounts.

The other companies, though, have used the scrambling of those at Facebook to their own communications advantage.

"There's no better time to dump bad tech news than during a Facebook news cycle or earnings call," Wexler said with a laugh.

He added that peer companies do sometimes use the time that Facebook spends in the spotlight to try to mitigate concerns that would apply to them as well, because "some of the issues Facebook is confronting, like polarization or misinformation, are tech industry problems or larger societal problems."

Another former Twitter official, who asked not to be named discussing internal conversations, said the scrutiny on Facebook can even benefit smaller social media platforms' product teams as they develop similar offerings to those that got Facebook in trouble.

"It's an opportunity to say, 'Look at how a company like Facebook or Google either handled this poorly or well three years ago,'" the ex-Twitter employee said, giving the example of Facebook's maligned efforts around promoting voting.

The tendency of the biggest players to hire law and PR firms, and otherwise "gobble up the influence and the resources," made smaller companies feel like Facebook deserved the heat, they added.

"You also bear the responsibility of being upfront on things," they said. "Often, we were happy for them to do so."

While the latest Facebook furor follows extensive and continuing media reports, Kovacevich, the former Google employee, admitted the companies also sometimes try to foster such moments by urging elected officials and regulators to focus on competitors, including Facebook.

Kovacevich, who is now CEO of the Chamber of Progress, a tech trade association that counts Facebook as a "corporate partner," said he urges companies to "be careful in fanning the flames or taking too much delight in your competitors' pain," because the result can be regulation that goes far beyond Facebook in its effect.

In fact, Facebook's latest crisis recently led to a hearing this week with YouTube, TikTok and Snapchat, and some lawmakers are pushing for increased regulation to protect kids online.

It's an echo, of sorts: Perhaps the most stinging loss for the tech industry in recent years was an amendment to a legal provision known as Section 230 that attempted to curb online sex trafficking. The law made all kinds of tech companies face more liability for user content. President Trump signed it in 2018, one day after Mark Zuckerberg's first congressional testimony, which unofficially launched the techlash in Washington.

Now, as Facebook contends with Washington's anger, the company is pushing for further changes to Section 230. The move has infuriated other companies that rely on the provision to host and moderate a wide range of content far beyond trafficking.

"Facebook is causing all sorts of conflicts and difficulties with its 230 shenanigans," said a tech policy expert who has worked closely with several companies.

Facebook's public difficulties often prompt other companies to say, "great, the Eye of Sauron is looking elsewhere," the person said, adding: "On the other [hand], their continued malfeasance and failure to have any control of their products is causing reputational harm to the entire industry."

A MESSAGE FROM NASDAQ

www.protocol.com

As we come out of the pandemic, consumers will be even more accustomed to highly flexible, customer-centric digital experiences that let them engage with companies on their own terms. Businesses must consider the impact of an even more digital economy with dynamic buyer behaviors and determine how next-generation customers want to consume products and services and interact with them.

Learn more

Fintech

Affirm CEO: 'Buy now, pay later' becomes more attractive in a slump

With consumers grappling with rising rates and prices, the question of whether they’ll still buy now and pay later is open. Max Levchin thinks Affirm knows the answer.

Affirm CEO Max Levchin spoke with Protocol about "buy now, pay later."

Photo: John Lamparski/Getty Images

Shortly after Affirm went public last year, CEO Max Levchin told Protocol that he saw “an ocean of opportunities” for the “buy now, pay later” pioneer. Wall Street agreed.

Affirm’s stock soared in its trading debut as the company blazed a trail for a fast-growing alternative to the credit cards that Levchin says consumers are increasingly rejecting.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Businesses are evolving, with current events and competition serving as the catalysts for technology adoption. Events from the pandemic to the ongoing war in Ukraine have exposed the fragility of global supply chains. The topic of sustainability is now on every board room agenda. Industries from manufacturing to retail and everything in between are exploring the latest innovations like process automation, machine learning and AI to identify potential safeguards against future disruption. But according to a recent survey from Boston Consulting Group, while 80% of companies are adopting digital solutions to navigate existing business challenges or opportunities like the ones mentioned, only about 30% successfully digitally transform their business.

For the last 50 years, SAP has worked closely with our customers to solve some of the world’s most intricate problems. We have also seen, and have been a part of, rapid accelerations in technology in response. Across industries, certain paths have emerged to help businesses manage the unexpected challenges over the last few years.

Keep Reading Show less
DJ Paoni

DJ Paoni is the President of SAP North America and is responsible for the strategy, day-to-day operations, and overall customer success in the United States and Canada. Dedicated to helping customers become best-run businesses, DJ has established himself as a trusted advisor who places a high priority on their success. He works with many of SAP North America's 155,000 customers and helps them adopt business and technology best practices across 25 different industries.

Workplace

The post-layoff playbook: How to avoid 'survivor's guilt'

Taking care of your laid-off employees is important. But how can you restore trust with the employees who make it through?

Employees who survive layoffs are charged with holding the company together. Whether or not managers listen to their concerns can make or break a company’s culture.

Photo: Justin Pumfrey/The Image Bank/Getty Images

Jennifer Burke was on her way to Hawaii for her daughter’s wedding when Zillow followed through on its long-anticipated layoff. She asked her manager to break the news to her by message in the car. You’re one of the safe ones, her manager responded.

“I felt relieved, of course,” Burke said. “I felt apprehensive. I felt sympathy for my co-workers that I knew were going to be laid off.”

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at llawrence@protocol.com.

Enterprise

Why chip companies need the college students dazzled by software jobs

New chip fabricating plants will need tens of thousands of skilled workers who don’t currently exist. Training them means persuading students to look away from jobs at big tech companies.

Intel employees in clean room "bunny suits" work at Intel's D1X factory in Hillsboro, Oregon.

Photo: Intel Corporation

Every morning, Isaiah Morris drives his white Nissan Altima eight miles down Arizona state Route 101 to a sprawling, low-level office park in South Tempe. Inside one of the unassuming buildings adjacent to GoDaddy’s headquarters and a couple of Amazon offices, the Arizona State University student dons a lab coat, safety shoes and prescription goggles as he helps engineer chemicals for a chip manufacturing process called planarization.

Morris is an unusual 21-year-old. When they graduate college, many of his tech-minded peers will opt to work for the likes of Apple, Google and other household names that have enjoyed meteoric growth over the last decade. Jobs at those tech companies symbolize prestige for graduates and their parents in a way that careers with chipmakers like Intel do not.

Keep Reading Show less
Anna Kramer

Anna Kramer is a reporter at Protocol (Twitter: @ anna_c_kramer, email: akramer@protocol.com), where she writes about labor and workplace issues. Prior to joining the team, she covered tech and small business for the San Francisco Chronicle and privacy for Bloomberg Law. She is a recent graduate of Brown University, where she studied International Relations and Arabic and wrote her senior thesis about surveillance tools and technological development in the Middle East.

Policy

A new UK visa could steal your top tech talent

Without meaningful immigration reform, U.S.-trained foreign graduates could head across the pond.

The U.S. immigration system turns away hundreds of thousands of highly skilled tech workers every year.

Photo: Ben Fathers/AFP via Getty Images

Almost as soon as he took office, President Biden began the work of undoing a lot of the damage the Trump administration did to the U.S. H-1B visa program. He allowed a Trump-era ban on entry by H-1B holders to expire and withdrew a Trump proposal to prohibit H-1B visa holders’ spouses from working in the U.S. More recently, his administration has expanded the number of degrees considered eligible for special STEM OPT visas.

But the U.S. immigration system still turns away hundreds of thousands of highly skilled — and in many cases U.S.-educated — tech workers every year. Now the U.K. is trying to capitalize on the United States’ failure to reform its policy regarding high-skilled immigrants with a new visa that could poach American-trained tech talent across the pond. And there’s good reason to believe it could work.

Keep Reading Show less
Kwasi Gyamfi Asiedu

Kwasi (kway-see) is a fellow at Protocol with an interest in tech policy and climate. Previously, he covered global religion news at the Associated Press in New York. Before that, he was a freelance journalist based out of Accra, Ghana, covering social justice, health, and environment stories. His reporting has been published in The New York Times, Quartz, CNN, The Guardian, and Public Radio International. He can be reached at kasiedu@protocol.com.

Latest Stories
Bulletins